Interchange Justification Report (IJR) I-75 at Bethlehem Road Henry County

Similar documents
INTERACTIVE HIGHWAY SAFETY DESIGN MODEL (IHSDM)

Locust Grove Distribution Center 700 Price Road, Bldg. 100 Locust Grove, GA 30248

Final Recommendations Identification of Improvements, Strategies, and Solutions

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

PLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Final Recommendations. Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

The New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM

NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80)

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310

Twin Cities Regional Truck Corridors Study. MnDOT Metro Freight Studies Roundup

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT

Members of the Board of Directors. Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

National Governors Association

3 INTERSTATES. The Carolina Crossroads Project Team Welcomes You

Exit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification Study

The Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

500 Interchange Design

SR 29 Project Development & Environment Study. Presentation to SR 29 Stakeholders Advisory Committee. January 23, 2014

CLASS I RAIL CSX & Norfolk Southern

5.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Tier 1 Recommendations October 30, 2017

Past, Present, and Future

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

A Unique Application of Railroad Preemption with Queue Mitigation at a Roundabout Interchange

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

Logistics Park Kansas City (LPKC) Edgerton, KS. Infrastructure, Development And Transportation. September 30, 2013

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

Chapter 1. Proposed Project. 1.1 Introduction

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES

South Dakota Department of Transportation. Interchange Modification Justification Report. Interstate 90 Exit 44 (Bethlehem Road - Piedmont)

Working with Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas

Charlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis. Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Congestion Management Process Update

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

AREAWIDE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

Appendix K. Detroit River International Crossing Study Air Quality Impact Analysis Technical Report Addendum

3.14 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Cartersville-Bartow County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Long-Range Regional Transportation Plan Project Evaluation Process

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

CHAPTER 12 TRANSPORTATION. Introduction Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study

EXISTING AND FUTURE FREIGHT GOODS MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT

Exclusive Facilities for Trucks in Florida: An Investigation of the Potential for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways on the State Highway System

Utilizing Transportation Data for Low Cost Safety Improvements

I-10 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY STATE PROJECT NUMBER H FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER H004100

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

I-10 KENDALL EXTENSION. Open House

San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (SF FCMS)

Houston Galveston Area Council Congestion Management Process

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

US 70 Corridor James City Project Update. Craig Young, Three Oaks Engineering US 70 Corridor Commission May 21, 2015

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

TRAFFIC PROGRAM ACCESS MANUAL Edition WYDOT ACCESS MANUAL 0

Functional Classification Comprehensive Guide. Prepared by

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Overall project. The $288 million Phase 2 DesignBuild project starts construction. this spring, with completion by December 31, 2016

Background Study Goals and Objectives

APPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS

Air Report. Project Information PPTA/LAP. Traffic Data I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE. Project Number: , C501, P101 UPC:

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

ITEM 8 Action May 17, 2017

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

1.1 Purpose of the Project

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Intelligent Transportation Systems Master Plan

C. Alternatives There are a number of possible solutions to address the need for improvements along the I-64 corridor. The goals of the study

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Traffic Records Forum Biloxi, MS October 28,

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

Qualitative Hot Spot Analysis for PM2.5 February 4, 2008

Tri-Cities Transportation Study Area Congestion Management System Operations Plan

3.6 GROUND TRANSPORTATION

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional Classification System. Briefing to MPOs, PDCs, and Local Governments

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

DRAFT Congestion Management Process Keeping the Region Moving Efficiently, Reliably, and Safely

Access Management Manual December 2003

INSIDE THIS ISSUE. mctrans.ce.ufl.edu VOLUME 64 \\ OCTOBER Streets Heat Map Freeways Animation HSM Supplement

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

Transcription:

Interchange Justification Report (IJR) I-75 at Bethlehem Road Henry County

IJR Study/Analysis Area Exit 216: SR 155 Bethlehem Road Exit 212: Bill Gardner Pkwy

Planning Background ARC 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 2017 New Interchange Project AR-955: Long Range (2040), $25M Henry Co Joint County/Cities Transportation Plan 2016 New Interchange Project R-72(A): Mid-Range (2022-2030), $47M Atlanta Regional Freight Mobility Plan Update 2016 New interchange was Tier 1 recommendation needed for access and mobility within the McDonough/Henry freight cluster I-75 Interchange Feasibility Study 2015 Accepted by GDOT, documented need for new interchange

Project Purpose and Need Address Congestion/Growth/Safety Population Growth in Henry County: (2015 2040): 218,364 351,691 = 61% Increase Employment Growth in Henry County: (2015 2040): 68,568 100,413 = 46% Increase Improve Access/Economic Development Study Area Industrial Development Existing: 25M square feet Planned/Underway: 15M square feet Increasing Freight Demand ARC estimates a 56% increase in freight traffic by 2040 Driven by expansion of Port of Savannah and Panama Canal GDOT Commercial Vehicle Lane (CVL) project to support freight demand

Planned Area Development 6 Lambert Farms 5 King Mill* 1 Locust Grove-Clayco Phases I* & II 4 Trammel Crow Site 7 Midland Logistics* 2,3 Norfolk Southern Intermodal & Warehousing * Development under construction

Planned Area Development Development Name Development Type Size Daily Trips Generated Lambert Farms Warehousing/Distribution 4,817,200 sf 8,093 King Mill* Warehousing/Distribution 3,048,300 sf 5,121 Locust Grove-Clayco Phases I & II* Warehousing/Distribution 4,089,993 sf 6,886 Trammel Crow Site Warehousing/Distribution 1,190,160 sf 1,999 Midland Logistics* Warehousing/Distribution 669,732 sf 1,125 Norfolk Southern Warehousing Warehousing/Distribution 1,846,500 sf 3,102 SUBTOTAL 15,670,885 sf 26,326 Norfolk Southern Intermodal Site Intermodal Truck Terminal 60 Acres 4,914 TOTAL 31,240

Adjacent Transportation Improvements Project Project Type GDOT PI# / ARC # Total Cost Construction Date SR 155 from I-75 to Bill Gardner Pkwy Widening 0015284 / N/A $72M 2029 SR 155 from I-75 to SR 42/US 23 Widening 0007856/ HE- 113 $42M 2022 Bill Gardner Pkwy from SR 155 to I- 75 Widening 0000562/HE126 B $20M 2026 I-75 Commercial Vehicle Lanes (NB) from I-475 to SR 155 Widening 0014203 $723M 2025

Interchange Spacing GDOT Interchange Spacing Guidelines Area Minimum Average Classification Spacing Spacing Urban 1 mile 2 miles Suburban 2 miles 4 miles Rural 2 miles 8 miles Study Area Spacing Existing: 3.44 miles With New Interchange: 2.87

Crash Analysis SR 155 from SR 42 to Bill Gardner Pkwy (3.4 miles) Urban Minor Arterial Year No. of Crashes Crash Rate* Statewide Average Crash Rate No of Injury Accidents Injury Accident Rate* Statewide Injury Accident Rate 2013 219 1,009 606 69 318 128 2014 215 975 604 64 290 124 2015 299 1,298 637 88 382 156 2016 323 1,319 Not Available 94 384 Not Available Bill Gardner Pkwy from SR 42 to SR 155 (3.84 miles) Urban Minor Arterial Year No. of Crashes Crash Rate* Statewide Average Crash Rate No of Injury Accidents Injury Accident Rate* Statewide Injury Accident Rate 2013 126 581 606 26 120 128 2014 120 544 604 18 82 124 2015 177 768 637 31 134 156 2016 271 1,107 Not Available 36 147 Not Available

Preferred Interchange Alternative

Preferred Interchange Alternative

Connection with GDOT CVL Project

Basic Freeway Segments IJR Traffic Analysis Analysis of one-way, uninterrupted freeway (interstate) segments Ramp Junctions Analysis of merge (on-ramp) and diverge (off-ramp) junctions Weave Segments Analysis of freeway segments where two or more traffic streams cross paths. Not applicable to this study. Intersections Analysis of signalized and un-signalized intersections. Particular attend given to intersection at interstate ramps.

Level of Service (LOS) IJR Traffic Analysis LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe traffic flow on a transportation facility (freeway, intersection, ramp junction, arterial, etc.) LOS is a letter designation on a declining scale from A to F. LOS A represents free-flow conditions and LOS F represents gridlock conditions LOS D or better considered acceptable in urban areas.

2017 Existing Conditions 2017 Existing Freeway Segments LOS C or Better Ramp Junctions LOS C or Better Intersections LOS D or Better at Interchanges

Future Conditions: Traffic Projections 2025 deemed appropriate Opening Year for interchange by GDOT Could open to traffic earlier than 2025 Traffic Projection Methodology Background Traffic Growth Area Development Trips Future Traffic Volumes

Future Conditions: Traffic Projections Background Traffic Growth SURFACE STREETS TC Station Location Description 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Compound Annual Growth 1510167 SR 20 West of Westridge Pkwy 17,250 16,670 20,020 20,470 21,900 22,700 22,700 3.14% 1510169 SR 20 East of Regency Plaza Blvd 17,780 23,380 22,980 22,720 22,700 22,200 22,900 1.28% 1510105 SR 155 East of King Mill Rd 14,340 14,090 16,590 16,530 17,400 18,000 20,300 2.51% 1510103 SR 155 South of Greenwood Industrial Blvd 17,560 17320 17230 18120 18100 18400 19000 0.98% 1518137 Greenwood Industrial Pkwy South of Bethlehem Bottoms Rd - 1,090 1,070 1,090 3,640 3,790 3,880 6.96% 1518119 Bethlehem Rd East of I 75-1,110 1,090 1,110 1,110 1,150 1,180 1.46% 1510336 SR 42 North of Bethlehem Rd 8,670 8,500 11,940 11,860 14,000 15,100 14,500 3.24% 1510378 Bill Gardner Pkwy West of Lester Mill Rd 6,120 5,910 6,320 6,460 6,460 6,950 9,090 2.61% 1510381 Bill Gardner Pkwy East of Lester Mill Rd 5130 4960 4890 7680 7680 8260 8530 3.35% 1510383 Bill Gardner Pkwy East of Tanger Blvd 22520 20160 19860 20300 20300 20800 21300-0.32% 1510334 SR 42 South of Bill Gardner Pkwy 20590 21540 21430 23070 23100 21900 22600 0.93% INTERSTATE 75 Weighte d Average 1.76% 035-0127 I-75 2 mi N of SR 36 @ colwell Rd 74400 71450 72040 71898 74700 79300 76200 0.80% 1510404 I 75 South of SR 20 108,200 102,350 102,340 102,340 105,000 105,000 109,200 0.29% 1510402 I75 North of Bethlehem Rd 89,980 83,820 84,610 84,610 88,500 88,500 89,000 0.33% Weighte d Average 0.45%

Future Conditions: Traffic Projections Area Development Trips Trips assigned to roadway network for: No-Build (no new interchange) Build (new interchange)

2025 No-Build and Build Conditions 2025 No-Build Freeway Segments LOS D or Better Ramp Junctions LOS D or Better Intersections LOS E & F at Interchanges 2025 Build Freeway Segments LOS D or Better Ramp Junctions LOS D or Better Intersections LOS D or Better at Interchanges

2045 No-Build and Build Conditions 2045 No-Build Freeway Segments LOS D or Better Ramp Junctions LOS D or Better Intersections LOS E & F at Interchanges 2045 Build Freeway Segments LOS D or Better Ramp Junctions LOS D or Better Intersections LOS D or Better at Interchanges

Environmental Screening Ecological Resources Jurisdictional Waters

Environmental Screening Cultural Resources History & Archaeology

Environmental Screening Community Resources

IJR Results/Conclusions Requests for new interstate access must address the two FHWA Policy Requirements: FHWA Policy #1: Operational Analysis An operational and safety analysis has concluded that the proposed change in access does not have a significant adverse impact on the safety and operation of the Interstate facility. The proposed interchange at Bethlehem Road would not have an adverse impact on the safety and operation of I-75. In fact, the proposed interchange would improve safety and operations for adjacent interchanges and surface streets.

IJR Results/Conclusions FHWA Policy #2: Access Connections & Design The proposed access connects to a public road only and will provide for all traffic movements. The proposed interstate access would connect to an existing public road (Bethlehem Road) and would provide for all traffic movements.

IJR Results/Conclusions By balancing the traffic and access needs of the study area between three interchanges rather than two, the proposed interchange at Bethlehem Road would: Provide much-needed congestion relief to the SR 155 and Bill Gardner Pkwy Improve safety and traffic operations for all users while meeting the mobility and access needs of study area business and residents Support economic development by facilitating efficient movement of freight into and out of the study area

We are here Schedule/Next Steps Bethlehem Road at I-75 Interchange Project Schedule Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Prepare IJR GDOT/FHWA Review Concept Development/Report Environmental Analysis Preliminary Engineering Final Design ROW Acquisition GDOT Pre-Award Activities Construction Public Information Open House Interchange Open to Traffic

Project Critical Paths: Schedule/Next Steps Concept Development/Environmental Studies Preliminary/Final Engineering Meeting with ARC to get the project programmed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)