Fly Ash Testing Results PEI Energy Systems Waste Combustion Ash

Similar documents
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT

SUB-Programs - Calibration range Fe Base for "PMI-MASTER Pro" Spark - mode Fe 000

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SILLIKER, Inc. Southern California Laboratory 6360 Gateway Drive, Cypress, CA Tel. 209/ Fax. 714/

Coal Ash Material Safety

This method is applicable to the following parameters: Nitric Hydrochloric acid digestion, Instrumental analysis.

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

9 Toxins / 11 Essential Minerals

LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES

Strong Acid Leachable Metals (SALM) in Soil - Prescriptive

BLACK STURGEON LAKES WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

AAS - Atomic Absorption Mono Element ppm Standard Solutions (Spectro ECON)

RE: Split Ash Sample Results October 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility

Use of Lime Activated Class F Fly Ash for Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) of Asphalt Pavements

Development of Soil-to-Terrestrial Invertebrate Uptake Factors to Improve Estimation of Ecological Risk on DFO Lightstation Sites in Atlantic Canada

METALLIC MATERIALS SPECIFICATION HANDBOOK

Material Evaporation Application Comment MP P / Optical films, Oxide films, Electrical contacts. Doping, Electrical contacts.

Test Report No. F690101/LF-CTSAYHA Issued Date : August 20, 2013 Page 1 of 5

High Purity Acids Trace Elemental Analysis. Detect as low as 1 to 100 ppt

Core Analysis with the Tracer

CARBOWAX SENTRY Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) and Methoxypolyethylene Glycol (MPEG) Products

Recommended List of Common Impurities for Metallic Fixed-point Materials of the ITS-90

This resource contains three different versions of the periodic table, including a blank one for colouring!

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Part 1. Preparation and Color of Solutions. Experiment 1 (2 session lab) Electrons and Solution Color. Pre-lab Report, page 29

A.M. MONDAY, 18 January minutes

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

High-Purity Acids & Reagents

New GCSE 4462/02 SCIENCE A HIGHER TIER CHEMISTRY 1

ICP/ICP-MS Standards. High Purity Standards for ICP/ICP-MS

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

Table of Contents. Quality Management LIMS System... Customer Services...

2010 Drinking Water Quality Annual Report

MEMBRANES FOR WTPS JUSTIN RAK-BANVILLE, M.SC., P.CHEM., EP WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE WSP CANADA INC

FORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION

for production of 2-[ F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose with the

TOP INORGANIC STANDARDS

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LICENSE. ACZ Laboratories, Inc. AZ0102

Appendix 4a: PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS (full)

The Determination of Trace Elements in Waters using the US EPA Method and the Thermo Scientific icap 6500 ICP-OES (Duo)

Final Report DMR-QA 36. NPDES Permit: IL DMR-QA Study. Open Date: 03/18/16. Close Date: 07/01/16. Report Issued Date: 07/29/16

Use of MSWI by-products. H.J.H. Brouwers M.V.A. Florea P. Tang K. Schollbach Q. Alam V. Caprai

WEACAU-III: International Workshop on Environmental Aspects of Coal Ash Utilization Tel Aviv, Israel December 11 th 12 th 2012.

A.M. MONDAY, 18 January minutes

DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTS IN DRINKING WATER AS PER BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS 10500, & USING THE AGILENT 5100 ICP-OES

Newmont Mining Corporation Water Management Standard

The unofficial TRITON METHOD for dummies guide

GCSE 4462/01 CHEMISTRY 1 FOUNDATION TIER SCIENCE A/CHEMISTRY. P.M. FRIDAY, 12 June hour JUN S

Drinking Water Analyses

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Chapter 1.6. Polished Single-Crystal Silicon, Prime Wafers (all numbers nominal) Wafer Specification Table. Diameter 100 mm 4-inch 150 mm 6-inch

APPENDIX 3-VII REGIONAL DATA ANALYSIS

AIM: SWBAT determine the location of metals, nonmetals and metalloids on the periodic table. What is another name for a column in the periodic table?

The Determination of Toxic Metals in Waters and Wastes by Furnace Atomic Absorption

CHAPTER 4 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

Appendix C1: Batch Kinetics Tests

Nomenclature. A systematic method of writing chemical formulas and naming compounds

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Waste Discharge By-law

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMS SOILS & INPUTS

Testing Report. Applicant: XX Overall Rating: XX Data Satisfactory Contact(s): XX Unsatisfactory Others, See Detail Enclosed

*This report is combined with 18 copies of report which provides by client*

Chemistry/Additional Science

US EPA Method using the Thermo Scientific icap 7600 ICP-OES Duo

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Utilization of a Pneumatic Tube Mixing Technique for Processing and Stabilization of Contaminated Dredged Material

CQA COMPOST QUALITY & VALUE TESTING PARAMETERS REPORT

TEST REPORT : SCENTCO LIMITED : SMARKERS. : China : USA, EU, ASIA. : Not Present. : 16-May : 09-Jun-2014

CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALS (CRM)

Innovative Mine Waste Management Planning at a Site with Multiple Waste Streams

Method (0.1 to 8.0 mg/l Cu) TNTplus 860

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Services SAMPLE SUMMARY REPORT DR. PUMP, LLC Isuzu Rodeo. Atlanta, GA 05/24/2007

Test sticks and test papers for semi-quantitative determinations

Table 1. VOCs Detections (all data in µg/l)

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION

Naturally-Occurring Metals Concentrations in Michigan Soils: A 2015 Survey

APPENDIX 22-B: SCREENING LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT

USP Chapters <232> and <233> Implementation Strategy. Horacio Pappa, Ph.D. Director - General Chapters U.S. Pharmacopeia

Limestone Neutralisation of Arsenic-rich Effluent from a Gold Mine

SUMMARY OF FEDERAL PRETREATMENT STANDARDS CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT CATEGORY. Within U.S.: 165

STANDARD DI VETRI E MATERIALI CERAMICI

CHARACTERISTICS OF RDF ASH

Materials Declaration Form

MILAF: INTEGRAL MANAGEMENT OF ARSENICAL SLUDGE, TREATMENT AND RECOVERY OF BY-PRODUCTS OF ACID WATERS FROM SMELTER PLANTS

Summer Assignment Coversheet

Al. Mickiewicza 30, Krakow, A-0 pavilion tel. (12) , Secretariat KHGI (12) , fax (012) ELABORAT # 8 page 1/pages 4

Locked Cycle Leaching Test and Yellowcake Precipitation

Environment Canada s Metals Assessment Activities

Sonoma County Complex Fires Health Screening Level Guidance, Cleanup Goals and Background Data Sets

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Combined Sewer Overflows July 2012-December 2013

Chemical Formulas. In a chemical formula, the element with the positive charge is always written first.

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Iron ores Determination of various elements by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry Part 1: Comprehensive procedure

Transcription:

Fly Ash Testing Results PEI Energy Systems Waste Combustion Ash Job No. 121811835 Prepared for: PEI Energy Systems (Veresen Inc.) PO Box 271 Charlottetown PE C1A 9M2 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 165 Maple Hills Avenue Charlottetown PE C1C 1N9 February 11, 2016

Stantec Consulting Ltd. 165 Maple Hills Avenue, Charlottetown PE C1C 1N9 February 11, 2016 File: 121811835 Attention: Mr. Chris MacDougall, P.Eng. PEI Energy Systems (Veresen Inc.) PO Box 271 Charlottetown PE C1A 9M2 Dear Mr. MacDougall, Reference: Fly Ash Testing Results - PEI Energy Systems Waste Combustion Ash The following report presents the results of municipal waste combustion ash testing completed on fly ash samples collected on January 7, 2016. The fly ash is generated at the PEI Energy Systems waste combustion plant, located in Charlottetown, PEI. The fly ash is collected on a conveyer belt and diverted into a covered storage container located inside the waste combustion plant. The covered storage container is left to collect fly ash for one week before being sealed and moved to the exterior of the plant. Samples were taken from three covered storage containers located on-site at the waste combustion plant. Sample Methodology Three discrete grab samples were taken from three separate covered storage containers located at the waste combustion plant. The three containers represented newly generated fly ash (Fly Ash- 01), ash that had been stored on-site for one week post-generation (Fly Ash-02), and ash that had been stored on-site for two weeks post-generation (Fly Ash-03). As the containers are covered, samples were collected through an access hatch using an extendable sample pole. A bottle attached to the sample pole was used to decant sample into laboratory-supplied bottles. The bottles were then capped and stored in a cooler for transport to Stantec. Selected photos are presented in Appendix A. Sample Analysis Three ash samples (Fly Ash-01, Fly Ash-02 and Fly Ash-03) were shipped in a cooler to the Maxxam Analytics Inc. (Maxxam) laboratory in Bedford, Nova Scotia, for analysis. As per guidance from the PEI Department of Communities, Land and Environment (PEIDCLE), the samples were analyzed for metals leachate, PCB leachate and dioxin/furan leachate using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), and total cyanide. As a policy, Maxxam does not conduct free cyanide analysis due to health and safety concerns. Based on this and in consultation with PEIDCLE, total cyanide analysis was conducted on the samples.

February 11, 2016 Mr. Chris MacDougall, P.Eng. Page 2 Reference: Fly Ash Testing Results - PEI Energy Systems Waste Combustion Ash Results Sample results are summarized on Tables B1 to B4 in Appendix B, with copies of laboratory certificates included in Appendix C. As no leachate guidelines were specified by PEIDCLE, Environment Canada Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclable Material Regulations-Schedule 6 (2005) were included for reference purposes. Environment Canada has not published guidelines for leachable PCBs. Leachable cadmium concentrations were found to exceed the referenced leachate guideline in all three samples. All other sample concentrations were below the referenced guidelines (where published). Closure This report documents work that was performed in accordance with generally accepted professional standards at the time and location in which the services were provided. No other representations, warranties or guarantees are made concerning the accuracy or completeness of the data or conclusions contained within this report, including no assurance that this work has uncovered all potential liabilities associated with the identified property. This report provides an evaluation of selected environmental conditions associated with the identified portion of the property that was assessed at the time the work was conducted and is based on information obtained by and/or provided to Stantec at that time. There are no assurances regarding the accuracy and completeness of this information. All information received from the client or third parties in the preparation of this report has been assumed by Stantec to be correct. Stantec assumes no responsibility for any deficiency or inaccuracy in information received from others. The opinions in this report can only be relied upon as they relate to the condition of the portion of the identified property that was assessed at the time the work was conducted. Activities at the property subsequent to Stantec s assessment may have significantly altered the property s condition. Stantec cannot comment on other areas of the property that were not assessed. Conclusions made within this report consist of Stantec s professional opinion as of the time of the writing of this report, and are based solely on the scope of work described in the report, the limited data available and the results of the work. They are not a certification of the property s environmental condition. This report should not be construed as legal advice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client identified herein and any use by any third party is prohibited. Stantec assumes no responsibility for losses, damages, liabilities or claims, howsoever arising, from third party use of this report.

February 11, 2016 Mr. Chris MacDougall, P.Eng. Page 3 Reference: Fly Ash Testing Results - PEI Energy Systems Waste Combustion Ash The locations of any utilities, buildings and structures, and property boundaries illustrated in or described within this report, if any, including pole lines, conduits, water mains, sewers and other surface or sub-surface utilities and structures are not guaranteed. Before starting work, the exact location of all such utilities and structures should be confirmed and Stantec assumes no liability for damage to them. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Stantec at the time the work was performed at the specific testing and/or sampling locations, and conditions may vary among sampling locations. Factors such as areas of potential concern identified in previous studies, site conditions (e.g., utilities) and cost may have constrained the sampling locations used in this assessment. In addition, analysis has been carried out for only a limited number of chemical parameters, and it should not be inferred that other chemical species are not present. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Stantec does not warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities, nor that the sampling results are indicative of the condition of the entire site. As the purpose of this report is to identify site conditions which may pose an environmental risk; the identification of non-environmental risks to structures or people on the site is beyond the scope of this assessment. Should additional information become available which differs significantly from our understanding of conditions presented in this report, Stantec requests that this information be brought to our attention. The primary author of this report was Janeen McGuigan, M.A.Sc, E.I.T. It was reviewed by Chris Balram, P.Eng. (NB). Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. Janeen McGuigan, M.A.Sc., E.I.T. Stephanie Griffin, P.Eng. Phone: 902-566-2866 Phone: 902-566-2866 Fax: 902-566-2004 Fax: 902-566-2004 janeen.mcguigan@stantec.com stephanie.griffin@stantec.com jm v:\01218\active\121811835\reports\fly ash- jan 2016\121811835_pei_energy_fly_ash_02092016_dft rpt.docx

Appendix A Site Photos

Photo 1. Collection of newly generated fly ash inside the waste combustion plant at PEI Energy Systems (January 7, 2016).

Photo 2. Covered fly ash storage container outside the waste combustion plant at PEI Energy Systems (January 7, 2016).

Photo 3. Access hatch on covered fly ash storage container (January 7, 2016).

Appendix B Laboratory Summary Tables

Table B1. Leachable Metal Concentrations (mg/l) Parameter Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclable Material Regulations Fly Ash-01 Fly Ash-02 Fly Ash-03 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 Leachable Metals Leachable Aluminum (Al) -- 4.5 <1.0 1.8 Leachable Antimony (Sb) -- 1.9 1.5 0.77 Leachable Arsenic (As) 2.5 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Barium (Ba) 100 2.6 2.7 1.8 Leachable Beryllium (Be) -- <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Boron (B) 500 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Leachable Cadmium (Cd) 0.5 28 28 28 Leachable Calcium (Ca) -- 11000 10000 10000 Leachable Chromium (Cr) 5 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Cobalt (Co) -- <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Leachable Copper (Cu) -- 15 12 8.9 Leachable Iron (Fe) -- <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Leachable Lead (Pb) 5 1.5 1.1 0.97 Leachable Lithium (Li) -- 0.30 0.33 0.25 Leachable Magnesium (Mg) -- 110 100 97 Leachable Manganese (Mn) -- 4.1 3.8 3.3 Leachable Mercury (Hg) 0.1 0.002 0.001 0.0016 Leachable Molybdenum (Mo) -- 0.24 0.24 <0.20 Leachable Nickel (Ni) -- <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Potassium (K) -- 1100 1000 660 Leachable Selenium (Se) 1 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Leachable Silver (Ag) -- <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Leachable Strontium (Sr) -- 8.9 8.7 8.7 Leachable Thallium (Tl) -- 0.013 0.011 0.012 Leachable Tin (Sn) -- <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Uranium (U) 10 0.021 0.016 0.018 Leachable Vanadium (V) -- <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Leachable Zinc (Zn) -- 440 400 350 BOLD = exceeding guideline

Table B2. Leachable PCB Concentrations (µg/l) Leachable PCBs Parameter Fly Ash-01 Fly Ash-01 LD Fly Ash-02 Fly Ash-03 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 Leachable Aroclor 1016 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1221 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1232 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1248 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1242 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1254 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Aroclor 1260 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Leachable Calculated Total PCB <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Table B3. Cyanide Concentrations in Ash (mg/kg) Parameter Fly Ash-01 Fly Ash-02 Fly Ash-03 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 Cyanide in Ash Total Cyanide (CN) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Table B4. Leachable Dioxin and Furan Concentrations (pg/l) Parameter Export and Import of Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Recyclable Material Regulations Fly Ash-01 Fly Ash-02 Fly Ash-03 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 7-Jan-16 Leachable Dioxins and Furans Leachable 2,3,7,8-Tetra CDD * -- <0.774 <0.891 <0.609 Leachable 1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDD * -- <0.523 <0.797 <0.671 Leachable 1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexa CDD * -- <0.928 <0.935 <0.747 Leachable 1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexa CDD * -- <0.988 <0.996 <0.796 Leachable 1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexa CDD * -- <0.869 <0.875 <0.699 Leachable 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hepta CDD * -- <0.810 <0.843 <0.891 Leachable Octa CDD * -- 3.05 1.88 1.71 Leachable Total Tetra CDD * -- <1.05 <0.891 <0.866 Leachable Total Penta CDD * -- <0.843 <0.797 <0.671 Leachable Total Hexa CDD * -- <5.33 <2.52 <1.95 Leachable Total Hepta CDD * -- <0.810 <0.843 <0.891 Leachable 2,3,7,8-Tetra CDF ** -- <0.636 <0.718 <0.976 Leachable 1,2,3,7,8-Penta CDF ** -- <0.956 <0.818 <1.00 Leachable 2,3,4,7,8-Penta CDF ** -- <0.961 <0.823 <1.01 Leachable 1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexa CDF ** -- <0.947 <0.675 <0.514 Leachable 1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexa CDF ** -- <0.902 <0.643 <0.490 Leachable 2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexa CDF ** -- <0.957 <0.683 <0.520 Leachable 1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexa CDF ** -- <1.04 <0.743 <0.566 Leachable 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hepta CDF ** -- <0.817 <1.00 <0.590 Leachable 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Hepta CDF ** -- <0.993 <1.22 <0.717 Leachable Octa CDF ** -- <1.06 <1.04 <0.964 Leachable Total Tetra CDF ** -- <0.636 <0.855 <0.976 Leachable Total Penta CDF ** -- <0.959 <0.820 <1.01 Leachable Total Hexa CDF ** -- <0.959 <0.684 <0.521 Leachable Total Hepta CDF ** -- <0.896 <1.10 <0.648 Total Toxic Equivalency (TEQ) 1500 2.37 2.62 2.17 * CDD = Chloro Dibenzo-p-Dioxin ** CDF = Chloro Dibenzo-p-Furan

Appendix C Laboratory Certificates