NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

Similar documents
FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

4. Environmental Analysis of the Proposed Project

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

SAFETY AND NOISE 9. Safety and Noise

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project EIR Noise

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

11 NOISE INTRODUCTION NOISE FUNDAMENTALS AND TERMINOLOGY

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

4.7 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS OF NOISE AND VIBRATION

III.I. NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.7 NOISE Setting

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 12 Noise

4.7 NOISE. Introduction. Decibels and Frequency. Perception of the Receiver and A-Weighting

4.10 Noise Setting. a. Overview of Noise and Vibration Measurement

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Revised Noise Element

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT

12 November Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDIX 3.11-A NOISE ANALYSIS DATA

US 53 Noise Mitigation

3.1 Noise Overlay District

Introduction. Section 3.10 Noise Fundamentals of Noise. Decibels and Frequency

E. NOISE AND VIBRATION

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

CHAPTER 9 NOISE ELEMENT

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Exposition Corridor Transit Neighborhood Plan Draft EIR 4.9 NOISE

24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review. November 19, 2013

Traffic Noise Analysis

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan

APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

NOISE BARRIER ANALYSIS

Gisborne District Council

PLANNING FOR CHILDCARE IN THE GATEWAY DISTRICT NODE: CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Mitigation Monitoring Program

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

Table of Contents. City of Redlands - Redlands Crossing Center

NORTH GILROY NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS URBAN SERVICE AREA AMENDMENT EIR NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT GILROY, CALIFORNIA

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Australian Standard. Acoustics Road traffic noise intrusion Building siting and construction AS

Noise Study Report December 2016

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Noise Compatibility Program Update

PART 7 - NOISE, SIGNS AND ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING

Noise & Vibration Technical Appendix

Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Proposed City of Elk Grove Sphere of Influence Amendment (LAFC # 09-10) Recirculated Draft EIR

APRIL 2017 UNDER CONSTRUCTION

H3. Residential Single House Zone

City of High Point Airport Overlay District Noise Level Reduction Design Standards

4.11 NOISE SOUND FUNDAMENTALS SOUND AND THE HUMAN EAR SOUND PROPAGATION AND ATTENUATION

Article 7. COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

8.0 NOISE ELEMENT 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.2 NOISE INVENTORY 8.3 GOALS, POLICIES, IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS

Draft Noise Study Report

PALO VERDE MESA SOLAR PROJECT

Evaluation of noise impacts associated with a proposed commercial retail project typically includes the following:

TTM & Residential Development Noise Impact Study City of San Jacinto, CA

SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

This page intentionally left blank

EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND NOISE ELEMENT PRINCIPLE INTRODUCTION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

H3 Residential Single House Zone

PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE

Kamperman & James Nine-page summary edition Page 1 of 9

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary

Virginia Department of Transportation I-66 Tier 2 Environmental Assessment

APPENDIX C NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY

# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Final Environmental Impact Report No. 617 John Wayne Airport Settlement Agreement Amendment

4.3 NOISE Environmental Setting. Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise

Airborne Noise and The New NY Bridge Project

# 14 ) ZN AMERICAN DIALYSIS CENTER OF NORTH LAS VEGAS M-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO M-1, BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

The existing land use surrounding North Perry Airport can be described as follows:

Sydney Port Botany Terminal 3 Project Out of Hours Works Protocol

Noise Impact Study for UMore Park Sand and Gravel Resources

Transcription:

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise problems in the community... The noise contours shall be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses in the Land Use Element that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise." Goal 1 Policy 1.1 Policy 1.2 Minimize the amount of noise to which the community is currently exposed. The City shall require each land use to maintain noise levels at their property line in compliance with City standards. The City shall place a priority upon control of noise at the noise source. Policy 1.3 The City shall periodically update the Noise Ordinance to minimize noise exposure within the City. The Noise Ordinance update and acoustical studies shall use the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) methodology for quantification of noise exposure. Policy 1.4 Policy 1.5 Policy 1.6 The City shall encourage Vandenberg AFB to utilize flight patterns which are the least disturbing to residential areas of the City. The City shall coordinate with Federal, State, and local agencies to minimize noise exposure within the City. The City shall use noise reduction as one criterion in equipment purchasing policies. Goal 2 Minimize noise problems created by future development. Policy 2.1 The City shall use the noise standards presented in table entitled "Interior and Exterior Noise Standards" in determining land use designations and maximum noise levels allowable for new NOISE - 1

developments. Interior and Exterior Noise Standards LAND USE CATEGORIES CNEL CATEGORIES Residential USES Single Family, Duplex, Multiple Family, Mobile Home NOISE - 2 INTERIOR 1 EXTERIOR 2 45 3 60 4 Commercial & Retail, Restaurant 55 65 Industrial Motel 45 60 4 Community Facility Open Space Notes Professional Offices, Movie Theater, Auditorium Manufacturing, Utilities, Warehousing, Agriculture Hospital, School, Nursing Home, Church, Library, Civic Offices, Parks Passive Outdoor Recreation 45 65 65 75 45 65 -- 60 4 1. Interior areas exclude bathrooms, closets, and corridors. 2. Exterior areas are limited to the following: Private yards or patios of residential uses; Restaurant patios; Motel recreation areas; Office, theater, or hospital patios or assembly areas; School playgrounds; Nursing home, library, or civic office assembly areas; and Park picnic areas. 3. If achievement of the interior noise standards requires that windows and doors remain closed, air conditioning or mechanical ventilation is required. 4. In areas affected by aircraft noise, the standard is 65 CNEL with the stipulation that the noise level exclusive of the aircraft-generated noise cannot exceed 60 CNEL. Application of Standards In situations of overlapping Noise Standards, the quieter standard

shall apply unless it can be found that the circumstances of the project allow for a less conservative interpretation based on the specific type of use, the benefits of the project, and the ability to mitigate the noise impacts. Noise levels may not exceed 75 CNEL at any noise sensitive land uses. NOISE - 3

Policy 2.2 The City shall require acoustical studies for new development projects in areas where noise levels are anticipated by the City to be within five CNEL of the noise standard or greater than the noise standard for the proposed land use(s) under existing or future conditions. Noise attenuation features recommended by acoustical studies shall be incorporated into the project. Policy 2.3 The City shall minimize noise exposure in the vicinity of the Lompoc Airport by maintaining consistency with the Santa Barbara County Airport Land Use Plan, as amended. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Measure 1 The City shall amend the Noise Ordinance to include the following provisions: Establish noise limits which cannot be exceeded at the property line; [Policies 1.1 and 1.2] Require an acoustical study to demonstrate compliance with Noise Standards prior to approval of: new commercial or industrial projects near existing residential areas and new residential developments within the 60 CNEL contour of existing stationary noise sources; [Policy 2.1] Require development projects in areas having noise levels which exceed the Noise Standards for the proposed land use to add noise attenuation measures during the development review process to meet the Noise Standards. These attenuation measures may include: landscaped-sound buffers, berms, setbacks or open space, building design or orientation, prohibiting window openings, door openings, or bedrooms on the sides of residential units facing noise sources which exceed the Noise Standards, enhanced wall or roof insulation, placement of air conditioning units in locations which minimize noise exposure, or other measures; [Policy 2.2] Require noise insulation of multi-family units constructed within the 60 dba CNEL contour.; [Policy 2.2] Add provisions which restrict noise from landscape maintenance devices, auto alarms, stationary sources, and the hours of operation of noise sources. Expand provisions restricting radios in NOISE - 4

parks and other non-residential areas; and [Policies 1.2 and 1.3] Establish guidelines for conducting acoustical studies, monitoring noise sources, and providing noise attenuation. [Policy 2.3] Measure 2 The City should investigate noise impacts from stationary sources in response to noise complaints and then enforce existing noise standards if City noise standards are being exceeded. [Policies 1.4 and 1.6] Measure 3 The City shall amend the projected noise contours for the Lompoc Airport as more current information becomes available. [Policy 2.4] Measure 4 The City shall amend the noise ordinance to includes these measures: For construction near sensitive receptors, require that noisy construction activities be scheduled for periods, such as between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, when loud noises would have the least impact on adjacent residents or other sensitive receptors; [Final EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 1a] Develop a construction schedule that minimizes potential cumulative construction noise impacts and accommodates particularly noise-sensitive periods for nearby land uses (e.g., for schools, churches, etc); [Final EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 1b] Where feasible, require use of caissons instead of driven piles to reduce the intensity level and duration of noise impacts; [Final EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 1c] Where feasible, construct temporary, solid noise barriers between source and sensitive receptor(s) to reduce off-site propagation of construction noise. This measure could reduce construction noise by up to five decibels; and [Final EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 1d] Require internal combustion engines used for construction purposes to be equipped with a properly operating muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. Also, require impact tools to be shielded per manufacturer's specifications. [Final NOISE - 5

EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 1e] NOISE - 6

Measure 5 The ultimate noise contours at the design capacity of existing and proposed roadways shall be used for preliminary planning purposes and refined when detailed site-specific acoustic reports are prepared for new developments. Until that time, the following table shall serve as a general planning guide to determine the potential "worst case" future noise levels and shall be used to determine required setback distances. [Final EIR Noise Mitigation Measure 2] DESIGN NOISE LEVELS ADJACENT TO PLANNED ROADWAYS Roadway Classification Lanea Geometrics Designb Capacity CNELc @ 100 feet Distance to Contours (Ft.)d 70dBA 65dBA 60dBA Expressway 4D 30,000 67.0 66 134.285 Major Arterial 4D 30,000 64.3 47 90 189 Minor Arterial 4U 20,000 62.5 R/W 69 146 Minor Arterial 2D 12,500 59.1 R/W 42 87 Minor Arterial \Collector 2U 10,000 58.1 R/W 35 75 a. D=Divided U=Undivided. b. The ultimate daily design capacity shown in terms of vehicles per day. c. CNEL values are at 100 feet from all roadway centerlines (see Appendix F for assumptions). d. All distances are measured from the centerline. R/W means that the CNEL contour falls within the right-of-way. [Notes: The following policies are implemented through the current City Codes and procedures: Policies 1.4, 1.5, 1.7 and 2.3.] NOISE - 7