ESAA Regulatory Forum - Edmonton, AB - November 7, 2017

Similar documents
Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP)

Discharge and Discovery Reporting Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Esquimalt Harbour Remediation Project - Overview. RPIC FCS National Workshop 16 April 2014

Successes and challenges: An overview of ongoing assessment and remediation activities at Environment Canada s High Arctic Weather Stations

Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol

Substation Developments Environmental Guidelines Checklist for Applicants

Steve Mailath, M.Sc., P.Geol. April 10, 2014 WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

Limited Remedial Action Reference Documentation For Site Professionals

This report was prepared by Stanley Abraham, Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil

ALBERTA TIER 1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION GUIDELINES

Grid Soil Sampling Outside of Source Areas

WHO WILL DO THE CLEANUP?

Material Characterization Report

MONTHLY UPDATE REPORT - PRIMROSE SOUTH W4M AUGUST 19 TO SEPTEMBER 22, 2014

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

2016 COUNTRY UPDATE: CANADA

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

Endpoint Selection Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Bioremediation: Case Studies in Central Alberta

Hamilton Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

SOIL REMEDIATION OF A FORMER POWER PLANT SITE IN TULITA, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

Canada Border Services Agency Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy (DSDS)

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES

Waste Discharge Permit Application. for. Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Discharges

Railroad Commission of Texas

STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

Environmental Regulation & Mine Permitting in Ontario

Fairchild Air Force Base Atlas E Missile Site Sprague, Lincoln County, Washington

Chapter 14 Water Pollution

Evaluation of Environmental Protection and Stewardship. July (CRS)

APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES

Site Map Investigative Areas (IAs) IA-3

AN UPDATE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE SEDIMENT REMEDIATION IN ESQUIMALT HARBOUR

Atlantic RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada. Version 3. User Guidance

VAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response


Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

OF CONTENTS 14.0 COUNTY OF BRANT...

Module 12: Oceanography Topic 6 Content: Ocean Pollution Notes. Ocean Pollution

OVERVIEW CAPACITY & CONDITION

Emergency Plan Under the Storage Tank Systems for Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products Regulations

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS

Canadian Environmental Protection Act

Alberta s Climate Leadership Plan. Alberta Climate Change Office. May 17, 2017

Development of Soil-to-Terrestrial Invertebrate Uptake Factors to Improve Estimation of Ecological Risk on DFO Lightstation Sites in Atlantic Canada

The Dirt on Excess Soil Across Canada How Will Brownfields Be Affected?

Protecting Our Water Keeping Our Water Healthy

Problem Formulation and Conceptual Model Development for Aquatic Placement

ATLANTIC RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) Ecological Screening Protocol for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada

Evaluation of Alternative Approaches for Managing Risks of Salt Releases at Wetland Sites

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

PROPOSED CHANGES TO REVISE WATER STANDARDS IN SCHEDULE 6 OF CSR. Heather Osachoff, MSc, PhD, RPBio Risk Assessment Officer May 20, 2015

Brownfield Program in California

Treatment and disposal of chemical wastes in daily laboratory work

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE VICTOR DIAMOND MINE EXTENSION IN ONTARIO

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

Trends in Technology Development for Marine Spill Response. Chantal Guénette CANADIAN COAST GUARD - ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE

The use of petroleum products in gold mining environmental impacts and cost implications

PHASE III ESA, HHERA AND RAP, NORTHWEST POINT, LABRADOR. Appendix 4a. Site Drawings. East Bulk Fuel Storage Site

Nez Perce Tribe Groundwater Assessment and Cleanup

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF CANADA

LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites. Bud Ivey Ivey International

SAR Pathfinder - Background. SAR Pathfinder Goals and Activities

Environnement et Changement climatique Canada

Fundamentals and Applications of Biofilms Bacterial Biofilm Applications

HAMILTON HARBOUR RAP GOVERNANCE & COMMITTEES

75C Calcium Peroxide

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

The following is a short summary of the definitions and acronyms associated with the evaluation process.

Territorial Premiers discuss plans to create strong sustainable North

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

Overview of Reported Emissions

MARINE POLLUTION DEGRADATION MITIGATION MANAGEMENT IS ESSENTIAL FOR IMPROVING MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Top 10 Risks of the Clean Fill Dump Site

CHAPTER 6 DEMAND FOR REMEDIATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SITES

April 8, 2015 Olympic Medical Center Rebecca Lawson, P.E. LHG. Connie Groven, P.E. Audrey Kuklok

Code of Practice for Land Treatment of Soil Containing Hydrocarbons

Introduction to Brownfields: Site Assessment and Cleanup

5.14 CONTAMINATED MATERIALS

Mobile Water Treatment Trailer

Soil remedation in The Netherlands

Implementing Centralized Reporting using SAP Analytics

National Standard for Environmental Risk Management of Industrial Chemicals

Do Australian Clean Up Projects Currently Accord with the Concept of Sustainable Remediation?

ENERGY, MINES AND RESOURCES. Yukon Government 9-1

M.A. - Marine Affairs, Environmental Management Emphasis, University of Rhode Island, 1998

Overtime Averaging Rules. Maximum Duration of Arrangeme nt

Canadian Oil, Gas and LNG Market Review

Report of the Royal Society Expert Panel on the Behaviour and Environmental Impacts of Crude Oil Released into Aqueous Environments

UK Legislative Approach: Contaminated Land

4.1 This directive is issued under the authority of the Assistant Deputy Minister, Socio-Economic Policy and Programming and Program Re-design.

ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT

Appendix D. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan

Transcription:

Overview of the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) and FCSAP Phase III and Federal Infrastructure Initiative (Recap of Year 1 and Forecast to 2020) ESAA Regulatory Forum - Edmonton, AB - November 7, 2017 Jennifer Froese Contaminated Sites Coordinator ECCC Edward Domijan Senior Environmental Engineer PSPC

Outline Introduction to federal contaminated sites Overview of FCSAP Roles of ECCC, HC, DFO, PSPC within FCSAP Current status of FCSAP Phase III and Federal Infrastructure Initiative FCSAP achievements and considerations for a federal contaminated sites program post-2020 Questions?

Federal Contaminated Sites Contaminated sites on lands owned or leased by the Government of Canada, or on nonfederal lands where we have accepted full responsibility for the contamination Iqaluit Metal Dump, NU

Federal Contaminated Sites Result of past practices in government operations such as leaking fuel storage tanks, PCB spills, heavy metal contamination, etc. Mercury contamination at hydrometric stations

Federal Contaminated Sites Result of past management of 3 rd party operations on federal Crown land e.g. abandoned mines in the territories 5

Federal Contaminated Sites Wood Buffalo National Park, AB (PC) Typical locations include military bases, federal harbours, airports, lighthouses, firing ranges, First Nations lands, and national parks Wood Buffalo National Park, AB

Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory List of all known and suspected federal contaminated sites Maintained by Treasury Board

Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) FCSAP is a 15-year program to address federal contaminated sites involving up to 17 custodians (i.e. federal departments, agencies, and consolidated Crown corporations) which share the costs for site assessment and remediation FCSAP Objectives Reduce risks to human health and the environment; and Reduce liability in the Public Accounts of Canada related to contaminated sites Ancillary benefits: employment, skills development, technology advancement

Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) $4.54B committed in Budgets 2003, 2004, 2009, 2011, 2015, and 2016 $2.98B approved for Phase I and II (2005-06 to 2015-16) $1.35B approved for Phase III (2016-17 to 2019-20) $217M allocated in Budget 2016 for accelerated activities in 2016-17 and 2017-18 Cost Share program (80-100% of expenditures covered by FCSAP, 0-20% by custodian department) Funding is available for assessment and for remediation / risk management projects

Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) Only federal contaminated sites that have been contaminated prior to April 1, 1998 are eligible for FCSAP funding Federal sites are evaluated through National Classification System for Contaminated Sites to determine their relative priority for action (e.g. remediation and/or risk management) Class 1: High Priority for Action (NCSCS score >70) Class 2: Medium Priority for Action (NCSCS score of 50-69.9) In Phase I of FCSAP, funding was available for Class 1 and Class 2 sites; funding restricted in Phase II and III of the program for new Class 1 sites and ongoing Class 2 sites only Infrastructure funding allows for assessment and remediation / risk management regardless of classification and when contamination occurred

FCSAP Partners in Phase III Custodian: Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Correctional Service Canada Environment and Climate Change Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada The Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated National Capital Commission National Defence National Research Council Natural Resources Canada Parks Canada Agency Public Services and Procurement Canada Transport Canada VIA Rail Canada Inc. Expert Support: Environment and Climate Change Canada Health Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Public Services and Procurement Canada Secretariat Environment and Climate Change Canada Support to Secretariat and Policy Advice Treasury Board Secretariat

ECCC, HC, DFO Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Review site-specific documentation to ensure risks to human health and the environment have been adequately considered NCSCS/ASCS reviews Technical reviews of environmental site assessments Technical reviews of human health and ecological risk assessments Provide support and advice at various stages of contaminated sites management Participate in site visits and project working groups Develop and maintain technical guidance documents, fact-sheets, tools and guidelines Provide training to custodians on considering and managing risks to human health and the environment

ECCC, HC, DFO Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Dozens of Guidance Documents and tools for improved decision making and technical support have been published by Expert Support Departments. Documents and training are provided to federal contaminated sites custodians (and sometimes their consultants) Guidance documents are used by ECCC, HC, and DFO when conducting technical reviews of various contaminated sites reports

ECCC, HC, DFO Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Ecological Risk Assessment Comprehensive Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance with additional modules on: Toxicity Testing Selection or Development of Site Specific Toxicity Reference Values Standardization of Wildlife Receptor Characteristics Causality Assessment Defining Background Conditions and Using Background Concentrations (in preparation) Ecological Risk Assessments for Amphibians on Federal Contaminated Sites (in preparation) Default Wildlife Toxicity Reference Values for Use at FCSAP Sites (in preparation)

ECCC, HC, DFO Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Human Health Federal Contaminated Sites Risk Assessment in Canada (Parts I-V) Interim Advice to Federal Departments for the Management of Federal Contaminated Sites Containing PFOS Aquatic *new Soil and Drinking Water Screening Values Sediment Guidelines for PHCs Framework for Addressing and Managing Aquatic Sites under FCSAP Monitored Natural Recovery FCSAP Aquatic Sites Classification System

ECCC, HC, DFO Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Updates and Interim Guidance for CCME Documents: Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines *new boron, cadmium, silver, PERC, TCM, methanol, glyphosate and tricholron Update to 1996 CCME Guidance and Spreadsheet on setting Site- Specific Soil Quality Tier 2 Remediation Objectives for Contaminated Sites Supplemental Guidance for the Scoring of Sites Using the National Classification System for Contaminated Sites (NCSCS) and Aquatic Sites Classification System (ASCS) under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (2013)

PSPC Expert Support Roles in FCSAP Expert Support: develop guidance for usage by federal community, address procurement issues, share innovative, green, sustainable approaches, and inform private sector of forecasted federal need for support Custodian: responsible for management of its inventory approximately $150M program (16-17 through 19-20) Common Service Provider: provide technical advice, procurement support, and project management services to other federal custodians

PSPC Expert Support Guidance and Tools Project Management Tools Cost Management Guidance Tool Stakeholder Mapping Tool Sediment Remediation Conceptual Cost Estimation Tool SOW Templates (for ERA and others) Long Term Monitoring Planning Guidance GOST Decision Making Framework Sustainable Decision Support Tool Site Closure Tool and Tool for Risk Assessment Validation

Status of Sites in the Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory from 2005 to 2016 25,000 *$ million, FCSAP assessment and remediation expenditures (incl. cost share) $373 $209 $222 $309 $270 $260 Number of Sites 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 $192 $191 $219 $310 1,630 2,505 665 527 3,825 7,660 1,396 1,430 5,215 10,480 367 11,800 1,100 13,427 14,429 15,381 4,415 4,644 451 462 4,243 1,309 1,407 $168* 518 1,129 1,334 5,189 488 800 5,530 1,380 1,137 467 1,242 468 4,993 1,065 441 3,415 4,700 1,030 11,841 11,510 10,809 4,435 4,252 3,869 7,434 6,958 4,609 4,929 4,014 3,020 2,606 2,353 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspected Active in Assessment Active in Remediation Active in Long Term Monitoring Closed

Total FCSAP Phase III Funding (Including Stimulus) - By Province/Territory Assessment By Fiscal Year From 2016-2020 Assessment Funding (Millions) $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2019-2020 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2018-2019 Assessment Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2017-2018 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2017-2018 Assessment Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2016-2017 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2016-2017 Assessment $1,000,000 $- AB BC MB NB NL NS NU ON PE QC SK YT Unkown Province/Territory

Assessment Funding (Millions) $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 Total FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites (Including Stimulus) - By Custodian Assessment By Fiscal Year From 2016-2020 FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2019-2020 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2018-2019 Assessment Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2017-2018 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2017-2018 Assessment Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2016-2017 Assessment FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2016-2017 Assessment $2,000,000 $- DFO DIAND-LED DND EC NCC PC PSPC TC Other Custodian Other includes CSC and NRC

Remediation Funding (Millions) $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 Total FCSAP Phase III Funding (Including Stimulus) - By Province/Territory Remediation By Fiscal Year From 2016-2020 FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2019-2020 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2018-2019 Remediation Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2017-2018 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2017-2018 Remediation Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2016-2017 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2016-2017 Remediation $20,000,000 $- AB BC MB NB NL NS NT NU ON PE QC SK YT Unknown Province/Territory

Total FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites (Including Stimulus) - By Custodian Remediation by Fiscal Year From 2016-2020 $250,000,000 Remediation Funding (Millions) $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2019-2020 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2018-2019 Remediation Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2017-2018 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2017-2018 Remediation Federal Stimulus Plan Funded Sites 2016-2017 Remediation FCSAP Phase III Funded Sites 2016-2017 Remediation $50,000,000 $- DFO DIAND-LED DIAND-NAO DND PC PSPC TC Other Custodian Other includes AAFC, CSC, EC, JCCBI, NCC, NRC, NRCan, and VIA

FCSAP Phase III (Including Stimulus) Expected Total Cost Range 2016-2020 250 200 FCSAP Assessment Sites FCSAP Remediation Sites Stimulus Assessment Sites Stimulus Remediation Sites Number of Sites 150 100 50 0 Up To $50,000 $50,000 - $250,000 $250,000 - $1M $1M - $10M Over $10M Total Cost Range

FCSI Inventory: Most Commonly Reported Contaminant Types Other organics, 2% Other Physical/Chemical, 2% Other, 2% Other inorganics, 2% PCBs And PCDD/Fs, 2% PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons), 29% Petroleum hydrocarbons and PAH's Oxygen depleting substances Toxic organics Nuisance substances PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) BTEXs (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Microorganism PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofuran) Pesticides Halogenated Hydrocarbon Metal, metalloid, and organometallic, 30% BTEXs, 4% Isotopes Energetics Biological/chemical warfare agents Other inorganics Source: Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory, January 2017 PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon), 23% Unlabelled Contaminants Each 1% or Less Of Total Other organics Other Physical/Chemical (ph, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Other

FCSAP Achievements to Date Phase I (2005-2011) Phase II (2011-2016) Better understanding of risks by assessing federal contaminated sites 9,431 sites 1,614 sites Reduced risks by remediating sites 1,412 sites 583 sites Liability reduction from remediation $1.0B $1.2B Liability increase from new sites and improved cost estimates $2.7B $2.6B * Estimated liability in 2016 for FCSAP-eligible sites is $3.96B Since 2005 14,800 person-year jobs created Targeted the sites with highest risks and liabilities e.g. Giant and Faro Mines and Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line sites

On-Going FCSAP Challenges Total liability has increased substantially during FCSAP Significant funding surpluses on custodian funding each year (approx. 30%) Positive benefits of the program have not been wellcommunicated to Canadians Mega Sites have unique circumstances and challenges that mask progress at other sites

Moving Forward - Post FCSAP Issues Under Consideration: Site eligibility Delivery Governance Actions in support of relevant GoC priorities: Reconciliation with Indigenous peoples Climate change adaptation Innovation and clean technology Economic growth & northern strategy 30

Summary ECCC, HC, DFO and PSPC are important program partners in the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan Nearly $3B was approved during Phase I & II (FY 2005-06 to 2015-16 Current forecast indicates more than $1.6B will be spent during the FY16-17 through FY19-20 Current FCSAP program approved until March 31, 2020 and discussions concerning successor program have been initiated.

Thank You! - Questions? More information: Federal Contaminated Sites Web portal www.federalcontaminatedsites.gc.ca Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf ec.secretariatpascf-fcsapsecretariat.ec@canada.ca