The Evolution of SDTM

Similar documents
CDISC/TransCelerate Collaboration and TransCelerate work streams. -Clinical Data Standards -Common Protocol Template -esource

CDISC Data Standards Validation

The SDTMIG: What s New in 3.2

CDISC Controlled Terminology across the Clinical Trial Continuum. Bay Area Implementation Network 6 March 2008

LOINC in Regulated Clinical Research a Lab LOINC Steeringg Committee Meeting 08 June 2017

CDISC Journal. Current status and future scope of CDISC standards. By Rebecca D. Kush, President and CEO, CDISC. 1. Introduction

CDISC Standards: Current and Future

Evolving Regulatory Guidance on Submission of Standardized Data. James R. Johnson, PhD RTP CDISC User Network

CDASH Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization

HD Regulatory Science Consortium (HD-RSC) A consortium aimed at accelerating treatments for Huntington s disease

CDISC and Clinical Research Standards in the LHS

Consortia-Based Strategies in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Critical Path Institute s Track Record in Collaborative Efforts

Visualising CDISC SDTM for Monitoring and Review. Philip C. M. Bartle Clinical Innovation, PPD

October, Integration and Implementation of CDISC Standards

Industrialized Clinical Data Standards Management Speed of automation, Power of accuracy and Transforming clinical data into business intelligence

CDISC Tech Webinar Leveraging CDISC Standards to Drive Crosstrial Analytics; Graph Technology and A3 Informatics 26 OCT 2017

CDISC UK Network face to face Reading

CDISC Production Standards Status & Plans

From Standards that Cost to Standards that Save: Cost Effective Standards Implementation

Steps and Slides of Implementing Global Standards Producing High Quality Programming Outputs Edition

Statistical Review and Data Standards: It s Gettin Better All The Time

Implementation and Operation of CDISC ODM-based EDC by UMIN

PharmaSUG 2017 Paper DS14

Biomarker Data Management in Clinical Trials: Addressing the Challenges of the New Regulatory Landscape

CDASH 2.0. Berlin Éanna Kiely CDISC Engineer

Putting CDISC Standards to Work How Converting to CDISC Standards Early in the Clinical Trial Process Will Make Your CDISC Investment Pay

CFAST Therapeutic Area Program Steering Committee 2013 Meeting Summaries (January-August)

PharmaSUG Paper PO12

Roadmap for Managing Multiple CRO Vendors

Eileen Navarro MD, FACP Medical Officer, OCS, OTS, CDER, FDA

End-to-End Management of Clinical Trials Data

Aepodia is a team of experts with more than 15 years

Optimizing Your Study Data Submissions to FDA Updates from CDER and CBER

CDISC International Interchange Program Embracing a Changing Landscape Standards to Connect Research and Patient Care

Question and Answer Guide Regarding Notification on Practical Operations of Electronic Study Data Submissions

Electronic Health Records and Clinical Data Interchange Standards

The use of electronic Health Records in Clinical Research - The value of CDISC Standards

Availability of Masked and De-identified Non-Summary Safety and Efficacy Data; Request for

Janssens Discovery Data Integrity program (DDI): A journey over the last 7 years Research Integrity: Position yourself for success!

Clinical Data Standards Governance. Tammy Burns, Expert Clinical Data Manager 11 th January 2013

21 st Century Cures Act: Progress Update

Chapter 1. Pharmaceutical Industry Overview

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search

FDA Biomarker Learnings and the Future

Model-Based Qualification of Biomarkers. Klaus Romero, MD MS FCP Director of Clinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Medicine

Specific pathologist responses for Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data (SEND)

The Anatomy of Clinical Trials Data: A Beginner s Guide

Developing Strong Partnerships to Ensure Success With Global Medical Device Trials. 23-February-2017, OCT Burlingame

Pharmacovigilance and the Generic Industry. Mark Vieder RPh MBA Director, Safety & Medical Writing Biorasi

Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH)

ectd: A Clinical Reviewer s Experience Sarah M. Connelly, MD Medical Officer Division of Antiviral Products FDA

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

GCP Basics - refresher

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. May

Expanded Access to Investigational Imaging Drugs

Breaking the Silo Mentality Working With Opinion Leaders

HTAs and EMA working together: 23 parallel scientific advice procedures later - what have we learned?

Expanded Access. to Investigational Drugs & Biologics. for Treatment Use

Presentation Outline

Pre-Competitive Collaboration in Clinical Trials. July 24, 2013 Garry A. Neil, MD Board of Directors, Chairman

Exploration des données d essais cliniques en utilisant le standard CDISC

The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium:

IRB-GCP and Timelines. Andrew Majewski, MSc. 1 st DOLF Meeting Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Missouri-USA October th, 2010

Connecting the parts Developing an integrated IDMP strategy

McKinsey Center for Government What's Driving the Recent Surge in New Drug Approvals?

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Deployment of SAS Programming Contract Staff: Pathway to Sinkhole or Best Strategy for Programming Division? Parag Shiralkar, Eliassen Group, NJ, USA

EU perspective: European procedure for Qualification of novel methodologies for medicine development. Elmer Schabel MD

Non-clinical Assessment Requirements

Clinical trials from CRA s point of view

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

THE VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY STUDIES USING JMP CLINICAL

GUIDELINE REGARDING COLLECTION, VERIFICATION, AND SUBMISSION OF THE REPORTS OF ADVERSE EVENTS / REACTIONS OCCURRING IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS

EAUTIFUL BDATA AGGREGATION EXTRAVAGANZA. Implementing a Clinical Data Repository and Analytics Platform in 90 Days

Chin Koerner Executive Director US Regulatory and Development Policy

Flexible and Pending Monographs

SWABIK Software Tools for the Exchange of Image Storage Media in Clinical Research (SWABIK)

Regulatory and ethical requirements in medical devices studies. France

Welcome to the American College of Toxicology s Webinar Series. We will begin at 11AM EDT

Fergus Sweeney, European Medicines Agency

Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary

Regulatory and ethical requirements in medical device studies. Finland

Okaloosa RESTORE Advisory Committee (ORAC) October 3, :00 PM 8:00 PM Northwest Florida State College

Business Practice Manual for The Transmission Planning Process

Drug Development: Why Does it Cost so Much? Lewis J. Smith, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Center for Clinical Research Associate VP for Research

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

E2B, Safety databases & Eudravigilance

GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE (GCP) Series Catalog

22 nd February Utilizing big data to enhance patient recruitment

Sunshine on Europe: impact of recent EFPIA and EU guidelines on publication planners. Susan Scott, PhD, CMPP Director, Scott Pharma Solutions Ltd

Expanded Access and the Individual Patient IND

Applying SDTM and ADaM to the Construction of Datamarts in Support of Cross-indication Regulatory Requests

Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data Implementation Guide: Nonclinical Studies

IBM Clinical Trial Management System for Sites

Clinical Trial Transparency UK perspective

The Role of Comparative Analyses for Evaluation of Generic Drug-Device Combinations in an ANDA

Update on Current FDA Policies and Priorities

April 13, Background

Clinical Trials Management for Molecular Diagnostics. April 2016

Transcription:

The Evolution of SDTM What s new? Tina Apers CRO Manager Mobile +32 476 60 08 79 tina.apers@businessdecision.com Business & Decision Life Sciences Tel +32 2 774 11 00 Fax +32 2 774 11 99 Sint-Lambertusstraat 141 Rue Saint- Lambert 1200 Brussels www.businessdecision-lifesciences.com

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

FDA Announcements 2004-2013 2004 2006 2008 2006 HHS Food and Drug Administration (FDA) PROPOSED RULE STAGE 36. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF DATA FROM STUDIES EVALUATING HUMAN DRUGS AND BIOLOGICS Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 21 USC 355; 21 USC 371; 42 USC 262 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 314.50; 21 CFR 601.12; 21 CFR 314.94; 21 CFR 314.96 Legal Deadline: None c Abstract: The Food and Drug Administration is proposing to amend the regulations governing the format in which clinical study data and bioequivalence data are required to be submitted for new drug applications (NDAs), biological license applications (BLAs), and abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). The proposal would revise our regulations to require that data submitted for NDAs, BLAs, and ANDAs, and their supplements and amendments be provided in an electronic format that FDA can process, review, and archive. The proposal would also require the use of standardized data structure, terminology, and code sets contained in current FDA guidance (the Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) developed by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium) to allow for more efficient and comprehensive data review. 2013 2010

China s SFDA Announcement February 2013 http://www.raps.org/focus-online/news/news-article-view/article/2934/

EMA «Clinical Data Transparency Initiative» Project Scope Clinical reports & data from all clinical studies in Europe Timelines Jan 2013 Apr 2013 : Advisory Groups Patient Confidentiality Clinical Data Formats Rules of engagement Good Analysis Practice Legal Aspects June 2013 : Draft Agency Policy Nov 2013 : Final Agency Policy Jan 2014 : Policy comes into force

EFSA Announcements http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2760.pdf

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

Overview of CDISC Models Content Standards Semantics Technical Standards Therapeutic Areas SEP 2013 Upcoming

Updates over time SEP 2013 Content Standards Technical Standards SDTM v1.1 SDTM IG v3.1.1 Define.xml v1.0 ODM ODM v1.1 v1.2.1 SDTM ODM v1.0 BRIDG v1.3 SDTM IG v1.1 v3.1 ADaM ODM BRIDG / v2.0 v1.2 v1.0 SDTM v1.2 SDTM IG v3.1.2 CDASH v1.0 BRIDG v2.1 BRIDG v2.0 BRIDG v1.1.1 Semantics Therapeutic Areas ADaM v2.1 ADaM IG v1.0 BRIDG v3.0 BRIDG v2.2 BRIDG v3.0.3 ADaM Val. Checks v1.0 BRIDG v3.0.2 ODM v1.3.1 BRIDG v3.0.1 Protocol Model v1.0 SDTM v3.1.2 Am.1 Alzheimer v1.0 SDM.XML v1.0 ADaM Val. Checks v1.1 CDASH v1.1 SEND v3.0 Virology Parkinson s Disease Devices BRIDG v3.2 ADaM Val. Checks v1.2 SDTM v1.3 SDTM IG v3.1.3 Tuberculosis Pain PRM Toolset v1.0 CDASH UG v1.0 BRIDG v3.1 SDTM QS Supplements CDASH E2B SAE IG ADaM MD Guide BRIDG v4.0 BRIDG UG v2 Define.xml v2.0 PKD CDASH v1.2 SDTM v1.4 SDTM IG v3.1.4 SDTM Associated Persons IG v1.0 SEND v3.0.1 Asthma Alzheimer v1.1 ADaM IG v1.1 Protocol Concept Guide Cardiovascular Therapeutic Brain Injury Schizophrenia Oncology Virology- Hepatitis C Diabetes Multiple Sclerosis Define.xml IG Validation CDASH v2.0 SDTM v1.5 SDTM IG v3.1.5 ADaM General Occurrence Model v1.0 ADaM Integration IG v1.0 Extended ODM PRM XML Schema SDTM.xml v1.0 SEND v3.1 SDTM Devices IG v1.1 SDTM Device Submission Pilot 2002 2005 20032006 2004 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

The Evolution of SDTM SDTM V1.1 and SDTM IG V3.1.1 Only for studies initiated prior to 13 Jun 2011 Date Support Ends 28 Jan 2015 SDTM V1.2 and SDTM IG V3.1.2 Published Nov 2008 SDTM V1.2 and SDTM IG V3.1.2 Am. 1 Published Dec 2011 SDTM V1.3 and SDTM IG V3.1.3 Published Jul 2012 SDTM V1.4 and SDTM IG V3.1.4 Expected end 2013

Data Standards Governance DATA GOVERNANCE PROCESS DEDICATED TEAM

Technical Plan Project Schedule Published March 2013 http://www.cdisc.org/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/5fbd2b7afd4cc3ae3274d97d44d7a8b0/misc/cdisc0213.pdf

CDISC Team Charters CDASH Team SDS Team Device team ADaM Team XML Technologies Team Terminology team BRIDG Team Questionnaire Team Protocol Team http://www.cdisc.org/team-charters

CDISC Volunteers http://cdisc.wufoo.com/forms/m7p6r7/

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

Published Therapeutic Areas SEP 2013 1. Oncology Domains Included in SDTMIG 3.1.3 2. Alzheimer s Disease V1 - Final 3. Pain V1 - Provisional 4. Parkinson s Disease V1 - Provisional 5. Polycystic Kidney Disease V1 - Provisional 6. Tuberculosis V1 - Provisional 7. Virology V1 Provisional 8. Asthma Open for public review * A CDISC provisional release is defined as a proposed standard that has completed a public review within the CDISC user community and is available for initial use; but subject to modification for some component parts still in process

CFAST Therapeutic Area Standards CFAST Coalition for the Advancement of Standards and Therapies Joint initiative of CDISC & C-Path Development of therapeutic area standards along with FDA and TransCelerate Biopharma, Inc. http://www.cdisc.org/therapeutic

Enhanced Standards Development Process

CFAST Program Overview July 2013

Enhanced Standards Development Process CFAST Deliverables: 1. Mindmap visualization of disease area clinical concepts 2. Essential core data elements of the disease 3. Definitions 4. Data types (simple & ISO 21090) 5. BRIDG and SDTM mappings 6. SDTM domains and examples 7. Minimum value sets (from code lists) with definitions and C-Codes 8. User/Implementation Guide with permissions statement 9. Standard CDASH CRFs with SDTM annotations, as appropriate Source : Cdisc Intrachange July 30 2013 22

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

What is CDISC SHARE? http://www.cdisc.org/cdisc-share

CDISC SHARE R1 Implementation Plan Initial Release of CDISC SHARE is planned early 2014

What is the Potential Value of SHARE? Improves data quality based upon better definitions, change control Improves data consistency, encourages data re-use and facilitates aggregation of data and comparisons across organizations Improves data exchange, sharing, workflow and collaboration among multiple parties with clear, unambiguous standardised definitions Supports ability for 2 computers to understand information without direct human interpretation (interoperability) Provides reduction in costs resulting from maintaining individual (and different) dictionaries within research organizations Improves the speed by which we develop new standards among all stakeholders with consistent, reliable governance Maintains version traceability, change control to allow impact analysis Source : Cdisc Intrachange July 30 2013

Agenda 1 FDA Submission Landscape 2 Evolution of CDISC Models 3 Development of Standards 4 CDISC SHARE 5 SDTM 3.1.4 Highlights

General Releases SEP 2013 Public Review Period ended SDTM IG v3.1.4 Batch 1 SDTM IG v3.1.4 Batch 2 SDTM IG v3.1.4 Batch 3

SDTM IG V3.1.4 Batch 1 Specifications for representing exposure data, Immunogenicity and Reproductive data EC - Exposure as Collected IS - Immunogenicity Assessments SR - Skin Response RD - Reproductive Details

SDTM IG V3.1.4 Batch 2 Specifications for representing morphology, histopathology and physiology data MO - Morphology MI - Microscopic Findings CV - Cardiovascular Physiology PR - Procedures TD - Trial Disease Assessments DD - Death Details SS - Subject Status

SDTM IG V3.1.4 Batch 3 Draft SDTM Domain, SDTM Model Document and SDTMIG for AP SDTM 1.4 SDTMIG for Associated Persons HO - Healthcare Resource Utilization

Link TA QS SDTMIG domains Therapeutic Areas Oncology Alzheimer s Disease Pain Parkinson s Disease Polycystic Kidney Disease Tuberculosis Virology Questionnaires Alzheimer s disease Assessment Scale Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) Mini Mental Scale (MMSE) Audio Verbal Learning Test Version A (AVLTvA) Pain Intensity Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) EuroQol (EQ-5D) Karnofsky Performance Status Scale SF-36 Health Survey Hamilton Depression Scale Faces Pain Scale Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) SDTMIG 3.1.3 TU Tumor Identification TR Tumor Results RS Disease Response RELREC Related Records SDTMIG 3.1.4 EC - Exposure as Collected IS - Immunogenicity Assessments SR - Skin Response RD - Reproductive Details MO - Morphology MI - Microscopic Findings CV - Cardiovascular Physiology PR - Procedures TD - Trial Disease Assessments DD - Death Details SS - Subject Status SDTM 1.4 SDTMIG for Associated Persons HO - Healthcare Resource Utilization

Questions?

Thank you for your attention Tina Apers CRO Manager Mobile +32 476 60 08 79 tina.apers@businessdecision.com Business & Decision Life Sciences Tel +32 2 774 11 00 Fax +32 2 774 11 99 Sint-Lambertusstraat 141 Rue Saint- Lambert 1200 Brussels www.businessdecision-lifesciences.com