Biomass Emissions Permitting in Pennsylvania

Similar documents
Boiler MACT & Related Rules. Western Regional Boiler Association 45 th Annual Meeting Portland, Oregon March 14, 2013

CISWI and solid-waste-identification rules

Current Topics In Air Quality

COMAR Amendments and Regulation.12 Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr

Update on Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules and Policies. MMEA Fall Conference October 4, 2017

Update on EPA s Rulemakings Affecting Biomass-Fired Boilers

AIR REGULATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA 3 JUNE 2016

Air Emissions Permitting Considerations for an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Unit Potentially Located in the State of Delaware

ARE Fall 2005 Lecture Slides - Clean Air Act - Part 2 (October 12, 2005)

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Rules Final Reconsidered Rules Requirements Summary

Air Pollution Control Program Permits Section

Understanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process

EPA's Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Industrial Boilers MARAMA/ICAC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP MAY 18-19, 2011

Update on ICI Boiler MACT

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

PSD Background Presentation

EPA EMISSION RULES - BOILERS

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For Flakeboard America Limited, dba ARAUCO North America Grayling, Michigan

New Source Review (NSR) Program Review Questionnaire May 14, 2003

Reducing Power Plant Emissions: EPA s New Proposed Rules For Mercury

Draft 10/28/13. Guidance for 1-Hour SO 2 Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions October 2013

North Central Indiana Air Quality Update

Industrial and Institutional Boilers after Boiler MACT

New Source Review Reform: What Lies Ahead

Introduction. Federal Regulatory Background

A.6 Boilers. A.6.1 New and Existing Boilers located within AQCR 131

Representing the Interests of America s Industrial Energy Users since 1978

Air Permitting for Major Sources/Title V (Part 2)

Greenhouse Gas Regulation (new Federal)

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Compressor Station Whites Creek Pike Page 1

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For DCP Midstream, LP Hamilton Township, Michigan

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DOCUMENTS For Holland Board of Public Works Holland, Michigan

Michigan Guide to Air Use Permits to Install

Single-Source Impacts on Secondary PM 2.5 Formation A Case Study

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

Technical Contact. Yvonne Couts Environmental Coordinator (919) Corinth Road Moncure, NC 27559

502(b)(10) Permit for Part 70 Source

Encouraging Energy Efficiency through the Clean Air Act

For audio participation, please dial: ; Passcode

Introduction. Ridge Road Transfer Station Ridge Road, Cleveland

Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Identifying Sources to be Evaluated for Inclusion in an Increment Assessment

Environmental Council of the States State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials

Air Quality Permit File: TVOP & AR Cambria CoGen Company / Cambria Generation Facility

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO [AMENDMENT TO AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO ] IS ISSUED TO

Workshop K. Thursday, July 21, :30 a.m. to noon

Biomass Electricity. Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009

Update on Proposed Solid Waste Rule for Incinerators

ALTERNATIVE EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLANS AND AUTHORIZATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

New Articles 76 & April 2012

Original : 2535 I~ C I i!._ ~iughes, NEarJorie. Froo :

FERC PDF (Unofficial) 9/29/2014 4:29:38 PM. Title V Permit Modification Addendum Submitted June 23, 2014

6NYCRR Part 212 Process Operations

Clean Air Act History

Citations from CRF as required in WV DEP's 45CSR24

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

State of Utah. Department of Environmental Quality DAQE-AN October 26, 2009

Air Quality Update on the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee January 27, 2016 Harrisburg, PA

RELEASE POINT TYPE Enter or select one of the following stack/emission point release orientation: downward

Applied Environmental Consultants,

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

STATEMENT OF BASIS. For the issuance ofdraft Air Permit # 1140-AOP-R4 AFIN: PERMITTING AUTHORITY:

Limiting Potential to Emit (PTE) in New Source Review (NSR) Permitting

Technical Manual Guidance on Preparing an Air Quality Modeling Protocol

Huber Engineered Woods, LLC, TV Page 1 of 7

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. September 17, 2015 PERMIT TO INSTALL A

Hazardous Waste Recycling Under the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) Rule. Tribal Lands Forum August 2011

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

MPCA Air Quality Permits Guide

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division

THE TITLE V PROGRAM - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Guidance for Quantifying and Using Emission Reductions from Voluntary Woodstove Changeout Programs in State Implementation Plans

U.S. EPA s s Clean Air Gasification Initiative

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

AIR QUALITY REGULATORY ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH RESOURCE RECOVERY

AIR PERMITS FORM 805 APPLICATION

Trees, Trash, and Toxics:

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division RENEWABLE OPERATING PERMIT STAFF REPORT

New Source Review (NSR) Reform. Modeling Guidance: Policies and Procedures

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

AIR DISPERSION MODELING

STATEMENT OF BASIS. NAICS Description: All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing NAICS Code:

Overview of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Presented by Brandy D. Olson, JD Director, Legal & Regulatory Services Muscatine Power & Water

Minor Source BAT Programs

ARE Fall 2005 Lecture Slides - Clean Air Act - Part 2 (October 19, 2005)

Integrating ADAir Mixer Technology to Optimize System Performance with DSI Applications

GASP comments regarding Air Quality Plan Approval C - Tenaska Pennsylvania Partners, LLC Westmoreland Generating Station

Gas-Fired Boilers under EPA s Boiler MACT

Environmental and Renewable Energy Regulations

An Overview of Air Pollution Issues

New Source Review Rulemakings & Court Decisions

Kendra Abkowitz & Quincy Styke III

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO

STATEMENT OF BASIS. For the issuance of Draft Air Permit # 1987-AOP-R4 AFIN:

MECKLENBURG COUNTY - A i r Q u a l i t y C o m m i s s i o n -

Implementation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Opportunities for Public Participation

NAAQS and Other Implementation Updates

Recyllose TM Products from sewage

Transcription:

Biomass Emissions Permitting in Pennsylvania Penn State Bioenergy Emissions and Health Short Course March 22, 2012 1 John Slade jslade@all4inc.com Meghan Schulz mschulz@all4inc.com

Agenda Basics: Regulated Air Pollutants from Biomass New Rules for Biomass Combustion NESHAP and NSPS (CISWI / Boiler MACT) Permitting for Biomass Projects Types of projects Control technology requirements Other possible air requirements 2

3 Air Regulation Basics

Basics Overriding Air Rules Pollutants with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS - see 40 CFR Part 50) Pollutants regulated under federal NSPS and NESHAP rules (see 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63) Regulated new source review pollutants (see 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50)) Title V regulated air pollutant as defined (40 CFR 70.2) Pollutants regulated under a State Implementation Plan (SIP) or under state or local rules or policy (e.g., air toxics policy) 4

Basics NAAQS Standards Pollutant Concentration (µg/m 3 ) Averaging Time Form CO 10,000 1-Hour High Second-High 40,000 8-Hour High Second-High Pb 0.15 3-Month 3-Month Rolling Average PM10 150 24-Hour High Second-High PM2.5 35 24-Hour 98 th Percentile 24-hour 15 Annual Maximum Annual NO2 188 1-hour 98 th Percentile of Daily Maximum 1-Hour SO2 196 1-hour 99 th Percentile of Daily Maximum 1-Hour 1,300 3-hour High Second-High 5

Basics Who Regulates Air in PA? Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) responsible for implementing PA air regulations and is administrator for most Federal air rules. Philadelphia Air Management Services (AMS) and Allegheny County (ACHD) have autonomous programs with rules that are similar or the same as PADEP s U.S. EPA - Region 3 out of Philadelphia has direct oversight for PA 6

Basics Major Air Regulations for Combustion Federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) OR Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Standards 7

New Rules for Biomass Combustion 8

4 Rules: Overview NHSM Rule 40 CFR 241 Material is a Solid Waste, not considered a fuel CISWI Rule 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts CCCC & DDDD Material is not a Solid Waste, can be considered a fuel Boiler MACT Rules 40 CFR Part 63 Area Sources Subpart JJJJJJ Major Sources Subpart DDDDD 9

NHSM Rule: Biomass The following traditional fuels are not wastes: 1. Fossil fuels and derivatives 2. Virgin wood 3. Clean cellulosic biomass (contaminant level similar to virgin wood) are not secondary materials or solid wastes unless discarded. Examples: Agricultural and forest derived biomass (forest thinnings, wood pellets) Urban wood (tree trimmings) Energy crops (corn stover) Crop residues (peanut shells) Wood from forest fire clearance activities, or disaster debris Clean construction and demolition wood. 10

NHSM Rule Basics Non-hazardous secondary materials burned or used in combustion units are solid wastes unless: Material used as fuel: remains within control of the generator and meets the legitimacy criteria. Resinated wood, and scrap tires under the oversight of established tire collection programs, that meet the legitimacy criteria. Discarded Material has been sufficiently processed to produce a material that meets the legitimacy criteria. Non-Discarded Material that has been handled outside the control of the generator has been approved by U.S. EPA on a case-by-case basis. 11

NHSM Rule Sufficiently Processed Remove or Destroy Contaminants: Removing wire from shredded tires or removing paint from painted wood. Improve Fuel Characteristics: Drying and pelletizing biosolids or shredding and blending scrap plastics. Improve As-Fired Energy Content: Removing moisture, dirt and/or metal to improve heating efficiency. 12

NHSM Rule Sufficiently Processed Improve Ingredient Characteristics: Processing of high carbon fly ash to remove carbon and produce a specification concrete fly ash. Minimal operations like shredding do not constitute sufficient processing. Self Implementing. 13

NHSM Rule Legitimacy Criteria for Fuels Valuable commodity: Storage period. Management consistent with an analogous fuel. Protective of the environment. Meaningful heat value (>5,000 Btu/lb): Combustion unit recovers energy. Comparable or lower contaminant levels. 14

NHSM Rule Solid Waste Determination Steps 1. Traditional Fuel? 2. Discarded? 3. Sufficiently Processed? 4. In Control of Generator? 5. Petition Needed? 6. Meets Legitimacy Criteria? 15

Fuel or Solid Waste? Example No. 1 Dried Biosolids: 1. Traditional Fuel? 2. Discarded? 3. Sufficiently Processed? 6. Meets Legitimacy Criteria? No Yes. Solid Waste, unless Assumed Yes, Non-Solid Waste No, Solid Waste (Contaminant Level) 16

Fuel or Solid Waste? Example No. 2 Pulp & Paper Sludge: 1. Traditional Fuel? No 2. Discarded? No 4. Within Control of Generator? Yes 6. Meet the Legitimacy Criteria? Yes Not a Solid Waste - or - 1. Traditional Fuel? No 2. Discarded? No 4. Within Control of Generator? No Solid Waste, unless 5. Case-by-case petition granted? Yes Not a Solid Waste 17

Four Rules NHSM Rule Material is a Solid Waste CISWI Rule Boiler MACT Rules Area Major 18

CISWI Rule - Basics New Source Performance Standards, 40 CFR Part 60 All sources (size does not matter). Title V Operating Permit requirement. Standards set for opacity and nine (9) pollutants: HCl, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, PM, PCDD/PCDF, NO X, and SO 2. Operator training. Siting requirements (Subpart CCCC). Waste Management Plan. Monitoring and testing requirements. 19

The Four Rules NHSM Rule Material is not a Solid Waste CISWI Rule Boiler MACT Rules Area Major 20

Boiler MACT Regulated Pollutant Surrogate Major & Area Sources: Mercury (Hg) Non-Mercury Metallic HAP Non-Dioxin Organic HAP Major Sources Only: Dioxins/Furans (D/F) Non-Metallic Inorganic HAP None Particulate Matter (PM) Carbon Monoxide (CO) None Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) 21

Major Source Boiler MACT (Subpart DDDDD) Major source of HAP = > 10 TPY or more of one HAP, or >25 tons per year or more of combined HAPs. Biomass Unit : annual heat input 10% biomass 19 subcategories based on type of boiler Emission limits, testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements 22

Area Source Boiler MACT (Subpart JJJJJJ) Area Source of HAP = any stationary source that is not a major source Subcategories: Coal, Biomass, and Oil Biomass Unit (proposed): Any boiler that burns any biomass and is not in the coal subcategory. Coal Unit: Burns any solid fossil fuel and <15% biomass annual heat input. Emission limits, testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements 23

4 Rules Timing Final 4 Rules and Notice of Reconsideration (CISWI and major source Boiler MACT only) published in Federal Register Final Compliance Date, Boiler MACT for existing sources, AS OF TODAY 3 years 03/21/2011 12/23/2011 Spring 2012? 03/21/2014 Spring 2015? Reconsidered 4 Rules published (Not yet final) Probable Reconsidered 4 Rules finalized 3 years Probable Final Compliance Date, Boiler MACT for existing sources, AFTER RULES FINALIZED 24

Permitting for Biomass Projects 25

Does My Facility Need An Air Permit? MYTHS FACTS My facility is too small Size does not matter No one told me I needed a permit Responsibility lies with the facility My vendor says I do not need a permit Vendors want to make a sale I already have an air permit You may need more than one permit 26

What Air Emissions Sources Require a Construction Permit? Simple Rule of Thumb: An air quality plan approval to install a source is required for ANY air emission sources unless: The source type is listed in the PADEP rules or on the exemption list OR PADEP makes a case-by-case determination that the source does not require installation approval 27

Is There More Than One Kind of Air Permit? Permit to Install/Permit to Construct Required before emissions units can be installed or modified Permit to Operate/Operating Permit Needed to operate equipment once installation or modification is completed 28

Pennsylvania Air Quality Permits Plan Approvals (Construction Permits) State Only Operating Permits (Minor Source /Synthetic Minor OPs) Title V Operating Permits (Major Source OPs) 29

Step 1: Define The Project Does this project result in the use of new and/or greater quantities of raw materials? For Biomass it is likely any existing permit does not provide for biomass as a permitted fuel for the combustion unit! Will this project involve changes to existing pollutant control systems? Will this project increase my production capacity? 30

Step 1: Define The Project New Source Review (NSR) Permitting Applies to Major Sources of Pollutants The NSR permitting review has different rules depending on whether the pollutant of concern is considered to be in attainment with its National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 31

Step 1: Define the Project New Source Review (NSR) Location is in attainment with the NAAQS Location is in not in attainment with the NAAQS Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Non-Attainment New Source Review (NNSR) 32

Step 1: Define The Project Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Applies to Major Sources emitting a pollutant for which the location of the facility is classified as attainment with the NAAQS. Federal PSD Program 40 CFR Part 52.21 Most States are SIP-approved by incorporation of Part 52.21 by reference or have developed state-specific rules based on Part 52. 33

Step 1: Define The Project Non-Attainment New Source Review (NNSR) Applies to Major Sources emitting a pollutant for which the location of the facility is classified as nonattainment with the NAAQS. Federal NNSR Program 40 CFR Part 52.24 Requirements for SIP NNSR Programs 40 CFR Part 51.165 Appendix S of Part 51 Offset Rules Most States are SIP-approved and have developed state-specific rules based on Part 51.165 34

Major Source Emission Increase Pollutants Precursors Attainment Classification Major Source Threshold (tons per year) Significant Emission Increase (tons per year) NOx, SO 2, Lead NA PSD General 100/250 As applicable Ozone VOC/NOX NNSR outside of Philadelphia 5-County Area Ozone VOC/NOX NNSR Severe-Philadelphia 50/100 40 25 25 PM 2.5 NA PSD/NNSR 100 10 PM 2.5 NO X PSD/NNSR 100 40 PM 2.5 SO X PSD/NNSR 100 40 PM 10 NA PSD/NNSR 100 15 35

Step 2: Check The Air Regulations Federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) OR Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Standards 36

Step 2: Check The Air Regulations Pennsylvania requires that all new or modified sources are subject to review for: Best Available Technology (BAT) And Major Air Emission Sources can be subject to review for: Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Lowest Achievable Emission Reductions (LAER) 37

Step 2: BAT / BACT A PSD BACT review will require performance of a Top-Down analysis Determine what control technologies are feasible vs. technically infeasible Rank feasible controls according to their effectiveness Evaluate operating costs on $/ton basis 38

Step 2: LAER The rate of emissions based on the following, whichever is more stringent: (A) The most stringent emission limitation which is contained in the implementation plan of a state for the class or category of source unless the owner or operator of the proposed source demonstrates that the limitations are not achievable. (B) The most stringent emission limitation which is achieved in practice by the class or category of source. 39

Step 3: Determine Emission Increase New Sources: Potential To Emit Max Capacity at 8760 hrs/yr unless otherwise restricted Existing Major Facilities or Where the Emission Increase Will Be Major Itself Modified Sources Projected Actual Emissions minus Baseline Actual Emissions 40

Step 3: Existing Modified Sources Calculate Baseline Actual Emissions (BAE) Determine a Future Projected Actual Emissions (PAE) Recent EPA decisions do not allow maximum credit for substitution of cleaner fuels. THIS MAKES THE PROCESS TRICKIER THAN IT SHOULD BE. 41

Step 4: Dispersion Modeling Required for PSD Major Source Permits New NAAQS for NO X is very low and problematic to demonstrate compliance Screen modeling - simple, conservative, overestimates ambient concentrations Refined modeling more complex, very expensive & causes significant project time delays 42

Summary Basics: Regulated Air Pollutants from Biomass New Rules for Biomass Combustion NESHAP and NSPS (CISWI / Boiler MACT) Permitting for Biomass Projects Types of projects Control technology requirements Other possible air requirements No reason it shouldn t be doable!!! 43

Thank you! Questions? 44