Calculating the Direct and Indirect Costs of a Phase III HABP/VABP Clinical Study Stella Stergiopoulos Senior Project Manager Tufts CSDD

Similar documents
2017 Clinical Trials Data Library

Recruitment Innovation Initiative

Research Job Summaries

CPPE Leading for change Programme handbook

Recommendations for Strengthening the Investigator Site Community

The Clinical Research Regulatory Process

The Research Services Organization (RSO) of the Academic Health Center

Multi-Site Coordination Process. Drafted by: Ester Dimayuga Page 1 of 18

About Clinical Trials

IBM Clinical Trial Management System for Sites

The Promise and Challenge of Adaptive Design in Oncology Trials

Summary of Provisions in 21 st Century Cures Act (H.R. 6) as passed by full House of Representatives, July 10, 2015

Financial Services Job Summaries

Administrative Faculty Job Evaluation Model

Staff Position Management Guidelines

Australia: A Dynamic Environment for Conducting Clinical Trials

Expanded Access and the Individual Patient IND

Nurturing the Clinical Research Leaders of Tomorrow

Introduction to Clinical Research

Getting Connected: The Benefits of a Unified Clinical Platform

CANCER CENTER SCIENTIFIC REVIEW COMMITTEE

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-P

Objectives Discuss the importance of proper data collection. Identify the types of data collected for clinical trials. List potential source documents

Keywords: fi eld-medical, medical science liaisons, metrics, return on investment, consensus

Competence in Clinical Trials the Regulators Perspective.. (Jennifer Martin Senior GCP Inspector, 9 June 2014)

Quality Assurance QA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR FDA or Pharmaceutical Sponsored Audits

Tier Assessment/Setting - Quick Guide to Competency Levels

GCP Convergence Improves Transportability of Medical Device Clinical Data

10:00 Examining the Challenges with Sourcing the Right CRO and Vendors for Global Trials

Research Shared Services:

Assessing the Economics of Single-Source vs. Multi-Vendor Manufacturing

OCTC 2012 CRO Selection

PDUFA VI Public Meeting Remarks of Cynthia A. Bens Alliance for Aging Research. August 15, 2016

The Situation of Investigator Initiated Trials in Europe. Dr.N.Gökbuget

Challenges and Solutions in Clinical Supply Management. Pamela Osborne Sr. Clinical Supply Chain Mgr

Immunotoxicology Technical Committee (ITC) HESI Assembly of Members January 19, 2009

RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (RA), SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (SRA)

CLOSING DATE: 27 TH SEPTEMBER 2013

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

The Role of the CRO in Effective Risk-Based Monitoring

Volunteering for Clinical Trials

Bakersfield College Program Review Annual Update 2017

Vendor Selection: Identifying Effective Procedures & Strategies

Diversifying the MSL-KOL Relationships: The Prominent Rise of the Pharmacist KOLs Key Study Findings

MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ISO 14155

THE FDA, THE DRUG APPROVAL PROCESS, AND THE PATIENT VOICE

End-to-End Management of Clinical Trials Data

ASSISTANCE AND ASSESSMENT:

Clinical Research at MSU

CTTI Overview One Decade of Impact. One Vision Ahead.

ICH/GCP Guidelines Self-Evaluation Questionnaire

THE BOUNTYJOBS MARKETPLACE FOREWARD

Ethics Committees/IRBs Today: Challenges for Efficiency and Quality

Guidelines: c. Providing the investigational drug for the requested use will not interfere with the initiation, conduct, or completion of clinical

Structuring Compliance: The Duke Model

Clinical Trials Management for Molecular Diagnostics. April 2016

Regents of the University of Michigan Committee Charters Last updated June 17, 2010

@ALSETF #EAP2015. Jess B. Rabourn CBI Expanded Access Conference July 22, 2015

22 nd February Utilizing big data to enhance patient recruitment

USG Comprehensive Administrative Review

Application form UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MEDICAL SCHOOL ETHICS COMMITTEE

GCP Refresher and GCP/GCDMP Trends. in the CTN. Denise King, MS, RD, CCRA & Lauren Yesko, BS. Presented by:

What We Learned Running Investigator Initiated Trials

INTRODUCTION TO MODERN RANDOMIZATION AND TRIAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT SERVICES

DEMONSTRATING YOUR MEDICINE S VALUE TO ALL STAKEHOLDERS TRUSTED COMMERCIALIZATION AND MARKET ACCESS EXPERTISE

Decoding Phase II Clinical Trial Terminations

PAREXEL ACCESS MANAGED ACCESS PROGRAMS

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

RECRUITING OF AND ADVERTISING FOR SUBJECTS

Standard Operating Procedures Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

Medical Affairs Not a Sunshine Day Analyzing the Impact of the Sunshine Act on Medical Affairs: Challenges for 2014 and Beyond

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH TITLE

Drug Research Center CIM Sant Pau

National Center for Healthcare Leadership. The Catalyst for Leadership and Organizational Transformation

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. Revised January 2010 Page 1

CLINICAL TRIALS AND MARKET RESEARCH

BEST PRACTICES IN IRT IMPLEMENTATION:

Patient Handbook on Stem Cell Therapies

ISPE Comments on the CIOMS 2006 draft Special Ethical Considerations for Epidemiologic Research 1

10/9/2012. Alicia Joy, IRB. Wednesday October 10, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

Allowable costs and co-funding

Global Contract Research Organization (CRO) Market: Size, Trends & Forecasts ( ) November 2017

Protection of Research Participants: The IRB Process and the Winds of Change

Sunshine on Europe: impact of recent EFPIA and EU guidelines on publication planners. Susan Scott, PhD, CMPP Director, Scott Pharma Solutions Ltd

The Economics of New Drug Development: Costs, Risks, and Returns

1.4 Applicable Regulatory Requirement(s) Any law(s) and regulation(s) addressing the conduct of clinical trials of investigational products.

External IRB Review What Does it Mean for Your Institution

Recruitment of Subjects Best Practices

European Academy of Hospital Pharmacy Biotechnology Educational Summit. Clinical trials David Gerrett (Acknowledgment Mark Howells)

"From Bedside to Bench and Back: regulatory requirements for collaborations between pharma industry and academia

Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Discipline

UPDATE ON COMBACTE STATUS AND ACTIVITIES

AN EXECUTIVE S GUIDE TO BUDGETING FOR SECURITY INFORMATION & EVENT MANAGEMENT

DSAES IT SERVICES. Student Fees Advisory Committee (SFAC) PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FY19

Bakersfield College Program Review Annual Update 2015

PHARMACY, MEDICINES & POISONS BOARD

Transcription:

Calculating the Direct and Indirect Costs of a Phase III HABP/VABP Clinical Study Stella Stergiopoulos Senior Project Manager Tufts CSDD CTTI Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP/VABP) Pilot Study Meeting February 24, 2015

About the Tufts CSDD Center at Tufts University School of Medicine (http://csdd.tufts.edu) Tufts CSDD: Furthering the Cause of Pharmaceutical Innovation Independent, academic group focusing on drug development scientific, regulatory, economic and management policy Staff Presentations Surveys & Questionnaires Manuscripts, White Papers & Book Chapters Louis Lasagna Library of Drug Development Research and Publications Information Services Electronic Databases & Bibliographies Industry Programs Sponsorship Multi-Company Project Series Sponsored Research Projects Grant funded and sponsored studies Commentaries & Editorials Public Hearings & Testimony Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development Tufts CSDD Executive Forum Quarterly Updates Results have informed Congress, the National Academies of Science, Foundations, Industry, Capital Market analysts and investors, Regulatory Agencies, the National Institutes of Health Bi-Monthly Impact Report Annual Outlook Report Quarterly R&D Mgmt. Report Subscription- Based Reports T U F T S U N I V E R S I T Y Training & Workshops Annual Postgraduate Course Annual Leadership Course Webinars, Wkshps., & R&D Roundtables 2

CTTI-Tufts CSDD Study Modeling the Cost of a HABP/VABP Phase III trial Study looking to capture and benchmark fully-loaded costs (direct and indirect) of a typical phase III clinical trial for HABP/VABP* Comprehensive mapping of total cost elements developed Retrospective cost data gathered and integrated into relational data model Data elements and model being validated by experts and individuals who have experience with HABP/VABP studies Model output will provide benchmarks to compare against new and potentially transformative HABP/VABP study designs HABP: Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia; VABP: Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia 3

Study Methodology: Three Parts 1. Comprehensive, detailed mapping of indirect and direct cost elements: Tufts CSDD faculty and staff expertise Secondary data and literature Data from past HABP/VABP clinical trial protocols Benchmarking tools used to assess clinical trial costs 2. Cost data from: Internal proprietary databases (resource costs) Cost data inflation adjusted to reflect 2015 USD Cost and resource data based on all therapeutic areas Commercial sources(e.g., Medidata, Oracle, IRBs, CenterWatch) Assumptions based on completed HAPB/VABP trials listed on Clinicaltrials.gov 3. Modeling and data validation based on discussions and interviews with experts and members of CTTI Pilot Study 4

Project Timeline Milestone Timeline Mapping of Cost Elements November 2014 Data Gathering December 2014 January 2015 Data Modeling January 2015 February 2015 Data Validation February 2015 March 2015 Final Report/Model completion Mid-March 2015 5

Determining Fully-Loaded Costs: Primary Cost Elements Direct Costs (Per Patient; i.e., Study Conduct Costs) Direct Costs (Fixed; i.e., Study Level Costs) Indirect Costs (Fixed) Patient Costs Personnel Costs (Internal and External) Upper Management Time Personnel Costs Site and Clinical Supply Costs Overhead Costs Other Printing / Paper / Data Costs Other Costs 6

Detailed Mapping: Study Conduct Cost Elements Patient Costs Personnel Costs (Per Site) Other Costs Patient Recruitment Costs Patient Retention Costs (i.e. compensation) Informed Consent Screen Failure Costs Cost of procedures Cost of lab tests Primary Investigatory (PI) Co-PI Research Nurse / Study Coordinator Technician Other Admin Recruitment Specialist Regulatory Affairs Pharmacist Microbiologist Case Report Form Recordkeeping / Document Storage Data Entry Query Resolution CGP/ICH Compliance Expenses 7

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Study Conduct Costs and Study Assumptions Variable Assumption Phase, Indication Outsourcing Model Total Sites (all locations) Total Subjects (all locations) Total Number of Countries III; HABP/VABP Fully outsourced; medium sized providers 20 sites 604 subjects (Range: 100 to 1,000 subjects) 3 countries (Range: 1 12 countries) Assumptions represent the mean values for all clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov with the following main disease indications: Nosocomial Pneumonia Bacterial Pneumonia Infections and Respiratory Infectious Infection due to resistant bacteria; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated Post-extubation Respiratory Failure Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Other Looking only at completed, industry sponsored trials that are phase III. Not all trials list total sites and countries. Mean values based on completed trials; ranges incorporate standard deviations 8

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Study Conduct Costs Site Assumptions Variable Assumption Screen Failure Rate 17% Subject Drop Rate 9.7% Source Data Verification 100% Assumptions based on internal Tufts CSDD databases. They represent mean values for many therapeutic areas. 9

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Subject and Treatment Duration Assumptions Variable Enrollment Period (i.e. time to find patient; FPI to LPO) Assumption 880 Days (~2.4 years) Treatment Period Test of Cure Visit End of Follow-up Visit 3 to 14 days; 8 days in hospital 21 calendar days from randomization 28 calendar days from randomization Assumptions based on feedback from industry experts. 10

Detailed Mapping: Study Conduct Costs Personnel Assumptions Variable Principal Investigator 70% Co-Investigator 50% Assumption: Percentage of Time on One Study Research Nurse / Study Coordinator Technician Other Administration Recruitment Specialist Regulatory Affairs Pharmacist / Pharm Tech Project Manager 25% 25% Assumptions based on feedback from industry experts. 11

Detailed Mapping: Study Level Cost Elements Personnel Costs Sponsor: Site Contract Management Sponsor: Pharmaceutical Technician Sponsor: Product Development Clinical Pharmacology CRO/Site Contract Management Clinical Research Associate Physician Stat Programmer and Statistician Study Manager Non-Clinical Research Scientist Site and Clinical Supply Costs IRB Feels (Central / Local) Amendment Fees Site Recruitment Costs (marketing) PI Training / Travel Costs Meeting costs for clinical travel team (venue, food, travel) Clinical Supply Costs Manufacturing Comparator Printing / Paper / Data Costs Investigator Brochure Printing Translation Study Protocol Printing Translation Informed Consent Printing Translation Data Costs Server charges for EDC IT Charges for EDC Storage Costs Data Entry Costs 12

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Printing / Paper / Data Assumptions Variable Assumption Investigator Brochure Clinical Trial Protocol Informed Consent Number of Copies per site 50 Pages 75 Pages 12 Pages 2 Copies per Site Assumptions based on feedback from industry experts. 13

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Study Level Cost Assumptions Variable Assumption Number of Attendees (Investigator Meeting) Number of Countries (Investigator Meeting) Sponsor Personnel Time 60 people (3 people / site) 1 Country (USA) Each FTE s salary converted to hourly rate Total hours spent phase III study tasks analyzed by TCSDD Cost per employee determined as total hours spent on a study hourly rate Sanity checked using back-of-envelope calculation: $250K per FTE per year 12 individuals on clinical team (where team is spending 100% of time on one study). Percent time indicated on next slide 14

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Sponsor/CRO Personnel Time Assumptions Resource (One Individual) Total Months Spent on Phase III Study Clinical Pharmacology 2.2 100% Site / Contract Management 7.2 100% Document Manager 17.8 (~1.5 years) 100% Clinical Research Associate 160 (5.3 years) 100% Physician 5.9 70% Statistical Programmer 11.8 (~1 year) 100% Statistician 6.4 70% Study Manager 54.3 (2 years) 100% Pharmaceutical Technician (clinical supplies) Product Development (clinical supplies) 1.3 100% 102 (3.4 years) 100% Non-Clinical Research Scientist n/a 20% Hours (months) reported based on all phase III trials. Includes outsourced trials. Percentages from Industry experts. Percent Time Spent (In One Year on One study) 15

Detailed Mapping: Indirect Cost Elements Upper Management Time Senior director Vice President CMO Overhead Costs Travel and Meetings Depreciation (equipment) Depreciation (buildings) Other infrastructure costs Material and office supplies IT costs Other Costs Administration Costs Training and Professional Development Employee Benefits 16

Detailed Mapping and Modeling: Indirect Cost Assumptions Upper Management spends ~1% of their time on one clinical study Overhead costs are small for one clinical trial Other costs: Administration and Training costs lumped into total cost per FTE: $200K - $250K/ FTE-year. 17

Timeline: Model Currently Being Validated Milestone Timeline Mapping of Cost Elements November 2014 Data Gathering December 2014 January 2015 Data Modeling January 2015 February 2015 Data Validation February 2015 March 2015 Final Report/Model Completion Mid-March 2015 18

Thank you Stella Stergiopoulos Stella.Stergiopoulos@tufts.edu 617.636.0322