The Marco Polo programme: key for sustainable mobility

Similar documents
WP24, Geneva, October 2007

Definition of the Award Criteria for the different actions

DIOMIS (Developing Infrastructure and Operating Models for Intermodal Shift)

Theo Notteboom ITMMA - University of Antwerp and Antwerp Maritime Academy

The Mediterranean corridor From a road corridor to a multimodal corridor A success story for the regional economy

Rail strategy of the Port of Barcelona. November 2013

North Adriatic Intelligent Transport System Technical seminar

Intermed Ports /The role of Mediterranean ports

YOUR EFFICIENT CONTAINER GATEWAY FOR EUROPE

PROGETTO P.Im.Ex. Piattaforme logistiche integrate per lo sviluppo delle relazioni commerciali import-export nello spazio transfrontaliero

MBZ_logo.jpg November 17th 2009 Patrick Van Cauwenberghe 1

Short Sea Promotion Centre Spain

Market Place Seminar Rail Crossroads

Port Landside connection Train MaNu. Train MaNu. Agnes Eiband MBA & Eng Brussels, 13th May Rhine Main (- Rotterdam)

THE SPANISH PORT SYSTEM

The Performing. Rail Infrastructure. Manager. Transport

Rail Cargo Group. China Belt and Road Initiative and Logistics Solutions

The development of international merchandise

Environmental performance of inland shipping in comparison with other modes

25 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 5 % Share rail, inland waterways and oil pipelines 0 %

Supply and Demand Analysis

The relevance of MoS in the EU transportation system and TEN-T

Mediterranean Corridor - RFC 6 connections to OSJD corridors from China Odessa, 2 June 2017

DG TREN Making Co-Modality work BESTUFSII 24-25TH May John Berry - European Commission DG TREN

SHORT SEA SHIPPING COMPETITIVENESS AND THE EUROPEAN MARITIME POLICY: A CASE STUDY

MoS: the paradigm for the development of modern ports

Overview of SmartRivers 2006 Report

ITALOEXPRESS. The innovative solution for intermodal transport between Scandinavia and Italy. Marco Polo Conference Valencia 2-3 December 2008

THE BALTIC SEA MOTORWAY - RECENT DEVELOPMENT AND OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE

Reduce External Costs

Reduce External Costs

The EU funding emphasises the importance of bayernhafen Regensburg as a logistics hub in Europe

Preface. The Airports of Brussels and Liege are important hubs for Full Freighters and the preferred location for the European head offices of

Luka Koper - Connecting markets eregions Think Thank Meeting, Castle Jablje, Ljubljana, 15th March, 2016

Experiences of the freight transportation planning especially in relation to the ports of Bremen

Magnify: The opportunity in European logistics

Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Financing Opportunities

LATVIA LOGISTICS AND COOPERATION WITH CHINA

Intermodal connections and networks the challenge and opportunity for Latin American A railroads

Linking modes of transportation makes modal shift possible

Paul Kyprianou. GLD Lines

Logistical and environmental considerations for the Far East to Europe corridor

LATVIA TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SECTOR KASPARS OZOLIŅŠ. State Secretary Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia

Challenges and solutions for transport in the Danube region

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

RETRACK: Setting up an innovative rail freight service between Rotterdam and Constantza. Trans-European Rail Freight seminar Delft, 3 September 2008

Motorways of the Sea Forum

THE BOLOGNA FREIGHT VILLAGE Moves the global logistics

PORT ENERGY OPERATIONS AND CLEAN POWER INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

Barcelona. Present and future of the Port of Barcelona

Mediterranean. Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator. Laurens Jan Brinkhorst APRIL Mobility and Transport

FOCUS ON... YOUR EUROPEAN CONNECTIONS

Green ports policies, coastal shipping and inland waterways November, 2013 Incheon

The Baltic-Adriatic Corridor (BAC)

Orient-East Med Corridor

Freight crossing the Pyrenees.

The Committee of Chambers of Commerce of the Railway Axis North-South Rotterdam- Duisburg-Basel

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

SHORT SEA SHIPPING IN CANADA: LESSONS LEARNED AND RESEARCH MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SERVICES Marc-André Roy, CPCS 1 Peter Harrison, CPCS

Rotterdam. Duisburg. Antwerp. Mannheim. Basel. Kiel. Lübeck. Hamburg. Bremen. Amsterdam. Nijmegen. Hannover. Magdeburg. Münster. London.

Szczecin-Świnoujście as a point infrastructure of the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor. Opatija, Nov. 2017

Green corridors: policy and regulatory issues

Our aim is a sustainable modal shift

STATE OF INTERMODAL TRANSPORT IN CROATIA AND SERBIA

Conference on sustainable freight transport in sensitive areas 27/28 October 2004, Vienna

bayernhafen Passau excels with environmentally friendly transport modes of inland waterway and rail

The Port of Barcelona: a strategy for the future

CEF Transport Info day 2016 Greece

The transport modes need to share the load

Presentation of the Study Transport of semi-trailers in UCT through Switzerland. Bern,

FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND GATEWAYS: DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND EVALUATION CRITERIA COMPARISON IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

2016 Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FACTSHEET. Spain

Developing Infrastructure and Operating Models for Intermodal Shift SIAFI 24 APRIL 2007 SANDRA GEHENOT SENIOR FREIGHT ADVISOR

Go with the flow - instead of being stuck in a jam. The way to the future is multimodal

Brochure of Project Results. FUNDED BY EUROPEAN COMMISSION 7TH RTD PROGRAMME

Rhine Alpine. Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator Paweł Wojciechowski DECEMBER Mobility and Transport

LOGISTICS HUB LUXEMBOURG

UNECE Workshop Role of freight forwarders and logistics in intermodal transport chains

DECEMBER Mediterranean. Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator. Laurens Jan Brinkhorst. Mobility and Transport

THE 30 th IAPH WORLD PORTS CONFERENCE

CMA CGM AN OCEAN OF TALENT

Promoting sustainable mobility: natural gas and biomethane as a fuel for transport

Measure 43: Intermodal Loading Units and freight integrators First page:

Landscape of the European Chemical Industry 2017

Key issues in port development in India. Marten van den Bossche Managing Partner Ecorys New Delhi, 8 February 2012

VOLTRI TERMINAL EUROPA

Concept of Sustainable Transport: Planning and Designing for Sustainable and Inclusive Transportation Systems UNESCAP Transport Division

Improved Accessibility in North-Eastern Baltic Sea Region NSB CoRe project

Pre-proposal Submission Form

European Commission. Trans-European transport network policy. December Information - Communication 1

THE ROUTE MAP TO A CONNECTED EUROPE

The Ecobonus and Ferrobonus Experiences and their contribution to the TEN-T Networks

International Corridor Rhine-Alpine Conference

1. EU Research 2. TEN Transport 3. LNG technology 4. LNG in the EU 5. LNG projects

2015 CEF Transport Calls

SUSTAINABLE CRUISE

Rail Freight Corridor North Sea - Baltic. Corridor Information Document. Book 1

TEN-T POLICY REVIEW. UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva, 7-8 September 2010

Brunsbüttel Ports GmbH

Auto Industry Opportunities & Challenges. 2 nd SIAM Automotive Logistics Conclave Greater Noida 16 th & 17 th January 2015

Transcription:

The Marco Polo programme: key for sustainable mobility Cristóbal Millán de la Lastra Marco Polo programme coordinator European Commission Directorate-General for Energy & Transport Unit G2

MACO POLO - MARKET CONTEXT annual freight transport growth much higher than overall economic growth road +35%, short sea shipping +31%, inland waterway +9%, rail +6% short sea shipping: strong, sustained dynamism inland waterway: considerable unexploited potential rail: halted relative decline since 2001, higher increase in states with early market opening environmental impacts of transport remain high: 1% of GDP, road congestion cost 1% of GDP

MARCO POLO POLITICAL CONTEXT 2001: Transport White Paper: intermodality as key concept (shifting the balance, linking the modes) 2003: MARCO POLO programme (2003-2006) to support intermodal services and alternatives to road-only transport until commercial viability 2006: Keep Europe Moving - Mid-term review of 2001 White Paper co-modality: promotion of optimal use and integration of modes (continuity of policy, no U-turn) logistics: using existing capacities more efficiently, cutting costs, reducing environmental impact

MARCO POLO I MARCO POLO I (2003 2006) : shifting freight off the road to more environmental friendly transport modes modal shift Budget: 102 million 4 Calls for proposals published 3 different action types: Modal shift actions, Common learning actions and Catalyst actions

MARCO POLO I OVERALL RESULTS Call 2003 Call 2004 Call 2005 Call 2006 Available budget (in M ) 15 20.4 30.7 35.7 Committed budget (in M ) 13 20.4 21.4 18.9 Received proposals 92 62 63 48 Concluded contracts 13 12 15 15 Contracts cancelled before ending 2 2 0 n.a. Average subvention per contract (in M ) 1 1.7 1.4 1.3 Planned freight to be shifted (in billion tkm) 12.4 14.4 9.5 11.5 Environmental benefit (in M ) 204 324 245 241 External costs saved per subvention 15.7 15.9 11.4 12.7

MARCO POLO I GLOBAL OBJECTIVES Total Planned Model Shift (bln. Tonkms) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Total Planned Modal shift Modal shift target 0 2003 2004 2005 2006

Unea 083 Vaasa Marco Polo I Call 2003 New modally shifted routes Belfast Cork 059 059 Moerdijk Köln 038 082 014 SSS: Mediterranean Sea, North Sea, Atlantic & East Sea 035 Antwerpen Zeebrugge Le Havre 024 023 035 München Traunreut Lambach 008 Graz 042 Trieste 023 Santander 082 060 Figueira da Foz Barcelona Thessaloniki 088 Valencia Salerno Huelva Cartagena Palermo Cadiz 014 Istanbul Rail: NL/BE to South Eastern Europe

Marco Polo I Call 2004 New modally shifted routes Padborg 061 Hamburg SSS: in the same geographical areas Lübeck Birmingham 061 040 Rotterdam 009 031 Limay 040 051 Le Havre 051 050 München 023 026 009 Ribadeo Santander 034 Livorno 049 Setúbal Valencia 026 Verona Koper Bologna Bilbao Figueira da Foz Sevilla Piacenza 023 Rail: more widespread + DE to IT 1 IWW

Marco Polo I Eskilstuna Call 2005 Ventspils Göteborg 018 058 Esbjerg 040 058 Gdansk Rostock 013 015 034 011 053 SSS: also Baltic Sea Passau Offenburg 047 015 034 015 028 Golbey New modally shifted routes Poznan 018 Rotterdam Duisburg 034 Essen Zeebrugge 013 034 041 015 028 011 Lyon 015 Marin 053 Genova 027 Aveiro Toulon Le Boulou Barcelona Tanger Vidin 011 Piombino Civitavecchia Istanbul Taranto 051 015 Koropi 009 051 051 053 Livorno 009 Setúbal Huelva Milano Rail: also FR, Scandinavia & new East-west corridors

Marco Polo I Call 2006 New modally shifted routes Poznan Lübeck Hamburg Köln Duisburg 006 Barking 028 030 Genk Ronet Ludwigshafen 018 015 009 037 Ottmarsheim 037 017 Gliwice Pardubice 010 022 030 020 Piacenza Lambach 022 Vitoria 015 Marseille Lavéra Zaragoza Tarragona Valencia 005 Novara Tortona Genoa Gardenna Gyor 027 037 011 028 1 IWW: river Elbe Magdeburg Cervignano 023 Timisoara Arad 037 Pitesti Rail: BE, ES, RO well presented

MARCO POLO I TRANSPORT MODES 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 SSS RAIL RAIL/SSS IWT

MARCO POLO I ACTION TYPES 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 Modal shift action Common learning action Catalyst action

MARCO POLO I SHIFTED TKM PER 1 GRANT 1.200 1.000 Shiften tonkm per subsidy 800 600 400 200 0 2003 2004 2005 2006

MP I GOOD CHANCES FOR GOOD PROJECTS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Received proposals Eligible proposals Concluded contracts 2003 2004 2005 2006

MARCO POLO II Continuing Marco Polo I with larger scale and scope Duration: 2007-2013 Budget: 450 M more than twofold increase of annual budget Larger possibility to finance infrastructure if linked to the service Larger geographical scope close third countries 5 action types; 2 new innovative ones: Motorways of the Sea Traffic Avoidance Actions

MARCO POLO II Key Features objective: shift international increase in road freight off the road (road freight transport estimated growth of 20.5 billion tkm/year in EU-25 in the period 2007 to 2013) risk funding, business-driven all segments of international freight (except air) services only <> no research, studies or (core) infrastructure

legal entity: commercial undertakings only (private or public) eligible for participation: EU-27 Member States close third countries eligible for EC-funding: EU-27 Member States EFTA & EEA States after conclusion of specific agreement Candidate and close third countries after Memoranda of Understanding European dimension MARCO POLO II Key Features international routes (EU Member States and close third countries) min. 2 undertakings,1 of them in EU but exceptionally also1 EU MS

MARCO POLO II Key Features Eligible costs: only costs incurred after submission date of the application even if the action starts earlier No profit allowed: during the (accumulated) years for funding does not exclude the possibility to show profit sometime in the period Viability: - the project should show profit and continue after MP funding No state aid allowed: maximum combined public grant allowed = maximum subsidy rate of eligible costs of each action type (35% - 50%)

MARCO POLO II Key Features No unacceptable distortion of competition: - a detailed justification must be given! Credibility essential: proven by letters of intent/commitment, good business plan, market study etc. presently the main reason for failing the evaluations! Financial capacity: last annual financial statement Technical capacity: track records and experience of all partners, CV s etc.

MARCO POLO II Key Features Modal shift actions New or significantly enhanced existing transport services Robust, not necessarily innovative: just shift freight off the road Maximum subsidy of 1 per 500 tkm shifted Minimum grant threshold: 500 000 or 250 M tkm shifted Subsidy rate up to 35 % Maximum duration 3 years

MARCO POLO II Key Features Catalyst actions Overcoming structural market barriers Highly innovative: causing a real breakthrough Subsidy rate up to 35% Minimum grant threshold: 2 M Maximum duration 5 years

MARCO POLO II Key Features Common learning actions Improve co-operation and sharing of know-how Mutual training: coping with an increasingly complex transport & logistics market Subsidy rate up to 50% Minimum subsidy threshold 250 000 Duration up to 2 years

MARCO POLO II Key Features Motorways of the Sea frequent, large volume intermodal services based on SSS Subsidy rate up to 35% Maximum subsidy of 1 per 500 tkm shifted Minimum subsidy threshold 2,5 M - at least 1.25 billion tkm to be shifted per contract Duration up to 5 years

MARCO POLO II Key Features Motorways of the Sea same general objective of sustainable efficient transport but different approach funding is fully complementary MARCO POLO II Transport services Ancillary infrastructure Modal shift objective Private sector driven Bottom-up (undertakings) Short-term TEN-T Infrastructure Strategic infrastructure Creation of transport network Public sector driven Top-down (Member States) Long-term

MARCO POLO II Key Features Traffic avoidance actions - innovative integration of production and transport logistics less empty runs, reduction of volume/weight etc. Subsidy rate up to 35% Actual, measurable and sustainable traffic avoidance of at least 10% of the freight volume Maximum subsidy of 1 per 500 tkm (or 25 vehicle- km) Minimum subsidy threshold 1 M - at least 500 M tkm (25 M vehiclekm) to be avoided per contract Duration up to 5 years

MARCO POLO II Key Features Ancillary infrastructure Funding rules Infrastructure required for timely completion of new modally shifted transport service Works are completed within 24 months after start of action Transport service starts within 3 months after the completion of the works Other EU funding, especially TEN-T funding, is excluded Total aid (state aid and EC funding) not more than 50% of eligible costs For all action types except MOD and CLA actions

MARCO POLO II Results of Call 2007 Very good chances for good proposals! 2007 Received Proposals Subvention requested Selected proposals Subvention requested by selected projects Budget available 55 93 M 27 (49%) 58 M 56 M

MARCO POLO II Results of Call 2007 Evaluated proposals by mode(s) (2007) 7% 2% 24% sss rail+sss 7% rail Traffic Av. 9% 9% iww sss+mos Logistic 35% Intermodality Proposals selected for funding by mode(s) (2007) n = 55 0% 11% 41% 7% 33% sss rail+sss rail Traffic Av. iww sss+mos Logistic Intermodality n = 27

MARCO POLO II Results of Call 2007 Evaluated proposals by type of action (2007) 5% Modal Shift Actions 4% Catalyst Actions 22% 7% 62% Common Learning Actions Motorways of the Seas Traffic Avoidance Proposals selected for funding by type of action n = 55 (2007) 4% Modal Shift Actions 7% 0% Catalyst Actions 7% Common Learning Actions Motorways of the Seas Traffic Avoidance 81% n = 27

Marco Polo I Call 2007 Götteborg 048 016 New modally shifted routes 028 015 037 014 Bremerhaven Birmingham 039 026 020 Waghäusel 004 003 018 046 030 Volvic Santander 054 Passau 017 043 044 Castellon 054 Murcia Cartagena 027 Arad Szeged Timisoara Pitesti 037 046 Civitavecchia 020 020 Vidin 020 Livorno Barcelona 030 009 Wels 037 Verona Sète 039 028 Sassuola Genoa Carrara Bilbao Zebrzydowice 020 Ingolstadt 039 Wüppertal Melnik Genk Frankfurt Mannheim Regensburg Stuttgart Maubeuge Le Havre Gdynia Lübeck Hamburg Hannover 048 015 Gent 030 Rotterdam022 Hockenheim Poole Scheerness Gdansk 007 Pescara 020 024 Istanbul Very evenly distributed map: except for the East Mediterranean area which is not covered

MARCO POLO II What s next? Next Call for proposals beginning 2008; deadline March/April almost no changes compared to Call 2007 1 st quarter of 2008: transfer of Marco Polo project management to EACI Executive Agency of Competitiveness & Innovation

Thank you for your attention! MARCO POLO Help Desk http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/marcopolo/index_en.htm Email: tren-marco-polo@ec.europa.eu Phone: +32 (02) 29-96448 Fax: +32 (02) 29-63765