BCG Institute for Workforce Development

Similar documents
OFCCP Audit: Violations & Recommended Solutions

Understanding Basic Qualifications and Their Role in EEO Compliance

Title VII Case Study: Plaintiff v. U.S. City

Compensation 101 for Federal Contractors: Part 2 of 2 Statistical Concepts and Methods

Understanding the Unique Applicant Management Obligations of Federal Contractors & Subcontractors

Developing a Strategic Applicant Tracking Process. Lynn Clements, Esq. Director of Regulatory Affairs, Berkshire Associates

OFCCP Compliance and Disability

How to Prepare for an OFCCP Audit: Are You Ready for a Compliance Evaluation?

CCH Internet Research NetWork

Understanding OFCCP s Compliance Evaluation. (Through the Federal Contract Compliance Manual)

EEO-1 & VETS 100 Filing. A presentation of the BCG Institute for Workforce Development (BCGi) August 13, 2014

Diversity and Affirmative Action: Friends or Foes?

Compliance Reviews. A Presentation. HR Analytical Services

Affirmative Action Plan Methodology 101 Part I : An Overview

Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity

Affirmative Action Planning Methodology 101 Part I. A presentation of the BCG Institute for Workforce Development (BCGi) October 14, 2011

5/8/2018. Pay Equity: Legal and Organizational Reasons Why It s So Important. Equal Pay, Pay Equity & the Wage Gap. Concepts

NEW 503/VEVRAA FAQS FROM THE OFCCP

Steering: A Case Study. Matthew J. Camardella Jackson Lewis P.C. Long Island, NY

jackson lewis Preventive Strategies and Positive Solutions for the Workplace Corporate Diversity Counseling ALL WE DO IS WORK

OFCCP Guidance on Defining a Job Applicant in the Internet Age: The Final Word?

Understanding The OFCCP s New Definition of Internet Applicant

How to Conduct an OFCCP-Style Compensation Analysis with Microsoft Excel(Will Begin Momentarily)

A Historic Rights Act 1/28/2009. Chapter 2. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Chapter 2. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of Statutory Basis. A Historic Rights Act 1/12/2009

EEOC Pay Equity Enforcement

Legal Issues Overview

Data-Driven, Client Focused

The New OFCCP Compliance Review: What To Expect When Scheduled For A Review In 2012

Reasons for Affirmative Action Plans

NAVIGATING THE NEW EEO-1 FORM & DOL GUIDANCE WITHDRAWALS. July 20, 2017 Webinar

EEOC Investigations How we Do It What We Look For Understanding the Process. Detroit Office Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Legal Issues Overview

OFCCP s Veterans and Individuals with Disabilities Final Regulations Impose New Obligations on Federal Contractors and Subcontractors

A Guide to Compliance for Government Contractors Working with Temp Agencies and Staffing Firms. Presented by: David J. Goldstein Michael Childers

EEO regulatory and Reporting

Review Questions. Defining and Measuring Labor Market Discrimination. Choose the letter that represents the BEST response.

Background Screening Best Practices & EEOC Guidance: A Compliance Tool for Employers

ACHIEVING PAY EQUITY: HOW ANALYTICS HAS EVOLVED T O S U P P O R T TRUE PROGRESS

Apprenticeship Programs: Changes. to Equal Employment Opportunity. Regulations. Joint Apprenticeship Training Programs

Human Resources 101. Audit and Best Practices in Key Areas of HR Function

Preparing Now for EEOC s New EEO- 1 Report: Disclosure of Pay Data

An Introduction to Descriptive Statistics (Will Begin Momentarily) Jim Higgins, Ed.D.

Affirmative Action Terms. Ability A present competence to perform an observable behavior or a behavior that results in an observable product.

Chapter 2. Equal Employment Opportunity. Multiple Choice. 1. Which of the following is not a basis for protection under federal laws?

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics: The Use of Multiple Regression Analysis in Pay Discrimination Challenges

HR COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HIRING PRACTICES

Affirmative Action Plan. for MinoritLes & Women Jan. 1, 2013-Dec. 31, 2013

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

The New U.S. Pay Equity Laws: Answering the Biggest Questions

Workforce Compliance and Diversity ebook

Search Committee Process

Adverse Impact: What is it? How do you calculate it?

CHAPTER 14. Performance Management, Compensation, Benefits, Payroll, and the HRIS

California's New Fair Pay Act: Prepare to Defend Your Employee Compensation

Most Impacted by Robotics, Human Enhancement Technologies, & the Growth of AI. Garry Mathiason, Esq. robotics business review

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR MINORITIES AND FEMALES

Applicant Name. Today s Date

Compensation Equity. Public Policy Issue Statement. April 2018

Talent Management Technology: 5 Reasons to Embrace HRMS in Attracting, Sourcing, Recruiting &

California s New Fair Pay Law: What It Means for Your Business

AP 3420 Equal Employment Opportunity

Equal Employment Opportunity AP 3420

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. Diversity and Leadership Roundtable Discussion PRAXIS: Integration of Diversity and MD 715

CHAPTER 2 Understanding the Legal Context of Assessment- Employment Laws and Regulations with Implications for Assessment

Guide to UUA Salary Recommendations,

9:45 10:35 am EEOC Update Jennifer L. Schancupp

The most difficult thing in writing about the law is realizing that no sooner is the ink dry than the chapter must be rewritten.

PAY EQUITY UPDATES for 2017 More Obligations How Do We Comply?

GENDER PAY REPORT 2018

FOR CURRENT JOB VACANCIES go to: THIS APPLICATION, OR ANY PART THEREOF, IS NOT A CONTRACT FOR EMPLOYMENT

Copyright 2014 HudsonMann, Inc.

Merced Community College District Equal Employment Opportunity Plan

Selection. Revision No. 8. Section 2, Page 35 Revised: January 1, 2014

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY March 2009

Jennifer Swayze SPHR-CA, GPHR, SHRM SCP, CEBS Employment Law Compliance Analyst. Compliance Risks In Human Resources

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES AND FOR PROTECTED VETERANS. Tarleton State University

#METOO: KEEPING EMPLOYEES SAFE AND FREE FROM INAPPROPRIATE WORKPLACE CONDUCT MARK WILETSKY HOLLAND & HART LLP MARCH 8, 2018

DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

John F. Myers, Attorney at Law

Human Resource and Labor Laws

DATA REQUIREMENTS For Affirmative Action Programs

Hiring Without Hitting an EEOC Land Mine

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN. For the Student Affairs Committee, June 12, 2015

Position(s) applied for Date of Application (Required)

Integrating the Potential of the Changing Face of Today s Workforce.

Discrimination and prejudice in selection

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS

The EEOC in 2013 and Investigation Best Practices

RETAIL TRADE Workforce Demographics

1230 W. Boone Avenue, Spokane, Washington Phone: (509) FAX: (509)

Plaintiffs Ingrid Avendaño, Roxana del Toro Lopez, and Ana Medina, individually, and

osborneclarke.com The Equality Act 2010

New Challenges in Combating Absenteeism. Cornelia Gamlem, SPHR February 28, 2008

Dealing With Union Organizing

EXECUTIVE ORDER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN (AAP)

How to Avoid Sex Discrimination Claims. A guide for employers

Legal Issues Surrounding The Interview & Selection of Volunteers

Harmony Family Center, Inc. Employment Application Form. Harmony Family Center Employment Application Form

MEMORANDUM. B. Who is a part time employee? Who is an independent contractor?

Transcription:

Message to Recruiters and Hiring Managers: There s a Regulatory Storm, and You re in the Middle of it Patrick M. Nooren and Nina Le Tse July 10, 2012 The following presentation is not to be construed as legal advice. For specific legal advice please consult your corporate counsel or a labor attorney. CONTACT INFORMATION Patrick M. Nooren, Ph.D. 916-294-4250 x 111 patrick@biddle.com Nina Le Tse 916.294.4250 x 128 nle@biddle.com www.biddle.com www.bcginstitute.org Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 2 BCG Institute for Workforce Development BCGi Standard Membership (free) Online community Monthly webinars on EEO compliance topics EEO Insight Journal (e-copy) BCGi Platinum Membership (paid) Fully interactive online community Includes validation/compensation analysis books EEO Tools including validation surveys and AI calculator EEO Insight Journal (e-copy and hardcopy) Members only webinars, training and much more Over 4500 members / 200+ webinars / 11,000 HRCI credits to-date www.bcginstitute.org

Agenda Adverse Impact Analyses: An Overview Collecting and Retaining Accurate Data: Analyses Must Reflect Reality Component Step Analyses Creating Disposition Codes Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 4 Recent OFCCP Settlements Baldor Electric Co. Production and Laborer Positions 795 Women and Minority Applicants $2,000,000 in damages 50 job offers FedEx Ground Package Inc. and FedEx SmartPost Inc. Package Handler Positions 21,635 applicants (both genders/multiple races) $3,000,000 in damages 1,703 job offers Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 5 Adverse Impact Analyses: An Overview Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 6

Disparate Impact Analyses: A Legal Overview An unlawful employment practice based on disparate impact is established only if: A complaining party demonstrates that a respondent uses a particular employment practice that causes an adverse impact, and the respondent fails to demonstrate that the challenged practice is jobrelated for the position in question and consistent with business necessity, or the complaining party makes the demonstration described above with respect to an alternate employment practice, and the respondent refuses to adopt such alternative employment practice. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 7 Title VII Disparate Impact Discrimination Flowchart How selection processes are challenged... 1. Plaintiff Burden 2. Defense Burden 3. Plaintiff Burden Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 8 Burden 1 (Plaintiff): Selection Rate Comparison Evaluate whether a practice, procedure or test (PPT) results in disproportionate selection rates by gender, race/ethnicity, or age group. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 9

Burden 1 (Plaintiff): Selection Rate Comparison Adverse/Disparate Impact Analysis Impact Ratio Analysis (IRA) 80% test Men Pass (50) Women Pass (25) Men Fail (50) Women Fail (75) Men Passing Rate (50%) Women Passing Rate (25%) Results in a value indicating if the observed difference in rates is not likely due to chance (i.e., statistically significant). Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 10 Burden 1 (Plaintiff): Selection Rate Comparison Male v. Female (Overall Analysis) Step Start Complete Completion Rate (%) Overall (App vs. Hired) Male - 100 Female - 100 Male - 50 Female - 30 50.0 30.0 Result 2.81 SD This overall analysis (i.e., applied v. hired) is the basis for the OFCCP investigation This is the data that is typically submitted in response to the audit It may be by AAP job group or individual job title Extreme caution/care should be taken to clean the data (i.e., ensure the data accurately reflects reality) Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 11 So if Adverse Impact is Such a Big Deal, What Can I Do About It? Collecting/Retaining Accurate Data (i.e., Analyses Must Reflect Reality) Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 12

Analyses Must Reflect Reality Analyses must reflect reality! Sounds simple... right?!?!?! Incorrect applicant data is the number one data-related technical violation in OFCCP conciliation agreements. As recruiters and hiring managers, you are on the front line in the battle to collect accurate data. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 13 Analyses Must Reflect Reality The proper collection of applicant data involves a lot of moving parts: A robust Applicant Tracking System (ATS) Proper configuration of the ATS Proper usage of the ATS by all personnel Proper report generation Proper integration of the regulations It is rare that all of these parts work perfectly together to generate accurate data on all occasions, as a result, clean-up is often necessary Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 14 Analyses Must Reflect Reality The Four (4) Prongs of Internet Applicant: 1.The job seeker submits an expression of interest in employment through the internet or related electronic data technologies; 2.The contractor considers the job seeker for employment in a particular position; 3.The job seeker s expression of interest indicates the individual possesses the basic qualifications for the position; and 4.The job seeker at no point in the contractor s selection process prior to receiving an offer of employment from the contractor, removes himself or herself from further consideration or otherwise indicates that he or she is no longer interested in the position Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 15

Analyses Must Reflect Reality Remove all applicants who: Actively withdrew (e.g., no longer interested, accepted another position, moved away, etc.) Passively withdrew (e.g., does not respond to repeated attempts to contact, no show to test/interview, etc.) Were not willing (based on salary, location/commute, shift, etc.) Were not considered for a specific position o Considered: evaluated the applicant s substantive criteria (i.e., opened the record and looked at it) o Specific position: Specific job title and/or requisition o Considering an applicant requires that you retain their data for (currently) two years, however, the record is only included in the analyses if they are considered for a specific position Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 16 Analyses Must Reflect Reality Remove all applicants who: Applied after the last hire of the at-issue time period (they couldn t have been considered for any of the at-issue hires) Applied more than once to the same position/requisition (leave one record - leaving all records will yield misleading results) Were hired elsewhere within your organization (leave them as applicant for the position they were hired into - leaving all records will yield misleading results) Did not meet the Basic Qualifications (Remember to identify which specific BQ was not met) Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 17 Analyses Must Reflect Reality Also ensure: All applicants are properly dispositioned at the close of each requisition All hires appear in the applicant file (in the proper applicant pool) The job title, gender, and race of the applicant record is reconciled with the hires file Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 18

You Mean We re Required to Analyze All of the Steps Too! Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 19 Component Step Analyses Title VII of 1964/1991 Civil Rights Act An unlawful employment practice based on disparate impact is established under this title only if a complaining party demonstrates that a respondent uses a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact... Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 20 Component Step Analyses Important Note: Enforcement agencies have every right to investigate the practices, procedures, and tests (i.e., the individual steps ) contractors use to screen applicants. However, in the past, due to resource constraints they wouldn t typically do so unless there was adverse impact in the overall hiring process. Times have changed! Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 21

Component Step Analyses Male v. Female Steps Start Complete Completion Rate (%) Overall (App vs. Hired) 1. Basic Qualifications Male - 100 Female - 100 Male - 100 Female -100 2. Test Male - 79 Female - 77 3. Interview Male - 65 Female - 35 4. Final Selection Male - 60 Female - 32 Male - 50 Female - 30 Male 79 Female - 77 Male 65 Female - 35 Male 60 Female - 32 Male 50 Female - 30 50.0 30.0 79.0 77.0 82.3 45.5 92.3 91.4 83.3 93.8 Result 2.81 SD 0.25 SD 4.80 SD 0.18 SD 0.00 SD Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 22 Component Step Analyses At the heart of a welldeveloped (compliant) ATS are disposition codes. A disposition code is a device that identifies ALL specific decisions or actions that have been taken relative to an Applicant. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 23 Component Step Analyses Will one set of disposition codes suffice? Job #1: General Job #2: Above-Entry Job #3: Entry-Level 1. Application Screening 1. Application Screening 1. Application Screening 2. Written Test 2. Written Test 2. Data Mgmt Technique 3. Selection for Interview 3. Selection for Interview #1 3. Interview 4. Interview/Hire 4. Interview #1 4. Hire 5. Selection for Interview #2 6. Interview #2 7. Post-Offer Assessments 8. Hire What if all jobs were forced to use the same codes? How would you analyze Interview #2 if the code simply states Passed Interview? Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 24

Creating Disposition Codes Step 1: Choose a high-volume, entry-level position This will help to prioritize based on legal exposure and number of applicants/hires Step 2: Create a flowchart of the selection process This is helpful in the event of an audit, and will also be beneficial when creating disposition codes Step 3: Create disposition codes aligned with each step in the selection process It is a balance to create enough codes to capture all necessary data, but not too many to become overly cumbersome Codes must allow analysis of each step (Ideally) Include secondary codes to track more granular detail (e.g., which BQ did they fail, which post-offer assessment did they fail, etc.) Step 4: Create additional codes that allow for refinements based on the definition of internet applicant (e.g., withdrawals, not willing, etc.) Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 25 Sample Disposition Codes 1. Application Received 2. Not an Applicant a) Did not complete online application process b) Lied on application c) Not considered for a specific position d) Not considered for a specific position - DMT 3. Not Interested a) Shift b) Location c) Salary d) Hours 4. Passed Basic Qualification Screening 5. Failed Basic Qualification Screening a) Age b) Licenses (ex. CDL) c) Lifting (ex. 50lbs.) d) Education (ex. Bachelor s Degree) This is just a starting point specific disposition codes must be created to match your organization s hiring/selection processes. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 26 Sample Disposition Codes 6. Invited to Take Written Test No Show 7. Invited to Take Written Test Unable to Contact 8. Failed Written Test 9. Passed Written Test Forwarded to Specific Requisition 10. Not Selected for Interview 11. Invited for Interview No Show 12. Invited for Interview Unable to Contact 13. Failed Interview 14. Offer of Employment Declined 15. Offer Accepted Failed Drug Test 16. Offer Accepted Failed Medical 17. Offer Accepted Failed Background 18. Offer Accepted No Show 19. Offer Accepted Hired IMPORTANT: It is highly recommended that hiring managers be required to use a pull-down of articulated legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for nonadvancement in the process. Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 27

(Ideal) ATS Data Aside from tracking disposition codes, the most robust ATS will also track dates each applicant was subjected to each step allowing for the easiest analysis of each step. Req. No. App. No. App. Rec. Written Test Interview 1 Interview 2 Offer Made Hired 123 34535 1/23/2012 1/27/2012 2/15/2012 123 34536 2/5/2012 2/15/2012 123 34537 2/14/2012 2/15/2012 2/19/2012 3/19/2012 123 34538 3/8/2012 3/12/2012 3/15/2012 3/19/2012 3/20/2012 3/20/2012 123 34539 3/10/2012 3/12/2012 Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 28 Legal Implications for Employers 1. Lack of recordkeeping and documentation is the number one datarelated technical violation in conciliation agreements 2. The OFCCP s primary focus remains adverse impact in the hiring process (which is intimately tied to the ATS) 3. An inability to analyze the steps in the selection process leaves an employer vulnerable and unable to rebut overall adverse impact 4. Adverse impact in hiring leads to millions of dollars in make-whole relief by the OFCCP 5. Irrespective of the OFCCP, tracking this information is required by law and can leave employers vulnerable to Title VII claims (where the serious damage can occur) Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 29 Summary and Recommendations 1. Adverse impact in hiring continues to be the OFCCP s highest priority (with the most potential financial damages) 2. Accurate and detailed applicant data is crucial to ensuring analyses reflect reality 3. Collecting accurate and detailed applicant data requires a comprehensive strategy including: A robust Applicant Tracking System (ATS) Proper configuration of the system to track applicants throughout the selection processes Proper training on usage of the system Proper reporting of data within the system Periodic evaluation and monitoring of data within the system with feedback for users 4. Recruiters and hiring managers are on the front lines when it comes to collecting and retaining accurate and complete applicant data Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 30

Copyright 2012 BCG, Inc. 31