Evaluation of Water Quality Effects of Stormwater Pond Construction in Horry County, South Carolina

Similar documents
ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT IN COASTAL CAROLINAS

Outer Cove Brook Network

Heated pavement surfaces transfer thermal energy to stormwater runoff. Typical impact is short term temperature spikes in receiving waters

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

July 29, Report Date: September 8, 2009 Technical Report #

CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH OCEAN OUTFALL PROGRAM

POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FOR TYPICAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN FLORIDA

Outer Cove Brook Network

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Relationship Between Bacteria and Conventional Water Quality Parameters

Abstract. Introduction

Sources and Persistence of E. coli in Inland Texas Streams

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Pollutant Source Tracking Unique Tools to Identify Sources of Pollution in Waterbodies

Attachment 1. Categorical Summary of BMP Performance Data for Solids (TSS, TDS, and Turbidity) Contained in the International Stormwater BMP Database

Infiltration Stormwater Control Measures. Andrew R. Anderson, M.S., E.I.T. Extension Associate Engineer

South Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008

OPERATING CONTROLLED DRAINAGE AND SUBIRRIGATION SYSTEMS

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

fcgov.com/water-quality Water Quality Update Summer 2017 Monitoring and Protecting Our Water Sources

Section Treatment of Sewage and Stormwater

Stormwater Treatment Wetlands

Field Evaluation of Indicator Bacteria Removal by Stormwater BMPs in North Carolina

Results of Water Quality Measurements in Messer Pond Bob Crane, Messer Pond Protective Association (MPPA) Board

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Richland County Department of Public Works Engineering (Land Development) Division

Performance Assessment of an Iron-Enhanced Sand Filtration Trench for Capturing Dissolved Phosphorus

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

CACHE VALLEY STORM WATER DESIGN STANDARDS. As Amended by Logan City November 2010

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) FLEXSTORM Inlet Filter

01719; PH (978) ; FAX (978) ; PH (503) ; FAX (503) ;

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

GULF OF MEXICO - SEGMENT 2501

Mayo Renewable Power Killala Construction Works Monthly Environmental Report 010 April 2016

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Overview of NCDOT s Stormwater Research Program

Stormwater as an Alternative Source of Water Supply: Feasibility and Implications for Watershed Management 1

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for the Reduction of Total Suspended Solids in Agricultural Runoff

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

ALMY POND TMDL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Indicator Bacteria Removal by Bioretention in North Carolina

Using Innovative Technologies to Mitigate Phosphorus Impacts from Urban and Ag Runoff

Stormwater Management at San Diego International Airport

Wet Detention Ponds, MCTTs, and other Options for Critical Area Stormwater Control. Robert Pitt University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

FocalPoint as an Acceptable Alternative Biofiltration Practice

Tidal Creek Ecosystems: Consequences of Rapid Coastal Development

Reading the River 2006 Water Study Sixth Grade Science Mindy Fry Kenton County

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Modeling Surface Water Contamination

SAN BERNARD RIVER WATER QUALITY MODEL UPDATE. August 18, 2011

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

Evaluation of the potential implementation of a FWS within an Italian natural wetland for the area restoration and maintenance: Torre Flavia Wetland

A. Manufactured Treatment Device Characteristics

Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals

DESIGN BULLETIN #16/2003 (Revised July 2007) Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas.

Water Quality in the Saco River: Indicators of Watershed Health

Effectiveness of Coanda Screens for Removal of Sediment, Nutrients, and Metals from Urban Runoff

Grants Pass Water Quality Monitoring

Monitoring. Floating Islands. Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment May Plan. Public Lands

9.93 lbs lbs 3/31/2012. McGee Watershed 12 cups of sediment. City Hall Watershed 6.1 cups of sediment. 6,700 SF Watershed. 7,700 SF Watershed

Estero Americano Watershed Sediment Reduction Project, Phase II, Sonoma and Marin Counties, CA. Draft Quarterly Monitoring Report Item B.4.

Decomposition Study of Grass and Leaves

Goose Management through Habitat Restoration

Appendix B. Box Plots of Water Quality Data

Estimated Construction Cost: $30,000-$110,000

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS: An Overview of the Technology

SOP 1: Dry Weather Outfall Inspection SOP 1: DRY WEATHER OUTFALL INSPECTION. Introduction

Property Management: Protecting Your Stormwater Facilities

2009 Columbia River Water Quality Monitoring Data Report

Melissa L. Partyka & Ronald F. Bond Western Center for Food Safety University of California-Davis March 1 st, 2017 Annual Walnut Production Meeting

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

Water management: Table Of Contents

Reporting Period: 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

INTERMEDIATE BMI ASSESSMENT TIER 2 FIELD SHEET

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND 2017 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (SWMP) PLAN

CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN

9.2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

16.0 Water Quality Management Criteria for Developed Land

Report Date: September 30, 2009 Technical Report #

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021

Istokpoga Marsh Watershed Improvement District (IMWID) Minor Impoundment Project. May 23, 2012

Chapter 2. The Great Lakes Protection Fund. Watershed Flow Regime Restoration Evaluaton Process Developing Stormwater BMP Quality Gallon Metrics

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

The City of Cocoa (City) is located in east

Bacteria Source Identification Report

Appendix C. Soil Compost Amendment

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

USING MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING TO IDENTIFY FECAL CONTAMINATION SOURCES IN BOZEMAN CREEK BOZEMAN, MONTANA

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Transcription:

Evaluation of Quality Effects of Stormwater Construction in Horry County, South Carolina Environmental Quality Lab Burroughs & Chapin Center for Marine and Wetland Studies Coastal Carolina University February 2010

FINAL RESULTS SUMMARIES AND COMPARISONS for Evaluation of Effects of Detention Construction behind Surfside Bowl Bowling Alley on Highway 17 in Surfside Beach, South Carolina by Environmental Quality Lab Burroughs & Chapin Center for Marine and Wetland Studies Coastal Carolina University February 2010 RESULTS Summaries of field and laboratory measurement results for selected water characteristics and chemical parameters in runoff water in vicinity of Surfside Bowl bowling alley on Highway 17 in Surfside Beach both prior to and after construction of a runoff detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley are provided in Tables 1 through 4 and in Figures 1 through 10. Tables 1 and 2 summarize results for pre-construction samplings. Table 1 summarizes results for dry weather conditions (i.e., no rainfall for at least 72 hours prior to sampling event). Table 2 summarizes results for wet weather conditions (i.e., significant rainfall within 24 hours of sampling event). Tables 3 and 4, dry weather and wet weather, respectively, summarize results for post-construction samplings. Because the average values provided in the tables are in most cases averages of measurements on only two sampling dates, the ranges of the values are provided on the tables but confidence intervals for the averages were not determined. Figures 1 through 10 compare the pre-construction and post-construction results for individual parameters for all sampling sites. Because of the limited number of samples and measurements for each category (i.e., usually two), it was not possible to estimate representative error bars (i.e., confidence intervals) for the averages compared. In spite of the limited sampling events and limited measurements obtained, the comparisons provide several notable observations: Prior to construction of the enlarged pond behind the bowling alley, the concentration of enterococci bacteria on the average in water flowing into the small preexisting pond decreased by about 45% (range 0% to 84%) before flowing out of the pond (Figures 1 and 2). After completion of construction that enlarged the pond behind the bowling alley and establishment of vegetation around the pond, the concentration of enterococci bacteria on the average in water flowing into the pond decreased by about 82% (range 60% to 97%) before reaching the pond outlet (Figures 1 and 2). Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 1 of 12

Both prior to and after the best management practice (BMP) construction (i.e., runoff detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley), turbidity levels were generally low (i.e., <10 NTU), but the BMP construction did appear to reduce turbidity levels in the water at the pond s outlet in wet weather (Figures 3 and 4). During pre-construction sampling events (Tables 1 and 2), dissolved oxygen levels at all sites were within SC DHEC water quality standards for freshwater (i.e., >5 mg/l). After BMP construction (Tables 3 and 4), dissolved oxygen levels in water flowing into the pond in both dry and wet weather were below SC DHEC water quality standards for freshwater. The BMP construction activities included piping and covering some of the primary ditch flowing into the pond. Compared to pre-construction sampling events, the sunlight blocked from some of the ditch by post-construction piping probably hindered photosynthesis and oxygen production in the ditch water and the warmer temperatures during post-construction sampling (Figures 8 and 9) probably increased bacterial decomposition and oxygen consumption in the ditch water. Both prior to and after BMP construction, flows at the sampling sites were highly variable (Tables 1 4) with, as expected, higher flows during wet weather and increasing flows the further downstream the sampling site (Figure 10). It should be noted, however, that in both dry and wet weather after BMP construction flow out of the BMP pond into the outlet weir was never observed. All wet weather sampling was conducted one day or less after a rainstorm of at least 0.5 inches of precipitation. Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 2 of 12

Table 1. Summary of dry weather measurement results in runoff water in vicinity of Surfside Bowl bowling alley in Surfside Beach, South Carolina. Measurements were conducted prior to completion of construction of a detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley. Parameters and Units Enterococci bacteria (MPN/100mL) Turbidity (NTU) Conductivity (µs/cm) Oxygen (mg/l) Oxygen (% saturation) ph (-log H+ activity) Air Flow (L/sec) Flow (GPM) Applicable Quality Standards or Criteria <35 <25 >5.0 >6.5, <8.5 Average a b Concentrations, (Range of Concentrations), and ((Number of Samples)) Flowing Inflow Outflow from to Outflow 1785 (1317-2419) 3.1 (1.6 4.6) 380 (304 455) 6.14 (5.44 6.83) 66.0 (61.4 70.5) 7.12 (7.02 7.22) 19.1 (16.88 21.28) 25.5 (23 28) 16.1 (11.6 20.6) 255 (184 327) 835 (727-959) 6.55 (2.7 10.4) 356 (303 406) 6.51 (5.54 7.48) 69.9 (62.5 77.2) 7.06 (6.99 7.13) 19.0 (16.74 21.30) 25.5 (24 27) 21.6 (18.6 24.6) 342 (295 390) 1136 (821-1483) 3.6 c (3.1 4.1) 357 (317 397) 6.15 (5.20 7.17) 60.1 (41.0 69.9) 6.99 (6.87 7.11) 18.2 (14.74 21.58) 24.8 (22 27) 76.9 (67.8 81.7) 1219 (1074 1296) 89 (89) 4.1 (4.1) 357 (357) 9.62 (9.62) 95.5 (95.5) 7.61 (7.61) 15.1 (15.07) 23.0 (23) 85.8 (85.8) 1359 (1359) a For enterococci bacteria the average concentrations listed are geometric mean values. b No rainfall occurred within 72 hours of sampling. Sampling dates were 11/1/07 and 11/13/07, while last rainfall was on 10/27/07. c Turbidity measurements from 11/1/07 sampling not used because of substantial turbidity increase in ditch caused by construction activities at pond. Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 3 of 12

Table 2. Summary of wet weather measurement results in runoff water in vicinity of Surfside Bowl bowling alley in Surfside Beach, South Carolina. Measurements were conducted prior to completion of construction of a detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley. To equally weight results for individual sampling dates, this table was revised slightly from the Table 2 provided in the pre-construction results report issued 5/26/08. Parameters and Units Enterococci bacteria (MPN/100mL) Turbidity (NTU) Conductivity (µs/cm) Oxygen (mg/l) Oxygen (% saturation) ph (-log H+ activity) Air Flow (L/sec) Flow (GPM) Applicable Quality Standards or Criteria <35 <25 >5.0 >6.5, <8.5 Average a b Concentrations, (Range of Concentrations), and ((Number of Samples)) Flowing Inflow Outflow from to Outflow 6297 (3635-9677) 10.1 (4.0 16.1) 316 (172 462) 9.48 (9.13 9.78) 84.4 (8 88.5) 7.26 (7.18 7.35) 10.16 (9.34 10.90) 13.3 (13 14) 151 (31.5-270) 2395 (499 4287) 2520 (657-9677) 18.3 (3.7 32.8) 243 (132-354) 8.32 (7.05 9.59) 75.6 (64.4 86.7) 7.20 (7.14 7.26) 11.10 (10.85-11.34) 13 (13-13) 313 (8.1 619) 4968 (128 9808) 1738 (380-7945) 25.4 (5.5 45.3) 232 (130-334) 8.20 (6.71 9.69) 74.0 (60.4 87.5) 7.23 (7.19-7.27) 10.64 (10.46 10.82) 13.5 (13-14) 405 (45.2 764) 6417 (716 12117) 904 (626-1633) 13.4 (9.5 17.6) 372 (359-385) 9.36 (9.02 9.70) 87.2 (80.3-94.0) 7.74 (7.68-7.79) 12.13 (10.37-13.89) 13 (13 13) 389 (69.0 709.7) 6172 (1094 11250) a For enterococci bacteria the average concentrations listed are geometric mean values. b Heavy rainfall (i.e., >0.3 inches) occurred within 24 hours of sampling. Sampling dates were 12/16/07 and 1/17/08. Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 4 of 12

Table 3. Summary of dry weather measurement results in runoff water in vicinity of Surfside Bowl bowling alley in Surfside Beach, South Carolina. Measurements were conducted after completion of construction of a detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley. Parameters and Units Enterococci bacteria (MPN/100mL) Turbidity (NTU) Conductivity (µs/cm) Oxygen (mg/l) Oxygen (% saturation) ph (-log H+ activity) Air Flow (L/sec) Flow (GPM) Applicable Quality Standards or Criteria <35 <25 >5.0 >6.5, <8.5 Average a b Concentrations, (Range of Concentrations), and ((Number of Samples)) Flowing Inflow Outflow from to Outflow 10829 (7766-12098) 3.10 (2.42 4.63) 461 (437 484) 4.24 (2.97 5.50) 47.7 (36.9 58.3) 7.30 (7.18 7.42) 21.4 (17.3 25.6) 23.5 (17.0 32.0) 12.0 (10.2 14.3) 191 (162 227) 361 (108-1049) 5.50 (5.06 6.62) 409 (394 425) 9.16 (8.60 9.47) 109.5 (93.9 122.6) 7.43 (7.41 7.45) 23.4 (18.7 27.5) 25.8 (18.6 33.0) ( ) ( ) 529 (256-1094) 5.50 (3.86 7.13) 406 (393 420) 6.64 (6.43 6.85) 78.9 (70.3 87.4) 7.36 (7.26 7.47) 22.9 (19.0 26.8) 25.6 (20.1 31.0) 13.0 (11.6 14.4) 207 (184 229) 26.2 (10 68.7) 4.78 (3.66 5.91) 350 (300-400) 7.51 (6.89 8.13) 91.0 (90.2 91.8) 7.80 (7.51 8.08) 25.0 (20.5 29.4) 23.6 (17.1 3) 29.9 (22.0 37.7) 474 (350-598) a For enterococci bacteria the average concentrations listed are geometric mean values. b No rainfall occurred within 72 hours of sampling. Sampling dates were 6/22/09 and 11/3/09, while last rainfalls were on 6/16/09 and 10/31/09, respectively. Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 5 of 12

Table 4. Summary of wet weather measurement results in runoff water in vicinity of Surfside Bowl bowling alley in Surfside Beach, South Carolina. Measurements were conducted after completion of construction of a detention pond and covering the ditch next to the bowling alley. Parameters and Units Enterococci bacteria (MPN/100mL) Turbidity (NTU) Conductivity (µs/cm) Oxygen (mg/l) Oxygen (% saturation) ph (-log H+ activity) Air Flow (L/sec) Flow (GPM) Applicable Quality Standards or Criteria <35 <25 >5.0 >6.5, <8.5 Average a b Concentrations, (Range of Concentrations), and ((Number of Samples)) Flowing Inflow Outflow from to Outflow 5052 (2603-9804) 4.39 (3.23 5.55) 330 (300 359) 3.08 (2.73 3.43) 38.8 (34.2 43.4) 7.04 (6.91 7.18) 27.2 (26.5 27.9) 30.5 (29 32) 32.6 (20.1 45.0) 516 (319 714) 1242 (379-3255) 7.62 (5.50 9.90) 302 (281-322) 5.34 (4.54 6.15) 68.1 (57.2 79.0) 7.22 (7.14 7.27) 27.2 (26.6 27.7) 31 (30-33) ( ) ( ) 1722 (911-3255) 6.04 (5.36 6.73) 300 (284-317) 6.24 (5.92 6.56) 79.9 (75.2 84.6) 7.17 (7.10-7.24) 28.2 (27.5 28.9) 31 (29-33) 24.4 (17.9 31.0) 387 (283 491) 127 (80 177.5) 8.38 (3.77 9.92) 312 (251-372) 7.41 (5.54 9.28) 95.6 (70.1 121.4) 7.66 (7.17 8.16) 28.4 (27.2 29.7) 31 (30 32) 71.5 (0 143) 1134 (0 2268) a For enterococci bacteria the average concentrations listed are geometric mean values. b Heavy rainfall (i.e., >0.3 inches) occurred within 24 hours of sampling. Sampling dates were 6/17/09 and 7/14/09. Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 6 of 12

Figure 1. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - Enterococci Average Enterococci Bacteria (MPN/100 ml) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Inlet Inlet Figure 2. 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects Enterococci Bacteria Allow ed Vegetation to Establish Around BMP 0 9/1/07 11/1/07 1/1/08 3/1/08 5/1/08 7/1/08 9/1/08 11/1/08 1/1/09 3/1/09 5/1/09 7/1/09 9/1/09 11/1/09 Pre-BMP Dry Pre-BMP Wet Post-BMP Dry Post-BMP Wet Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 7 of 12

Figure 3. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - Turbidity 3 Average Turbidity (NTU) 25.0 2 15.0 1 5.0 Inlet Inlet Figure 4. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects Turbidity 35.00 Turbidity (NTU 30 25.00 20 15.00 10 5.00 0 9/1/07 12/1/07 3/1/08 6/1/08 Allow ed Vegetation to Establish Around BMP 9/1/08 12/1/08 3/1/09 6/1/09 9/1/09 12/1/09 Pre-BMP Dry Pre-BMP Wet Post-BMP Dry Post-BMP Wet Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 8 of 12

Figure 5. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - DO Average Oxygen (mg/l) 12.0 1 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 Inlet Inlet Figure 6. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - % DO Average Oxygen (%saturation) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Inlet Inlet Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 9 of 12

Figure 7. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - ph 8.00 Average ph (-logh+ activity) 7.80 7.60 7.40 7.20 7.00 6.80 6.60 6.40 Inlet Inlet Figure 8. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - Temp 3 Average (ºC) 25.0 2 15.0 1 5.0 Inlet Inlet Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 10 of 12

Figure 9. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - Air Temp Average Air temperature (ºC) 35.0 3 25.0 2 15.0 1 5.0 Inlet Inlet Figure 10. Surfside Bowling Alley BMP Effects - Flow 7000 6000 Average Flow (GPM) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Inlet Inlet Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 11 of 12

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions concerning the information provided or if you desire additional information. Sincerely yours, Joseph T. Bennett, Ph.D. Laboratory Technical Director (843) 349-2237 jbennett@coastal.edu Coastal Carolina University Environmental Quality Lab P.O. Box 261954 Conway, SC 29528-6054 Surfside Bowling Alley Final Results Report_Feb2010 Page 12 of 12