Noise Assessment Report

Similar documents
Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary

PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

Section 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas

CASE STUDY OF THE SOUND REDUCTION OF VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL GLAZING TREATMENTS

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

Acoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Environmental Assessment May 2007

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

H3. Residential Single House Zone

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

MAY 4, Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

Basement Renovation Guide For Residential Dwellings

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Buffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise

H3 Residential Single House Zone

H2. Residential Rural and Coastal Settlement Zone

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

Rural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies...

The Homeowner s Building Application Checklist for Constructing a Residential Addition

NYU Core: Post-EIS Façade Improvement Acoustical Assessment

Stantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON.

Gisborne District Council

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

One and Two Family Additions

5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

9. NOISE AND VIBRATION

STANDARDS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. (in the Low Density Residential zone)

City of High Point Airport Overlay District Noise Level Reduction Design Standards

SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES

3.1 Noise Overlay District

NIGHTTIME ILLUMINATION

Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area

Traffic Noise Analysis

Design Guidelines. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SECTION SPECIFICATIONS 3. HOUSE DESIGN RULES

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

RS-1 District Schedule

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

Australian Standard. Acoustics Road traffic noise intrusion Building siting and construction AS

WILL THE REAL R-VALUE PLEASE STAND UP

Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment

US 53 Noise Mitigation

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

HAINE ROAD, RAMSGATE NOISE ASSESSMENT

What is Noise? In daily life, noise means unwanted sound.

Appendix H. Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers

APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS

Noise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES

RS-2 District Schedule

Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms

SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE MITIGATION

Evaluating Appropriate Residential Ventilation Strategies in Dense Urban Environments and the Challenges for Passive Design

WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT SAMPLE PLAN

2016 MUTCD CONCEPT TTC COMMENTS. Michael A. Chacon Traffic Operations Division

5.8 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE

Transcription:

Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT... 1 1.2 LOCATION... 1 2.0 NOISE LEVEL CRITERIA... 2 2.1 GUIDELINES... 2 3.0 OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS... 5 3.1 NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS... 5 3.2 ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES... 5 3.3 PROJECTED NOISE LEVELS... 6 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 13 4.1 NOISE IMPACTS... 13 4.2 INDOOR NOISE MITIGATION AIF METHOD... 13 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Noise Criteria for Residential Land Use... 3 Table 2 Combination of Road and Rail Noise Daytime Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements... 3 Table 3 Combination of Road and Rail Noise, Night-Time Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements... 4 Table 4 Road and Rail Noise Building Component Requirements... 4 Table 5 Traffic Volumes Greenfield Avenue and Main Street, 2-Lane Urban Arterial... 5 Table 6 Traffic Volumes Highway 417, 8-Lane Highway... 6 Table 7 Distance Adjustment Factor... 7 Table 8 Summary of Projected Unattenuated Noise Levels... 7 Table 9 AIF Summary... 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 176 Greenfield Avenue Development... 2 Figure 2 Indoor Receiver Sites Plan View... 8 Figure 3 Outdoor Receiver Sites Plan View... 9 Figure 4 Indoor Noise Clauses Daytime... 10 Figure 5 Indoor Noise Clauses Nighttime... 11 Figure 6 Outdoor Noise Clauses... 12 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS... A.1 A.1 Indoor Receiver Stamson Reports... A.2 A.2 Outdoor Receiver Stamson Reports... A.3

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D NOISE WARNING CLAUSES... B.1 AIF AND BUILDING COMPONENTS... C.1 ORNAMENT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT SECTION 5.5... D.1

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT Stantec Consulting Ltd. has been retained by TC United Group to prepare an environmental noise assessment for the proposed 3 storey student apartment at 176 Greenfield Avenue, located in Ottawa East in the City of Ottawa. A site plan control application is being prepared and a Noise Assessment Study is required to address City policies regarding residential development adjacent to highways and arterial roads. The purpose of this report is to: outline the Ministry s guidelines and criteria for noise levels and residential land use; apply the noise level standards of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment to the site in conjunction with the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (2006); determine the extent to which noise levels will be of concern to future residents of the proposed development, using the computerized version (STAMSON 5.03) of the M.O.E. s noise model; and outline recommendations for noise attenuation, as necessary, to achieve acceptable noise levels for future residents of the proposed development. This report has been revised to reflect City of Ottawa Comments received on January 21, 2016. 1.2 LOCATION The site is located along Greenfield Avenue, east of Main Street and north of Highway 417. The proposed site is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed development consists of 6-bedroom suites on each floor including common living area. This report will focus on the rooms with exposure to Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417. Surrounding land uses are as follows: north existing residential east existing residential south existing residential and Highway 417 west existing residential and commercial The main potential noise source that may impact the subject site is vehicular traffic and the volumes for these roadways are based on the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines. 1

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Figure 1 176 Greenfield Avenue Development 176 Greenfield Ave 2.0 NOISE LEVEL CRITERIA 2.1 GUIDELINES The Ontario Ministry of Environment (M.O.E.) has produced guidelines for noise levels for use in noise assessment and land use planning. Noise level criteria for residential land use are summarized in Table 1 below. Noise levels in excess of the guidelines presented are acceptable under certain conditions and with certain provisions. 2

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Table 1 Noise Criteria for Residential Land Use Location 7 a.m. - 11 p.m. 11 p.m. - 7 a.m. Outdoor Living Areas 55 dba N/A Indoor Living Areas 55 dba at plane of living room windows 50 dba at plane of bedroom windows Table 2 and Table 3 set out noise levels in excess of the criteria and the required provisions to allow residential activity in locations where noise level criteria are expected. Table 2 Combination of Road and Rail Noise Daytime Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Location Outdoor Living Area Plane of Living Room Window Leq (16 hr) (dba) Leq16hr less than or equal to 55 dba Leq16hr greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 60 dba Leq16hr greater than 60 dba Leq 16 hr less than or equal to 55 dba Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 65 dba Greater than 65 dba Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause N/A None required Not required N/A N/A Control measures (barriers) may not be required but should be considered Control measures (barriers) required to reduce the Leq to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible Required if resultant Leq exceeds 55 dba Type A Required if resultant Leq exceeds 55 dba Type B None required N/A Not required Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Central air conditioning N/A N/A Required Type C Required Type D (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) 3

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Noise Level Criteria February 8, 2016 Table 3 Combination of Road and Rail Noise, Night-Time Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Location Plane of Bedroom Window Leq (8 hr) (dba) Greater than 50 dba to less or equal to 60 dba Ventilation Requirements Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Warning Clause Required Type C Greater than 60 dba Central air conditioning Required Type D (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) The M.O.E. also specifies building component requirements when indoor noise levels exceed the criteria by certain levels. These requirements are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Road and Rail Noise Building Component Requirements Location Leq (16 hr) (dba) Building Component Requirements Plane of Living Room Window - Daytime Road Less than or equal to 65 dba Greater than 65 dba Rail Less than or equal to 60 dba Greater than 60 dba Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Location Leq (8 hr) (dba) Building Component Requirements Plane of Bedroom Window - Nighttime Road Less than or equal to 60 dba Greater than 60 dba Rail Less than or equal to 55 dba Greater than 55 dba Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Building compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria (Source: Ministry of the Environment, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning: Requirements, Procedures and Implementation, October 1997) 4

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, 2016 3.0 OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS 3.1 NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS Noise predictions in this report were completed using the computerized version (STAMSON 5.03) of the M.O.E. noise model ORNAMENT to calculate noise levels from various sources. The program accepts variables related to noise sources and receivers, road traffic volumes, and the nature and extent of noise mitigation features, if required. 3.2 ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volume data for Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417 were provided by the City of Ottawa document Environmental Noise Control Guidelines. The document indicates that the average annual daily traffic volume for Greenfield Avenue and Main Street will be 15,000 vehicles per day for a 2-lane urban arterial and Highway 417 will be 146,664 vehicles for an 8-lane highway. Additional information regarding applicable assumptions and ratios for day/night traffic and car/ truck traffic is summarized as follows: heavy truck traffic for this segment is estimated to be 5% of total traffic volume; medium truck traffic for this segment is estimated to be 7% of total traffic volume; the rest is assumed to be car traffic; daytime (7 am 11 pm) traffic is assumed to be 92%, with the remaining 8% at night (11 pm 7 am); and the speed limit for Greenfield Avenue and Main Street is 50 km/hr and Highway 417 is 100 km/h Table 5 and Table 6 summarize the traffic volumes used for calculations in this report. Table 5 Traffic Volumes Greenfield Avenue and Main Street, 2-Lane Urban Arterial Day Night Total Car 12,144 1,056 13,200 Medium Truck 966 84 1,050 Heavy Truck 690 60 750 TOTAL 13,800 1,200 15,000 Speed Limit 50 km/hr Gradient Approx. 1% Surface Asphalt 5

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, 2016 Table 6 Traffic Volumes Highway 417, 8-Lane Highway Day Night Total Car 118,739 10,325 129,064 Medium Truck 9,445 821 10,266 Heavy Truck 6,747 587 7,333 TOTAL 134,931 11,733 146,664 Speed Limit 100 km/hr Gradient Approx. 5% Surface Note Asphalt 4.0m noise barrier provided along edge of roadway Housing row partially blocking basement to 2nd floor Approximate grade differential of 4.5m from receiver to roadway 3.3 PROJECTED NOISE LEVELS Using the M.O.E. noise model, ORNAMENT, noise levels were calculated for daytime conditions at the point representing the anticipated building location, based on the site plan prepared for TC United Group. The resulting receiver sites are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3 and the noise clauses are illustrated in Figure 4 through Figure 6. The receiver heights for indoor, daytime, and nighttime noise level calculations for the proposed buildings were completed at the mid-height of each floor. To account for the distance from the receivers along Greenfield Avenue that were under 15 metres, the Ornament methodology outlined in Section 5.5 of the Ornament Technical Document was applied. This distance adjustment factor is based on a reference 15.0 m receiversource distance and applied to generate the Ornament output for typical receivers. While it was developed for distances between 15.0m and 500.0m, it is felt that it will closely approximate distances slightly below 15.0m. The adjustment factor will be added to the 15.0m noise level to increase the resultant noise level for mitigation purposes. The adjustment factor calculation if as follows: 6

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Observations and Calculations February 8, 2016 Table 7 Distance Adjustment Factor Equation : Ad = 10 (1 + α) log (Dref / D) α = 0.75 (1 heff / 25) Inputs: Dref = 15.0 D = 13.5 α = 0.66 heff basement = 3m α = 0.57 heff 1st = 5.94m α = 0.49 heff 2nd = 8.76m α = 0.40 heff 3rd = 11.58m Adjustment Factors Basement = 0.76 dba 1st Floor = 0.72 dba 2nd Floor = 0.68 dba 3rd Floor = 0.64 dba The unattenuated receiver noise levels have been summarized in Table 8 and noise level calculations are provided in Appendix A for daytime and nighttime building face noise levels and daytime outdoor noise levels. Table 8 Summary of Projected Unattenuated Noise Levels Receiver Site Location Daytime- Building Face (dba) Nighttime- Building Face (dba) Noise Clause Requirement R1 Basement 68.4 60.8 Clause D R2 1 st Floor 68.3 60.7 Clause D R3 2 nd Floor 68.3 60.7 Clause D R4 3 rd Floor 68.2 60.6 Clause D R5 Basement (rear) 62.1 54.5 Clause C R6 1 st Floor (rear) 63.1 56.5 Clause C R7 2 nd Floor (rear) 66.1 58.5 Clause D R8 3 rd Floor (rear) 68.3 60.7 Clause D R9 Outdoor Amenity Space 59.6 - Clause A Note: bold noise levels identify dba values exceeding MOE criteria 7

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, 2016 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 NOISE IMPACTS Predicted noise levels are above City of Ottawa and M.O.E. criteria at the daytime building face and the nighttime building face for potential units with exposure to Greenfield Avenue, Main Street and Highway 417. The following summarizes the measures required by the City of Ottawa and MOE criteria for the development to occur within accepted standards: Noise Warning Clause A is to be included in all offers of purchase and sale for the site due to the economic and technical feasibility of providing mitigation to Highway 417. Central air conditioning is to be installed in the building, inclusive of all floors. Noise Warning Clause D is to be included in all offers of purchase and sale of the building, inclusive of all floors. Noise warning clauses are provided in Appendix B. 4.2 INDOOR NOISE MITIGATION AIF METHOD For the floors and rooms requiring Noise Warning Clause D, the following building components will apply based on the Acoustical Insulation Factor (AIF) method, as per Environmental Noise Assessment in Land Use Planning Manual, 1999. The AIF value and minimum building component were based off the preliminary unit floor plans. The calculated noise levels requiring mitigation were 68.1 dba at the north side of the building during the daytime and 59.4 dba at the south side of the building during the nighttime. These noise levels were used to determine the typical building components required for the building façade. Table 9 summarizes the AIF values and minimum building components and Appendix C provides the floor plans and sample calculations. Table 9 AIF Summary Floor Room Wall AIF Value Type of Window Glazing Basement Type of Exterior Wall Unit 1 Living Area 1 31 2 (6) 2 EW1 4 31 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 1 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 2 4 23 n/a EW1 13

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, 2016 1 st & 2 nd Floor 3 rd Floor Unit 2 Living Area 1 29 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 29 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 1 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 2 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 3 2 23 n/a EW1 Unit 1 Living Area 1 31 2 (22) 2 EW1 4 31 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 1 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 2 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 3 4 23 n/a EW1 Unit 2 Living Area 1 29 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 29 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 1 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 2 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 3 2 27 n/a EW1 Unit 1 Living Area 1 31 2 (22) 2 EW1 4 31 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 1 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 2 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 3 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW1 4 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bedroom 4 *3 *24 n/a EW1 Unit 2 Living Area 1 29 2 (15) 2 EW1 2 29 n/a EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 1 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 2 2 26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 3 2 23 n/a EW1 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bedroom 4 *3 *26 2 (6) 2 EW1 Note: Wall 1 is closest in proximity to adjacent noise source As the noise levels exceed the MOE Criteria, building components include walls and windows are to be designed so the indoor sound levels comply with MOE noise criteria by using *EW1 as illustrated above. In this situation, double glazed windows with 2mm thickness and various spacing outlined above would be required the building. Windows with an equivalent AIF may be substituted for the recommended thickness, glazing and spacing. E.g. a double glazed 3mm pane with 6mm spacing may be substituted for double glazed 2mm panes with 15mm pacing. 14

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Conclusions and Recommendations February 8, 2016 *EW1 construction consists of: 12.7 mm gypsum board, vapour barrier, and 38x89 studs with 50 mm mineral wool or glass fibre batts in inner stud cavities. As well as sheathing and wood siding or metal siding and fibre backer board. Should the actual floor plans differ from the plans shown in Appendix C, updated calculations must be performed prior to the issuance of building permits. The inclusion of these measures will allow the residential development to proceed in accordance with MOE criteria with respect to environmental noise. Respectfully submitted by: Darren Scott, P.Eng., Project Manager Andrew Harte, P.Eng., Transportation Engineer 15

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 Appendix A NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 A.1 INDOOR RECEIVER STAMSON REPORTS

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 19-11-2015 11:14:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 1 - Indoor Basement Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -83.00 deg 57.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -23.00 deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 52.70 / 52.70 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 67.39 + 0.00) = 67.39 dba -83 57 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.39 Segment Leq : 67.39 dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 55.09 + 0.00) = 55.09 dba -23 6 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.09 Segment Leq : 55.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 67.64 dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) --------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 59.79 + 0.00) = 59.79 dba -83 57 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.79

Segment Leq : 59.79 dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) --------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 47.50 + 0.00) = 47.50 dba -23 6 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 Segment Leq : 47.50 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.04 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.64 (NIGHT): 60.04 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 19-11-2015 11:15:49 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 2 - Indoor 1st Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -83.00 deg 57.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00

Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -23.00 deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 52.70 / 52.70 m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 67.39 + 0.00) = 67.39 dba -83 57 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.39 Segment Leq : 67.39 dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 55.09 + 0.00) = 55.09 dba -23 6 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.09 Segment Leq : 55.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 67.64 dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) --------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 59.79 + 0.00) = 59.79 dba -83 57 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.79 Segment Leq : 59.79 dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) --------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 47.50 + 0.00) = 47.50 dba -23 6 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 Segment Leq : 47.50 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.04 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.64 (NIGHT): 60.04

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 19-11-2015 11:14:05 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 3 - Indoor 2nd Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -83.00 deg 57.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -23.00 deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 52.70 / 52.70 m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 67.39 + 0.00) = 67.39 dba -83 57 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.39 Segment Leq : 67.39 dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 55.09 + 0.00) = 55.09 dba -23 6 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.09 Segment Leq : 55.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 67.64 dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) --------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 59.79 + 0.00) = 59.79 dba -83 57 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.79

Segment Leq : 59.79 dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) --------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 47.50 + 0.00) = 47.50 dba -23 6 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 Segment Leq : 47.50 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.04 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.64 (NIGHT): 60.04 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 19-11-2015 11:16:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 4 - Indoor 3rd Floor Road data, segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) ---------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Greenfield (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -83.00 deg 57.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 10.08 / 10.08 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Main (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 1 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 15000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00

Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: Main (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -23.00 deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : 52.70 / 52.70 m Receiver height : 10.08 / 10.08 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Greenfield (day) ------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 67.39 + 0.00) = 67.39 dba -83 57 0.00 68.48 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.39 Segment Leq : 67.39 dba Results segment # 2: Main (day) ------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 55.09 + 0.00) = 55.09 dba -23 6 0.00 68.48 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.09 Segment Leq : 55.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 67.64 dba Results segment # 1: Greenfield (night) --------------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 59.79 + 0.00) = 59.79 dba -83 57 0.00 60.88 0.00 0.00-1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.79 Segment Leq : 59.79 dba Results segment # 2: Main (night) --------------------------------- ROAD (0.00 + 47.50 + 0.00) = 47.50 dba -23 6 0.00 60.88 0.00-5.46-7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.50 Segment Leq : 47.50 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.04 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.64 (NIGHT): 60.04

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 02-02-2016 10:11:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 5 - Indoor Basement - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 118739/10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 146664 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 46.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 1 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 89.70 / 89.70 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 46.00 deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 71.60 / 71.60 m Source elevation : 72.00 m Receiver elevation : 67.50 m Barrier elevation : 72.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ---------------------------------- Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 1.50! 0.59! 72.59 ROAD (0.00 + 62.09 + 0.00) = 62.09 dba -90 46 0.53 85.25 0.00-11.85-2.09 0.00-9.00 0.00 62.31-90 46 0.29 85.25 0.00-9.98-1.74 0.00 0.00-11.43 62.09 Segment Leq : 62.09 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.09 dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) ------------------------------------ Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 1.50! 0.59! 72.59 ROAD (0.00 + 54.49 + 0.00) = 54.49 dba -90 46 0.29 77.65 0.00-9.98-1.74 0.00 0.00-11.43 54.49 Segment Leq : 54.49 dba Total Leq All Segments: 54.49 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 62.09 (NIGHT): 54.49

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 02-02-2016 10:11:10 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 6 - Indoor 1st Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 118739/10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 146664 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 46.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 1 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 89.70 / 89.70 m Receiver height : 4.44 / 4.44 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 46.00 deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 71.60 / 71.60 m Source elevation : 72.00 m Receiver elevation : 67.50 m Barrier elevation : 72.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ---------------------------------- Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 4.44! 1.18! 73.18 ROAD (0.00 + 63.11 + 0.00) = 63.11 dba -90 46 0.44 85.25 0.00-11.16-1.97 0.00-9.00 0.00 63.11-90 46 0.20 85.25 0.00-9.30-1.60 0.00 0.00-10.27 64.08 Segment Leq : 63.11 dba Total Leq All Segments: 63.11 dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) ------------------------------------ Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 4.44! 1.18! 73.18 ROAD (0.00 + 56.48 + 0.00) = 56.48 dba -90 46 0.20 77.65 0.00-9.30-1.60 0.00 0.00-10.27 56.48 Segment Leq : 56.48 dba Total Leq All Segments: 56.48 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.11 (NIGHT): 56.48

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 02-02-2016 10:09:25 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 7 - Indoor 2nd Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 118739/10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 146664 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 46.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 89.70 / 89.70 m Receiver height : 7.26 / 7.26 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 46.00 deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 71.60 / 71.60 m Source elevation : 72.00 m Receiver elevation : 67.50 m Barrier elevation : 72.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ---------------------------------- Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 7.26! 1.75! 73.75 ROAD (0.00 + 66.13 + 0.00) = 66.13 dba -90 46 0.11 85.25 0.00-8.64-1.44 0.00 0.00-9.03 66.13 Segment Leq : 66.13 dba Total Leq All Segments: 66.13 dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) ------------------------------------ Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 7.26! 1.75! 73.75 ROAD (0.00 + 58.54 + 0.00) = 58.54 dba -90 46 0.11 77.65 0.00-8.64-1.44 0.00 0.00-9.03 58.54 Segment Leq : 58.54 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.54 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 66.13 (NIGHT): 58.54

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 02-02-2016 10:10:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r8.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 8 - Indoor 3rd Floor - Rear Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 118739/10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 146664 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 46.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 89.70 / 89.70 m Receiver height : 10.08 / 10.08 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 46.00 deg Barrier height : 4.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 71.60 / 71.60 m Source elevation : 72.00 m Receiver elevation : 67.50 m Barrier elevation : 72.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ---------------------------------- Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 10.08! 2.32! 74.32 ROAD (0.00 + 68.30 + 0.00) = 68.30 dba -90 46 0.03 85.25 0.00-7.98-1.28 0.00 0.00-7.69 68.30 Segment Leq : 68.30 dba Total Leq All Segments: 68.30 dba Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (night) ------------------------------------ Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 10.08! 2.32! 74.32 ROAD (0.00 + 60.70 + 0.00) = 60.70 dba -90 46 0.03 77.65 0.00-7.98-1.28 0.00 0.00-7.69 60.70 Segment Leq : 60.70 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.70 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 68.30 (NIGHT): 60.70

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix A Noise Level Calculations February 8, 2016 A.2 OUTDOOR RECEIVER STAMSON REPORTS

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 02-02-2016 15:20:33 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r9.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Receiver 9 - Outdoor Amenity Space Road data, segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 118739/10325 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 9445/821 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 6747/587 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 100 km/h Road gradient : 5 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 146664 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 49.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 89.70 m Receiver height : 1.50 m Topography : 4 (Elevated; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 49.00 deg Barrier height : 3.00 m Elevation : 4.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 20.90 m Source elevation : 72.00 m Receiver elevation : 67.50 m Barrier elevation : 72.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Hwy 417 (day) ---------------------------------- Barrier height for grazing incidence ------------------------------------ Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.50! 1.50! -1.95! 70.05 ROAD (0.00 + 59.56 + 0.00) = 59.56 dba -90 49 0.35 85.25 0.00-10.45-1.74 0.00 0.00-13.50 59.56 Segment Leq : 59.56 dba Total Leq All Segments: 59.56 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.56

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix B Noise Warning Clauses February 8, 2016 Appendix B NOISE WARNING CLAUSES

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix B Noise Warning Clauses February 8, 2016 WARNING CLAUSES The following warning clauses may be used individually or in combination: TYPE A: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 55 dba and less than or equal to 60 dba) Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic (rail traffic) (air traffic) may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE B: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 60 dba) Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic (rail traffic) (air traffic) may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE C: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 55 dba and less than or equal to 65 dba or (Leq(8) in the OLA greater than 50 dba and less than or equal to 60 dba) This dwelling unit has been designed with the provision for adding central air conditioning at the occupant s discretion. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant in low and medium density developments will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment. TYPE D: (Leq(16) in the OLA greater than 65 dba or Leq(8) in the OLA greater than 60 dba) This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits Source: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources Approval and Planning Publication NPC-300, Queen s Printer for Ontario, 2013

NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix C AIF and Building Components February 8, 2016 Appendix C AIF AND BUILDING COMPONENTS

AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: 1604 01199 176 Greenfield Avenue - Basement Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.4 dba 60.8 dba Table 1.1 - Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source 1 68.4 68.4 68.4 68.4 60.8 60.5 60.5 60.5 Shielding Correction 0-3 -15-3 0-3 -15-3 Resultant Sound Le 68.4 65.4 53.4 65.4 60.8 57.5 45.5 57.5 Table 1.2 - Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 1 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table 1.3 - AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 28 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 20 Unit 2 Common Are 29 26 Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 20 Table 1.4 - Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle 0-90 60-90 60-90 Adjustment 0 3 3 Table 1.5 - Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 31 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Common Are 29 29 Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 23 Table 2.1 - Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are 30 73 27 76 288 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 17 96 115 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 84 113 Unit 2 Common Are 46 81 9 123 263 Unit 2 Brdm 1 11 65 105 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 11 65 94 Note: TC United Group Layouts Table 2.2 - Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 10 25 10 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 15 83 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 75 Unit 2 Common Are 18 31 3 47 Unit 2 Brdm 1 11 62 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 12 69 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table 2.3 - Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (6) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables 7.2-7.4, "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 1

AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: 1604 01199 176 Greenfield Avenue - 1st / 2nd Floor Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.3 dba 60.7 dba Table 1.1 - Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source 1 68.3 68.3 68.3 68.3 60.7 60.5 60.5 60.5 Shielding Correction 0-3 -15-3 0-3 -15-3 Resultant Sound Le 68.3 65.3 53.3 65.3 60.7 57.5 45.5 57.5 Table 1.2 - Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 3 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table 1.3 - AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 28 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 20 Unit 2 Common Are 29 26 Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 24 Table 1.4 - Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle 0-90 60-90 60-90 Adjustment 0 3 3 Table 1.5 - Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 31 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 23 Unit 2 Common Are 29 29 Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 27 Table 2.1 - Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are 65 87 13 109 286 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 12 64 107 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 12 64 107 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 106 122 Unit 2 Common Are 46 81 9 123 262 Unit 2 Brdm 1 13 64 105 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 13 64 105 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 106 119 Note: TC United Group Layouts Table 2.2 - Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 23 30 5 38 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 11 60 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 12 59 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 86 Unit 2 Common Are 18 31 3 47 Unit 2 Brdm 1 12 60 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 12 60 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table 2.3 - Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (22) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (13) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables 7.2-7.4, "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 2

AIF Calculation and Selection of Components Project #: 1604 01199 176 Greenfield Avenue - 3rd Floor Front Source: Road Traffic Predicted free-field day time sound level: Predicted free-field night time sound level: 68.2 dba 60.6 dba Table 1.1 - Sound level at building façade Day (Living Area) Night (Bedroom) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Source 1 68.2 68.2 68.2 68.2 60.6 60.5 60.5 60.5 Shielding Correction 0-3 -15-3 0-3 -15-3 Resultant Sound Le 68.2 65.2 53.2 65.2 60.6 57.5 45.5 57.5 Table 1.2 - Number of Components Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Total Number of Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Components Unit 1 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 x 1 Unit 2 Common Are x x x x 4 Unit 2 Brdm 1 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 x x 2 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 x 1 Note: Ignore if sound level below 55 dba Table 1.3 - AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 28 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 23 Unit 2 Common Are 29 26 Unit 2 Brdm 1 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 23 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 20 Table 1.4 - Adjustment for Geometry Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Exposure Angle 0-90 60-90 60-90 Adjustment 0 3 3 Table 1.5 - Required AIF Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Unit 1 Common Are 31 31 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 26 Unit 2 Common Are 29 29 Unit 2 Brdm 1 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 26 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 23 Table 2.1 - Component Area (ft 2 ) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Room Floor Area Unit 1 Common Are 65 87 14 109 286 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 12 64 107 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 12 64 107 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 106 122 Unit 2 Common Are 67 60 9 123 262 Unit 2 Brdm 1 13 64 105 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 13 64 105 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 106 119 Note: TC United Group Layouts Table 2.2 - Component Percentages per Room Floor Area (%) Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 23 30 5 38 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 11 60 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 12 59 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 86 Unit 2 Common Are 26 23 3 47 Unit 2 Brdm 1 12 60 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 12 60 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 89 Table 2.3 - Component Selection Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Room Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Window Wall Door Unit 1 Common Are 2 (22) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 1 Bdrm 3 EW1 Unit 2 Common Are 2 (15) 2 EW1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Brdm 1 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 2 2 (6) 2 EW1 Unit 2 Bdrm 3 EW1 Note 1: Use Tables 7.2-7.4, "Topic 7, Enironmental Noise Assesment in Land Use Planning Manual" Note 2: Windows are based on 2 mm glass thickness (Double Glaze Windows) Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2/2/2016 Page 3