Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Similar documents
Cost and Return per Lamb - Long Range

SHEEP FLOCK PLANNING GUIDE,"

FINPACK. Livestock Budgets. Based on 2015 FINBIN Database Reports

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

User Manual - Custom Finish Cattle Profit Projection

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Slope Farms. Our farm. Our work with other farmers. Experience with leasing land. Models for seasonal grazing

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

PROJECTING CASH FLOWS ON DAIRY FARMS

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Background and Assumptions

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Feedlot Finishing Costs. in Manitoba

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

Background and Assumptions

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

2013 Ohio Farm Business Analysis

2015 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

Guidelines for Estimating. Bison Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2008 On Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

2017 Beef Cattle Market Outlook

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2009 on Selected WISONSIN DAIRY FARMS

feezeted Dry-Lot Cattle Feeders

Elko County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns, 2006

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

A Study into Dairy Profitability MSC Business Services during

Our Thanks To: The professionals who worked with farms and completed the analyses included in this summary:

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXII November 29, 30, & December1, 2011, Mitchell, NE

SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE YEARLING/STOCKER PRODUCTION 300 Head

IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS,

A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1

Ranch Calculator (RanchCalc)

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

The Impacts of Increasing Fuel Costs on Nevada s Agricultural Enterprises

What Is the Cost of Gain for Stocker Cattle on Ryegrass Pasture?

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

How Does the Level of Feeder. Prices Affect Cattle Feeding Profits? Hal Routhe, Kenneth H. Thomas, and Roger Johnson * -September 19.

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

The data for this report were collected by Iowa Farm Business Association consultants and compiled by Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

RETUR COSTS A 8 R R. and 96 LI6R R

COW/CALF DAYS 2015 NICOLE KENNEY-RAMBO

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia ECONOMICS OF IMPROVED GRAZING SYSTEMS

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Margin = Difference. Navigating Through Financials- Careful Where you Step! Stepping Forward. Revenue $$$ less expenses $$$ Improving Margins

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2015

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS, 1926-'27¹

Total 2, ,519

Market Outlook for Cattle and Beef

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

Your Dairy In Transition

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

A Method for Determining Ranch Profit Probabilities When Livestock Yields Are Normally Distributed

FOOD FOR VICTORY * * * * * * * * * *

Organic Dairy Sector Evolves To Meet Changing Demand

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Chapter 7. Dairy -- Farm Management Wayne A. Knoblauch, Professor George J. Conneman, Professor Emeritus Cathryn Dymond, Extension Support Specialist

Evaluating Preconditioning Profitability - Projection and Closeout Manual

BUSINESS SUMMARY DAIRY FARM WESTERN NEW YORK REGION 2011 JUNE 2012 E.B

Grassfed Beef Production Profit Projection and Closeout

Cattle Market Outlook

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Illinois 4-H Livestock Record

Taking Your Beef Cow Herd Profitably Through The Cattle Cycle

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

The Impact of Corn and Fed Cattle Prices on Feeder Cattle Price Slides

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profit Cow-Calf Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Cow-Calf Enterprise

Northern Utah Small Cow-Calf Pasture Finished Beef Production Costs & Returns, 2012

c) What optimality condition defines the profit maximizing amount of the input to use? (Be brief and to the point.)

Introduction BEEF 140

Transcription:

rjrj -~ S-o I J (, e:--' FARM MANAGEMENT SERIES FM-01 REV. 1/ /1.e1 LI. o..:> Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide Should I Feed Cattle The average Minnesota cattle feeder lost money feeding cattle during the past decade. Many quit feeding--especially after the losses of the 19- period, and again after the losses of 190 and 191. Timing of purchases and sales has been a significant factor affecting returns. In general, cattle feeders who marketed most of their cattle in the second or third quarter of the year have survived; while those who normally sold in the lower priced fall-winter period suffered severe losses. Looking to the future, cattle feeding will likely continue to show very low returns to average or below average feeders (see long-run budgets). Therefore, cattle feeding can't compete with other enterprises for resources on Minnesota farms unless the following location, resource and management conditions are met: LOCATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT In areas with surplus feedgrains. Where the farmer is in a strong capital position. - Where feedgrain supplies are large while labor available for livestock is small. Able to limit feed conversion to 60 pounds of dry matter per cwt. of gain on calves and 6 pounds per cwt. of gain on yearlings. Have above average marketing ability. Unless the buy-upgrade-sell ability is average or better, as evidenced by the value produced per cwt. of gain, the cattle feeding enterprise could well be a money loser because of continued strong competition from commercial feedlots. Paul R. Hasbargen Extension Economist Dept. of Ag & Applied Economics Erlin J. Weness Area Extension Agent Farm Management Steven D. Plegge Extension Specialist Department of Animal Science Agricultural Extension Service St. Paul, Minnesota 10 ------------------------------------------------------- It is the policy of the Agricultural Extension Service of the University of Minnesota that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to Its programs and facilities without regard to race, creed, color, sex or national origin.

INSTRUCTIONS VALUE PRODUCED FOR CWT. OF GAIN is a very important marketing skill measure in cattle feeding. To analyze past performance in buying, upgrading and selling, use tax and production records to determine the average value produced per hundredweight of beef produced. For each feeding year, subtract the cost of the feeders from the total value of sales (see line of schedule F of your farm tax return) plus the value of any butchered animals to determine the total value of beef produced. Then determine the total hundredweight of beef produced from purchase and sale records and divide this into the total value produced to obtain the value produced per cwt. of gain. This margin will vary each year with cattle prices (also, a larger one is needed when production costs are higher, so an individual must compare his figures with those obtained by other cattle feeders in farm record keeping groups--see extension agent, ag instructor or creditor). With corn at $2.60 to $2. per bushel, we are suggesting a long run planning value produced figure of $60 to $6 for calves and $6 to $6 for yearlings. These margins must increase a dollar for each 10 increase in corn prices to cover added costs. VARIABLE CASH COSTS PER HEAD - Use lot records and copies of income tax returns to estimate cash costs incurred by the cattle feeding operation. RETURN OVER VARIABLE CASH COSTS is a figure that can be useful in financial planning when combined with cash flow projections from other enterprises. COST OF HOME PRODUCED RESOURCES - Bedding requirements vary greatly by type of housing and management practices. Fertility value of manure will range from 0 to $1 per cwt. of beef produced depending upon manure management systems. The feed requirements below are based on feed--if actually weighed--to the cattle and assume an effective implant (growth promotant) is maintained in the cattle throughout the feeding period and an ionophore (Bovatec or Rumensin) is fed continuously to steers and either an ionophore or MGA fed continuously to heifers. If implants and feed additives are not part of cattle management at least 1 percent more feed would be required per unit of gain. Calf Heifer Heifer 0-100/f Steer Calf Yearling (Fed High Forage To 00/f) 00-1100/f 00-9011 600-100011 Corn equivalent, bu. 1 6 2 6 36 Corn silage, 3% DM/ton 2.3.6 2.6.62 Hay, tons.2.1 Protein, lbs. 20 20 130 130 20 1 Feed/cwt. of gain, lbs. DM 630 63 60 6 690 10 Note: In calculating the budget costs shown on the next page, a percent wastagespoilage factor is added to corn and about 1 percent to forage needs. FEED COSTS PER CWT. OF GAIN is the important production efficiency measure in cattle feeding. Use the market value of home produced feeds plus all purchased feeds when figuring this. This figure can become too high because of poor feed conversion, wastage and spoilage, or high feed prices. An annual comparison should be made with the feed costs of other cattle feeders with similar feeding programs. RETURN TO LABOR AND FACILITIES over direct operating costs can be used in making cash flow projections. RETURNS over the market value of feed show how much farm earnings would decline if cattle feeding is discontinued, the feed is sold at prices used, and facilities and labor are not used for anything else. This is the amount available for facility payments and other overhead costs, including pay to the operator.

COSTS AND RETURNS PER HEAD - LONG RANGE GROSS RETURNS PER HEAD BOUGHT Buy-sell weights (pounds) Sales value Feeder cost Value produced per cwt of gain Value produced per head sold (line, schedule F, from 100 + head bought) Typical Management STEER CALVES Good Management STEERS Typical 2-1, 02 0-1,00 00-1,100 --------------variable------------ --------------variable------------ $ 60 360 $ 63 3 $ 66 26 MY ESTIMATES Per Head Total VARIABLE CASH COSTS PER HEAD - Number in ( ) is the line number, schedule F, IRS from 100 (19) Labor hired (32, 1, 2) Repairs, maintenance (33) Interest on cattle (3) Interest on operating (3) Feed purchased - protein (36) - salt & mineral (36) Machine hire & supplies (39, 0) Veterinary and medicine (2) Fuel and oil (3) Insurance (6) Utilities () Freight and trucking () Other () Total cash costs $ 10 2 32 6 1 2 10 $ 10 2 30 6 16 2 10 $ 30 20 3 3 1 1 112 RETURN OVER VARIABLE CASH COSTS 216 22 12 SALES VALUE OF HOME PRODUCED FEED Hay (.6 ton &.1 ton @ $60 per ton) Grain (9, 3 & bu of corn@ $2. 6/bu) Corn silage (2. ton @ $22 per ton) $ 36 16 $ -- 11 6 $ 10 12 Total value of home raised feed 192 10 13 Feed costs per cwt of gain 3 3 0 Return over feed costs per cwt of gain 22 29 26 Cash nonfeed costs per cwt of gain 19 19 22 RETURN TO LABOR AND FACILITIES PER HEAD Over variable livestock costs & sales value of crops 1 1

COMPUTER DECISION AIDS EXTENSION FARM MANAGEMENT (c) AGRI. EXTENSION SERVICE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS CATTLE FEEDING BUDGET RESULTS FOR119 Stee~ 01/10/ PROGRAM: Calves COMPUTER DECISION AIDS EXTENSION FARM MANAGEMENT (c) AGRI. EXTENSION SERVICE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS PROGRAM: CATTLE FEEDING BUDGET RESULTS FOR:19 YEARLINGS 01-10-19 FEEDLOT MINN BUDGET FOR STEER CALF USING STANDARD RATION NUMBER BUDGET FOR STEER YEARLING USING STANDARD RATION NUMBER 3 PERFORMANCE: PURCHASE WEIGHT, LBS.... SELLING WEIGHT, LBS......... TOTAL GAIN, LBS..... AVERAGE DAILY GAIN, LBS...... DAYS ON FEED........... HEAD 0. 100. 600. 2.20 23. CWT GAIN PERFORMANCE: PURCHASE WEIGHT, LBS........ SELLING WEIGHT, LBS........... TOTAL GAIN, LBS....,.... AVERAGE DAILY GAIN, LBS..... DAYS ON FEED......... HEAD 00. 110. 0. 2.0 1. CWT GAIN VALUE PRODUCED: SALE VALUE AT $ PURCHASE COST AT GROSS MARGIN 6. 00 /CWT.... $ 0.00 /CWT 62.0 31.00 36.0 61.2 VALUE PRODUCED: SALE VALUE AT $ PURCHASE COST AT GROSS MARGIN 6.00 /CWT....... $ 6.00 /CWT.... 0.0.00 31.0 0.11 FEED REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS: CORN 6,00 BU AT$ 2.60.... HAY 0.0 TON AT$ 66.00.... PROTSUP 20 LBS AT$ 10.00/CWT.... MINERAL 0 LBS AT$ 12.00/CWT TOTAL FEED COST.......... 166.0 33.00 2.00.0 231.20 2.3.0.0 0.0 3.3 FEED REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS: CORN 60.00 BU AT$ 2.60.... HAY 0.30 TON AT$ 66.00... PROTSUP 10 LBS AT$ 10.00/CWT.. MINERAL 30 LBS AT$ 12.00/CWT. TOTAL FEED COST......... 16.00 19.0 1.00 3.60 19.0 3.6.0.00 0.0 3. OPERATING COSTS: INTEREST ON ANIMALS <1.0 PERCENT). DEATH LOSS ( 1. PERCENT!.... SELLING AND BUYING COSTS... VET. & MEDICINE.......... SUPPLIES............. REPAIRS AND MAINTANENCE.... UTILITIES, FUEL, HIRED LABOR,INS. INTEREST ON FEED AND OPERATING COSTS. TOTAL OPERATING COSTS... 32.9 6.3 16.00.00.00 10.00 1.00.00 101.30.9 1.06 2.6 1. 1 0.6 1. 6 2.3 1. 33 16. OPERATING COSTS: INTEREST ON ANIMALS < 1. 0 PERCENT> DEATH LOSS < 0. PERCENT>.... SELLING AND BUYING COSTS...... VET. & MEDICINE...,.... SUPPLIES.......... REPAIRS AND MAINTANENCE...... UTILITIES, FUEL, HIRED LABOR,INS. INTEREST ON FEED AND OPERATING COSTS. TOTAL OPERATING COSTS.... 32.2 3.96 19.00.00 3.00.00 13.00.00 9.6.2 0..22 0,9 0.6 ;~~* 1.6 19.93 TOTAL FEED & OPERATING COSTS. 332.0.2 TOTAL FEED & OPERATING COSTS... 2.0 63.0 BUDGETED RETURN TO LABOR & FACILITIES. 3.00.3 BUDGETED RETURN TO LABOR & FACILITIES 2.2 6.32 RETURN PER HEAD FOR LABOR & FACILITIES WITH DIFFERENT PRICES RETURN PER HEAD FOR LABOR & FACILITIES WITH DIFFERENT PRICES SELLING 62.00 WHEN PURCHASE COST PER CWT IS: 66.00 0.00.00.00 SELLING.00 WHEN PURCHASE COST PER CWT IS: 61.00 6.00 3.00 61. 00 63.00 6.00 6.00 33... 96. 11. 13.2 3.2.2 6.2 9.2 -.00 1.00 3.00 6.00.00-2.2-6.2 1. 3. 6. -.9-26.9 -.9 1.1 36.1 63.00 6.00 6.00 1. 00 2.93 6.93.93 111.93 13.93 12.6 3.6.6 1. 6 10.6-1..2 2.2 1.2.2 -.3-2.3-1. 3 21. 1. 1 -.09 -.09-32.09-9.09 13.91 BREAK EVEN SELLING PRICES THAT WILL COVER FEED, OPERATING AND $.00 RETURN FOR LABOR AND FACILITIES PURCHASE 62.00 66.00 0.00.00.00 2.0.93 60.6 62. 6.1 66.6 WHEN CORN PRICE PER BU IS: 2.3 2.60 2.6 60.1 62. 6.3 66.30 6.22 62.10 6.03 6.9 6. 69.1 63.6 6.61 6. 69. 1.39 3. 12 6.2 6. 19 69. 12 1. 0 2.9 NOTE: TO COVER ONLY FEED AND OPERATING COSTS SUBTRACT $.29 BREAK EVEN SELLING PRICES THAT WILL COVER FEED, OPERATING AND $ 2. 00 RETURN FOR LABOR AND FACILITIES PURCHASE.00 61. 00 6.00 3.00 2.0.3 61.36 63.99 66.62 69.2 WHEN CORN PRICE PER BU IS 2.3 2.60 2.6 60.0 62.2 6~.3 6.9 0.61 61. 6.0 66.0 69.33 1. 96 62.0 6.3 6.06 0.69 3.32 3.12 6.1 66. 69.2 2.0.6 NOTE: TO COVER ONLY FEED AND OPERATING COSTS SUBTRACT$ 2.1