ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

Similar documents
My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance I know how my department measures success.

Work Expectations Profile

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. IC Annual Employee Climate Survey. April Summary Results

Document A: Staff Exit Interview. Exit Interview Date:

Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior Chapter 1:

Campus Climate Initiative Action Items June 15, 2017

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Annual Self Performance Review

A Report on the Quality of Work Life Survey Conducted During April-May 2010

20% 19% 9% 11% 8% 4% 4% 5% Satisfaction with UC San Diego. Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary

Stanislaus County Supervisor Training Academy Training Catalog 2018

Annual Workforce Equality and Diversity Report 2016/2017. (Incorporating Workforce Race Equality Standard)

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

Diversity and Inclusion Strategy

Central Office Work Environment Survey Results, Spring 2012 and Spring 2013

BUILDING A CULTURE OF ENGAGEMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP

2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results for: National Park Service

Do Happy Employees Lead to Happy Customers?: Revisiting the Employee-Customer Relationship

LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

Paylocity Compliance Training Course Catalog

Top 10 HR Risks for Businesses and How to Avoid Them

STUDENT ORGANIZATION SUCCESS FRAMEWORK

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES. Human Resources Report No. M13A009. August 21, 2013

MBS Code of Conduct. MBS places great importance on the values of ethical conduct, efficiency, fairness, impartiality and integrity.

Finnish working life is the third best in Europe Interim evaluation of the Working Life 2020 project

Maintaining a Harassment & Discrimination-Free Workplace. A Guide for Managers & Employees

The Role of the Manager in Impacting Employee Engagement. Presented by: Kerry Liberman, President People Perspectives LLC

Course Learning Report

2017 University of Arkansas Staff Climate Survey

Equality and Diversity Policy

DTR72KXREB7/TGDTRN24PERe. Sample Organization Sample Organization

LeadingforLoyalty.com

pinpoint planning human resources audit tool

How to Engage Employees. A Guide for Employees, Supervisors, Managers, & Executives

The Employee Net Promoter Score: A (new) Metric for Assessing Your Workforce Engagement Profile

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN VOLUNTEER ADMINISTRATION

ORGANISATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

BBCBC Professional Development Training Plan & Course Catalog FY 16/17

MARICOPA INTEGRATED HEALTH SYSTEM Code of Conduct and Ethics

Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) Action Plan

Office of Diversity Programs

WESTFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL ANTI-STRESS POLICY

LIVING OUR CORE VALUES. Supplier Code of Conduct

Stress Policy. Adopted by the Trust Board on 6 December 2016

1.1 What is Ethics? Why is it important to apply this Code?.. 2

Human Resource Certification (HRC) Program. Course Descriptions

2013 IUPUI Staff Survey Summary Report

Skills Standards NATIONAL LAW, PUBLIC SAFETY, SECURITY & CORRECTIONS CORE ASSESSMENT OD15001

2011 Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement

Equal Opportunities Plan Approved in the meeting of the University Board 27 November 2012

TALENT REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS

Institutional Climate Update

Effective Diversity Recruiting: Building a Workforce for Today and Tomorrow

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Ed.D. in Organizational Leadership Core Leadership Understandings. Program Competencies

Leadership Competencies. Level 3. Self-Assessment Tool

Education Liaison: The Performance Evaluation Process (PEP)

Job Description: Operations Manager September 2017

Chapter 7E: Nurturing Human Capital/Focus on Staff

Lesson 1: Merit System Principles

Describe recent meetings and discussions with staff members and management.

Employee Engagement Hierarchy

THE FUCHS PETROLUB GROUP GLOBAL DIVERSITY GUIDELINE

Renovating an Internal Communications Infrastructure to Enhance Employee Engagement

SPRING 2012 EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK PART OF THE CIPD OUTLOOK SERIES

SUPPLIER CODE OF PRACTICE SUPPLIER CODE OF PRACTICE

ON-CAMPUS STUDENT EMPLOYMENT SUPERVISOR HANDBOOK A UTEP EDGE EXPERIENCE

DTR9274O1HJ/TGDTRm5Xgw33Z. Department Survey Sample Department

EQUALITY & DIVERSITY. CORE POLICY In accordance with its statement of intent, the company commits itself to the following:

> > > > > > > > Chapter 9 Human Resource Management, Motivation, and Labor-Management Relations. Kamrul Huda Talukdar Lecturer North South University

Internship Tool Kit 1

2016 Employee Climate Survey:

Now I Know My X, Y, Z: Won t You Succession Plan With Me? Presented By: Laura Kalty May 4, 2016

Equal Opportunities & Race Equality Policy September 2005

2010 UND Employer Satisfaction Survey

Professional Competencies Self-Assessment & Development Plan

Job Description. Reports directly to: Area Manager Reports indirectly to: General Manager Direct Reportee: 6 Indirect Reportee: 0 Total: 6

Description. Award Categories. Customer Service. Engagement

Lancaster University Placements Policy managing and supporting university facilitated work placements

OUR CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

HR.com August 16, Bob Lavigna Bob Lavigna

EQUALITY & DIVERSITY POLICY. November 2016

EQUASS 2018 Principles, criteria and Indicators for EQUASS Excellence recognition

Working by the VUMC Credo

Policy Name Policy Category Policy Number Officer Responsible Application

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

CNB Ethics Frequently Asked Questions

ANTI- DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY

Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) Data and Action Plan

Manager, Supervisor & CEMA Skill Set Model County of Santa Clara

SKL International Code of Conduct

Tulsa Community College Tulsa, Oklahoma

Maricopa Integrated Health System CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS

ICHWC Code of Ethics (Updated February 1, 2017)

EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES POLICY

Effective Diversity Recruiting: Building a Workforce for Today and Tomorrow

RMIT Diversity and Inclusion. Gender equality ACTION PLAN

Transcription:

WSU VANCOUVER For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 49 respondents in compared to 30 respondents in who identified their department within WSU Vancouver. Within WSU Vancouver, the response average for statements 1-38 was 3.92, resulting in a 1.5% decrease in the overall response average from. Of those who responded, 38.78% were administrative professionals, 38.78% were classified staff, and 22.44% were faculty. As explained in the EES Results Report, responses were measured using a 5-option Likert scale with Never equaling 1 and Always equaling 5 to determine the frequency in which employees identified with the statements. The overall satisfaction at work (statement 38) increased from 3.83 in to 3.86 for. Additionally, for the survey, 77.55% of respondents said they always or often enjoy being part of their department (statement 28). A breakdown of response averages can be found at the end of this report on pages 4-5. Always or Often, 77.55% Sometimes 18.37% Rarely or Never, 4.08% ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT ADVANCING THE UNIVERSITY S MISSION: For, the survey asked respondents to identify the extent to which their department approached advancement of the University s mission, specifically as it related to the University goals of accountability, innovation, creativity, openness, and collaboration. This graph demonstrates the response average within WSU Vancouver compared to the overall WSU average: 5 Advancing the University's Mission - vs WSU 4 4.02 3.97 4.02 4.08 3.85 3.82 3.83 3.80 3.68 3.89 3 2 1 Accountability Innovation Creativity Openness Collaboration WSU Employee Engagement Survey WSU Vancouver 1

HIGHEST AREA RESPONSE AVERAGE: WSU My supervisor treats me with dignity and respect. ** - 4.51 4.29 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.67 4.40 4.08 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.23 4.25 4.10 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.63 4.21 4.37 LOWEST AREA RESPONSE AVERAGE: WSU I feel appropriately compensated for my level of position. ** - 2.98 3.17 My supervisor encourages me to use the University resources available to me. ** - 3.37 3.47 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve my performance.* 3.73 3.47 3.45 I know how my department measures success. 3.73 3.51 3.41 SIGNIFICANT AREA RESPONSE CHANGE (HIGHEST/LOWEST RESPONSE CHANGES): Change I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.30 3.61 +0.31 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.83 +0.26 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.77 3.96 +0.19 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 4.23 3.89-0.34 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 4.33 3.94-0.39 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.63 4.21-0.42 UNIVERSITY RESOURCES: Based on feedback, the survey added additional statements regarding workplace concerns and employee awareness of WSU resources, specifically those resources related to Workplace Violence, Bullying, State Ethics, Discrimination, Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct. This graph demonstrates the percentage of employees who identified awareness of the following University policies within WSU Vancouver: Policy Prohibiting Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Washington State University Ethics, Conflict of Interest, and Technology Transfer 91.84% 95.92% Workplace Violence 69.39% Bullying Prevention and Reporting 59.18% Employee Engagement Survey WSU Vancouver 2

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK: At the end of the survey, employees were given the opportunity to provide feedback regarding subjects not addressed in the survey. The following feedback, specifically related to employee perceptions of the workplace, was provided by respondents who identified themselves within WSU Vancouver: I have great coworkers and a great Director I like the people I work with Lack of merit pay increases Recruiting concerns with the new $15.00 an hour minimum wage increase Difficult for adjunct faculty to develop research due to being a part time employee and ineligible for many University sponsored professional development and grant opportunities Each outlying campus needs support built around the local needs Difficulty deciphering policy when receiving conflicting opinions from Vancouver and Pullman The limited investment in technology infrastructure does not meet expectations of faculty, staff and students Concerns about data security Not having the tools to collaborate with on-line co-workers, faculty, researchers, and other organizations Limited opportunities for advancement at outlying campus Negative work climate due to some employees in leadership positions bullying, not being helpful and making things difficult ACTION ITEMS: In reviewing the lowest area response averages and the statements with negative change from to in WSU Vancouver, initiatives to improve employee engagement and perceptions of the workplace may include, but are not limited to: Identify positions with inappropriate compensation Provide employees with resources as appropriate and encourage the use of University resources Provide employees with on-going feedback and recognition Encourage communication with employees on how success is measured and provide on-going feedback on how to improve performance Improve communication efforts regarding changes at the university level Evaluate how input is solicited and taken into consideration Improve communication efforts regarding department reporting structures Improve communication regarding work expectations Improve communication regarding the WSU policies concerning workplace violence and bullying prevention and reporting, and provide employees with resources as appropriate Employee Engagement Survey WSU Vancouver 3

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN: WSU # of Respondents 30 49 1891 1958 Overall 3.98 3.92 3.72 3.81 SECTION 1: Do employees feel they have what is needed to do their job? 1 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.63 4.21 4.38 4.37 2 I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.20 4.00 4.06 4.03 3 I have the resources and training to do my job effectively.* 3.97 4.12 3.99 4.00 4 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.23 4.18 4.15 4.09 SECTION 2: Do employees feel they are valued? 5 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.50 3.55 3.41 3.50 6 My supervisor values me and the work I do. 4.23 4.08 3.84 3.93 7 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.77 3.78 3.41 3.63 8 I feel appropriately compensated for my level of position. ** - 2.98-3.17 SECTION 3: Do employees feel they provide individual contributions? 9 I am encouraged to develop myself professionally. 3.60 3.78 3.44 3.59 10 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.77 3.96 3.54 3.64 11 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.83 3.56 3.72 12 I am given opportunities to be innovative or creative. ** - 3.76-3.69 13 I am given opportunities to be collaborative. ** - 3.83-3.78 SECTION 4: Do employees feel connected to their co-workers? 14 A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between my co-workers and me. 3.97 3.86 3.85 3.88 15 Knowledge and information sharing is practiced between my co-workers and me. 3.97 3.80 3.80 3.84 16 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.23 4.25 4.12 4.10 17 I have positive interactions with my co-workers. ** - 4.14-4.19 18 I enjoy the work climate that exists between my co-workers and me. ** - 4.08-4.00 SECTION 5: Do employees feel satisfied with their supervisor? ** 19 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve my performance.* 3.73 3.47 3.29 3.45 20 My supervisor encourages a positive work climate. ** - 4.18-3.90 21 My supervisor promotes open communication and feedback. ** - 4.16-3.90 22 My supervisor treats me with dignity and respect. ** - 4.51-4.29 SECTION 6: Do employees feel connected to their department? 23 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 4.23 3.89 3.79 3.87 24 I receive clear information about changes being made within my department. 3.87 3.74 3.32 3.43 25 I know how my department measures success. 3.73 3.51 3.26 3.41 26 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 4.33 3.94 3.84 3.92 27 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.67 4.40 4.00 4.08 28 I enjoy being part of my department. 4.27 4.08 3.96 4.00 Rate the extent to which your department approaches the following to advance the University Mission: ** 29 Accountability - 4.02-3.97 30 Innovation - 3.85-3.82 31 Creativity - 3.83-3.80 32 Openness - 4.02-3.68 33 Collaboration - 4.08-3.89 SECTION 7: Do employees feel connected to WSU as a whole? 34 I am encouraged to improve work processes to benefit students and other University constituents or colleagues.* 4.03 3.79 3.71 3.70 35 I receive clear information about changes being made within my college/area. 3.63 3.61 3.18 3.29 36 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.30 3.61 3.16 3.33 37 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.23 4.10 4.07 4.08 38 Overall, I am satisfied at work. 3.83 3.86 3.84 3.86 EMPLOYEE RESOURCES: Are employees aware of WSU resources or do they have concerns in the workplace? ** I am comfortable with utilizing University resources. ** - 3.53-3.75 My supervisor encourages me to use the University resources available to me. ** - 3.37-3.47 I have concerns regarding work climate. ** - 3.73-3.54 I feel comfortable bringing work climate concerns to my supervisor. ** - 4.02-3.77 Employee Engagement Survey WSU Vancouver 4

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN, CONTINUED: WSU FACULTY SPECIFIC: Do faculty members feel they provide contributions within their faculty appointment? I have support to pursue my research opportunities. 3.00 3.00 3.61 3.63 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 4.00 4.13 3.77 3.86 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 3.38 3.50 3.68 I am encouraged to engage in Extension opportunities. ** - 2.33-2.96 Employee Engagement Survey WSU Vancouver 5