REVIEW OF LAND ALLOCATION IN CHO DON DISTRICT, BAC THAI PROVINCE

Similar documents
Community Carbon Accounting Action Research Project Vietnam

TAM DAO NATIONAL PARK, VIETNAM Forest utilization by the forest dwellers. Toshiyuki Tsuchiya *

FIELD GUIDE FOR VILLAGE LAND USE PLANNING. For Field Staff. of the Afforestation Project in Ha Tinh, Quang Binh and Quang Tri.

Community Participation in Mangrove Forest Management in Vietnam

Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Houaphan province

Task Force I Report CLARIFICATION OF THE FIVE MILLION HECTARE REFORESTATION PROGRAM. Final version

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief VIETNAM: Forest Programmes ("FP") II + III

Land Use/Land Cover Change Research and Management in Vietnam

Reforestation and Improved Forest Management in Uganda

The Nou Joint Forest Management Project

Village Livelihood Development in Houaphan

Intercropping with Rubber for Risk Management

COLLECTION & USES OF RICE STRAW IN THE MEKONG RIVER DELTA, VIETNAM

Targeting the rural poor. The Participatory Wealth Ranking System

LAND USE PLANNING: AN APPROACH TO POVERTY REDUCTION AND STABILISATION OF SHIFTING CULTIVATION IN THE LAO UPLANDS TO IMPROVE UPLAND LIVELIHOODS

SOWING THE SEEDS OF GENDER EQUALITY

Partnerships for Development - 5 million hectare Reforestation Program

Drought Situations and Management in Vietnam

The Five Million Hectare Reforestation Program in Vietnam: An Analysis of its Implementation and Transaction Costs A Case Study in Hoa Binh Province

LINKAGES IN PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF EXPORTED VEGETABLES: PERSPECTIVES OF FARMERS AND FIRMS IN LUC NAM DISTRICT, BAC GIANG PROVINCE, VIETNAM

Welcome to today s webinar How companies are managing biodiversity in their supply chains

Survey on and evaluation of real conditions of slash-and-burn cultivation in the Central Highlands provinces

TECHNOLOGY OF PRODUCING TEAK TIMBER FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND: TOWARD SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT

Potential and constraints for intensive land use with pond irrigation in north-east Thailand

PRODUCTION, PROCESSING AND IMPORT EXPORT PEPPER (REPORT AT 42 TH CONFERENCE OF EXPORTER) IPC ANNUAL MEETING (Dated 22-26/2011 in Lombok, Indonesia)

Agroforestry Research for Development in Shifting Cultivation Areas of Laos.

Local livelihoods: Farmers stories from Southern Leyte, Philippines

CURRICULUM VITAE NAME NGUYEN HAI HOA. Living address: House N0. 24B, Group I, Tan Xuan, Xuan Mai town, Chuong My

Final Report for Ford Foundation Community Forestry Research Predissertation Fellowship

Management of Biological Resources in Tam Giang Lagoon: Issues, Participatory Research Application, and Challenges

Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute

Economic Change in Lao Agriculture: The Impact of Policy Reform

LANDSCAPE APPROACH MANAGEMENT. De-coupling Environmental Degradation from Sustainable Growth

institutional framework in Vietnam

Draft Training Workshop Report. Capacity building for community groups about the potential of forest/tree protection

Oxfam America (VIE 034/07): System of Rice Intensification -- Advancing Small Farmers in Mekong Region

1. Gender Dimensions in Natural Resources Management Roles, Responsibilities, Practices and Knowledge

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL FORESTRY REVISED ANNUAL PLAN & DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN

Government of Uganda, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) And World Bank

Vietnam Agriculture Extension And Market Information System

PARTICIPATORY RANGELAND MANAGEMENT INTERGRATED FARM AFRICA S APPROACH

SRI APPLICATION IN RICE PRODUCTION IN NORTHERN ECOLOGICAL AREAS OF VIETNAM. Ngo Tien Dung, National IPM Program (updated through 2006)

Smallholder Timber Production: Example of Teak in Luangprabang

[Approval by mail] Indonesia: Promoting Sustainable Community Based Natural Resource Management and Institutional Development (World Bank) FIP

Eastern Karnataka Afforestation Project

A review of environmentally sustainable land use practices and their benefit to Namibia s communal communities

Moving away from shifting cultivation?

The declining role of ethnicity in farm household differentiation: A case study from Ngoc Phai Commune, Cho Don District, Bac Kan Province, Viet Nam

Country Paper Lao PDR RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN UPLAND LAO PDR. Presented by Vansy Senyavong

WORKING PAPER. Chopping for chips. An analysis of wood flows from smallholder plantations in Vietnam. Nguyen Quang Tan

Fact sheet: Mauritania - Women, agriculture and rural development

PUBLIC SECTOR CASE STORY TEMPLATE. Agriculture, Forestry and Community Development Program in Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia

TURKEY ANATOLIA WATERSHED REHABILITATION PROJECT. Ankara 2008

- Trees For Zambia - A project by Greenpop ( Concept Note

Sri Lanka: National Water Resources Authority

Reconsidering structures in production dynamics: methodological insights from World Agriculture Watch and preliminary elements on Indonesia

The Earth Summit 2012 and Forests The Submission of the Collaborative Partnership on Forests to the Preparatory Process for Rio+ 20

An introduction to incentives for forest-water ecosystem services. Thomas Enters, UNEP

Guidelines for simple silvicultural practices in community forests in Vietnam

TERMS OF REFERENCE Individual Contractor. Phnom Penh Cambodia and Home Based Expected Place of Travel:

Author: AFP team in Cambodia (Mr. Sun Heng, Mr. Ly Sereyrith and Mr. Nico Janssen) Country: Cambodia Sector: Agricultural and Forest Product (AFP)

In Competition: Teak Smallholders in Java, Indonesia

INTEGRATED FORESTRY & FARMING SYSTEM (IFFS)

Declaring EFA: learning from a virtual case

Procedures for Village & Commune Development Planning

Combined Safeguards and Sub- on ERDD-plus, Singapore, March Daw Le Le Thein, U Than Naing

Lady and Gentlemen I am Bui Duc Dien and from Viet Nam, I am very happy to this forum here. Now, I will read summary report about bioenergy

FORESTS, DEVELOPMENT, AND CLIMATE ACHIEVING A TRIPLE WIN

Setting up a. Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation System for. the SFDP Project, Vietnam

Land Tenure and Property Rights Issues in Natural Resource Management and Biodiversity Conservation

Customers in focus: Strengthening social and financial sustainability of small town water supply in Northern Vietnam

Collective Action and Collaborative Management of Forests

Lao PDR Country Paper Current Status of Agriculture Mechanization and Marketing

Viet Nam. REDD+ Capacity Building Services Assessment

Enhancing forest livelihoods in Uganda to advance REDD+

CHINA S FOREST TENURE REGIME

Result of Analysis on Lao Agricultural Census 2010/11

FLEGT VPA Process in Lao PDR

Leigh Winowiecki, Mieke Bourne, Ana Maria Paez-Valencia, Boniface Massawe, Patricia Masikati, Hadia Seid

Participatory Rural Assessment

Climate Change: Impacts and Opportunities for the Red River Basin and Delta, Vietnam

Forestry Extension in Cambodia

Agricultural Cooperatives in Vietnam

Off-Reserve Forest Conflicts:

VALUE CHAIN INITIATIVES FOR DRAGON FRUIT (PITAYA) MARKET DEVELOPMENT

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING PAYMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: THE PHILIPPINE EXPERIENCE

Ecosystems and Their Services in Da Bac District, Hoa Binh Province

Case Study: Converting waste to cooking fuel in Vietnamese coastal communities. Overview. Key lesson learned

CLIMATE CHANGE AND AGRICULTURAL POLICIES

Power of information in the Indian rural set up an analysis

INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN

Public Private Framework for Reforestation in Afghanistan

Scope and risks of the Asia Biogas Programme

Vietnam s Forestry Sector and Environmental Sustainability

Characterising a local innovation: Fighting seasonal hunger in the village of Pout Dagné, in the district and rural community of Notto in Thiès Region

CONTRACT FARMING IN VIETNAM

SHARE AND CARE NEPAL Lalitpur. Environmental Policy 2066 (2009) Share and Care Nepal P.O. Box: Kathmandu

September Expert Consultation on Statistics in Support of Policies to Empower Small Farmers. Bangkok, Thailand, 8-11 September 2009

LAND TENURE AND TENANCY CONDITIONS IN RELATION TO RICE PRODUCTION IN THREE VILLAGES IN THE RED RIVER DELTA, VIETNAM

Costs Comparison between FSC and Non FSC Acacia Plantations in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam

Transcription:

Page 1 of 7 The Vietnam - Finland Forestry Sector Co-Operation Programme The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Bac Thai Province TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1 REVIEW OF LAND ALLOCATION IN CHO DON DISTRICT, BAC THAI PROVINCE November 1996 FOREWORD The Vietnam Finland Forestry Sector Co-operation Programme was initiated in 1996. The Programme's pilot area is located in Cho Don District in Bac Thai Province. One of the recommendations in the workshop which finalised the Programme's inception phase in August 1996, was that land allocation in the pilot area has to be completed prior to any development activities. Forest land allocation is a precondition for Programme's successful implementation. Two questions were raised concerning the land allocation especially in forest areas: i. what is the actual situation and experience in land allocation in Cho Don District? and ii. how the Programme could support the land allocation process? The Programme staff in Cho Don carried out a preliminary analysis on land allocation in the District in August- September 1996. In October 1996 a team of five consultants were contracted to carry out a detailed study on land allocation in the Programme's pilot area. The consultant team comprised the following persons: Mr. Doan Ba Toan, Mr. Nong Van Tri, Mr. Nguyen Quang Sinh and Mr. Nguyen Anh Dao from Agricultural Extension Centre of Bac Thai Province and Mr. Ly Quang Quyet from Forest Guard Station of Cho Don District. The consultants' findings were analysed in a workshop held in Cho Don on 17 to 18 October 1996. Wide range of participants representing province, district, commune and village level authorities attended the workshop. This is the first technical report of the Programme and is based mainly to the report of the consultants. We want to thank the consultants, the Programme staff and all the participants of the workshop for their contribution to this report. Mr. Nguyen Van Viet Director of the Programme Mr. Petri Lehtonen Chief Technical Advisor TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 2 of 7 1. Introduction 4 2. Land Use in Cho Don District 4 3. Land Allocation Policies 5 4. Experiences of Land Allocation in Cho Don District 7 4.1 Objectives and Achievements 7 4.2 Technical Procedures in Forest Land Allocation 8 4.3 Legal Procedures and Policy Mechanisms 8 4.4 Forest Land Use 9 5. Issues and Proposed Solutions in Land Allocation in Cho Don District 9 5.1 Issues 9 5.2 Proposed solutions 10 ANNEXES 1. Selected Readings on Forest Land Allocation in Vietnam 2. Population, Land Use and Situation in Land Allocation in Cho Don District 3. Historical Development of Land Use in the Programme's Pilot Area 4. List of the Participants of the Land Allocation Workshop in Cho Don from 17 to 18 October 1996 1. INTRODUCTION In the beginning of 1980's the Government of Vietnam started to allocate land to farmers especially in the delta areas. The land allocation aimed principally to increase production capacity of the existing natural resources. In 1983 the Central Committee of the Party cave instructions how to carry out allocation of forest land. The land allocation policy has since then have many adjustments concerning agricultural land and forest land. Direct consequence of farm land allocation to households has been a significant increase in agricultural production. However, the corresponding allocation of forest land has not created a similar effect. One reason why forest land allocation cannot have similar effects as allocation of farm land is that forest land allocation aims, in addition to increase production capacity, also to protect watershed areas, prevent soil erosion and maintain biodiversity. Considering the different functions of forest, production and provision of ecological infrastructure, the Vietnamese Government still sees that the best way to achieve different objectives of forestry is to allocate the forest land so that a user of that land feels that he or she is the owner of the land. However, the forest land allocation has faced many difficulties. Cho Don District in Bac Thai Province has also followed the national policy on land allocation. This document tries to analyse past steps in land allocation and review the current situation specially in Cho Don District. The principal objectives of this review are to clarify the current situation in land allocation - especially forest land, to identify problems and risks, and to propose solutions to identified problems and risks. 2. LAND USE IN CHO DON DISTRICT

Page 3 of 7 Cho Don District is located in mountaneous region in the northeast corner of Bac Thai Province. In 1995 the total population in the District was 43 247 people living in 8000 households. Six different ethnic groups occupy the area. The biggest ethnic group is tay (76%) followed by dao, kinh, hmong and nung. Practically all the population is depending on agriculture and forestry. Even agriculture is the basis of the District's economy, less than 3% of land area is under permanent agriculture. The exact economic value of the forests for rural households is not known. However, forests have a significant importance in the District covering 70% of the land area (Table 1). Forests provide the most important source of fuel for rural households, construction materials, fodder, fruits, medicines and probably many other products that are not yet studied. Traditionally forests have granted areas for shifting cultivation which has been practised especially by the poorest ethnic groups. Gradually land area has become so scarce that fallow periods of shifting cultivation are too short to maintain the production capacity. As a consequence forests have severely degraded. Table 1 Land use in Cho Don District Land use Hectares % Agriculture 2 48 2,7 Forest land 65 187 72.1 Covered by forests 25 439 28.1 Bare land 39 748 44.0 Other 22 706 25,1 Total 90 377 100,0 From the beginning of 1970's to early 1980's the Government has supported different reforestation programmes with little success. In most cases farmers have planted trees in order to receive the subsidies offered by the Government or organisations involved. To plant trees for the sake of benefits involved in forestry has not been the reason to establish plantations. At that time farmers opinion was that food production with shifting cultivation is the best and most profitable way to use forest land. However, the situation has remarkably changed since the beginning of land allocation in 1982 (Government decision number 184). Detailed statistics of land use and land allocation in Cho Don District is presented in Annex 2. The results of a Participatory Rural Appraisal exercise concerning historical development of land use in four pilot villages is presented in Annex 3. 3. LAND ALLOCATION POLICIES During the period from 1982 to 1983 forest land was allocated principally to co-operatives and working groups under the decision number 184. Only some forest land was allocated to households. Forest Guard Station was responsible to proceed the allocation. Households received a 'forest book' indicating the entitlement to use the land. Measurements maps and demarcation of boundaries were never done. In farmers opinion the 'forest book' did not give any means to improve management or any other practises concerning the use of the land. In addition, the policies guiding to protect and develop the area were not stated. According to the forest guards, 10-20% of the households who received forest land succeeded to maintain the forests. In the majority of the cases forests were cleared for shifting cultivation. The first period of forest land allocation was considered as a failure. In 1992, ten years after the decision number 184, forest land allocation was started all over. This time the Province had very particular rules and regulation in measuring, boundary demarcation and documentation. These rules and regulations were defined in detail in the 1993 Land Law, in 1994 Degree number 64 for agricultural land allocation and in 1994 Degree number 02 for forest land allocation. Land was allocated principally to households and the process was

Page 4 of 7 supported by CIDSE. The principle of land allocation is that the Government of Vietnam owns all land in the country. In land allocation a household or other entity only receives right to use the land for certain period of time. The user with land certificate is entitled to sell the right to use the land and user's children are entitled to inherit the land. Allocated forest land can be used by the holder of the land certificate according to regulations. Forest harvesting has to be authorised by forest guards. In the case of e.g. watershed areas or other forest areas that has to be protected farmers can make protection contracts with the State. Then farmers are paid 50000 dong/ha/year by the Government in the areas which are under the Programme 327. The Government pays the costs of demarcation of land allocation. The State has right to request persons who have received land to report how the land is utilised. In the case the allocated area is not managed according to the law and regulations the State can cancel the right to use the land. In the Province of Bac Thai there are no limits how large areas a person can receive. In the case somebody receives more than 15 ha a management plan has to be submitted to office responsible for land allocation. The procedure of forest land allocation by different administrative levels is following: Village: Village chief has to call a meeting to disseminate the policies, distribute land application forms to households and distribute land to households. Commune: The communal leaders have to establish a Communal Land Allocation Committee chaired by the People's Committee. Members of the Committee include forest guard responsible of the commune and officers carrying out the measurements. Commune has to disseminate the policies to farmers, prepare a land use plan for the commune, implement land allocation for the whole commune and solve problems concerning boundaries. District: The leaders have to establish a District Land Allocation Committee chaired by the chairman or vice-chairman of the People's Committee. The members include representatives from forest guards, forest enterprise, agriculture and rural development station, land administrative station. The Forest Guard Station has right to measure, allocate and monitor. The Forest Guards can also contract other entity to carry out land allocation. The chairman of the District's People's committee signs the land allocation decision when forest area is less than 100 ha. The District Land Allocation Committee has to prepare a land use plan for the whole district. Province: The authorities have to define the tasks for forest guard stations to carry out forest land allocation. The Province approves land use plans for each district, it is in charge of costs of land allocation and it prepares land allocation plan. The Province is also responsible to clarify land allocation policies. In practice the People's Committee distributes Guidelines and instructions to other relevant authorities. The chairman of the People's Committee of Province signs the land allocation decision when area is from 100-1000 ha. Nation: The Government defines policies and implications for land allocation and also indicators and work plans for provinces. From 1992 to 1996 almost 30% of the District's forest land was allocated and 70% of households received some forest area (Table 2). All paddy field is allocated to farmers and the farmers have received a 'red book'. At present 5 out of 22 communes in the District have not allocated any forest land. Table 2. Forest land allocation in Cho Don District Situation of land allocation Hectares % Total forest land 65 187 Allocated forest land 18 133 28 Unallocated forest land 47 054 72

Page 5 of 7 Number % Households in Cho Don 7 350 Households that have received forest land 5 299 72 Households that have received land certificate 1 577 21 4. EXPERIENCES OF LAND ALLOCATION IN CHO DON DISTRICT 4.1 Objectives and Achievements The objectives of forest land allocation are to protect the existing forests, to develop the forest resources, to use effectively bare land, to create employment and to improve rural economy. The experience of the past forest land allocation process was analysed against this background especially in the Programme's pilot area. The Government is aiming to facilitate the farmers to participate actively in developing the forests by allocating forest land. Farmers in principle are eager to receive more forest land. Farmers feel that the allocated forest land should be exactly defined, boundaries clarified and finally a red book should be granted. In the case of Ngoc Phai commune, the Programme's first pilot commune, allocated forest land has well developed even the input have been limited due to lack of technical assistance. However, farmers are not interested to invest in traditional forestry. They rather concentrate on fruit trees or tree planting in their home gardens. Different methods to use upland areas e.g. agroforestry are not well known. Farmers are complaining lack of appropriate technical assistance. It is evident that in the case of Ngoc Phai commune, which can represent also other communes in the District, productive land area remains even less than 30 years ago. The area of agricultural land is more or less the same and forests have severely degraded. With appropriate production methods farmers could produce more in allocated forest areas. Farmers are lacking sufficient sources of capital and appropriate technical assistance. 4.2 Technical Procedures in Forest Land Allocation To proceed with land allocation good ways to demarcate boundaries and carry out necessary measurements are needed. The present regulations have definitely improved the situation. Farmers have accepted the present system of land allocation. However, farmers knowledge of land allocation policies is still limited. It appears also that farmers have received unequal areas varying from 0,5 to 10,8 ha. This phenomenon has created conflicts among farmers. Boundaries between allocated areas still remain unclear. This could be improved only by better demarcation. Other problem in land allocation procedure is time. The process appears to be very slow. Some households who received land during 1992 to 1993 have received only recently the red book. The way land allocation procedure, especially demarcation, is organised well as the lessons from the past have taught. However, technical quality need to be improved. The best way to improve the quality is training especially at village and commune level. Training should be targeted on one hand to technical personnel and on the other hand to village and commune leaders and farmers. 4.3 Legal Procedures and Policy Mechanisms In the beginning of forest land allocation in 1982 farmers received a forest book from the forest guards. In later stages in the beginning of 1990's households received first a green book and then a red book issued by the District's People's Committee. The book's ensure full legacy and protection of farmer's rights in land use. Farmers have received information on land law and land allocation policies slowly. It is understandable that farmers do not know very well their responsibilities or rights regarding land use. In some cases farmers still think that they are planting trees for the Government when establishing plantations in allocated forest land. Lack of information is due to poor dissemination in all administrative levels

Page 6 of 7 Dissemination in mountaneous regions is difficult due to poor communication infrastructure. For example in Cho Don TV programmes can be seen only within 3km radius from the District centre Bang Lung. Working equipment are poor in the District especially at commune and village levels. For example land use maps are only available at province and district levels. Dissemination should be carried out in a more efficient way informing about the policies at district, commune and village levels. Also investment to professional equipment should be made by the Government. 4.4 Forest Land Use Most of the interviewed households in the Programme's area have carried out some activities related to conservation, protection or tree planting. In the pilot communes still a good part of forest land remain unallocated. These areas are utilised in destructive manner. The situation in unallocated areas have worsened after partial forest land allocation. Almost all pilot villages have some farms or plot which can be considered as models of sustainable and productive land use. Farmers normally recognise economic value and potential of forest land. However, the farmers do not have any means to develop their forest land in a sustainable more productive manner. Forests have generally degraded severely in Cho Don District. However, there appears to be a significant unused potential. Soils are very fertile and many natural forest tree species have enormous regeneration capacity. Forestry extension plays a key role in facilitating' farmers to use the full potential of their forests. Without any external assistance farmers find it very hard to carry on with productive activities in the forest land. In addition to lack of technical knowledge, many farmers lack of capital, food security and labour. The forest land allocation procedure should be integrated with forestry development programme. The programme should establish clear strategies for community development. In the farmers point of view the most important part is support in technical assistance and capital. The capital for forestry development should be circulated at village level for example through a village forestry fund which could provide farmers with loans for 3 to 5 years. Dissemination at all levels should be supported by the Government. Mechanisms that would allow information from farmer to farmer should be seeked for. Farmers need clear understandable regulations how to protect and manage their forest land. 5. ISSUES AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS IN LAND ALLOCATION IN CHO DON DISTRICT 5.1 Issues Forest land allocation in Cho Don District has reached to some extent the set objectives during the period from 1992 to 1996. Forests in allocated areas have developed in good direction. Unsustainable forest harvesting and shifting cultivation have reduced remarkably in allocated forest land. However, the fact that only part of the forests have been allocated has increased unsustainable use of unallocated areas and in that way increased forest degradation. Economic benefits of allocated forests are still limited due to low level of investments. Land allocation is rather recent phenomena and long gestation periods in forestry do not allow very fast returns. Households still lack capital and technical knowledge and skills to develop their forest areas. Land allocation has been carried out in a very straight forward way. There is still room to improve methods to facilitate farmers to do their own decision making. Current land allocation especially the technical part is too distant from development activities supported by extension agents. Farmers are not informed well enough of land allocation policies and practises.

Page 7 of 7 Officers at commune level who have responsibility in technical land allocation have insufficient capacity to carry out their tasks. Offices responsible for forest land allocation at district and commune levels do not have proper materials and equipment to fulfil their tasks. 5.2 Proposed solutions At commune level all the forest land should be allocated at once in order to eliminate pressure for unsustainable forest use in unallocated areas. Communes and villages should prepare land use plans. These plans should indicate all land use, also common areas, areas for grazing and areas for protection. Communes and villages should also define regulations for protection. Allocation of forest land has been successful in the Province of Hoa Binh. The methodology was designed in such a way that the local people were invited to take the initiative in the entire process. In reality participation of local farmers became the driving force in land allocation. The case of Hoa Binh could be taken as a model for forest land allocation in Cho Don District. The case is described in the report 'Land Classification and Land Allocation in Vietnam and in Tu Ne Commune of Tan Lac District, Hoa Binh Province' by Mr. Vu Van Me, Mr. Nguyen Tuong Van and Mr. Hans Warfvinge. Farmers should be involved from the beginning in land allocation process. The best situation would be that the farmers would at first step define their own borders and only in the second step the technical officers would check the demarcation and carry out measurements. Forest guards and extension agents should strengthen their co-operation. The key question for farmer is what happens after land allocation. Support strategy. technical assistance and credit schemes. should be established as a logical continuation to forest land allocation. Extensionists should support farmers to prepare realistic land use plans which would clearly indicate what can be done with farmers own resources and where external help is needed. Officers especially at district and commune level need training in allocation procedures. Efficient training in different forms should be targeted especially to this personnel. The extension agents and provincial level agents should facilitate efficient preferably on-the- job training. The provincial authorities should consider the correct relation between land allocation targets and budgeting. The most cost effective ways to proceed with land allocation should be applied. Offices responsible for land allocation need materials and equipment in order to fulfil their tasks. Once farmers have received forest land they are in charge of sustainable management. The State should ensure such policies that farmers can have the benefits of sustainable management, i.e. products of forests.