Karl Gawell, Executive Director, Geothermal Energy Association

Similar documents
Karl Gawell, Executive Director, Geothermal Energy Association

Renewable Independent Power Producer. Geothermal Conference and Expo

Renewable Energy: Strengthening Our Nation s Economy

Policy overview and options for maximizing the role of policy in geothermal electricity development

Navigating EPA s Clean Power Plan: Opportunities for Energy Efficiency

California Grid Operations: Current Conditions and Future Needs

April Annual US Geothermal Power Production and Development Report

Energy Sources: Off-shore Wind

February 26, Assessment of geothermal generating resource potential

The National Academy of Sciences

The Renewable Resources

Renewable energy - the future is now

The Mount Spurr Geothermal Project - Update

THE GEOTHERMAL LEXICON

GEOTHERMAL. snohomish county pud

APPENDIX B: WHOLESALE AND RETAIL PRICE FORECAST

COLLOCATED RESOURCES

MONTANA S ENERGY ECONOMY

Georgia Power's Solar Overview. Ervan Hancock III Renewable Development and Green Strategy Manager Georgia Power Company

DEVELOPMENT OF GEOTHERMAL POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES -WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN T WORK-

Annual U.S. Geothermal Power Production and Development Report April 2011

High Performance Homes: Savings Potential, Cost Effectiveness and Policy Options

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

RENEWABLE ENERGY Boulder Solar 1 & 2

ABENGOA SOLAR Solar Power for a Sustainable World

Trends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: July 2012

TESTIMONY ON AND. Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Holt, and members of the Subcommittee:

Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A Status Update

POWER A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP

Renewable Energy Opportunities on Tribal Lands

U.S Department of Energy Semi-Annual Program Report. Geothermal Energy Outreach in the State of Oregon Seventh Semi-Annual Report April 2008

Renewable energy (RE) is any energy source that naturally replenishes and cannot be exhausted. Renewable energies include:

Concentrating Solar Power

UPDATE: RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS IN THE NORTHWEST - A renewable power struggle?

2013 Annual US Geothermal Power Production and Development Report. April 2013

Oregon Renewable Energy Resources

Industrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region

A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership

State Renewable Electricity Standards:

Arizona s Climate Change Action Plan

CAISO s Plan for Integration of Renewable Resources

Geothermal Energy Utilization in the United States of America

Shortage on the Colorado River: Analysis of Impacts to Water Users in Central Arizona. Ken Seasholes

Siting and Taxing Wind Farms in Illinois

Loan Guarantee Program Status Update. October 29, U.S. Department of Energy

Chapter 5 Renewable Energy. Helping to Sustainably Power the Town of Veteran into the Future

The Colorado Renewable Energy Standard Ballot Initiative: Impacts on Jobs and the Economy

Bioenergy: What is it?

Bringing the Neal Hot Springs Geothermal Power Plant to Life

Our Solar Energy Business

Franchise.Org IFA Supplier Member Packages

IDYLWILDE PROJECT FEMA REIMBURSEMENT & POSSIBLE SOLAR PROJECT LOVELAND UTILITIES COMMISSION. July 16, 2014

Geothermal Technologies Office SMU Geothermal Conference March 13, 2013

California ISO Preparing California for a Greener and Smarter Grid

Why Renewable Energy?

Woody Biomass Utilization

Pacific Power Renewable Portfolio Standard Oregon Implementation Plan January 1, 2014

Arizona Solar Energy and Economics Outlook By George Frisvold, William P. Patton, and Stan Reynolds

Integrated Resource Plan

Financing Geothermal Development: Challenges & Opportunities

Farm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc.

Geothermal Energy Utilization: REC Markets and Tax Credits

Colorado Energy & Environmental Issues. Chris Hansen, PhD Senior Advisor, Janys Analytics Candidate, Colorado House of Representatives

Strategic Policy Choice in State-Level Regulation: The EPA s Clean Power Plan

SRP s s Sustainability Initiatives and Programs

Geothermal Energy Association 209 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Washington, D.C

Renewable Energy Demand: State and Federal Drivers. October 2012

The Denver Water System

Re: Base Case and Alternative Scenarios for CAISO Transmission Plan

Global Energy: Abundant Supply and Policy Uncertainty Carnegie Moscow Center Jonathan Elkind Fellow and Senior Adjunct Research Scholar

Our Solar Energy Business

A New Market for Energy Regulation: Advancing the Clean Energy Revolution

DRAFT This report has not yet received editorial or peer review in accordance with NREL publications policy.

Planning Tools. In Section 2: the Nevada Statewide Travel Demand Model; Connecting Nevada website; the webmap; and, data compilation.

Arizona s s Energy Future AG Forum. Kris Mayes, Chairman Arizona Corporation Commission February 26, 2010

Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Newsletter

SLIDES: Status of Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA): Third Intake into Lake Mead and Groundwater Project

Natural Resources. Mr. Dvorin Muir Middle School

Beneficial Use of Produced Water: A Case Study of Projects in Colorado and Wyoming

Franchise.Org IFA Franchisor Member Packages

MON TANA M EAN S BU SINE SS MONTANA TRANSMISSION FOR AMERICA CLEAN ENERGY AND TRANSMISSION DEVELOPMENT IN MONTANA AND THE WEST

DISTRIBUTED GENERATION IN STATE RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS

GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS THE NEW GOLD!!! Jack DiEnna Executive Director The Geothermal National & International Initiative

CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

Assessing wind energy potential for Nevada

The Greening of Texas?

February 1, Honorable Ryan Zinke Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C Dear Secretary Zinke:

Annual KOSMONT-ROSE INSTITUTE COST OF DOING BUSINESS SURVEY REPORT

NEAUPG Annual Fall Meeting

Solar Incentives and Development: Potential Impact of Federal Legislation

Water Use, Electric Power, and Nuclear Energy: Environmental Stewardship. William Skaff Nuclear Energy Institute September 15, 2009

California s Renewable Portfolio Standard

Conservation and Renewable Energy Development in California. Jim Kenna, May 18, 2012 U.S. Bureau of Land Management

Potential Impacts to Texas of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Brian Tulloh Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015

Solar Grand Plan. Ken Zweibel PrimeStar Solar February 2008

Utah Economic and Business Review

Utility Scale Integration of Wind and Solar Power

Renewable Energy Policy: A Driving Force

Imperial County Transmission Consultation Current Resource Deliverability Capabilities from Imperial Valley

Transcription:

Karl Gawell, Executive Director, Geothermal Energy Association www.geo-energy.org 202-454-5261

States generating geothermal energy and existing capacity (2006) Total installed capacity: 2830.65 Megawatts (MW) (11/2006)* Total generation: 16,010 GWh (2005) Alaska California Hawaii Nevada Utah 400 kw 2492.1 MW 35 MW 276.4 MW 26 MW

ORMAT 20MW Burdette Power Plant - Reno, Nevada

UTC Power 225 KW Power Plant - Chena, Alaska

State Unconfirmed PHASE 1 (Identifying site, secured rights to resource, initial exploration drilling) PHASE 2 (Drilling and confirming) PHASE 3 (Securing PPA and final permits) PHASE 4 (Under Const.) TOTAL* (PHASE 1to PHASE 4) Number of sites and MW-range # of sites/#mw AK 1/15 MW 1/20 MW 1/0.6 MW 2/20.6 MW AZ 1/2-20 MW 1/2-20 MW CA 5/320-330 MW 3/326.8 MW 5/139.5 MW 2/35-73 MW 15/821.3-869.3 MW HI 1/30 MW 1/8 MW 2/38 MW ID 2/200 MW 1/26 1/10 MW 2/36 MW NM 2/21 MW 2/21 MW NV 5/72-102 MW 7/304-393 MW 3/49-64 MW 6/157-167 MW 3/37 MW 19/547-661 MW OR 3/86-91 MW 1/40-60 2/60.2 MW 6/186.2-211.2 MW UT 2/135 MW 1/36.6 MW 1/11 MW 2/47.6 MW Total 10 projects 422-452 MW 18 projects 762-884 MW 11 projects 499.4-534.4 MW 14 projects 364.7-374.7 MW 8 projects 93.6-131.6 MW 51 projects 1719.7-1924.7 MW

18000 16000 GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL BY 2025 We can triple capacity in 10 years 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Today (2006) - 2830 MW + Under Development (2010/2011) - 4714.6 MW + Under Development and Unconfirmed (2012?) - 5184.6 MW + WGA near-term (2015) - 8413 MW + WGA longer-term (2025) - 15383 MW

New Study Finds Extensive Undeveloped Geothermal Resource in Western US; Identifies Barriers, Challenges, and Opportunities for Future Geothermal Development Washington, DC -- A new report released today finds extensive undeveloped geothermal resources in fourteen Western states Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. The new report, An Assessment of Geothermal Resource Development Needs in the Western United States, written by Dan Fleischmann for the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) is the most in-depth study we ve ever undertaken into the specific barriers and challenges to geothermal energy in the US.

Key Conclusions The West s geothermal resources appear to be more extensive than most people believe; The unidentified resource base is a significant near-term target of opportunity with up to 150,000MW; Federal and State policies need to be complementary and support a clear path for new project development; Federal programs and tax incentives will make a significant difference; and Federal efforts should be tailored to support the specific needs in each state

California Power Generation from Renewable Resources 1998-2005 California Renewable Power 1998-2005 gigawatt hours 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Year Geothermal Biomass Wind Solar

A Comparison of Recent Geothermal Power Supply Estimates for California California s Current Capacity: 2400MW California Geothermal Power Estimates USGS Petty Low Petty High NEMS EIA GeothermEx WGA MW of New Geothermal Power 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 13716 5801 24750 12170 9717 7078 3186.2 Source or Report

California California is the largest producer of geothermal electric power in the United States. Geothermal power plants represented 5% of California s energy production in 2005. However, based on analysis performed by GEA, this development is only a fraction of what is possible. While development has stalled since 1992, new capacity is coming online over the next few years. Despite a strong state Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and federal tax incentives for geothermal power plants, much of the new development is limited by transmission issues and delays caused by federal and state permitting regulations. While efforts are being made to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) that would allow new leasing in certain areas of the state for the first time in two decades, other areas of the state, beyond those specifically identified in the PEIS, should be considered. The PEIS is a joint effort by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) in conjunction with the California Energy Commission (CEC). At the time of this writing, the PEIS has not been finalized, and the BLM encourages input about additional sites that should be included.

Idaho The first commercial geothermal power plant is currently under construction at Raft River, and several other areas are under consideration. Past exploration and development efforts have been limited because power rates in Idaho were among the lowest in the country for many years and the state s small population did not necessitate new sources of electric power. Therefore, there is a great need for exploration and resource characterization to better define resource potential. Currently the best guess by even the most knowledgeable researchers in the state is that Idaho could sustain anywhere from a handful of geothermal power plants to rivaling Nevada or even Southern California in recoverable resource. A number of promising geothermal prospects are on BLM and USFS land which further complicates development. Further, both geothermal direct use and electric power projects may conflict with water allocation issues that can also limit development. For these reasons, federal and state support is needed to mitigate barriers and to help researchers understand the resource potential so that they may plan accordingly for future development.

Nevada From 1984 through 1992, 14 geothermal power plants were developed in Nevada. 15 years later, Nevada is seeing a resurgence in development: 24 new plants under development have a combined capacity of up to 751 MW; nine projects with power contracts already secure have a combined capacity of up to 204 MW. Nevada is the one state that has put together federal and state efforts to develop geothermal in an effective way. While some of the recent success in Nevada is owed to prior exploration and research, progress could not have been accomplished without the coordinated effort of state and federal agencies, the state RPS, the federal Production Tax Credit (PTC), the BLM efforts to reduce leasing backlogs, the USDOE s support for cost-shared drilling and technical assistance, and the work of the Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy at the University of Nevada Reno. These efforts can serve as a model for other states, but they must continue to maintain industry momentum.

New Mexico Geothermal resources have an opportunity to be a large contributor to the energy needs of New Mexico. To date, however, New Mexico only uses its geothermal resources for thermal heating applications in about a dozen locations. The greatest use of geothermal resources in New Mexico has been its greenhouses, which provide a few hundred jobs and $30 million in annual revenues. During the 1970s and 1980s a large geothermal power project was under development in the Valles Caldera in north-central New Mexico. Resource and regulatory issues led to the cancellation of the project. At the time, it was believed that Valles Caldera was the only geothermal resource area in the state capable of producing a large electric power plant. However, when traveling throughout the state, it became clear that there are a number of attractive resource prospects outside of this conflict area. Unfortunately, limited work has been done in these areas, and most of them are blind (i.e. without apparent surface manifestations). These areas are high-risk and developers in the state need federal or state funding to aid with early exploration and to reduce the high investment risk associated with their development. There is also a need to explore the Rio Grande Rift area in greater detail for both geothermal power prospects and for large-scale geothermal heating potential specifically in Las Cruces and its surrounding areas. In the near term, development is likely for direct use and smallscale power. Drilling has occurred at two locations where small geothermal power units will be installed for an aquaculture facility to produce 10 million pounds of fish annually and a greenhouse that would expand to 40 acres. The resource has been proven at these sites and these projects need continued financial support to ensure project completion.

Utah Utah is the only state in the continental U.S. outside of California and Nevada with an operating geothermal power plant. The first plant came online at Roosevelt Hot Springs in 1984. Two more facilities were built in 1990 that operated at Cove Fort-Sulphurdale until 2003 and 2004 when those facilities were decommissioned. The Blundell geothermal facility at Roosevelt Hot Springs is still operating, and is being expanded. The Cove Fort resource is also being expanded to three times more capacity, with new larger facilities expected to replace the old facilities. Utah also has great potential for direct use applications. A large-scale geothermal heating project was completed in 2005 at the Utah State Prison, 30 miles south of Salt Lake City. Researchers indicate that geothermal resources underlie much of the Wasatch Front, where the vast majority of Utah s population resides. It is clear from the research that the potential extent of Utah s geothermal resource (both for direct use and electric power) is not well understood, and the geology of these resources is complicated in some areas. A lack of state-level funding support and the short extension of the PTC have caused geothermal power projects to be cancelled or delayed. Most agree that federal and state support needs to be expanded for further development to be successful.

Other States Examined in the Report Alaska Arizona Colorado Hawaii Montana Oregon Texas Washington Wyoming Other parts of the country

To download a copy of the report: http://www.geo-energy.org/publications/reports.asp