First 100 T Non-Destructive Magnet Outer Coil Set. J. Bacon, A. Baca, H. Coe, K. Kihara, M. Manzo, J. Schillig, J. Sims and Y.

Similar documents
GA A22436 CREEP-FATIGUE DAMAGE IN OFHC COOLANT TUBES FOR PLASMA FACING COMPONENTS

R&D of the ITER Correction Coil magnet system in China

COMPOSITE LANDING GEAR COMPONENTS FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS

Welding Processes. Consumable Electrode. Non-Consumable Electrode. High Energy Beam. Fusion Welding Processes. SMAW Shielded Metal Arc Welding

9. VACUUM TANK 9. VACUUM TANK

Bonded Neo Magnetization Guide

R. Prokopec, K. Humer, H. Fillunger, R. K. Maix, and H. W. Weber

PROGRESS ON THE SECTOR MAGNETS FOR THE RIKEN SRC

Metal-to-glass bonding properties of an acrylate adhesive (DELO GB368) and an ionoplast interlayer (SentryGlas) at 23, -20 and 60 C.

TOP 5 REASONS TO USE FILM-CAST PTFE LINER TUBING FOR YOUR NEXT CATHETER DESIGN

Design Progress and Analysis for ITER Thermal Shield

Effect on deformation process of adding a copper core to multifilament MgB2 superconducting wire

THERMOFIT ADHESIVE S Flex Fluid Resistant, High Temperature, One Part-Flexible Epoxy

PART UF REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESSURE VESSELS FABRICATED BY FORGINGS

Structural integrity assessment and stress measurement of CHASNUPP-1 fuel assembly Part A: under tensile loading condition

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BALL VALVES

Overview of Presentation. SCBFs are Conceptually Truss Structures

Structural Design of Pergola with Airfoil Louvers

GREEN THREAD Piping Systems

A. This Section includes the following types of dry-type transformers rated 600 V and less, with capacities up to 1000 kva:

ABSTRACT. KEY WORDS: Tubular piles; composite behavior; offshore structures; push-out strength; bond strength; slip.

A STUDY OF FINE BLANKING PROCESS BY FEM SIMULATION. G. Fang, P. Zeng

Effect of Spray Quenching Rate on Distortion and Residual Stresses during Induction Hardening of a Full-Float Truck Axle

ROLINX Laminated Busbar. Design Rules Version 01 (12/2015)

Gage Series Stress Analysis Gages

CHARACTERIZATION OF TITANIUM ALLOYS FOR CRYOGENIC APPLICATIONS

Motor Ratings and Qualified Life Issues

Composites: Part B 53 (2013) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Composites: Part B

Cold Spray Developments at UTRC

Fast quench problems and how they damage coke drums

1. INTRODUCTION. (a) Sand/ Fabric-coated (b) Sand-coated deformed. (c) Helical wrapped/ribbed Fig.1 FRP anchors with different outer surfaces

Fast quench problems and how they damage coke drums

THERMAL DAMAGE IN CARBON FIBER POLYMER-MATRIX COMPOSITES, SENSED BY ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENT

Sensitivity of Nb 3 Sn Rutherford-type cables to transverse pressure

A Review of Suitability for PWHT Exemption Requirements in the Aspect of Residual Stresses and Microstructures

MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

Autofrettage process: finite element simulation and experimental validation

REINFORCING FIELD FABRICATED BRANCH CONNECTIONS USING COMPOSITE MATERIALS

MOMENT RESISTING CONNECTION WITH SIDEPLATE (GEOMETRIC ASPECTS)

Development of an Axial Gap motor with Amorphous Metal Cores

FUEL ROD PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AND RE-INSTRUMENTATION CAPABILITIES AT THE HALDEN PROJECT

1.7 Prestressing Steel

Solid-State Welding Processes

M. C. Yaksh, Ph.D., PE NAC International T. Chung SAIC

Bulging Assessment and Long- Term Repair of Coke Drums

Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling & Simulation

Residual stresses in machined and shrink-fitted assemblies

Details of technical leaflets/write-up on various pieces of equipment.

INNOVATIVE FIBRE REINFORCED BRIDGE DECK MODULES ABSTRACT

Design and Analysis of Multilayer High Pressure Vessels and Piping Tarun Mandalapu 1 Ravi Krishnamoorthy. S 2

Mechanical behavior of crystalline materials - Stress Types and Tensile Behaviour

MuShield s High Permeability Magnetic Shielding per ASTM A753 Alloy Type 4

FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITES FOR ADVANCED SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF WATER SUPPLIES

Council on Tall Buildings

Computerized calculation of composite laminates and structures: theory and reality

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

DESIGN OF A VARIABLE STIFFNESS LEG USING SHAPE MEMORY POLYMER COMPOSITES

A New Structural Bonding Process for Ferromagnetic Sheet Stacking used in Electric Motors (Rotors, Stators )

Standard Specification for Stainless Chromium-Nickel Steel-Clad Plate 1

Roll Bonding or Roll Welding

REINFORCING LARGE DIAMETER ELBOWS USING COMPOSITE MATERIALS SUBJECTED TO EXTREME BENDING AND INTERNAL PRESSURE LOADING

SECTION III DIVISIONS 1 AND 2

Effect of beam dimensions on structural performance of wide beam-column joints

GROOVE DESIGN FOR FORM FIT JOINTS MADE BY ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE CRIMPING

Notes Changed note Date. 1 (A) Changed template 09 / 07 / 2008

Review of Manufacturing Processes

Extrusion of complex shapes

High Performance Alloys. Characteristics

Design under high windload

LD21 NEW MATERIALS FOR LARGE-CALIBER ROTATING BANDS FOR HIGH CHARGES. M. Schupfer1, K. Steinhoff2, R. Röthlisberger1 1.

Seismic Retrofit Of RC Columns With Inadequate Lap-Splice Length By External Post-Tensioned High-Strength Strips

1. Division 23 Section "Hangers and Supports for HVAC Piping and Equipment" for pipe insulation shields and protection saddles.

CRIMP TOOLING WHERE FORM MEETS FUNCTION

Resin impregnated paper bushings. Product information

Aluminium Excellence Performance in Economical Way

Modeling the Creep Behavior of Torsional Springs

Research on the Near-net Forging Processes for the Shell Body Made by High-strength Steel Taibin Wu1, a, b

Presentation in support of

Crimp Tooling Where Form Meets Function

Bearing and Delamination Failure Analysis of Pin Loaded Composite Laminates

NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS USING SOLID65 ELEMENT

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE

Types of Strain. Engineering Strain: e = l l o. Shear Strain: γ = a b

4th Annual International Conference on Material Science and Engineering (ICMSE 2016)

CHAPTER 11: PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

Finite Element Simulation of Low Concrete Strength Beam-Column Joint Strengthened with CFRP

Development of W-Truss System

MAE 322 Machine Design Shafts -1. Dr. Hodge Jenkins Mercer University

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

THE CFRP SAILPLANE WING SEGMENTS MANUFACTURED BY FILAMENT PLACEMENT

Analysis and design of composite structures

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER /2016 STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS MODULE NO: AME6002

Behaviour of Concrete Filled Rectangular Steel Tube Column

CHAPTER 9 INFLUENCE OF RESIDUAL STRESSES ON THE FAILURE PRESSURE OF CYLINDRICAL VESSELS

FE MODELING OF CFRP STRENGTHENED CONCRETE BEAM EXPOSED TO CYCLIC TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY AND SUSTAINED LOADING

Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 7, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE REPAIRS WITH FULL-SCALE VALIDATION TESTING

Stress and Distortion Evolution During Induction Case Hardening of Tube

3M XYZ / Isotropic Electrically Conductive Adhesive Transfer Tape 9709

Solutions in Steel Innovative Technologies for Smart Solutions

Transcription:

LA-UR-99-5180 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Title: First 100 T Non-Destructive Magnet Outer Coil Set Author(s): J. Bacon, A. Baca, H. Coe, K. Kihara, M. Manzo, J. Schillig, J. Sims and Y. Eyssa Submitted to: http://lib-www.lanl.gov/la-pubs/00796142.pdf Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the University of California for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royaltyfree license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. FORM 836 (10/96)

First 100 T Non-Destructive Magnet Outer Coil Set J. Bacon, A. Baca, H. Coe, K. Kihara, M. Manzo, J. Schillig, J. Sims National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL), Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Y. Eyssa NHMFL, 1800 E. Paul Dirac Drive Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA Abstract The controlled power outer coil set of the first 100 T non-destructive (100 T ND) magnet is described. This magnet will be installed as part of the user facility research equipment at the National High Magnetic Field laboratory (NHMFL) Pulsed Field Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The 100 T ND controlled power outer coil set consists of seven nested, mechanically independent externally reinforced coils. These coils, in combination, will produce a 47 T platform field in a 225- mm diameter bore. Using inertial energy storage a synchronous motor/generator provides ac power to a set of seven ac-dc converters rated at 64 MW/80 MVA each. These converters energize three independent coil circuits to create 170 MJ of field energy in the outer coil set at the platform field of 47 T. Each coil consists of a multi-layer winding of high strength conductor supported by an external high strength stainless steel shell. Coils with the highest magnetic loads will utilize a reinforcing shell fabricated from highly cold worked 301 stainless steel strip. The autofrettage conditioning method will be used to pre-stress the coils and thereby limit conductor and reinforcement strains to the elastic range. The purpose of pre-stressing the coils is to attain a design life of 10,000 full field pulses. The operation and conditioning of the coil set will be described along with special features of its design, magnetic and structural analyses and construction. the conductor material from aluminum dispersion strengthened copper UNS C15175 (GlidCop Al-15 TM ) and UNS C15715 (GlidCop AL-60 TM ) to either steel clad copper or copper silver, or by increasing the amount of cold working of the aluminum dispersion strengthened copper. Using highly cold worked UNS-S30100 stainless steel sheet can increase the shell material strength. Autofrettage conditioning has been used for decades to condition artillery tubes and pressure vessels by plastically yielding the inner surface with a radially directed internal pressure. Upon removal of the pressure, the inner surface is driven into a state of beneficial compressive stress. During subsequent operation the tensile stress of the conditioned inner surface is reduced for pressures less than that which originally yielded the inner surface of the tube or vessel [3]. The analysis and preliminary design of the 100 T ND outer coil set are near completion. The primary design issues are the fatigue life and strain softening of the conductor and shell materials for the two innermost coils. Strain controlled fatigue testing of the conductor material and UNS-S30100 stainless steel overwrap at operating conditions will address these issues. Index Terms high field, pulsed magnet, 100 tesla II. SPECIFICATIONS I. INTRODUCTION The 100 tesla non-destructive (100 T ND) magnet outer coil set provides a nominal platform field of 47 T (net at peak) in a 225 mm bore. The 100 T ND insert coil provides the balance of the 100 T field in a 15 mm bore. A complete description of the 100 T ND magnet is given in [1]. Many of the design characteristics of the 60 T long pulse (LP) coils have been transferred to the 100 T ND outer coil set design. The 60 T LP magnet is described in [2]. Higher magnetic pressures, however, have driven the design to utilize stronger conductor and shell materials, and a post assembly coil conditioning method referred to as autofrettaging. Other design enhancements include additional insulation between coils and an improved coil lead and busbar design. Conductor material strength can be increased by changing Manuscript received September 27, 1999. This work was supported by US Department of Energy, Division of Materials Sciences and the US National Science Foundation through the NHMFL. The following specifications guided the design of the outer coil set: 1) The net platform magnetic field will be 47 T or greater at magnet peak field. 2) The maximum number of nominal pulses will be 10,000 or greater. 3) The time between nominal pulses will not exceed 1 hour. 4) The size of the magnet will be not be much greater than 1 m in diameter and 1 m long, due to manufacturing limits. 5) The voltage, current and power requirements for the magnet will not exceed that available from 7 power supply modules each rated at 64 MW or 20kA @ 3.2 kv (full load) III. DESCRIPTION A cross section of the 100 T ND magnet is shown in Fig. 1. The outer coil set consists of 7 coils divided into 3 separate electrical sections powered by a synchronous motor/generator through combinations of seven ac-dc converters. A coil is

comprised of a winding inserted into a steel shell and then vacuum impregnated with epoxy. The coils are numbered 1 coupling of the start and end of a winding allows a significant portion of the magnetic forces on the first and last turn to be Magnetic Field (T) Fig. 1. Internal details of 100 Tesla Non-Destructive Magnet through 7 starting at the innermost radial coil and progressing to the outermost radial Section 1 consists of coils 1 and 2 connected in series, powered by 2 converters. Section 2 consists of coils 3 and 4 connected in series, powered by 2 converters. Section 3 consists of coils 5, 6 and 7 connected in series, powered by 3 converters. The sections are energized in stages; section 3 first, followed by section 2 and finally by section 1. A simulation of the resultant nominal magnetic field produced by the outer coil set is shown in Fig. 2. The insert coil set is energized at the peak platform field. High magnetic pressures in coils 1 through 4 have driven their design to utilize stronger materials and the autofrettage technique for prestressing the conductor. The coils are nested and mounted in a NEMA G-10 epoxy fiberglass laminate and stainless steel frame. The frame is suspended inside a dewar (see Fig. 1) which is cooled to 77 K operating temperature. Cooling is accomplished using liquid nitrogen. The coils are free to expand and contract axially inside the dewar. A. Coil Windings The coil windings are basic multi-turn, multi layer solenoids. All of the coil windings are mechanically independent of each other and radially supported by a steel reinforcing shell. Coil winding details are presented in Table I. Conductor leads are silver brazed to the winding terminations and transition to a coaxial geometry which interlocks the leads against each other. This mechanical Time (s) Fig. 2. Simulated 47 T platform magnetic field pulse reacted by the conductor. The busbar connections to the coaxial leads utilize hemispherical rotating and sliding/rotating mechanical joints, which will adjust for minor deviations in geometry plus assembly and manufacturing tolerances. Paired, rectangular busbars connect to the coaxial leads and rise upward and radially outward and connect to coaxial magnet busbar risers that penetrate the dewar lid (see Fig. 1). Current is provided to the electrical sections through these risers. The busbar system design allows limited movement to accommodate thermal expansion and contraction and coil deflection under magnetic loads. TABLE I COIL WINDING GEOMETRY Coil Conductor Turns per Coil ID/OD Coil Length Size (mm) Layer/Layers W/o shell (mm) 1 7.2 x 5.2 58 / 4 225 / 274 460 2 7.2 x 5.2 58 / 4 338 / 388 460 3 10.5 x 5.5 67 / 4 454 / 506 752 4 10.5 x 5.5 67 / 4 607 / 659 752 5 13.0 x 9.0 67 / 4 751 / 831 920 6 13.0 x 9.0 67 / 4 913 / 993 920 7 12.0 x 8.5 68 / 6 1054/1167 866

B. Shells Each coil winding is enclosed by a stainless steel reinforcing shell. Shells 1 through 4 are each comprised of a forged steel bobbin wrapped with 60 % cold worked stainless steel sheet (see Fig 3). Sheet is needed to obtain this degree of cold working and the associated yield strength. Shells 5 and 6 are made from annealed stainless steel forgings. Shell 7 is a rolled, welded, and annealed stainless steel tube. C. Materials The base line materials for the conductors are Glidcop AL- 60 TM for windings 1 and 2, Glidcop AL-15 TM for windings 3 through 6 and C10400 copper for winding 7. Steel clad copper and copper silver are also material candidates for windings 1 and 2. The primary electrical insulation system for the conductors is comprised of an epoxy (CTD 101 TM ) impregnated E-glass TM fabric tape and Kapton TM tape. Shell 1 through 4 bobbins are Nitronic-40 TM and the overwrap sheet is extra full hard (XFH) UNS-S30100 stainless steel. Shells 5 and 6 are comprised of Nitronic- 40 TM. Shell 7 is comprised of UNS S30400 stainless steel. Additional information on materials may be found in [4]. Bobbin Coaxial lead IV. ANALYSIS Magnetic and structural finite element analysis was performed on the outer coil set using an axisymmetric model with mid-plane symmetry. The structural effects of the autofrettage pulse (50.92 T) and a nominal pulse (49.43 T) were examined using the analysis code, Cosmos TM -M. Currents obtained from a circuit analysis code were input into the magnetic analysis. Forces obtained in the magnetic analysis and coil temperatures predicted from the circuit analysis code were used as input into the structural analysis. The structural analysis was run in non-linear mode to allow plastic deformation to occur during the autofrettage pulse. Table II shows the conductor compressive state after autofrettage (for coils 1 through 4), maximum Von Mises stresses due to a nominal pulse, and yield strength for each The high stress states in the conductors for coils 1 and 2 have driven the design to require the autofrettage of these coils. The lower stresses in coil 3 and 4 conductors have allowed the selection of a material with a lower yield strength, but higher conductivity. These coils are also autofrettaged, primarily because their contribution to the total field is needed during the autofrettage of coils 1 and 2. The stress range for coils 1 and 2 is large and approaches a full reversal, an undesirable situation for fatigue loading and strain softening. A test is planned to cycle the coil 1 and 2 conductor material through 10,000 cycles at this stress range and at operating temperature. The stress state of the stainless steel overwrap for coils 1 and 2 is also of concern. Von Mises stresses as high as 1950 MPa are predicted at the midplane near the winding to shell interface during a nominal pulse. The yield strength of the UNS S30100 XFH stainless steel at 77 K is 2040 MPa. The stainless steel sheet will also be fatigue tested. The highest predicted combined stresses for the insulation occur during the autofrettage pulse. These predicted stresses are conservative due to the bonding of the insulation nodes with the shell nodes in the model. In reality, slippage can occur between the bobbin wall and the insulation. The mechanical safety margins of the insulation were checked using the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. The criterion states that in Stainless Steel Sheet Clock Pin Winding TABLE II PREDICTED CONDUCTOR STRESS AND YIELD STRENGTHS Coil Autofrettage Cond. Comp Stress (MPa) Nom Pulse Cond. VM Conductor Y.S. (MPa) @ 77 K Stress (MPa) 1-485 639 725 (AL-60 TM ) 2-493 651 725 (AL-60 TM ) 3-20 622 660 (AL-15 TM ) 4-19 618 660 (AL-15 TM ) 5 -------- 502 660 (AL-15 TM ) 6 -------- 459 660 (AL-15 TM ) 7 -------- 211 400 (C10400) Fig. 3. Cross-section of coil 1 showing winding, bobbin and stainless steel sheet wrap.

order to avoid failure the following equation must be satisfied where: n 0 2 n 2 0 1 n = predicted compressive stress, 0 = compressive strength, n = predicted shear stress, 0 = shear strength. Using the predicted compressive stress of 248 MPa, the compressive strength, 1250 MPa, the predicted shear stress of 68 MPa and the shear strength, 201 MPa, the summation was calculated to equal.313. A. Coil Windings II. FABRICATION The conductor material is pulled off of a supply spool and run through a winding train where a staggered half lap wrap of.03 mm thick Kapton TM and.13 mm thick E-glass TM tape is applied. The insulated conductor is wrapped over a mandrel under moderate tension (less than 900 N) and an automated guide positions the conductor. Windings 3 through 7 will require the brazing of several lengths of conductor material. Additional insulation is added on the ID, OD, and between layers of the winding. Coaxial lead components are brazed to the start and end of the windings. B. Sheet Reinforced Shells The process of winding the bobbins is described below. First, a steel wedge, which tapers from.41 mm thick to.13 mm, is glued to a bobbin. This wedge creates a gentle transition with a.13 mm step when winding rather than an abrupt.41 mm step. Next the UNS-S30100 stainless steel sheet is either welded to the wedge or glued to the bobbin. The sheet is then wound onto the bobbin under tension, to achieve a greater packing factor. The wedge and the sheet starting edge are held in place by friction. A packing factor greater than 90% is required for structural integrity. The steel sheet is terminated by plug welding the end of the sheet to the underlying layer and then cutting the material. C. Coils The OD of the winding is measured and the ID of the shell is machined to that dimension plus an assembly clearance. The winding and its mandrel are inserted into the shell. The shell is sealed and the winding is vacuum impregnated with epoxy. After curing the winding mandrel is removed from the (1) D. Coils The OD of the winding is measured and the ID of the shell is machined to that dimension plus an assembly clearance. The winding and its mandrel are inserted into the shell. The shell is sealed and the winding is vacuum impregnated with epoxy. After curing the winding mandrel is removed from the III. AUTOFRETTAGE AND OPERATION Coils 3 and 4 are autofrettaged by pulsing them with more current than used in a nominal pulse. Coil 5, 6 and 7 are also active to provide a background field, but coils 1 and 2 are inactive, as they would reduce the magnetic field in coils 3 and 4. This is due to the mutual inductances. A reduction in magnetic field would decrease the amount of yielding in the coil 1 and 2 conductors. Coils 1 and 2 are autofrettaged by energizing the entire coil set. During a normal operation, coils 5, 6 and 7 are energized first and the period these coils are energized bracket in time the period in which coils 3 and 4 are energized, which bracket the time period for coils 1 and 2. A peak platform field of 49.4 T (before interaction with the insert coil) is achieved when all coils are energized. IV. SUMMARY A method of fabricating a high strength high field magnet coil has been conceived and analyzed. A complete full size prototype of coil 1 will be built. After successful fabrication, it will be used in the operational magnet outer coil set. The estimated completion date for fabrication of the outer coil set is June 2001. REFERENCES [1] J. R. Sims, et al., First 100 T Non-Destructive Magnet, IEEE Transactions of Applied Superconductivity, this issue. [2] J. R. Sims, H. J. Boenig, L. J. Campbell, D. G. Rickel, J. D. Rogers, J. B. Schillig, and H. J. Schneider-Muntau, Completion of the US NHMFL 60 T Quasi-Continuous Magnet, Proceedings of the 15th Intl. Conf. on Magnet Technology, Beijing, China, October 20-24, 1997, pp. 635-641. [3] R.L. Brockenbrough and J.E. Steiner, Autofrettaged Wire-Wrapped Pressure Vessels, ASME Publication Paper No. 76-PUP-47 (1976). [4] K. Han, et al, Material Issues in the 100 T Non-Destructive Magnet IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, this issue.