NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Similar documents
Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Section O Noise Criteria

APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.

Traffic Noise Presentation

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

CITY OF AIRDRIE. Transportation Noise Policy

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development

APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

2.2. The intent of the Surface Transportation Noise Policy is to provide the following: The responsibility for providing noise attenuation.

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

Section 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas

Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario

Stantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON.

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

US 53 Noise Mitigation

Gisborne District Council

SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase

Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Assessment. Assessment. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE

3.1 Noise Overlay District

Acoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment

Rural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies...

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area

Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review. November 19, 2013

Buffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise

Assessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL ZONE - RULES

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Noise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES

Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

Community and Environmental Noise Measurement

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

442 CHELTENHAM ROAD KEYSBOROUGH. Noise Control Considerations. Prepared for Bridport Property Group Level 1, 170 Bridport Street, Albert Park VIC 3206

SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART THREE] DECISIONS VERSION 7 lower density SUBURBAN residential

San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project EIR Noise

Assessment of Traffic Noise Effects

APPENDIX 7 - AIRPORT NOISE AND DE VE LOPMENT CONTROL

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

Transcription:

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND... 1 3.0 METHODOLOGY... 2 3.1 Noise Background... 2 3.2 Noise Criteria... 2 3.3 Noise Attenuation Requirements... 3 4.0 PREDICTION OF OUTDOOR NOISE LEVELS... 4 4.1 Noise Sources... 4 4.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes... 4 4.3 Noise Analysis... 5 4.4 Noise Level Results... 5 4.5 Implementation... 6 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 7 DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE I DSEL

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Key Plan Noise Receiver Plan Acoustic Fence Plan TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Outdoor Noise Level Criteria Indoor Noise Level Criteria Noise Attenuation Requirements Traffic and Roadway Parameters Noise Analysis Results Attenuated Noise Analysis Results Required Noise Attenuation Measures APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Grading Plan STAMSON Input and Output Data PAGE II DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. DSEL

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 PROJECT NO.: 10-448 1.0 INTRODUCTION Phoenix Homes have retained David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL) to prepare a Noise Control Study in support of their application for site plan control. The subject property is located within the City of Ottawa urban boundary. As depicted on Figure 1, the subject property is Northwest of Prince of Wales Drive between Blackleaf Drive and Golflinks Drive located at 3654 & 3658 Jockvale Road. The subject property measures approximately 1.07ha and is zoned DR. The proposed development by Phoenix Homes involves the construction of 7 blocks of residential townhouses consisting of 54 units. The purpose of this report is to evaluate noise attenuation measure and warning clauses required for the subject lands. 2.0 BACKGROUND Environmental Noise Control Guidelines City of Ottawa, May 10, 2006. (ENCG) LU-131 Noise Assessment In Land Use Planning Ministry of the Environment Official Plan City of Ottawa, May 2003. The above documents form the basis of this report. PAGE 1 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Noise Background The City of Ottawa is concerned with noise from aircraft, roads, transitways and railways as expressed in the Official Plan, since it can affect the quality of life for residents. To protect residents from unacceptable levels of noise, the City of Ottawa has specific environmental noise control guidelines, which are primarily based on Ministry of Environment (MOE) policies, guidelines and procedures aimed at providing guidance on noise assessment in land use planning. Only noise generated from road traffic is considered in this analysis. Aircraft noise is not considered in this analysis as the subject lots are situated outside of the Ottawa Airport Operation Influence Zone (AOIZ) as per Figure 1.1 in the ENCG. Transitways and railway lines are not considered in this analysis, as they are not located within 250m and 500m, respectively, of the subject lots. Theoretical noise calculations are generated using the Stamson 5.04 program, which is provided by the MOE. The noise levels are dependent on the proposed receiver location, and the path in which the noise travels from the source to reach it. Noise levels are reported in decibels (dba). 3.2 Noise Criteria The quantitative sound level criteria, which require that specific outdoor and indoor living areas of the residential development meet certain energy equivalent sound levels (Leq), are summarized in Table 1, and Table 2, respectively. Compliance with the outdoor sound level criteria will generally ensure compliance with indoor sound level criteria. The Leq is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a selected period of time. The Leq is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour daytime / 8-hour nighttime split to assess its impact. Table 1: Outdoor Noise Level Criteria Time Period Receiver Location Max Noise Level Criteria (Leq) With no Noise Mitigation Requirements Daytime (07:00 23:00) Outdoor Living Area (OLA) 55 dba Daytime Plane of Window (POW) 55 dba (07:00 23:00) Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Plane of Window (POW) at bedrooms/sleeping quarters 50 dba PAGE 2 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 The OLA is defined as the part of the outdoor amenity area provided for the quiet enjoyment of the outdoor environment during the daytime period. The amenity area for this development is considered the backyards of the subject houses. The receiver location for measuring the OLA for a residential backyard is 3.0m from the wall of the house and 1.5m above grade. Table 2: Indoor Noise Level Criteria Time Period Receiver Location Noise Level Criteria (Leq) Daytime (07:00 23:00) Residential living spaces 45 dba Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Residential sleeping quarters 40 dba 3.3 Noise Attenuation Requirements In accordance with City of Ottawa guidelines, when noise levels are predicted to be less than the specified criteria for daytime and nighttime conditions, no attenuation measures are required. As the noise criteria are exceeded, a combination of attenuation measures is recommended. These attenuation measures may include any or all of the following: Noise barrier/berm; Forced air ventilation system with provision for central air conditioning; Air conditioning; When sound levels are predicted to exceed the applicable noise level criteria, a warning clause is registered on title to alert potential homeowners/residents. The noise attenuation requirements for the outdoor living area are presented in Table 3. DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 3 DSEL

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 Table 3: City of Ottawa Noise Attenuation Requirements Daytime (07:00 23:00) NOISE LEVEL (dba) Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Un-attenuated Attenuated Un-attenuated Attenuated OUTDOOR LIVING AREA (OLA) NOISE ATTENUATION OLA < 55 None 55 < OLA < 60 Noise Clause Type A OLA > 60 OLA < 55 Noise Barrier OLA > 60 OLA > 55 Noise Clause Type B PLANE OF WINDOW (POW) POW < 55 POW < 50 None 55 < POW < 65 50 < POW < 60 Forced Air Ventilation Noise Clause Type C POW > 65 POW > 60 Central Air Conditioning Noise Clause Type D 4.0 PREDICTION OF OUTDOOR NOISE LEVELS 4.1 Noise Sources The subject development is bound by Jockvale Road (south of Cambrian) to the east and is bound by the existing Stonebridge residential development. Jockvale Road is considered the only noise source for this development. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The assessment of road traffic noise impact is evaluated based on Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) for each noise source. Jockvale Road is considered an arterial road, and the AADT has been attained from Table 1.7 in the ENCG. The traffic and roadway parameters used for the sound level predictions are presented in Table 4. Table 4: Traffic and Roadway Parameters Jockvale Road Roadway Classification 4-Lane Urban Arterial - Divided Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 35,000 veh / day Posted Speed 70 km/hr Day/Night Split (%) 92/8 Medium Trucks (%) 7 Heavy Trucks (%) 5 PAGE 4 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 4.3 Noise Analysis The STAMSON software was used to predict noise levels for the development by inputting the traffic and roadway parameters for Jockvale Road. Calculations have been performed for various receiver locations, which are depicted on Figure 2, and represent the backyard (OLA) of the subject lots. Proposed and existing grades for the receiver location and Jockvale Road were attained from the detailed grading plan prepared by DSEL, enclosed in Appendix A. STAMSON input and output data for this analysis is presented in Appendix B. 4.4 Noise Level Results Table 5 illustrates the results of the noise analysis for the Jockvale Road development. The daytime values represent modeled noise levels for the Outdoor Living Area (OLA) while the nighttime values represent modeled noise levels at the Plane of Window (POW) on the second level of the dwellings. The detailed STAMSON calculations for various receiver locations are included in Appendix B. Table 5: Noise Analysis Results Receiver Lot Source Receiver Distance Source Exposure Angles Noise Levels Leq (dba) Daytime Unmitigated Nighttime (POW) R1 1 35-90 / 90 67.43 60.32 R2 2 40-90 / 30 64.23 57.17 R3 4 50-90 / 20 63.01 56.00 R4 7 65-90 / 10 60.58 53.69 R5 8 40-75 / 90 66.34 59.26 R6 10 50-20 / 90 63.01 56.00 R7 12 60-10 / 45 59.60 52.58 DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 5 DSEL

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 The lot numbers in Table 5 correspond to the lot numbers shown on Figure 2 in this report. The modeling analysis indicates that the City of Ottawa noise criteria are exceeded for the Outdoor Living Area of lots 1 through 11, as represented by receiver locations R1-R6. As such, a 2.5m high noise attenuation barrier shall be implemented 0.30m inside the property line in the location shown on Figure 3. Once the noise attenuation barrier is implemented, the daytime noise level for the OLA of these lots will be reduced, as presented in Table 6. Table 6: Attenuated Noise Analysis Results Receiver Lot Proposed Mitigation Noise Levels Unmitigated (OLA) Noise Levels Mitigated (OLA) R1 1 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 67.43 59.66 R2 2 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 64.23 59.60 R3 4 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 63.01 57.71 R4 7 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 60.58 56.15 R5 8 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 66.34 59.73 R6 10 2.5m noise barrier along Jockvale 63.01 57.77 It should be noted that there are existing dwellings south of the development that have been considered in the analysis to limit the exposure to Jockvale Road. However, at this current time, a noise barrier for the adjacent lots has not yet been constructed along the Jockvale Road rear property line. When the wall is constructed for the development to the south, the barrier extents should be revisited at this location. More specifically, the noise barrier shown on the development subject of this report will not require the wrap around wall, but should continue and connect to the adjacent wall by the other developer. 4.5 Implementation The attenuation measures required to satisfy the City of Ottawa noise criteria and the noise clauses that need to be included on title and in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the various dwelling units are summarized in Table 7. PAGE 6 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.

NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 Table 7: Required Noise Attenuation Measures Lots Attenuation Measure Notice on Title 1, 8 Noise Attenuation Barrier Central Air Conditioning B & D 3-7 9-11 Noise Attenuation Barrier Forced Air Ventilation B & C Remaining Lots Nothing Required None 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An analysis of the roadway traffic indicates that the City of Ottawa s criteria for residential noise will be exceeded, primarily for units in close proximity to Jockvale Road. The following is a summary of the attenuation measures and notice requirements to be placed on title for all units in accordance with the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines listed below. Lot 1 / 8: Noise attenuation barrier as indicated on Figure 3; Central air conditioning; Notice on title: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 7 DSEL

APPENDIX A Grading Plan

APPENDIX B STAMSON Input and Output Data

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:05:53 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 35.00 / 35.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 67.43! 67.43 67.43 dba Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.32! 60.32 60.32 dba

TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 67.43 (NIGHT): 60.32

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:00:58 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 35.00 / 35.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation : 94.69 m Receiver elevation : 94.52 m Barrier elevation : 94.53 m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.66! 59.66 59.66 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.32! 60.32 * 60.32 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.66 (NIGHT): 60.32

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:09:04 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 30.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 45.00 / 45.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 64.23! 64.23 64.23 dba Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.17! 57.17 57.17 dba

TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 64.23 (NIGHT): 57.17

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:02:39 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 30.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 40.00 / 40.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 30.00 deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : 8.00 / 8.00 m Source elevation : 94.69 m Receiver elevation : 94.51 m Barrier elevation : 94.53 m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.60! 59.60 59.60 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.98! 57.98 * 57.98 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.60 (NIGHT): 57.98

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:10:56 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 20.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.00 / 50.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 63.01! 63.01 63.01 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! 56.00 56.00 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.01 (NIGHT): 56.00

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:03:30 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 20.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.00 / 50.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 20.00 deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 18.00 / 18.00 m Source elevation : 94.69 m Receiver elevation : 94.49 m Barrier elevation : 94.53 m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.71! 57.71 57.71 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! 56.00 * 56.00 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 57.71 (NIGHT): 56.00

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:11:13 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 10.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 65.00 / 65.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.58! 60.58 60.58 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 53.69! 53.69 53.69 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 60.58 (NIGHT): 53.69

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:21:24 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 10.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 65.00 / 65.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 10.00 deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 33.00 / 33.00 m Source elevation : 94.69 m Receiver elevation : 94.82 m Barrier elevation : 94.53 m Reference angle : 0.00

Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.15! 56.15 56.15 dba Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 53.69! 53.69 * 53.69 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 56.15 (NIGHT): 53.69

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:11:28 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -75.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 40.00 / 40.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 66.34! 66.34 66.34 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.26! 59.26 59.26 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 66.34 (NIGHT): 59.26

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:22:43 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -75.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 40.00 / 40.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -75.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 8.00 / 8.00 m Source elevation : 94.50 m Receiver elevation : 94.84 m Barrier elevation : 94.86 m Reference angle : 0.00

Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.73! 59.73 59.73 dba Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.26! 59.26 * 59.26 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.73 (NIGHT): 59.26

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:11:50 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -20.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.00 / 50.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 63.01! 63.01 63.01 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! 56.00 56.00 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 63.01 (NIGHT): 56.00

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:25:36 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -20.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.00 / 50.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -20.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : 18.00 / 18.00 m Source elevation : 94.50 m Receiver elevation : 94.77 m Barrier elevation : 94.86 m Reference angle : 0.00

Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.77! 57.77 57.77 dba Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! 56.00 * 56.00 dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 57.77 (NIGHT): 56.00

STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: 27-04-2011 20:12:06 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) -------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 35000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) ------------------------------------------ Angle1 Angle2 : -10.00 deg 45.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 60.00 / 60.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) --------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.60! 59.60 59.60 dba

Result summary (night) ----------------------! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 52.58! 52.58 52.58 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.60 (NIGHT): 52.58