TRAFFIC NOISE Noise and Policy. Date. Date. Footer Text

Similar documents
1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

dministrator Wyoming Department of Transportation Federal ighway Administration Wyoming Division

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance

POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

MAY 4, Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

NOISE STUDY REPORT. for the WEKIVA PARKWAY (SR 429)/SR 46 REALIGNMENT PD&E STUDY. Orange, Lake, and Seminole Counties, Florida

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

Airborne Noise and The New NY Bridge Project

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

MnDOT Noise Policy. Type I Federal-aid Projects

US 53 Noise Mitigation

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Traffic Noise Presentation

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

MOUNTAIN VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FORT COLLINS, COLORADO TRAFFIC NOISE EVALUATION REPORT

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

Traffic Noise Analysis

NOISE BARRIER ANALYSIS

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing

Fix290 Noise Report Analysis of Future Highway Noise in Oak Hill for the TxDOT Hwy 290/71 Interchange Project

NOISE STUDY REPORT DESIGN ADDENDUM

Noise Reduction and Asphalt Rubber. Douglas D. Carlson RPA Deputy Director Asphalt Rubber Greenbook Workshop 08/22/02 UCSB, California

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

South Access to the Golden Gate Bridge Doyle Drive Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SH 35 Public Meeting

Attachment A FTA DCE Worksheet Section II, NEPA Class of Action

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Ohio Department of Transportation

TRAFFIC NOISE REPORT

Virginia Department of Transportation I-66 Tier 2 Environmental Assessment

FHWA/FTA/FRA Joint Project Procedures. Mark Ferroni Noise Team Leader July 22 25, 2007

Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

STATEWIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND REPORTING SYSTEM (STARS II)

MnDOT Metro District Highway Noise Abatement Study. September 2016

CITY OF AIRDRIE. Transportation Noise Policy

I-15 South, MP 0 to MP 16 Environmental Assessment. Public Hearing. August 7, :00 PM to 7:00 PM

FTBA 2018 Construction Conference Major Projects Update

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

Draft Noise Study Report

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

Draft Noise Study Report

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

Federal Aid Project #RPHP21L-0484(001) MERCED CAMPUS PARKWAY

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Link Noise Mitigation Policy

Appendix D Highway Traffic Noise Assessment

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis

M E T R O P O L I T A N W A S H I N G T O N A I R P O R T S A U T H O R I T Y. Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Wall Program

Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL OF CERTAIN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS

Environmental Assessment May 2007

500 Interchange Design

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

Information Sheet - Mountain Highway Interchange Noise Assessment and Sound Mitigation

NOISE STUDY REPORT. Interstate 75 / State Road 951 Ultimate Interchange Improvements PD&E Study. Collier County. June 20, 2013

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

US 14 EIS (New Ulm to N. Mankato) Interchange and Intersection Type Comparison

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY REPORT

APPENDIX F: CALTRANS COST ESTIMATE TEMPLATE (included in Appendix AA of the CALTRANS Project Development Procedures Manual)

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

Noise Study Report December 2016

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE

Exposition Light Rail Transit Project

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

Rubberized asphalt mixtures: a novel approach to pavement noise reduction

SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE MITIGATION

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

NHI Highway Traffic Noise

Members of the Board of Directors. Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board

Impact Assessment Methodology for the. Somerville Public Library August 4, 2008 Jason Ross, P.E. Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT

WHAKATU ARTERIAL PROJECT ASSESSMENT OF NOISE AND VIBRATION EFFECTS

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

Transcription:

TRAFFIC NOISE 2016 Noise and Policy

O Sound/Noise Noise Analyses V E R V I E W

Highway Traffic Sound Source < Propagation Medium > Receiver

Decibel A-weighting Equivalent Level

PRESSURE micro Pascals LEVEL decibels

SOURCES Rock Band Pneumatic Hammer Food Blender Downtown Vacuum Cleaner Air Conditioning Unit Dishwasher Library PRESSURE micro Pascals 6,324,555 2,000,000 632,456 200,000 63,246 20,000 6,325 2,000 LEVEL decibels 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 L 10log (P 2 ) 2 (P ) ref 10log 2 (P o ) 2 (P ) ref D 2 Do (St) 2 2

SOURCES Rock Band Pneumatic Hammer Food Blender Downtown Vacuum Cleaner Air Conditioning Unit Dishwasher Library LEVEL decibels 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 120 63 x2

Decibel A-weighting Equivalent Level

MIKEE-LECTRONICS 85 75 70 65 6,300 1,000 -weighting 7 8 9 > 4 5 6 < 1 2 3 / 0 + - % DIS PRO OUT SEC ENT NEX CLR SFT SOUND ANALYZER

Decibel A-weighting Equivalent Level

sound level time L = 10log eq 10 1 T N 10 Lt 10 t=1

O Sound/Noise Noise Analyses V E R V I E W

Traffic Noise Guidance and Policy FHWA 23 CFR 772 TxDOT s Guidelines for the Analysis and Abatement of Roadway Traffic Noise (2011) 14

Determine if a Type I project The construction of a highway on new location; or, The physical alteration of an existing highway where there is either: Substantial Horizontal Alteration Substantial Vertical Alteration The addition of a through-traffic lane(s) The addition of an auxiliary lane, except for when the auxiliary lane is a turn lane; or, The addition or relocation of interchange lanes or ramps added to a quadrant to complete an existing partial interchange; or, Restriping existing pavement for the purpose of adding a throughtraffic lane or an auxiliary lane; or, The addition of a new or substantial alteration of a weigh station, rest stop, ride-share facility, or toll plaza. 15

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process The major objectives of a traffic noise analysis are to: Identify areas where possible noise impacts may occur for each project alternative. Consider and evaluate abatement measures to mitigate these impacts. Propose implementation of feasible and reasonable abatement measures. Communicate the results to the public and local officials. Important: it is never too early to discuss possible noise abatement 16

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process Identify adjacent land uses for noise sensitive areas (residences, schools, churches, parks, etc) INCLUDES PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT 17

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process FHWA s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) 18

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process The major objectives of a traffic noise analysis are to: Identify areas where possible noise impacts may occur for each project alternative. Consider and evaluate abatement measures to mitigate these impacts. Propose implementation of feasible and reasonable abatement measures. Communicate the results to the public and local officials. Important: it is never too early to discuss possible noise abatement 19

Noise Abatement Source - Propagation Path - Receiver

Noise Barrier Source - Propagation Path - Receiver

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process 21

Determine Need for Traffic Noise Analysis of a Highway Project IF - New Location, or - Substantial Realignment, or - Addition of Through-Traffic Lane Evaluate YES Traffic Abatement Collect Data MeasuresDesign Information Information Measure/Model Noise Levels NO Analysis not required Feasible Existing Levels AND Determine Impact Predicted Levels Reasonable Predicted levels approach, equal, or exceed the NAC Consider/Evaluate Abatement Measures YES IF Predicted levels exceed OR roposeexisting by more than 10 dba Abatement NO Abatement not required Traffic Management Alteration of Alignment Acquisition of Buffer Zone Insulation of Public Buildings Construction of Noise Barriers Additional Topics Construction Noise Information for Local Officials Project Reevaluation

Determine Need for Traffic Noise Analysis of a Highway Project IF - New Location, or - Substantial Realignment, or - Addition of Through-Traffic Lane Evaluate YES Traffic Abatement Collect Data MeasuresDesign Information Information Measure/Model Noise Levels NO Analysis not required Feasible Existing Levels AND Determine Impact Predicted Levels Reasonable Predicted levels approach, equal, or exceed the NAC Consider/Evaluate Abatement Measures YES IF Predicted levels exceed OR Proposexisting by more than 10 dba Abatement NO Abatement not required Traffic Management Alteration of Alignment Acquisition of Buffer Zone Insulation of Public Buildings Construction of Noise Barriers Additional Topics Construction Noise Information for Local Officials Project Reevaluation

Feasible effective reduction in noise

Feasible -?

Feasible -? -5 (or more)

Feasible Reasonable -? -5 (or more) Cost-effectiveness Criterion Cost for each Benefited Receiver $25,000 (or less)

Feasible -? -5 (or more) AND Reasonable $25,000 (or less) -4-5 -5-5 -5-5 -5-4???????????????? NOISE BARRIER??????????????? For Example

Feasible -? -5 (or more) AND Reasonable $25,000 (or less) Cost for each Benefited Receiver -4-5 -5-5 -5-5 -5-4???????????????? NOISE BARRIER??????????????? = Total Cost #Benefited Total $120,000 Cost 6 = $20,000

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process The major objectives of a traffic noise analysis are to: Identify areas where possible noise impacts may occur for each project alternative. Consider and evaluate abatement measures to mitigate these impacts. Propose implementation of feasible and reasonable abatement measures. Communicate the results to the public and local officials. Important: it is never too early to discuss possible noise abatement 30

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process Noise Barrier AKA Sound Walls 31

A Brief Overview of the Traffic Noise Process The major objectives of a traffic noise analysis are to: Identify areas where possible noise impacts may occur for each project alternative. Consider and evaluate abatement measures to mitigate these impacts. Propose implementation of feasible and reasonable abatement measures. Communicate the results to the public and local officials. 32

Noise Workshop Purpose: to provide sufficient information to owners of property adjacent to a proposed noise barrier(s) that will allow these owners to make an informed vote for or against the proposed noise barrier(s). 33

Sample Ballot NOISE BARRIER BALLOT SH 286 EXPANSION and SH 358 INTERCHANGE PROJECT NOISE WORKSHOP, May 23, 2000 In conjunction with the SH 286 expansion and SH 358 interchange project, the Texas Department of Transportation proposes to construct a noise barrier within the right-ofway west of SH 286 between Gollihar Road and Mansheim Drive. However, the proposed noise barrier cannot be constructed without the approval, by majority vote, of adjacent property owners. 1. Do you own property adjacent to the right-of-way west of SH 286 between Gollihar Road and Mansheim Drive? YES NO 2. FULL NAME (please print) ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. 3. Are you for or against the construction of the proposed noise barrier within the rightof-way west of SH 286 between Gollihar Road and Mansheim Drive? Only one vote is allowed for each property. FOR AGAINST This vote is final. 4. Comments (use reverse if necessary): SIGNATURE (required) DATE The ballot must be completed and signed by the property owner of record. If possible, please bring your completed and signed ballot to the Noise Workshop. If you are not able to attend the Noise Workshop, please send your completed and signed ballot (must be postmarked no later than ) to: Texas Department of Transportation, Attention:..P.O. Box 9907, Corpus Christi, TX, 78469-9907. 1) Adjacent property owners will be notified of the results of the vote for or against the proposed noise barrier after all ballots have been received and counted. 34

Mailing Mailing preferably by prestamped/preaddressed return envelope include a description of the noise barrier and the noise effects with and without the barrier. Include a description of the decision making process that TxDOT will follow to assess the survey/ballot results and make a decision on whether to build the barrier. Include an invitation to the meeting with the location and time 35

Public Involvement Consent of a Majority of Adjacent Property Owners??????????????????????? SOUND WALL?????????????????????? 36

Noise Workshop Questions??? 37