Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Similar documents
MerSim TM Mercury Model. Abstract. Introduction. Mercury Control Strategies

Study of Mercury Oxidation by a Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst in a Pilot-Scale Slipstream Reactor at a Utility Boiler Burning Bituminous Coal

Mercury Measurement and Control

Mercury Control in the Boiler

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial Coal-Fired Boilers

Multimedia Impacts of Halogen Injection for Mercury Control in Coal- Fired Boilers

ESP and Fabric Filter Considerations for Meeting Environmental Regulations: IED, LCP and WI BREF

A Better Alternative to SO 3 for conditioning Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP)

CEMS for Measurement of Ammonia, SO 3, and Low Level NOx

DETERMINATION OF CONCENTRATION AND MASS FLOW OF PARTICULATE MATTER IN FLUE GAS FOR STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSIONS

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Integrating ADAir Mixer Technology to Optimize System Performance with DSI Applications

Prediction Hg Removals With Activated Carbon Injection in Utility Gas Cleaning Systems

TruePeak TDLS200. NH 3 Slip Measurement. <Document Number> Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation <date/time>

DRY HYDRATED LIME INJECTION FOR COAL-FIRED BOILER FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) FOREWORD

Gas Flow How to Improve It to Enhance ESP, Boiler, FGD, SCR, SNCR Performance

STUDY OF MERCURY OXIDATION BY SCR CATALYST IN AN ENTRAINED-FLOW REACTOR UNDER SIMULATED PRB CONDITIONS

Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas by V 2 O 5 /TiO 2 Catalysts Dispersed on Mesoporous Silica

Mercury Emissions Control from Existing Utility and Industrial Boilers

Mercury Reduction Performance of Concrete-Friendly C-PAC Sorbent

Fuel Quality and MATS for Coal- Fired Plants: The Ripple Effect

Biomass Boiler Emission Abatement Technologies. Simon Wakefield

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Power-Cost Alternative De-NOx Solutions for Coal-Fired Power Plants

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Predicting the impact of SO 3 on mercury removal by carbon sorbents

EPRI Electrostatic Precipitator Research. Bruce Scherer Program 76, Opacity & Particulate Control Project Manager

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

ABSTRACT. Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), which are particulate collectors, are now used as part

Coal Fired Boiler Optimization and the Impact on Emission Control Devices

ESP Does Size Really Matter?

Mercury Oxidation Across SCR Catalyst at LG&E s Trimble County Unit 1

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Emissions Calculations - Stack

Fully Extractive Vs. Dilution Extractive CEMS

Paper 4: Environmental Chemistry Paper 23: Air pollution controls, their chemistry and continuous monitoring instruments

PM Compliance Options for MACT and MATS Rules. Ed McCall PCME

Catalytic Filtration: Dioxin/Furan Destruction in the Baghouse

PPC specializes in maximum efficiency air pollution control equipment using a variety of different

Operating Experience of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology in Utility Size Power Plants

POWER PLANT AIR QUALITY CONTROL and FLY ASH QUALITY & AVAILABILITY

Purification of Oxyfuel- Derived CO 2

Flue Gas Particle Characterization at Different Parts of the Power Plant

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

Chapter 2.6: FBC Boilers

EXPERIENCE WITH ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION OF SWITCHGRASS. Jerod Smeenk and Robert C. Brown

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

Control of pollutants in flue gases and fuel gases

Cambridge Environmental Technologies 105 Goodwill Road Cambridge, MD Tel:

High Bridge Combined Cycle Plant

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

Mercury Oxidation Promoted by a Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst under Simulated Powder River Basin Coal Combustion Conditions

CAM does have exemptions for certain emission units as follows: Page 1 of 8

Research Activities on Oxyfuel Combustion at IVD, Universität Stuttgart

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

Results of Activated Carbon Injection Upstream of Electrostatic Precipitators for Mercury Control

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Comparison of Dry Sorbent Injection of Sodium Bicarbonate, Lime, and Carbon and Their Control of Dioxins/Furans, Mercury, Chlorides and Sulfur Dioxide

EVALUATION OF SCRUBBER ADDITIVES AND CARBON INJECTION TO INCREASE MERCURY CAPTURE August 17, 2012

WHITE PLUME REMOVAL USING FUEL ADDITIVES IN THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Controlling Ammonia-in-Ash through Direct Measurement of Ammonium Bisulfate

Catalytic Activated Ceramic Dust Filter a new technology for combined removal of dust, NOx, dioxin, VOCs and acids from off gases.

Can your unit pass a Particulate Emission Compliance Test?

ICAC Forum On-Line LOI Analyzers for NO x and Mercury Control

Fluor s Econamine FG Plus SM Technology For CO 2 Capture at Coal-fired Power Plants

W P C A. Worldwide Pollution Control Association. WPCA-Duke Energy FF/HAPS Seminar October 12-13, Visit our website at

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

WET FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) SYSTEMS ADVANCED MULTI-POLLUTANT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

LARGE-SCALE MERCURY CONTROL TECHNOLOGY TESTING FOR LIGNITE-FIRED UTILITIES OXIDATION SYSTEMS FOR WET FGD

Oxy-fuel combustion integrated with a CO 2 processing unit

INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY

Fundamental oxy-fuel combustion research carried out within the ENCAP project

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

De-NOx Concept to commissioning

Experiences from Commissioning and Test Operation of Vattenfall s Oxyfuel Pilot Plant

Item Hydrogen Gas Plant

TECHNICAL PAPER ISSN J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 56:

Advanced Instrumentation for Improved Plant Operation

AQCS (Air Quality Control System) for Thermal Power Plants Capable of Responding to Wide Range of Coal Properties and Regulations

Design, Construction, and Commissioning of a Pilot-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed System for CO 2 Capture

Electric Furnace Off-Gas Cleaning Systems Installation at PT Inco ABSTRACT

Hydrogen Sulphide and Mercaptan Removal

Optimal Design and Operation of SNCR System for a 150t/h CFB Boiler and Discussion on the Measurement of Flue Gas Components

Mercury Monitoring in a Cement Kiln

Air Pollution Control For

ENVIROENERGY SOLUTIONS. Presentation of APC and Wet Electrostatic Precipitation Technology

Hadong and Boryeong 10 MW Pilot Projects

The Benefits of High Reactivity Hydrated Lime for Air Pollution Control. April 9, 2015 Curt Biehn

ICAC Forum 03 Multi-Pollutant Emission Controls & Strategies

CH88 In Situ Flue Gas Oxygen Transmitter

Reduction Systems and Equipment at Moss Landing Power Plant

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

An Innovative Approach for Mercury Capture

Air Pollution Compliance Strategies for Coal Generation

Particle precipitation in medium- and large-scale biomass combustion plants

FINE PARTICULATE COLLECTION USING DRY ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

PORTABLE FLUE GAS ANALYZER

Transcription:

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities Several states have enacted Hg emission regulations that are more stringent than the CAMR milestones. For example, Massachusetts will require power plants to achieve 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of 0.0025 lbs/gw h by 2012, while Maryland will require 90% removal efficiency by 2013. Delaware will also require a removal efficiency of 90% by 2013. To ensure compliance with these regulations, as well as future federal regulation, coal-fired power plants need to know their current emission levels. With this knowledge, decisions regarding the implementation of various air pollution control devices (APCDs) to control Hg, as well as their intended targets, will be made. APCDs include cold-side and hot-side electrostatic precipitators (CS-ESPs and HS-ESPs), baghouses/fabric Filters (FF), wet flue gas desulfurization units (WFGDs), and selective catalytic reduction systems (SCRs), which are intended for control of particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO x ), and nitrogen oxides (NO x ), respectively. All of these APCDs have co-benefits for Hg capture but not always at the desired level. To gain additional Hg capture efficiency, other alternatives for Hg control have been demonstrated. For example, the injection of sorbent materials, in conjunction with the aforementioned APCDs, is a leading mercury control technology. Some of the most widely used adsorbents are powdered activated carbons (PACs), which are modified to enhance the affinity of their surfaces to Hg. Activated carbon injection (ACI) is used to convert gaseous mercury into activated carbon-bound mercury which will be subsequently captured in an ESP or baghouse as particulate bound mercury (Hg(P)). The total mercury in flue gas (Hg(T)) occurs primarily in three forms: elemental mercury represented by the symbol Hg 0, oxidized mercury represented by the symbol Hg 2+, and particulate-bound mercury represented by the symbol Hg(P). Mercury is

released from coal primarily as Hg 0. As the flue gas cools in the downstream ductwork of the boiler, some of the Hg 0 can be oxidized to Hg 2+. The degree of oxidation is affected by the temperature of the flue gas and its rate of change, as well as the other species present in the gas. The species present in the flue gas can be a result of the species present in the coal before combustion, such as Cl- or S-based compounds, or they can originate from injection into the flue gas stream, such as NH 3 for SCR performance. While some species, such as HCl and HBr, can promote the oxidation of elemental mercury, other species, such as NH 3, have no effect. Hg 2+ and Hg(P) are more easily captured by existing APCDs than elemental mercury. However, there are species in the flue gas that can interfere/compete with mercury adsorption on activated carbon, such as SO 2 and SO 3. Therefore, while an activated carbon may perform well in laboratory experiments that do not contain these species in the simulated flue gas, its performance at a power plant is likely to be reduced because of these inhibiting species. Thus, ICSET has developed two different sorbent testing facilities to evaluate the mercury sorbent capture efficiency at coal-fired power plant with the real flue gas during development. The results of mercury capture efficiency from ICSET testing facility are very similar to that of full-scale tests. Drop tube furnace (0.001 MW DTF) at ICSET A combination of a lab-scale combustor with a drop tube furnace (DTF 0.001MW, 1.9 tube) to simulate the effect of sorbent injection on mercury emission control at the inlet of an ESP in a utility boiler has been set up at ICSET. The specific goals of this facility will include: Evaluation of mercury removal efficiency by sorbent injection; Evaluation of varied flue gas composition on capture efficiency by sorbents Characterization of coals, fly ashes or adsorbents and measurement of flue gas compositions.

Based on the general injection location in the utility boiler, the injection conditions for DTF facility will be pre-set to the following specifications: (1) Test atmosphere: The atmosphere will be dependent on the specific coal flue gas. O 2, CO 2, SO 2, NO and HCl will be monitored during testing and controlled to simulate the desired conditions (2) Residence time: 1-2 s (3) Average temperature: 150 o C, (290 o F on average), typically temperature at the inlet of ESP (4) Mixture ratio of ash and adsorbent for dilution: 14:1 DTF Facility Setup: The lab-scale test facility, which is shown in Figure 1, includes 4 main components--a combustor, a drop tube furnace adsorbent injection facility, an SCEM system and a flue gas monitor. DROP TUBE FURNACE: Mercury capture tests will be conducted by using a lab-scale drop-tube reactor, as shown in Figure 1. The reactor is heated by electric furnaces. The drop tube furnace, by which the adsorbent injection test will be conducted, is best described as a lab-scale solid-gas multiphase flow reactor with an adsorbent injection facility on its top and a separation and sampling comb in its downstream. The adsorbent will be fed in by an accurate screw feeder and entrained in the reactor by real flue gas. With the assistance of a pressure balance line, which is located between the adsorbent hopper and injection port, the injection rate will be unaffected by pressure fluctuation inside the reactor. The real flue gas is extracted from duct through a venturi educator. The flow rate can be monitored by a pressure differential indicator. The adsorbents undergo the adsorption process by interacting with mercury in the reactor. The main body of the reactor is 2 in I.D. The material, which is used to make this reactor furnace, is a stainless steel pipe, which is reported and verified to be inert to mercury transformation. The temperature inside the furnace is controlled b y a t wo-channel temperature controller, generally at 150 o C to simulate ESP conditions. The system is well insulated to keep the system temperature constant. A custom-made mini stainless steel cyclone and inertial probe set up a gas solid separation combination, which has high separation efficiency for particle diameter less than 10um. During tests, the injection rate will be kept at 4lb.Mmacf, and residence time at 1 second.

SCEM SYSTEM: The mercury variation will be monitored continuously by SCEMs at the inlet of ESP. The detailed description of the two mercury test methods and QA/QC procedures can be found in the reference. The PS Analytical SCEM system consists of five major components: (1) A probe, filter, and pump module. (2) Heated Teflon sample lines, which are normally maintained at 200 C and are needed to prevent mercury losses along the sample lines, maintain the speciation that is in the stack, and reduce condensation of acidic gases. (3) A mercury conversion system. (4) An analyzer and data collection system. (5) The system also has a mercury vapor generator. This device is able to supply a constant stream of mercury vapor and blank at 14 L/min. These gases pass through the valve-switching box and can be directed to the probe to check the system bias completely. LECO AMA-254 Advanced Mercury Analyzer: Fly ashes will be collected from the OHM standard filter, mechanical hoppers, and ESP hoppers an will be analyzed with the LECO AMA-254 analyzer. This direct combustion mercury analyzer will be the principal instrument used to develop the newest ASTM standard method of analysis for mercury in coal and combustion residues (Method D6722) The AMA-254 analyzer has a 0.01-ng mercury detection limit, a working range of 0.05-600ng, a reproducibility of <1.5%, and a 5-min analysis time. Flue Gas Analyzers: Three flue gas analyzers will be used in this study to obtain accurate concentrations of different flue gas compositions and validate concentrations of flue gas compositions through replication among different measurement methods. The capabilities of the three gas analyzers will provide duplicate or triplicate determinations for several gases, such as SO 2 and NO, and show a numerical agreement of <5% difference, so that gas measurements could be validated. An IMR 5000 multigas analyzer, which uses an analysis method based on an electrochemical principal of measurement, will be used to determine carbon monoxide (<2000 ppm), oxygen (O 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and nitric oxide (NO) concentrations. A portable and flexible Tempest 100 combustion emissions monitoring system also will be used to determine the H 2 S (<1000 ppm), CO (1%-10%), O 2, NO, and SO 2 concentrations. Except for the CEM system, WKU s ICSET has the advanced instruments on mercury measurement in the Mercury Lab, which can conduct all mercury

measurement methods presently available. The Trace Elements Lab also can provide the instruments to achieve characterization of solid samples such as coal, ash and adsorbents, from conventional proximate and elemental analysis to advanced minor oxides, surface characterization by BET, SEM-EDX and XRD. All these advanced instruments can provide data to explore the complicated mechanism of mercury transformation and adsorption in utility boilers. Entrained Reaction Facility (0.1 MW ERF) at ICSET Another scaled-up facility of ICSET Entrained Reaction Facility (ERF) with a size of 0.5 X 0.5 X 19 feet (14000 SCFH) can be continuously used as a demonstration facility onsite with real flue gas in the next stage (larger scale) This pilot-scale slipstream reactor has been designed and manufactured to simulate the "full-scale" applications of a system, Figure 3. The adsorbent is dropped from an accurate feeder into a vessel and is fluidized with a small amount of air and allowed to flow to the 4-way ports in the slipstream reactor. This particular unit is 19.5 feet tall and the interior is 6 inches square in shape. Approximately 18 inches below the top of the unit, 4 injection ports are located 2.5 inches off the corners in an opposing fashion. This arrangement offers the best mixing of the adsorbent before entering into the flue gas stream. The precise control of the adsorbent injection rate has been achieved through a screw feeder. The screw feeder is pre-calibrated to ensure proper injection rates. The space velocity can be controlled by the ID Fan to simulate the 1.25 second residence time of the adsorbent inside the slipstream reactor at the designed temperature (about 300 o F). To ensure the control and even distribution of adsorbent, two static mixers have been built and installed at different locations in the slipstream reactor. The first static mixer is located one duct-diameter below the adsorbent injection ports to ensure homogeneous distribution of adsorbent. The second mixer was installed at the middle of the slipstream reactor to enhance the mixing of adsorbent with flue gas inside slipstream reactor. The specific locations of the sampling ports are relative to the locations of the adsorbent injection port. The inlet refers to the location just before the adsorbent injection port, and the outlet is under the bottom of the slipstream reactor and before the ID Fan. So far, many kinds of adsorbents, either carbon-based or non-carbon-based, and either in commercial-manufacture or in R&D stage, have been tested with ICSET s

drop tube furnace (0.001 MW DTF) and Entrained Reaction Facility (0.1 MW ERF) with all kinds of flue gas atmospheres that are available in the U.S. Some typical test results are shown in Figure 3. For reference purposes, PRB coal ash and commercially available DARCO LH adsorbent will be generally tested. In order to exclude any fly ash contribution from the calculation of Hg removal efficiency (with and without injection), the SCEM (PSA Analytical, UK) system is set up at the outlet of the slipstream reactor. Initially, tests are conducted without any adsorbent injection to understand the baseline condition. Thus, the comparison of speciated Hg concentrations between baseline tests and injection tests can provide the Hg removal efficiency based solely on adsorbent injection without the effect of fly ash in the flue gas. Figure 1 Drop Tube Furnace

Figure 2 Entrained Reaction Facilities

Hg Conc. (ng/nm 3 ) 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Dilution Ash Darco Hg-LH Graphite with 20% Pd Carbonized Chicken Litter with 2% Pd 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Rel. Time (min) Figure 3. Onsite mercury capture data for selected samples with an adsorbent injection rate of 4 lb/mmacf (squares represent Hg(T) and diamonds represent Hg(0))