Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Similar documents
MANAGEMENT AND FEEDING OF CATTLE DURING THE DROUGHT UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI LIVESTOCK SPECIALIST PATRICK DAVIS

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

Beef Cattle Handbook

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Marketing Cull Cows How & When?

Crop Residue Utilization by Beef Cows

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Utilizing Coproducts in the Grazing Program

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

2

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

FEEDING HORSES WHEN FEED IS SHORT R.J. (Bob) Coleman Ph.D. PAS

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Drought-Stressed Corn Silage for Beef Cows

SDSU. Effect of Calving Time and Weaning Time on Cow and Calf Performance - A Preliminary Report CATTLE 00-7

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

Backgrounding Calves Part 2: Herd Health and Feeding

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

Management Calendar for North Carolina Producers

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

How High Fuel, Fertilizer and Commodity Prices Affect Manure Management Decisions

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

Beef Cattle Library. Weaning Management of Beef Calves 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXII November 29, 30, & December1, 2011, Mitchell, NE

Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska LIMIT FEEDING PRODUCTION COWS IN CONFINEMENT

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing

Drought Management Strategies for Beef Cattle

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS, 1926-'27¹

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Research in Beef Cattle''6"#""' Nutrition and Management

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS, PART I

Analysis & Comments. Livestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA. National Hay Situation and Outlook

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

THE EFFECTS OF CO-ENSILING WET DISTILLER S GRAINS PLUS SOLUBLES WITH CORN SILAGE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BRED BEEF HEIFERS DURING LATE PREGNANCY

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

Backgrounding - Feeder Cattle Nutrition

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

Beef Cattle Research Update

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

feezeted Dry-Lot Cattle Feeders

Finishing Beef Cattle on Grass Supplemented with Self-fed By-Products

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS,

2010 UW Extension Cattle Feeder Clinic Proceedings 1

Cover Crop Grazing. Jim Church University of Idaho Extension

No-till Dryland Cover Crops as a Forage Option for Beef Cattle

Stockpiling Forages. Stockpiling Perennial Grasses. Stockpiling. Risky business? 8/22/2010. Rocky Lemus August 25, 2010 MSPFSC

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Small Grains, Sorghum/Sudan, Alfalfa

Opportunities exist to increase revenue from cull cows through changes in marketing strategies. This figure shows that cull cow prices tend to bottom

Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Feeding Bison Dr. Vern Anderson Carrington Research Extension Center North Dakota State University Box 219 Carrington ND USA 58421

FOOD FOR VICTORY * * * * * * * * * *

Targeting the North Dakota natural beef market: impacts on early calf growth and performance

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

PASTURE MANAGEMENT FOR BEEF COWS

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Effects of Creep Supplementation While Grazing Improved Irrigated Pastures

Background and Assumptions

Selection and Development of Heifers

FINPACK. Livestock Budgets. Based on 2015 FINBIN Database Reports

The Cattle Feeding Industry

A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016

Forage Base. Forb. Browse. Forbs

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Efficacy of Grazing Stockpiled Perennial Forages for Winter Maintenance of Beef Cows

Drought leads to predictable lack of forage production on

Emmit L. Rawls Professor Agricultural Economics

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

Beef Cattle Management Update

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

2001 Beef Research Report Iowa State University

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Forage Systems for Pasture Finishing Beef

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

Strategies to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

U.S. Beef Production Practices ---

Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows:

EVALUATING LIVESTOCK ENTERPRISES WESLEY TUCKER AGRICULTURE BUSINESS SPECIALIST

Transcription:

$/ Pair 2/13/2013 Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring Rick Rasby Beef Specialist University of Nebraska 100 Years of Weather in the U.S. 3 4 Northern Nebraska Rates for Pasture ($/Cow-Calf pair per Month, 1986-2012) 50 40 30 20 10 0 5 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 (Johnson et al.) 1

Head, Millions 2/13/2013 2012-270,000 head 2013-750,000 head 7 8 9 10 Top 10 Beef Cow States January 2013 Numbers 1. Texas 4.015 Million 2. Nebraska 1.805 M 3. Missouri 1.757 M 4. Oklahoma 1.745 M 5. S. Dakota 1.688 M (+) 6. Montana 1.506 M (+) 7. Kansas 1.328 M 8. Kentucky 1.028 M (+) 9. Iowa 0.925 M (+) = increase from January 2012 Tennessee and Arkansas dropped of Top 10 10.N. Dakota 0.922 M (+) Top 10 = 17.232 M US = 29.229 million Down 3% from 2012 2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.7 Beef Cow Numbers in Nebraska 1.65 1980 1990 2000 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year 112,000 hd increase Head 2

The 19lb increase offset nearly 700,000 head fed cattle slaughter in 2012 13 14 Source: USDA/ERS, CF Forecasts 16 58 lb. average 75 lb. average Global population and incomes will continue to grow creating more demand for protein! 17 18 3

Feeding Waste, % 2/13/2013 Low Beef Cow Numbers: Low beef cow numbers: Not good for Nebraska: Beef is a primary economic driver. Cow/calf, Feedlot, Corn, Processing Not good Nationally Increased beef prices for consumer At what price will they stop buying our protein? Drought Will not build cow herd until it ends Even if it ends this year long process Hay Wastage When Fed with and Without Racks Feeder Type Percent Wasted Round bale w/o rack 1 45 Round bale with rack 1 9 Ring feeder with skirt 2 5.9 Cone feeder 2 3.3 Cradle feeder 2 14.2 Trailer feeder 2 11.1 1 Anderson University of Nebraska 2 Buskerk, Michigan State University Hay Wasted by Cows When Amount Fed Was Controlled Forage Feeding Systems Feeding system Hay per cow per feeding, lb Hay refused or wasted, % Hay required over rack feeding, % Rack feeding on pasture ---- 5 ---- No rack feeding on pasture 1 day supply 20 11 12 2 day supply 40 25 33 4 day supply 80 31 45 Forage Feeding Systems Value of Feeding Losses in a Season per 20 Cow Feeder Hay Value, $/ton $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5% $200 $229 $257 $286 $314 10% $400 $457 $515 $572 $629 15% $600 $686 $772 $858 $943 20% $800 $915 $1,029 $1,144 $1,258 25% $1,001 $1,144 $1,286 $1,429 $1,572 4

Drought Management Plan: Goals for the cow/calf enterprise: Minimize negative impact on the grazed forage resource Keep productive cows in the herd Secure feeds Stay profitable Sequential Step-wise Management Approach to Drought Decrease the need for pasture: 1. Destock/Depopulate a. Early weaning (all/part of the calves) b. Cow/calf:Yearling Operations c. Cow Culling all (liquidate) or part 2. Relocate all or part of the herd: a. Pasture off-location: not happening b. Drylot off or on location c. Supplement on pasture Early Weaning the Calf: 1. Forage available for grazing Non-lactating cow: 4.6-5.9 lb decrease (1996 NRC Model) Forage intake by the calf: 5.3 lb 2. Each 2.5 days the calf is weaned supplies forage for 1 day of grazing. 3. Consider retaining calves efficient 4. Consider creep feeding before weaning Teaches the calves to eat out of a bunk Decrease the need for pasture: Depopulate/Destock: Sell cows that were ID ed as culls Yearlings moved to feedlot/or sold Keep only pregnant cows and pair ID ed productive cow cull groups Using 2 to 4 years of individual cow records 1. Group A 2. Group B 3. Group C Sell before everyone else does Confinement Feeding Beef Cows: Objectives: 1. Feed cows to a target body condition 2. Keep cows and calves healthy 3. Contain costs 4. Alternative to selling cows Ration Considerations: 1. Feeds: Crop residues Grains Byproducts 2. Consider ionophore Example: Rumensin 200 mg/hd/da 3. Can be limit-fed 4. Feed to BCS 5 5

Limit-feeding Cow in Confinement: Hard to balance with grains and low quality forage - needs a supplement Easy to balance with by-products and low quality forages. Cows will act hungry. In lactation ration: calf will eat 1.5% - 2.5% of their body weight dry matter. Limit-feeding Cow in Confinement: 24 to 36 inches per head bunk space 500 to 800 ft 2 per cow Sort young cows from old cows Do not finely grind Forages: 5 to 7 inch screen Grains feed whole Limit-feeding Cow in Confinement Cost of Energy (TDN) Equipment to deliver diet Weigh ingredients Once a day feeding May feed twice daily for the first week Be Consistent Time of feed delivery Amount fed Corn Stalk Bales : 5.0% CP, 50% TDN, 88% DM, $100/T; Wheat Straw: 4.0% CP, 40% TDN, 88% DM, $85/T CRP: 5.2% CP, 52% TDN, 88% DM, $125/T; DDGS: 30% CP, 112% TDN, 88% DM, $280/T Corn Silage: 9.0% CP, 68% TDN, 35% DM, $67.50/T; Grass Hay: 6.0% CP, 55% TDN, 88% DM, $150/T Corn: 9.0% CP, 90% TDN, 88% DM, $280/T; Alfalfa: 17% CP, 58% TDN, 88% DM, $250/T Comparing feeds on a cost per Nutrient basis: Allows feed comparisons based on the nutrient needed. Goes further than just comparing price of feeds on a units basis (tons, pounds, etc). Compares feeds at the same moisture content. What s needed to compare feeds cost per nutrient basis? 1. Nutrient analysis of feeds in the ration. 2. Know the nutrient needs of the livestock being fed. 3. Determine the nutrient needed to fill the deficiency in the diet. 4. Locate feeds that fit your feeding system and: Price Get nutrient analysis/feed tags of all feeds Including moisture content 6

If the feeds are the same feed at different moisture contents: Feed Dried Distillers grains (90% DM) Modified Distillers grains (50% DM) Wet Distillers grains (35% DM) Cost per ton $/ton $280/ton $155/ton $109/ton Cost feed at same moisture content, $/T $280/0.90 = $311.11/ton $155/0.50 = $310.00/ton $109/0.35 = $311.42/ton It was determined that protein is deficient in the ration being fed. Following are feeds that are possible: 32% Crude Protein Supplement @ $310/ton 91% dry matter 18% Crude Protein Alfalfa @ $265/ton 84% dry matter 30% Crude Protein WDGS @ $110/ton 35% dry matter Pricing the feeds at the moisture content. Feed 32% CP Supplement (91% DM) 18% CP Alfalfa Hay (84% DM) Cost per ton $/ton $310/ton $265/ton Price per ton at moisture content, $/T $340/T @ 100% DM $315/T @ 100% DM Pricing the feeds based on the amount of CP in the feed. Feed 32% CP Supplement (91% DM) 18% CP Alfalfa Hay (84% DM) Cost per ton $/ton $310/ton $265/ton Price per lb of protein at same DM, $/T $0.532/lb of CP @ 100% DM $0.876/lb of CP 100% DM 30% Wet Distillers grains (35% DM) $110/ton $314/T @ 100% DM 30% Wet Distillers grains (35% DM) $110/ton $0.523/lb of CP @ 100% DM Calculation: Calculating the value of a nutrient in a feed if moisture contents are different: Cost per unit of nutrient Compares feeds: $/ton or $/cwt of feed amount of nutrient on a dry matter basis (lb) Price per unit of nutrient on a dry matter basis Doesn t consider labor to deliver the feed Assumes all feeds have similar utilization Calculating the value of a nutrient in a feed if moisture contents are different: Feeds: Silage @ $75/ton, 70% TDN, 35% DM Corn @ $267/ton ($7.50/bu), 90% TDN, 90% DM Calculations to determine cost per lb of energy (TDN) Silage $75/ton ((2000 lb x.35) x.70) =$.153/lb of TDN Corn $267/ton ((2000 lb x.90) x.90) = $.165/lb of TDN 7

Nutrient Quality of Baled Crop Residues % Dry Energy % Crude Matter (%TDN) Protein Corn Field Baled in July 82-85 50-53 7.0-8.0 3 Rows Stalks +Tailings 82-85 48-53 4.5-5.5 Husk and Leaf 82-85 52-55 5.0-6.5 Stalk, Husk, Leaf 88-90 45-52 4.5-5.2 Pricing feeds on a price/nutrient basis Tool on the web: Ag Manager s Toolbox Livestock Production Decision aids Feed Cost Cow-Q-Lator http://westcentral.unl.edu/web/westcentral/agecon3 Soybean Stubble 82-88 37-40 3.8-4.0 Beef Extension Page http://beef.unl.edu Beef Reports 2013 Beef Cattle Report 8