Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors. Introduction. Load Modifying Factors

Similar documents
Chapter 4 Bridge Program Drawings

7.3 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND DESIGN METHODS Standard Specifications LRFD Specifications

AUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1

Praveen Chompreda. Dead Loads: DC/DW Live Loads of Vehicles: LL. Dynamic (Impact) Loads: IM. Loads on Bridge. Typical Loads.

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

GEOTECHNICAL LRFD DESIGN

MIDAS Training Series

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

THE NEW AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION 2008

Barriers, Parapets, and Railings

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

Multimedia Package for LRFD Concrete Bridge Design

A Case Study of a Computer Aided Structural Design of a System Interchange Bridge

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

DEVELOPMENT OF BRIDGE LOAD TESTING PROCESS

APPENDIX B ABC STRUCTURES DESIGN GUIDE

Overview. Fracture Critical Inspection History Project Overview Research to Determine Criteria Case Studies Conclusions

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

Flexure Design Sequence

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 4-a

Hand Calculation Examples. CG Gilbertson

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

Appendix D.2. Redundancy Analysis of Prestressed Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads

Superstructure Guidelines

December 19, 2012 ADDENDUM NO. 11. To Prospective Bidders and Others on:

John James Audubon Bridge

Structural - Engineering Review Checklist

Inventory Inspection and Load Rating of a Complex Segmental Concrete Bridge. Presented by Matthew J. Lengyel, PE, SE

2008 Bridge Load Rating Class 101

Comparison of Bridge Rehabilitation versus Bridge Replacement Concepts

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

LRFD BRIDGE MANUAL PART II: STANDARD DETAILS CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWING NUMBER, DESCRIPTION, DATE OF ISSUE

EERI/PEER/FHWA Bridge Team Report. Performance of Highway and Railway Structures during the February 27, 2010 Maule Chile Earthquake

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

Alberta Bridge Inventory STANDARD BRIDGE & CULVERT COMPONENTS. Standard Bridges. Typical Bridge Components. In Alberta there are about 13,300 bridges.

JULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1

Designing Bridges for Inspectability

SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

xiii Preface to the Fifth Edition Preface to the Second Edition Factors for Conversion to SI Units of

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

System reliability models for bridge structures

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Elevation. Typical Section

LRFD SEISMIC BRIDGE DESIGN, CALIFORNIA EXAMPLE. Mark S. Mahan 1

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

4.6 Procedures for Connections

Well Road Project Accelerated Bridge Construction Using Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMT s) By: Mark Bucci, P.E.

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

Live Load Distribution Factors Suitable For Concrete Bridges Under Ecp 201 And Euro Code 1991 Loading

Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges

Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection

Types of Structures and Loads

AGENDA AGENDA. Route 15/29 SBL Bridge Superstructure Replacement & Widening. NOVA District. Bridge Views SCOPE. Existing Structure.

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

Parapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS 101. Protecting Your Bridge Inventory for the Future Jason Kelly, PE

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

Structural Analysis Models and Their Advancing Technologies

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

District Department of Transportation ABC in DC (Accelerated Bridge Construction in Washington, DC) Paul Hoffman October 26, 2016

Proposed Modifications to the LRFD Design of U-Beam Bearings

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

Project ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Program for the Analysis and Rating of Truss Bridges BRASS-TRUSS. Version 2.2. User Manual May 2016

Don Theobald, V.P., Gulf Coast Pre-Stress. Standardizing Existing Spliced Girder Systems

INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1

CIVIL BREADTH Exam Specifications

Moving Load Analysis for Bridge Structures

Design of A Special Bridge for Taiwan High Speed Rail Project Lot C296

AASHTO- Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Railings. V 1.2 Rev

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

Bridge Superstructure Design

BRIDGE GIRDERS TECHNICAL GUIDE

Nonlinear Redundancy Analysis of Multi-Cell Pre-stressed Concrete Box-Girder Bridge

Appendix D.1. Redundancy Analysis of Composite Spread Box Girder Superstructures under Vertical Loads

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION UNDERPASS GRADE SEPARATION DESIGN CRITERIA

Submission Date: November 14, ,114 words (not including Title Page) plus words each = 4,114

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION USING SELF-PROPELLED MODULAR TRANSPORTERS (SPMT)

APPENDIX C CALIBRATION OF LRFD DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEEL CURVED GIRDER BRIDGES

Grade-Separated Trail Crossings How Do We Get Over There?

I-94/I-69 Interchange Bridge Construction

SUMMARY BIOGRAPHY LEAN-ON CROSS- FRAME BRACING FOR STEEL GIRDERS WITH SKEWED SUPPORTS

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Bridge Superstructure Design

Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bents used for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Bijan Khaleghi 1

Ontario Structure Inspection Manual Inspection Form Structure Number: 12

Transcription:

Chapter 1 Bridge Design Manual General Design Information Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors Introduction This section defines the loads and load factors to be used in structural analysis and design. The loads and load factors from the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification will be used unless noted. Load Modifying Factors The following load modifying factors (η i ) will be used for all structures designed under the LRFD Specifications unless noted below. Ductility - η D All bridges and box culverts will use η D = 1.0. Redundancy - η R Structural components whose failure is expected to cause the collapse of the bridge are considered fracture-critical and are deemed as non-redundant. These components may include pin and hanger systems, tension members in trusses, floorbeams, two-girder system bridges, and simple span metal pier caps. The typical girder bridges and box culverts designed by the Bridge Program have multiple loads paths and, therefore, will use η R = 1.0. For structures without multiple load paths, consult with Bridge Program Staff for the appropriate value of η R 1.03-1

Operational Importance - η I The importance of a structure will depend on many factors, which may include: Roadway Classification Feature Intersected Span Lengths Number of Spans Structure Length Detour Length ADT and Percent Trucks Defense Route Seismic Classification For all girder bridges and box culvert designs, use η I = 1.0. The Design Squad Leader should consider the above mentioned factors and if they feel the new structure should be considered operationally important, they should discuss the use of a larger factor with the Bridge Program Staff. Load Factors The following load factors (γ) will be used for structures designed under the LRFD Specifications. γ EQ shall be assumed as 0.5 for Extreme Event I Load Combination γ & γ shall be taken as follows: SE TG 0.0 for strength and extreme event limit states 1.0 for service limit states if live load is not considered 0.5 for service limit states with live load Multiple Presence Factors Design Vehicular Live Load Apply multiple presence factors as noted in the LRFD specification. All new bridges and culverts, which carry traffic on Interstates & Ramps, US, and State highways, will be designed for HL93 loading using the LRFD Design Code. 1.03-2

All new Local and Off-System bridges and culverts will be designed for HL93 loading using the LRFD Design Code. For rehabilitations and widenings, the design vehicle should match that truck for which the structure was originally designed. For older structures designed by LFD or ASD, the minimum design load should be HS20. Pedestrian Load Dynamic Load Allowance All new bridges with sidewalks will be designed assuming that the sidewalk may be removed in the future. Therefore, the vehicular live load (HL-93) will be placed assuming 1-8 wide curbs, and no pedestrian live load will be applied. The weight of the sidewalk(s) will be included as a superimposed dead load. The Dynamic Allowance shall be applied only to the design truck or design tandem. Vehicular Collision Force The 600 kip load as specified in Article 3.6.5.1 will be applied to all structures not meeting the requirements of Article 3.6.5.1 and the functional classification of the roadway being crossed is not a local rural or urban roadway. The magnitude of the load may be reduced based on the following criteria: Design speed Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Percent trucks using the roadway Engineering judgment based on site specific data Any reduction of the collision force must be approved by the State Bridge Engineer. Columns placed behind retaining walls do not need to be designed with the collision force. Stream Pressure The design high water elevation and velocity for the purposes of stream pressure calculations shall be based on Q 100. For structures where the pier is aligned with the stream flow the lateral stream pressure applied to the side of the pier will be based on an angle of 5 to allow for a change in the direction of flow over the life of the structure. 1.03-3

The stream flow pressure distribution shall be rectangular. In cases where the corresponding top of water elevation is above the low beam elevation, stream flow loading on the superstructure will be investigated. The pressure acting on the superstructure shall be a uniform distribution. Ice Loads The friction angle φ f between the pier nose and the ice is defined by the following equation. φ f = tan -1 μ However, the coefficient of friction μ cannot be established with great certainty. The Alberta Research Council uses μ = 0.18 and the Alyeska Pipeline Co uses μ = 0.10. For most design cases φ f = 0.0 (which is conservative) should be used unless the loads become unrealistic in which case the following values should be μ = 0.10 and φ f = 5.7. Changing the nose geometry β will have a bigger effect than changing φ f. β is defined as follows: β=100 β=180 β Note when β= 180 F t = 0.15F 1.03-4

Seismic Loads The seismic loads and analysis shall be based on the AASHTO Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. If the route that the structure is on services an emergency facility (hospital, fire station, etc.) or a major transportation facility and the detour for the emergency facility is greater than one mile the structure should be classified as critical. If the structure carries utilities (water, gas, and power) and these utilities would be considered essential in the case of an earthquake or other emergency, the structure should be considered critical. All bridges that are classified as critical will be considered Important for η Ι purposes. Dead Loads All structures whose deck slab will be exposed to traffic will be designed for a future wearing surface (fws) of 25 psf. All structures whose deck slab will have an asphalt wearing surface placed during original construction do not need to be designed for any additional future wearing surface. All new girder structures will be designed for an additional dead load of 15 psf to account for the use of stay in place (SIP) deck forms. The SIP load is assumed to act on the girder bays only, no permanent deck forming on the deck cantilevers. The following unit weights should be used when determining dead loads: Material Unit Weight (kcf) Concrete 0.150 Steel 0.490 Soil 0.120 (unless noted in Geology Report) Wood 0.050 Asphalt 0.145 Water 0.0624 1.03-5

For RAILING DEAD LOADS, the use of the following table is suggested. Railing Type Dead Load (plf) Approximate Center of Gravity Steel Bridge Rail (TL-3) 35 8" from FF curb Steel Bridge Rail (TL-4) 45 8" from FF curb Corrugated Beam Type Railing 40 7" from FF curb Concrete Bridge Barrier Rail 372 11" from FF rail Standard Pedestrian Railing 40 4" from RF sidewalk Pedestrian Safety Railing 35 5" from RF sidewalk Splash Boards 30 Attached to front face of pedestrian safety railing The front face curb or sidewalk thickness for new structures and rehabilitation projects should be 6. For girder structures, the weight of diaphragms, splices, stiffeners, etc., should be included as part of the applied dead load. For steel structures, this can be approximated by using 40 plf for interior girders and 20 plf for exterior girders. Distribution of deck loads will be in accordance to the following based on the structure type. Non-composite structures - Use tributary area for distribution of stage 1 loads (DC). For bridges without sidewalks, distribute stage 2 loads (DC & DW) equally to all girders. For bridges with sidewalks, distribute stage 2 loads (DC & DW) by transverse continuous beam. Composite structures - Use tributary area for distribution of stage 1 loads (DC). For bridges without sidewalks, distribute stage 2 loads (DC & DW) equally to all girders. For bridges with sidewalks, distribute stage 2 loads (DC & DW) by transverse continuous beam. 1.03-6

Temperature Ranges Bridge Design Manual All of Wyoming is assumed to be in the cold climate region. The base construction temperature for bridge structures is 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The base construction temperature is the assumed temperature at which the structure is initially built. All temperature related movements should be determined based on the difference between the base temperature and the limits of the temperature ranges listed below. The Following temperature ranges and load factors will be used in the design of steel and concrete structures. Steel Girder Bridges Base Temperature Range = -30 F to 120 F Bearing and Expansion Joint Design Temperature Range = -50 F to 130 F This range incorporates the 1.2 load factor Concrete Girder Bridges Base Temperature Range = 15 F to 95 F Bearing and Expansion Joint Design Temperature Range = 5 F to 105 F This range incorporates the 1.2 load factor 1.03-7