Becky Larson Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Biological Systems Engineering November 24, 2015

Similar documents
FARM DIGESTERS AND MANURE PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT

Small-Scale Solar-Biopower Generation For Rural Central America

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

Presented by: USA Biogas

REALIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL

Why consider AD? Definitions: What can be digested? 8/8/2016

Aerobic and Anaerobic Biodegradation

Assessment of Environmental Impacts from On-farm Manure Digesters

The Effect of Temperature on the biogas Production from Olive Pomace

Livestock Waste Technologies for Energy Production and Pollution Control A Global Perspective

Project carried out by: Joanna Grebosz, Prof Mike Larkin, Dr Chris Allen, Dr Leonid Kulakov QUB, School of Biological Sciences

The AgSTAR Program. Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems. Improved Performance at Competitive Costs 1EPA

Farm Digesters and Digestion 101 by Mark Moser

Organica is a registered trademark of the Keter Group Energy Division.

Aerobic and Anaerobic Biodegradation. Danny Clark ENSO Bottles LLC 06/29/2010

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM SOLID WASTE RESEARCH PROGRAM Student Project Report

Anaerobic Degradation of Organics

Making an Agricultural Waste-to-Energy Facility Work on a South Carolina Swine Farm

Steven Dickey. Abstract

Introduction. Objective: Livestock operations Current trend is towards large confined operations

Anaerobic Digestion (AD)

Biogas Energy Potential in Alberta

Anaerobic Digestion. Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries. Presented To:

ENVE 424 Anaerobic Treatment

Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute Centre for Research and Technology Hellas

Welcome to the Web Conference U.S. Dairy Industry s Report National Market Value of Anaerobic Digester Products April 11, 2013

Biogas Situation and Development in Thai Swine Farm

The Modern Dairy Cow

MANURE SOLIDS SEPARATORS

Manure source and collection.

7624 Riverview Road Cleveland, Ohio

Driven by pure energy. Understanding the Important Factors of Anaerobic Digestion ABC Workshop - May 27,

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF DAIRY MANURE WITH POTATO WASTE. Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 3

Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure: Design and Process Considerations

Training on Biogas and Biomethane Production

Vermont Tech Community Anaerobic Digester! Harvesting renewable energy & recycling nutrients for a more sustainable community

Value of Anaerobic Digester Products

PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE Energy Options for Ohio Agriculture

UBC BIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY GROUP COMMUNITY DRIVEN BIOSOLIDS RESEARCH

Waste Management for Food & Agriculture Industry Cleaner Production for Food industries

Piggery Digester Systems

Energy from biogas bright future or big headache? AgSystems Design

Overview of Biogas Technology

THE USE OF ULTRASOUND TO ACCELERATE THE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE. Ewa Neczaj, Joanna Lach

Jactone Arogo Ogejo and John Ignosh ; Virginia Tech Stephanie Lansing and Gary Felton, University of Maryland

Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids (Sludge)

Septicity. Midwest Contract Operations. Presented by: Ryan Hennessy. (Organic Acids/ Sulfide)

As the USA leader in anaerobic digestion, DVO s patented, efficient and cost-effective systems provide:

Biogas Workshop. Technical Director, Yield Energy Inc.

How EPA s Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Quantifies the Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Organics Management

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

High-Rate Anaerobic Digester Systems for Industrial Wastewater Treatment and Renewable Energy Generation

14 th Lecture Biogas and Biohydrogen

(c) Tertiary Further treatment may be used to remove more organic matter and/or disinfect the water.

Review of composting and anaerobic digestion of MSW & a methodological proposal for a mid-size city

Biogas recovery from anaerobic digestion process of mixed fruit -vegetable wastes

Opportunity: Methane gas recovery Problem: Where to market the power generated?

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

International Development in Biogas Utilization

Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass Waste : A Comprehensive Review

Natur-Tec is a division of Northern Technologies International Corp., a Minnesota based company. Northern Technologies International Corp.

Nutrient Management Planning

Problems at the biogas plant. Henrik Bangsø Nielsen Biogasforum, seminar, 29/

The Effect of Temperature on Methane Productivity of Municipal Solid Waste in Anaerobic Digester

Batch anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung and donkey manure

Nitrogen Availability from Manipulated Manures

Introduction into Digester Biology

Anaerobic Digestion Of MSW Organics 2011 ASTSWMO Solid Waste Managers Conference Kansas City, Missouri Nora Goldstein, BioCycle

Microbial Tools for Manure Management

Jenbacher gas engines

3/23/2015. Bunker Silage Storage Leachate and Runoff Management. Bunker Silage Storage. Silage

Biological Transformations of Refuse

A Biogas Decision Support System Tool

Estimating Greenhouse Gas Reductions For a Regional Digester Treating Dairy Manure

Pig producer diverts portion of liquid waste stream to tomato production

Preliminary Comparison of Five Anaerobic Digestion Systems on Dairy Farms in New York State

CA Dairy Anaerobic Digester Case study: Fiscalini Farms

EFFECT OF ANAEROBIC SLUDGE COMPOSITION ON A BIOGAS PRODUCTION

Production from Organic Residues. Biogas

Improvement Anaerobic Digestion performance of Sewage Sludge by Co-digestion with Cattle Manure Raouf Hassan

336098: DYNAMIC MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FOR HIGH ORGANIC STRENGTH WASTE

2/19/2013. Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical Technologies Introduction and Advantages

Canadian Biogas Metrics Study: Quantifying the Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits of Biogas Energy in Canada

Flexible Platform Technologies for Resource Recovery from Food Waste

Module 22 : Sludge Management

W hich types of biomass are best for a digester? 9/27/2013. quasar energy group. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Wastewater Treatment

THE EFFECT OF SUBSTRATE ON THE AMOUNT AND COMPOSITION OF BIOGAS IN AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANT

Heat Generation and Accumulation at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Experiencing Elevated Temperatures

New Ways to Energy. Energy Production of Renewable Resources and Bio-Waste in Biogas Plants. Hese Biogas GmbH Hese Biogas GmbH

Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion with Bio- Organic Catalyst Compositions (BOCs)

Microturbine Operation with Biogas from a Covered Dairy Manure Lagoon

PAGEL S PONDEROSA DAIRY REPORT

Project List (Cumulative Chronological order)

Thermal Conversion of Animal Manure to Biofuel. Outline. Biorefinery approaches

Pretreatment of cellulosic waste and high-rate biogas production. Solmaz Aslanzadeh

Village of Turtle Lake Collaborative Digester Feasibility Study

Successful Implementation of Septage Treatment Options. Pushkar Srivastava Urban Specialist, ADB

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Lili sugiyarto

Sustainable Energy Recovery from Organic Waste

Transcription:

FROM WASTE TO WORTH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Becky Larson Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Biological Systems Engineering November 24, 2015

What is Anaerobic Digestion? Biological process Breakdown of organic materials (called feedstocks) Absence of oxygen (anaerobic conditions) Produced biogas - methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 )

Why install a digester? Energy independence Reductions in green house gases Flexibility in manure management Reduced odors & pathogens Reduction in other environmental impacts Potential for additional asset streams (?) Bedding Tipping fees Environmental credits Profits? What can t digesters do?

Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S. USEPA AgSTAR, 2011

Anaerobic Digestion Livestock & Swine Operations Animals No. of Digesters Operational or in Construction Methane Emissions Reductions (metric tons CO2-eq/year) Shutdown Projects All Livestock 261 3,480,955 52 Swine 39 1,491,718 10 North Carolina has 10 swine digesters, others are scattered around country Operational from as far back as 1985 From 1,200 to 1,200,000 million animals Completely mixed, covered lagoons, mixed plug flow designs Gas use in boilers, electricity, cogeneration, flares USEPA AgSTAR, 2015

Biogas Opportunities Roadmap Voluntary Actions to Reduce Methane Emissions and Increase Energy Independence U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy August 2014

Traditional Anaerobic Digestion Process Flow Biogas Feedstock's Slurry Digestate Filtrate (liquid) Separator Fiber (solid)

Anaerobic Digestion Feedstocks Cheese Whey Cucumber Waste Human Waste Vegetables Yard Clippings Municipal Organics Food Processing Waste Grasses Cattle Manure Dairy Manure Swine Manure

The Biological Process of Producing Biogas Stage One: Hydrolysis COMPLEX POLYMERS (Proteins, polysaccharides, etc.) fermentative bacteria Characterized by rapid bacterial growth MONOMERS AND OLIGOMERS (Sugars, amino acids, peptides) Stage Two: Acidogenesis Stage Three: Acetogenesis fermentative bacteria acetogens (H 2 producing) fermentative bacteria PROPIONATE, BUTYRATE, etc. (Short-chain volatile organic acids) fermentative bacteria Weak link in the process of producing biogas Stage Four: Methanogenesis CO 2 reducing methanogens H 2 + CO 2 ACETATE acetogens (H 2 consuming) CH 4, CO 2 aceticiastic methanogens Goal?...Avoid inhibition, maintain stabilization! Source: Syed Hashsham, PhD, lecture notes, Michigan State University

Biogas Yield Kestutis Navickas. 2007. Bioplin Tehnologija in Okolje,

Anaerobic Digester Completely Mixed and Plug Flow

AD System Types

Covered storage Advantages included odor control, low cost, integrated manure storage and minimal operational costs Disadvantage include seasonal biogas production in cold climates and difficulties with sludge removal Covered Lagoon Digester and Flare Baldwin Dairy, Baldwin, WI Covered Lagoon at a Swine Farm Olivia, MN

Plug flow & mixed plug flow Plug flow digester and flare Emerald Dairy, Baldwin, WI Advantages include low cost of construction and ease of daily operation Disadvantage include the limited range of feedstock TS concentration Inside a plug flow digester under construction Baldwin Dairy, Baldwin, WI

Completely mixed Complete mix digester Green Valley Dairy, Krakow, WI Complete mix digester Five Star Dairy, Elk Mound, WI

Inside a completely mixed AD Slow speed agitator fixed to the digester floor Submersible mix mounted to a mast Inside a complete mix digester under construction Westfalia, Germany

Fixed film Fixed film digester ROPA, Regensburg, DE Advantages include low cost of construction and ease of daily operation Disadvantage include the limited range of feedstock TS concentration Fixed film digester media J.J. Farber Farm, East Jewett, NY

Dry Digestion OshKosh Dry Digester, BIOFerm

Small Scale Digesters

Small Scale Digestion Ecofys bag digester, ecofys.com

Community Digesters Dane County Digester, 2011

Biogas Biogas Components CH4 (50 65%) CO2 (40 50%) H2S (<1%) Other Trace Elements (?) Generator (CHP) electricity production Most common (ease of use) High cost Requires pretreatment or specially designed equipment Compressed Biogas High cost of clean-up Requires design High revenue Biogas Treatment High cost systems Multi-phase approach

Digestate Must be disposed Liquid and solid commonly used for fertilizer Solids potential for higher value products AD results in: nutrient mineralization odor reduction pathogen reduction antibiotic degradation

Nutrients & Anaerobic Digestion TKN Concentration (mg/kg) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 TKN AA DDI FA ML* NH Facility Input Output Wright, et al. 2004. Preliminary Comparison of Five Anaerobic Digestion Systems on Dairy Farms in New York State

Nutrients & Anaerobic Digestion Ammonia 3000 Ammonia Concentration (mg/kg) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 AA DDI FA ML* NH Input Output Facility Increase of 24% Wright, et al. 2004. Preliminary Comparison of Five Anaerobic Digestion Systems on Dairy Farms in New York State

Ammonia 40000 35000 Ammonia (mg/l) 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Pre Digestion Post Digestion

Nutrients & Anaerobic Digestion Total Phosphorus Total Phosphorus Concentration (mg/kg) 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 AA DDI FA ML* NH Input Output Facility Wright, et al. 2004. Preliminary Comparison of Five Anaerobic Digestion Systems on Dairy Farms in New York State

Phosphorus 100 80 60 40 20 0 Liquid % Solid %

N-P-K Concentration N (g/kg) P 2 O 5 (g/kg) K 2 O (g/kg) Manure 50 18 41 Liquid 101 27 75 Solid 15 14 8 Ratio N P 2 O 5 K 2 O Manure 3 1 2 Liquid 4 1 3 Solid 2 2 1

Odor Swine Manure Hansen et al. 2006, Applied Engineering in Agriculture Slurry concentrations of malodorous VFA were reduced 79-97% from AD Odor concentration above undisturbed slurry store reduced (higher odors after mixing) Land application odor reductions: 17% anaerobic digestion 50% anaerobic digestion and solid liquid separation Orzi et al., 2015, Science of the Total Environment Odors reduced 98% P2-P6 are pig slurries VFA destruction related to measured odor reductions

Pathogens in manure from a single farm by year and season Autumn, 2009 Spring, 2010 Autumn, 2010 Spring, 2011

Bovine Polyomavirus Mean Pathogen Concentration (gc/gm) 1E+09 100000000 10000000 1000000 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 Farm #1 Farm #3 Farm #4 Farm #5 Farm #6 Farm #7 Farm #8

Antibiotic Degradation Many antibiotics to be tested Not many studies to date May increase intermediates Beef manure studies by Arikan (2006, 2007, 2008) found some degradation in initial component, increases in some intermediaries Alvarez et al., 2010, Bioresource Technology Fate of antibiotics in pig manure in AD oxytetracycline (OTC) and chlortetracycline (CTC) Reduction in antibiotics over time, as well as methane production Antibiotics adsorbed to solids increasing duration for destruction

Global Warming Potential 10 10.00 kg CO 2 -eq ton -1 excreted manure 0-10 -20-30 -40 0.00-10.00-20.00-30.00-40.00-50 -50.00-60 SLS AD AD+SLS -60.00 CO2(f) CO2(b) N2O(f) N2O(b) CH4(f) CH4(b) NET

Ammonia Emissions 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 NH 3 emissions (BC) kg NH 3 -eq ton -1 excreted manure 0.0 Collection Storage Application NH 3 emissions (AD) kg NH 3 -eq ton -1 excreted manure 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 Collection Storage Application

Limitations to Adoption Lack of Awareness of Biogas Benefits. Unpredictable Biogas Market Conditions Lack of Market Maturity. Lack of Full Valuation Inconsistencies across Federal, State, and Local Governments. Lack of Technical and Applied Research & Development Capital cost Operating cost Energy use Energy value By-product Revenue Biogas Opportunities Roadmap Voluntary Actions to Reduce Methane Emissions and Increase Energy Independence U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy August 2014

Thank You! Becky Larson ralarson2@wisc.edu (608) 890-3171