Wind Turbine Noise Assessment in Ontario

Similar documents
Noise Impact Assessment

Noise Modeling Report from the Construction Activities of the Tangguh LNG Expansion Project

Variations of sound from wind turbines during different weather conditions

Wind Turbine Noise, Infrasound and Noise Perception

Rumster Wind Energy Project

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL. Number Three Wind Farm Lewis County, New York. Case 16-F-0328

The acquisition of baseline noise data at receptor locations, and the analysis of this data, to take account of site-specific wind shear.

Evaluating Ontario Regulations for Siting Turbines. in Context of. Findings from the Health Canada Study

Comparison of compliance results obtained from the various wind farm standards used in Australia

Synergy Wind Pty Ltd PO Box 327 Balaclava VIC 3183

You have applied in accordance with Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act for approval of:

Proposed Revisions to. Wind Energy Development Guidelines Targeted Review in relation to Noise, Proximity and Shadow Flicker December 11 th 2013

Cooling Tower Noise Control

Ontario Corp. as general partner for and on behalf of Illumination LP 545 Speedvale Ave W Guelph, Ontario N1K 1E6

GE Power & Water. Improved Aeroacoustics and Noise Management Options. Saskia Honhoff, Dr. Benoît Petitjean, Dr. Roger Drobietz, Dr. Kevin W.

The Clem7 Motorway Tunnel: Mechanical and Electrical Plant Acoustic Design and Performance

Pengrowth Lindbergh SAGD Project

INFRASOUND AND BLADE PASS FREQUENCY LEVELS IN AREAS ADJACENT TO WIND FARMS

BARON WINDS SOUND MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROTOCOL

The Effect of Atmospheric Absorption on Environmental Noise Propagation in an Urban Area

Kamperman & James Nine-page summary edition Page 1 of 9

MCS 020. MCS Planning Standards. For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

EPA GUIDANCE NO. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

MEASUREMENT AND LEVEL OF INFRASOUND FROM WIND FARMS AND OTHER SOURCES

Statutory Order on noise from wind turbines

Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Wind Turbine Specification Report

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

MURRA WARRA WIND FARM PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

WIND FARMS TECHNICAL PAPER. Environmental Noise. Prepared for. CLEAN ENERGY COUNCIL Suite 201, 18 Kavanagh Street SOUTHBANK 3006

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

WHY IS WIND TURBINE NOISE POORLY MASKED BY ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE? 2 GGD Amsterdam.

Acoustics and Classrooms BARD MANUFACTURING COMPANY REGISTERED AIA PRESENTER VAUGHAN SMITH

Community and Environmental Noise Measurement

Response to the Health Canada Wind Turbine Noise and Health Study: Summary of Results. John Harrison

Sound, Noise and Vibration

APPLICATIONS HVAC Acoustics and Vibration

Possible Impacts of Low Frequency Wind. Rita B. Messing, Ph.D. Carl Herbrandson, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Course, Feb. 2011

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Wind Energy Ordinances

CARRYING OUT NOISE ASSESSMENTS FOR PROPOSED SUPERMARKET DEVELOPMENTS

Investigation, prediction and assessment of wind turbine noise and infrasound in Japan

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Short Communication Infrasound Noise of Natural Sources in the Environment and Infrasound Noise of Wind Turbines

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

NIAGARA REGION WIND FARM PROJECT

Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation

Noise Assessment Report

Interference of Wind Turbines with Different Yaw Angles of the Upstream Wind Turbine

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING FACILITIES

Environmental Noise Compliance Assessment Bass Point Quarry

Aerodynamic Noise from Wind Turbines

Theme Comment Response. All neighbours should be entitled to revenue sharing, not just those who have signed an option agreement with Suncor.

Occupational Health and Safety (Noise) Regulations 2004

The major findings of the study are based on the following recommendations:

IAC Acoustics Noise-Foil Sound Absorption Panels for Industrial Applications. Dan O Brien

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation 4.6 NOISE Environmental Setting. Approach to Analysis

Noise Impact Assessment Dalveen Wind Farm Dalveen, QLD

USER S MANUAL 400W and 600W

Wind Development: Benefits and Constraints

Noise Impact Assessment

Wind farm aural and visual impact in the Netherlands

URBAN FOREST ACOUSTICS

Gibbet Hill Wind Farm Noise Monitoring Report

Report on Mill Noise levels and noise level attenuation for consideration at the proposed Coega and Empangeni clinker grinding sites.

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

Noise annoyance caused by large wind turbines a dose-response relationship

AIR POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY

WHAKATU ARTERIAL PROJECT ASSESSMENT OF NOISE AND VIBRATION EFFECTS

February 7, 2017 Mr. Daniel Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN

Analysis 4 Acoustical Analysis of Interior Partitions- Breadth

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook

WILSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: WIND ENERGY

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Content Copy Of Original

Acoustic impact of an urban micro hydro scheme

Theme: Sound/Noise Level ID Letter: A Original Questions:

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario

Enhancing Acoustic Performance through the use of Window Shade Fabric White Paper

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

Infrasound Measurements of Falmouth Wind Turbines Wind #1 and Wind #2

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

A Review of Wind Turbine Noise Perception, Annoyance and Low Frequency Emission

NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION, ICSV9 CASE STUDY OF A HOSPITAL ATRIUM WITH OVERLOOKING PATIENT ROOMS

Request for Quotations Acoustic Consultant Services

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels.

Use of ISO measurement uncertainty guidelines to determine uncertainties in noise & vibration predictions and design risks

Infrasound levels near windfarms and in other environments

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Hudson Series 300 Acoustic Louvre

Exposure-response relationships for annoyance by wind turbine noise: a comparison with other stationary sources

MAY 4, Noise Barrier Presentation NE Quadrant Smith Avenue, Cherry Hill Circle NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

Transcription:

Wind Turbine Noise Assessment in Ontario Jim Salmon York University ESS 5210 2013-11-26 (Tuesday) Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Noise Assessment

Sound Hz: measurement of frequency (tone) db: measurement of volume or sound pressure level dba: db adjusted for human hearing Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects: An Expert Panel Review: CanWEA/AWEA

Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects: An Expert Panel Review: CanWEA/AWEA

Wind Turbine Noise Considerations Generation Transmission Reception

Turbine Noise Generation Two primary types: Aerodynamic white noise (all audible frequencies) from blade tips (mainly) passing through air at high speed (70 to 100 ms-1 tip speed) Amplitude modulation can occur when blade is moving downwards (about 1 Hz) Tonal noise from turbine hardware (not common in modern turbines) Ranges Audible sound (20 to 20,000 Hz) Infrasound (< about 20 Hz; very low energy content)

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Measurement

Turbine Noise Propagation Geometrical spreading. (Adiv = 20log[r] 11 db, at a distance r) Molecular absorption. This is conversion of acoustic energy to heat and is frequency dependent Turbulent scattering from local variations in wind velocity and air temperature and is moderately frequency dependent Ground effects reflection, topography and absorption are frequency dependent; their effects increasing as the frequency increases Near surface effects temperature and wind gradients.

Turbine Noise Propagation The sound pressure at a point, distant from source, is given by LfT = LW + Dc A (db) In which: LfT is the sound pressure level at the receiving point LW is the sound power level of the turbine in decibels re 10-12 watts Dc is a directivity index, which takes non-uniform spreading into account A is attenuation All of the above are frequency dependent. Near surface meteorological effects are complex, as wind and temperature gradients affect propagation through the air. Turbine noise sources are unique due to their height.

Turbine Noise Propagation Best known sound propagation standard Basis of Ontario MoE Noise Guidelines Relatively conservative Not perfect: generally designed for ground-based noise sources does not specifically handle temperature inversions, for example

Reception Summation from all turbines for all octave bands (8) {[ n L AT DW =10log10 8 10 0.1 [ L ft ij A f j ] i=1 j=1 ]} LAT(DW) is the equivalent continuous A-weighted downwind sound pressure level at a receptor location, n is the number of turbines Af(j) is the standard A-weighting for octave band j j is an index indicating the eight standard octave-band midband frequencies from 63 Hz to 8 khz

Reception LfT(ij) LfT(DW) is the equivalent continuous downwind octave-band sound pressure level at a receptor location for turbine i and octave band j, and is given by L ft DW =LW DC A LW is the octave-band sound power level, in decibels, produced by the point sound source relative to a reference sound power of one picowatt DC is directivity correction in decibels

Reception A is the octave-band attenuation, in decibels, that occurs during propagation from the turbine to receptor, and is given by A=Adiv Aatm Agr A bar Amisc Adiv is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence Aatm is attenuation due to atmospheric absorption Agr is the attenuation due to the ground effect Abar is attenuation due to a barrier Amisc is the attenuation due to miscellaneous other effects

Reception AATM is given by αd A= 1000 α is the atmospheric attenuation coefficient, in decibels per kilometre, for each octave band at the mid-band frequency d is the distance from the turbine to the receptor Highly frequency dependent

Reception Agr = As + Am + Ar Result of interference of direct and reflected sound Strictly applies only to ground which is (nearly) flat Three regions: source, middle, receiver; 30h Regions acoustical properties accounted for by ground factors: Gs, Gm, Gr Hard ground: G=0.0 pavement, tamped ground, ice Porous (soft) ground: G=1.0 grass, trees, vegetation, crops Mixed ground: 0.0 < G < 1.0 Frequency dependent

Reception Combining sound pressures at a receptor: 1x turbine contributing 40 dba, results in 40.0 dba 2x turbines contributing 40 dba each, result in 43.0 dba 3x turbines contributing 40 dba each, result in 44.8 dba 4x turbines contributing 40 dba each, result in 46.0 dba

Reception Example calculation for receptor and turbine 632 m apart Octave band 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mid-band frequency (Hz) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 LW (dba) Adiv (db) Aatm (db) Agr (db) 82.4 93.0 96.0 99.8 100.1 96.5 89.6 85.7 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.3 6.1 20.9 74.8-3.0 1.0-0.1-0.7-0.7-0.8-0.8-0.8 LfT(DW) (dba) 18.3 24.7 28.4 32.3 31.5 24.1 2.4-55.4 Resultant receptor sound pressure level is 36.5 dba

Ontario MoE Noise Guidelines Interpretation document of Ontario MoE NPC-205, NPC-232 (note update to NPC-300) Likely due for an update Conservative Sets noise level limits at receptors Theoretically: dependent on ambient 10 m wind speed In practice: 40 dba at receptors 45 dba at participants (notional)

MoE Noise Guidelines

MoE Noise Guidelines Definitions Point of Reception (Receptor): means any point on the premises of a person within 30 m of a dwelling or a camping area, where sound or vibration originating from other than those premises is received. Participating Receptor (Participant): means a property that is associated with the Wind Farm by means of a legal agreement with the property owner for the installation and operation of wind turbines or related equipment located on that property.

MoE Noise Guidelines Definitions For the purpose of approval of new sources... the Point of Reception (Receptor) may be located on any of the following existing or zoned for future use premises: permanent or seasonal residences, hotels/motels, nursing/retirement homes, rental residences, hospitals, camp grounds, and noise sensitive buildings such as schools and places of worship. For equipment/facilities proposed on premises such as nursing/retirement homes, rental residences, hospitals, and schools, the Point of Reception may be located on the same premises.

MoE Noise Guidelines Definitions Vacant Lots: must be considered as potential host for receptor (1 ha) where zoning permits Vacant Lot Surrogate Receptors (VLSRs) Therefore: three types of points of reception: Receptors, VLSRs, Participants with different rules.

MoE Noise Guidelines Transformer sub-stations: Must be considered in the noise assessment Must include 5 db tonal penalty Presence of a sub-station triggers different rules for determining the exact Point of Reception for noise calculations

MoE Noise Guidelines Location: Point of Reception

MoE Noise Guidelines Distance Requirement: Assessment required if one or more receptors or participants are located within 1,500 m of a turbine. (Requirement is slightly modified if project includes sub-station.) Adjacent Wind Farms: must be included in assessment. (Note: only type of noise assessment where other noise sources must be considered!) Tonality: 5 db penalty assessed if there is tonality in the turbine noise. Distant Turbines: Turbines further than 5,000 m from a Point of Reception do not need to be included in the noise assessment.

MoE Noise Guidelines Specification of Parameters: Noise assessment must use atmospheric attenuation coefficients for 10C and 70% relative humidity. Maximum allowable source, middle, and receiver ground factors (G) of 1.0, 0.8, 0.5 respectively; 1.0 soft; 0.0 hard Vertical wind shear power law profile must be derived for summer night-time wind shear conditions. 550 m Distance Setback: The well-known 550 m distance setback from receptors is not included in the MoE Noise Guidelines. It is included in Ontario Regulation O. Reg 359/09 under the Environmental Protection Act (Renewable Energy Approvals, REA)

O. Reg. 359/09

Noise Assessment

Noise Assessment with additional setbacks