FIVE-SECOND EXPLOSION TEMPERATURE (U.S. ARMY ARDEC METHOD) USERS MANUAL

Similar documents
ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNATIVE CARTRIDGE CASE DESIGNS

Parametric Study of Heating in a Ferrite Core Using SolidWorks Simulation Tools

60mm M225 FATIGUE TEST AND BURST TEST

IMPROVING RELIABILITY BY REDUCING TOLERANCE STACK-UP FAILURES

Yttria Nanoparticle Reinforced Commercially Pure (CP) Titanium

GALVANIC CORROSION STUDY ON STAINLESS STEEL CARTRIDGE DESIGN

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

Safe Disposal of Secondary Waste

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Rockville, MD 20852

Predicting Disposal Costs for United States Air Force Aircraft (Presentation)

Determining the Exempt Solvent Content of Coatings Using Gas Chromatography

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Autoclave Meltout of Cast Explosives

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BLAST DESIGN FOR THE EXPLOSIVES DEVELOPMENT FACILITY ABSTRACT

Report No. D August 1, Internal Controls Over U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works, Disbursement Processes

Powder Coating as an Environmentally Acceptable Alternate to the System of MIL-P and MIL-PRF-22750

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

Hybrid Vapor Compression Ejector Cycle: Presentation to IAPG Mechanical Working Group

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

AFRL-RX-TY-TP

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND MISSILE CORROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL

AUTOCLAVE MELTOUT OF CAST EXPLOSIVES

Sustainable Management of Available Resources and Technology (SMART) Cleanup

AND Ti-Si-(Al) EUTECTIC ALLOYS Introduction. temperatur-dependent

FEASIBILITY OF USING NON PROPAGATION WALLS IN AN EXISTING OPERATING FACILITY. And

SAIC Analysis of Data Acquired at Camp Butner, NC. Dean Keiswetter

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Author: Kerry J. Libbert Mechanical Engineer. Performing Activity: Naval Surface Warfare Center Code 4045 Crane, Indiana

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

DoD Environmental Information Technology Management (EITM) Program

Update on ESTCP Project ER-0918: Field Sampling and Sample Processing for Metals on DoD Ranges. Jay L. Clausen US Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC CRREL

DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL

Vehicle Thermal Management Simulation at TARDEC

Lithium Potassium Manganese Mixed Metal Oxide Material for Rechargeable Electrochemical Cells

Testing Cadmium-free Coatings

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

Nanopowder Synthesis & Associated Safety Precautions at ARDEC: Partnering with NIOSH

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No

Novel Corrosion Control Coating Utilizing Carbon Nanotechnology

Magnesium-Rich Coatings

Title: Human Factors Reach Comfort Determination Using Fuzzy Logic.

Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Management at Fort Stewart

Protective Design. Force Protection Standards and Historic Preservation Policy. DoD Conservation Conference

The Case for Impulse - Analysis of Conventional Structures Subjected to Blast Loads

Views on Mini UAVs & Mini UAV Competition

Qualification of Ammunition Coatings for Renovating 155-mm M549A1 Projectiles

10/92 POP Test (09/92)

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

Navy s Approach to Green and Sustainable Remediation

Aeronautical Systems Center

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

NOTICE OF CHANGE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD HUMAN ENGINEERING

A Simulation-based Integration Approach for the First Trident MK6 Life Extension Guidance System

Reporting Limit (RL) Presenter

POWER MODULE COOLING FOR FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE APPLICATIONS: A COOLANT COMPARISON OF OIL AND PGW

Use of Residual Compression in Design to Improve Damage Tolerance in Ti-6Al-4V Aero Engine Blade Dovetails

Systems Engineering Processes Applied To Ground Vehicle Integration at US Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC)

Department of Defense Green Procurement Program and Biobased Products

Systems Engineering Processes Applied To Ground Vehicle Integration at US Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC)

Deciding in a Complex Environment : Human Performance Modeling of Dislocated Organizations

A Novel MicroElectroMechanical System (MEMS) Device for Passive Sampling of Hydrophobic Compounds

EVALUATION OF PROTECTION SCHEMES FOR ULTRAHIGH-STRENGTH STEEL ALLOYS FOR LANDING GEAR APPLICATIONS

Static and dynamic testing of bridges and highways using long-gage fiber Bragg grating based strain sensors

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DISPOSAL SITE IN NORTHEASTERN HARDEMAN COUNTY,

Reintroducing High Workload Needle Free Jet Injectors to the US Military Medical Community

Systems Engineering, Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence, the Semantic Web and Operations Research

Flip Chip Hybridization Using Indium Bump Technology at ARL

Title: Nano shape memory alloy composite development and applications

Ground-based IFF Interrogator System {GBIIS) at Edwards AFB ALEJANDRO REGALADO AVIONICS ENGINEER AIR FORCE TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA.

FINAL REPORT APRIL 2000 REPORT NO INCH ROCKET HYDRA PALLET MIL-STD-1660 FIRST ARTICLE TEST

Technical Report ARMET-TR-09055

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Fall 2014 SEI Research Review. Team Attributes &Team Performance FY14-7 Expert Performance and Measurement

Agenda. Current Acquisition Environment-Strategic Sourcing. Types of Contract Vehicles. Specific Contract Vehicles for Navy-wide Use DOD EMALL

EFFECTS OF SURFACE PREPARATION TECHNIQUES ON THE ADHESION OF TANTALUM SPUTTERED COATINGS

Evaluation of Dipsol IZ-C17 LHE Zinc-Nickel Plating

Development of an integrated ISFET ph sensor for high pressure applications in the deep-sea

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Final Report for AOARD

Counters for Monitoring

Implementing Open Architecture. Dr. Tom Huynh Naval Postgraduate School

Army Systems Engineering Career Development Model

Sustainable Contingency Bases Reducing the Logistical and Environmental Footprint

Transparent Ceramic Yb 3+ :Lu2O3 Materials

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Stormwater Asset Inventory and Condition Assessments to Support Asset Management Session 12710

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

Alternative Approaches to Water Resource System Simulation

Rigor and Objectivity in T&E

Enhance Facility Energy Management at Naval Expeditionary Base Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti. 12 May 2011

Evaluation of Zn-rich Primers and Rust Converters for Corrosion Protection of Steel Leonardo Caseres

Air Intakes for Subsonic UCAV Applications - Some Design Considerations

Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection (JECP) Family of Systems (FoS)

Transcription:

AD AD-E403 223 Technical Report ARMET-TR-09015 FIVE-SECOND EXPLOSION TEMPERATURE (U.S. ARMY ARDEC METHOD) USERS MANUAL Theodore Dolch Neha Mehta Eugene Homentowski June 2009 U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER Munitions Engineering Technology Center Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 20090803233

The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation. The citation in this report of the names of commercial firms or commercially available products or services does not constitute official endorsement by or approval of the U.S. Government. Destroy this report when no longer needed by any method that will prevent disclosure of its contents or reconstruction of the document. Do not return to the originator.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-01-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) June 2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED {From - To) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER FIVE-SECOND EXPLOSION TEMPERATURE TEST (U.S. ARMY ARDEC METHOD) USERS MANUAL 6. AUTHORS Theodore Dolch, Neha Mehta, and Eugene Homentoski 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army ARDEC, METC Energetics, Warheads & Manufacturing Technology Directorate (RDAR-MEE-W) Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army ARDEC, ESIC Technical Research Center (AMSRD-AAR-EIK) Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) Technical Report ARMET-TR-09015 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The 5-sec explosion temperature test was developed at the U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC), Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey. This ARDEC method is a thermal test used to determine the 5-sec time-to-explosion temperature of an energetic material. This test is required for Final Hazard Classification (FHC) of an energetic material used in the U.S. Army end items. This test was described in MIL-STD-650, Method T 515.1, dated 28 September 1987. MIL-STD-650 is now obsolete. This technical report will serve as a reference for this test method. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 5-sec Final hazard classification (FHC) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT U b. ABSTRACT U c. THIS PAGE U 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBE PERSON Ted Dolch 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (973) 724-2376 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Sample Preparation 1 Woods Metal Bath Preparation 1 Electrical Control 2 Calculations 4 Reference 7 Distribution List 9 FIGURES 1 West controller and saturable reactor 2 2 Hoskins FD-10A heater 3 3 Omega temperature indicator and HP counter 3 4 5-sec explosion temperature test block diagram 4 5 Plot of natural logarithm of the time-to-explosion versus the reciprocal 5 of the absolute temperature for class 1 RDX

INTRODUCTION The 5-sec explosion temperature test [U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) Method, Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey] is a thermal test used to determine the 5-sec time-to-explosion temperature of an energetic material. Apparatus used for this test includes a barricaded press with a die for loading 30 mg of energetic material into a no. 8 blasting cap, a no. 8 blasting cap crimper, a furnace with a molten Woods metal bath and shield, associated temperature measurement and controls, and a time interval recorder with microphone. SAMPLE PREPARATION A test sample is usually in powdered form. If need be, a material may be ground to a powder and passed through a 20-mesh screen before using in this test. A no. 8 blasting cap (copper blasting cap: nominal 0.24 in outer diameter, 0.20-in. inner diameter, and 2 in. long) is placed in a steel loading fixture (die). Approximately 30 mg of sample is placed into the blasting cap. A copper 0.22 caliber gas check, open side up, is placed in the blasting cap. The gas check is pressed into the blasting cap at 6000 psi (230 lb force) for 10 sec. Approximately 30 mg of dried talcum powder is placed into the blasting cap. Another copper 0.22 caliber gas check, open side up, is placed in the blasting cap. The gas check is pressed into the blasting cap at 6000 psi (230 lb force) for 10 sec. About 25 no. 8 blasting cap are loaded for the test. The loaded blasting caps were crimped at the closed end (explosive end) using a DuPont Superior Crimper, serial no. 1806. tray. The loaded, crimped blasting caps were stored in a wooden, non-propagating wooden WOODS METAL BATH PREPARATION The woods metal bath consists of a steel cup, capable of accommodating a submerged no. 8 blasting cap, heated up to a maximum temperature of 500 C. The temperature of the Woods metal bath is set to the desired level. The temperature of the molten Woods metal bath is measured using a thermocouple and digital readout. A loaded, crimped no. 8 blasting cap is placed in the Woods metal bath sampler holder. When the desired molten Woods metal bath temperature s attained, the loaded basting cap is lowered into the molten Woods metal bath. The electronic timer is activated. When the blasting cap explodes, the timer is stopped using a microphone connected to the timer. The temperature and corresponding time to explosion is recorded. Successive tests (about 20 to 25 total) are performed in the same manner to obtain time-to-explosion temperature values over a time range of 1 to 7 sec.

ELECTRICAL CONTROL The heating medium for this test is molten Woods metal that is contained in a Hoskins FD-1OA heater with a copper crucible. Pictures of the system are shown in figures 1 through 3. A block diagram for this system is shown in figure 4. West Instrument Co. was the designer/fabricator of the control elements consisting of the controller and saturable reactor output unit. The controller has two modes of operation, manual and automatic. Because the original temperature sensor-indicator is broken and replacement parts are no longer available, the controller is operated only in manual mode using an Omega engineering temperature indicator. In manual mode, the test temperature is obtained y turning a control potentiometer to a predetermined setting that generates a control dc voltage that is applied to the control winding of the saturable reactor. This results in an output of the saturable reactor that is applied to the Hoskins heater to bring the Woods metal bath to the desired test temperature. That temperature is sensed by a type K thermocouple and indicated by the Omega temperature indicator. Figure 1 West controller and saturable reactor

Figure 2 Hoskins FD-10A heater Figure 3 Omega temperature indicator and HP counter

Hoskins FD-10A 1 Thermocouple Omega Temperature Microphone Amp HP Counter West Saturable Reactor Figure 4 5-sec explosion temperature test block diagram CALCULATIONS The test result is reported as the temperature in degrees centigrade, which corresponds to the 5-sec time-to-explosion. The test data are plotted as the natural logarithm of the time-to-explosion versus the reciprocal of the absolute temperature. This results in a straight line. A linear least-square curve fit program should be used to determine the temperature value for the 5-sec time-toexplosion. Microsoft Excel may be used to plot the data and determine the 5-sec time-toexplosion temperature of a material. Temperature and time data for class 1 RDX is given in table 1. A plot of this data is given in figure 5. A linear least-square curve fit program was used to determine the temperature value of 250 C for the 5-sec time-to-explosion for class 1 RDX.

5-sec explosion temperature = 250 C Table 1 Temperature and time data for class 1 RDX RDX type 2 class 1 Lot HOL93C517032 Temperature ( C) Time (sec 297 1.02 293 1.19 287 1.07 284 1.66 284 1.58 283 1.54 282 1.62 281 1.37 280 1.66 277 1.94 276 1.99 256 3.87 248 5.42 247 6.04 245 6.43 244 6.29 RDX Type. Lot HOL93C517032 In l(sec) 1000rr(Dog. K) Figure 5 Plot of natural logarithm of the time-to-explosion versus the reciprocal of the absolute temperature for class 1 RDX

REFERENCE 1. MIL-STD-650, "Explosive: Sampling, Inspection and Testing," Interim Notice 4 (AR), 28 September 1987.

DISTRIBUTION LIST U.S. Army ARDEC ATTN: RDAR-EIK RDAR-GC RDAR-MEE-W (3) Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ATTN: Accessions Division 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ste 0944 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218 Commander Soldier and Biological/Chemical Command ATTN: AMSSB-CII, Library Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423 Director U.S. Army Research Laboratory ATTN: AMSRL-CI-LP, Technical Library Bldg. 4600 Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 Chief Benet Weapons Laboratory, WSEC U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center ATTN: AMSRD-AAR-WSB Watervliet, NY 12189-5000 Director U.S. Army TRADOC Analysis Center-WSMR ATTN: ATRC-WSS-R White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002 Chemical Propulsion Information Agency ATTN: Accessions 10630 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 202 Columbia, MD 21044-3204 GIDEP Operations Center P.O. Box 8000 Corona, CA 91718-8000