DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Technical Training

Similar documents
Feature Zone IECC 2009 IECC

Insulating Attics & Crawlspaces. Roger Morrison, PE, RRC NCFI Polyurethanes

A Closer Look Inspection Service 2015 IECC Residential DFW area handout

Boulder City NV Prepared by (Print Name) Signature Date

Recommended Amendments to the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC)

CERTIFICATE OF FIELD VERIFICATION & DIAGNOSTIC TESTING (Page 1 of 8)

THE GEORGIA ENERGY CODE: 2009 IECC + AMENDMENTS

California Building Envelope Solutions

Energy Efficiency: Designing Wood-Frame Buildings for Occupant Comfort

Insulation, Fireblocking, Draftstopping and Crawl Space Requirements REVISION DATE: JANUARY 2017

Hardin County Planning and Development Commission

Date Rater Verified. Rater Verified. Slab / Pre-Drywall / Thermal Inspection

PERFORMANCE OF SIDE-BY-SIDE SOUTH TEXAS HOMES Isolating the Contribution of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation

IRC 2012 Key Changes

Presentation Overview: NC Energy Code RESNET Standards HERS Index HERS Verification Process

Prescriptive Checklist for the 2015 Washington State Energy Code

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF ENERGY EFFICIENT CONSTRUCTION

Condi1oned A3cs and Crawlspaces. Making the Decision. Find This Presenta1on. Helpful Informa1on. page/

SAN MIGUEL COUNTY & TOWN OF MOUNTAIN VILLAGE BUILDING DEPARTMENTS PRESCRIPTIVE ENERGY CODE & GREEN BUILDING STANDARD

Oregon High Performance Home Requirements

Residential Cool Roof/ Roof Insulation Measures Stakeholder Meeting #2

Instructions for the Residential Building Data Collection Checklist 2009 International Energy Conservation Code with 2011 Georgia Amendments

Crawl Spaces and Basements: Defining the Building Envelope

2015 Michigan Residential Code Energy Worksheet for New Single-family Residential Building

Strategies for Meeting California s High Performance Attics and Walls Prescriptive requirements in California s 2016 Building Energy Efficiency

Questar ThermWise Duct Technical Specifications

Energy Code Basics for Residential Buildings. Presented by Newport Ventures NEWPORT VENTURES

The Creative and Performing Arts High School (CAPA) Pittsburgh, PA 9/30/2002 Andrew Tech Mechanical Option Prof. S. A. Mumma

Plan Check & Field Inspection Guide

RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY

DOE Zero Energy Ready Home. Zero Energy Ready Home Training. SIPA Annual Conference 4/30/14. Jamie Lyons, P.E.

If you are choosing a limited glazing area prescriptive option, completing the Glazing Schedule will be the first task.

PREP + INSULATION. DISCLAIMER: These tools are for illustrative purposes only and

2012 IECC Residential with State Adopted Changes

Michigan Energy Code Training and Implementation Program

The Role of Control Layers in Building Enclosure Design

Chapter 1: Compliance

ENERGY EFFICIENCY CERTIFICATION

High Performance, Energy Efficient Design for Wood Frame Buildings

Lock In Energy Savings For Life

Low-cost Construction for High-energy Savings. Brian J. Wimmer Construction Manager Rochester Area Habitat for Humanity

2001 National Workshop on State Building Energy Codes July th, 2001 Burlington, Vermont

Inspection of New One- and Two- Family Dwellings

Michigan Energy Code Training and Implementation Program

NCAT. Energy Code Evolution

ENERGY AUDITOR STUDY GUIDE

Energy Efficiency Programs

2006 Building Science Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

APPROVED. Acceptable to the code official for compliance with the provisions of the applicable Code or referenced Standard.

Fenestration Components: Mechanical Summary. Water heater energy factor: Ef Fuel type: Gas Electric Other

BUILDING ENERGY CODES UNIVERSITY

New Hampshire Residential Energy Code

Trusted DIVISION: 07 SYSTEM. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. not specifically. Copyright 2014

Compliance Certificate

10 Steps to Save Energy in Your House

February 28, Prepared by: Michael Flatt ICF International 7160 North Dallas Parkway Suite 340 Plano, TX 75024

Moisture Considerations for Insulated Building Assemblies

High Performance Attics & Walls with Spray Polyurethane Foam RICK DUNCAN, SPFA BRIAN OMAN, BASF C.R. HERRO, MERITAGE HOMES STEPHEN DAVIS, QUADRANT

Earth Advantage New Homes Standard - Points Worksheet 2012 Site Built Residential Oregon. Energy Health Land Materials Water

WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE, APPENDIX CHAPTERS

Low Cost Interior Duct Systems for High Performance Homes in Hot Climates

Air Infiltration & Insulation

2

Green Remodeling Illustrations GREEN REMODELING ILLUSTRATIONS GREEN BUILDING GUIDELINES FOR HOME REMODELING

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: THERMAL INSULATION SECTION: AIR BARRIERS REPORT HOLDER:

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: TERMAL INSULATION SECTION: AIR BARRIERS REPORT HOLDER:

Quick Reference Guide for 2009 IECC Residential Energy Efficiency Climate Zone 6

Single Family Residence Building Permits

Throughout the balance of this paper the terms attic and roof will and can be used interchangeably.

Chapter 2: Foundation

Building Energy Codes

A LOOK INTO THE 2015 IECC RESIDENTIAL PROVISIONS. Presented by: Shaunna Mozingo, Colorado Code Consulting

SUBMISSION GUIDE FOR ARCHITECTS

Quick Reference Guide for 2009 IECC Residential Energy Efficiency Climate Zone 5 and Marine 4

Guide to Heating and Cooling Load Calculations in High Performance Homes

ASHRAE 62.2: What s New in 2016

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: THERMAL INSULATION REPORT HOLDER: DEMILEC (USA) INC.

Connecticut 2011 Baseline Study of Single-Family Residential New Construction. Final Report

ESR-1826 Reissued February 1, 2013 This report is subject to renewal February 1, 2015.

2012 CLEAResult All rights reserved. Residential Energy Efficiency

RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Construction Report NYSERDA Residential Performance Challenge

Intumescent Coatings and Spray Polyurethane Foam

Administrative Changes

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: THERMAL INSULATION REPORT HOLDER: DEMILEC (USA) INC.

Insight. The Hollow Building. By Joseph W. Lstiburek, Ph.D., P.Eng., Fellow ASHRAE

Montana Homebuilder Brief: Residential Energy Code 1

Michigan Energy and Cost Savings

STEP UP TO THE ENERGY STAR INDOOR AIR PACKAGE. A new opportunity for leading builders to create better environments inside and out

Least Cost Path to Achieving 50% Reduction in Residential Energy Use (in Heating Climates)

Sealing the Envelope with SPF Insulation

Inside Why Spray polyurethane Foam insulation? All About Spray polyurethane Foam Book 1

REPORT HOLDER: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY 1501 LARKIN CENTER DRIVE MIDLAND, MICHIGAN EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Insulation Technologies and Installation Specifications for Better Energy Performance of Commercial Buildings

Deliverable for task 1.2 Side by Side tests of HUD code Homes, September 27, Zero Energy Manufactured Home Project (ZEMH)

ESR-2072 Reissued September 1, 2013 This report is subject to renewal September 1, 2015.

How to Meet Code and Manage Moisture in an Environment of Increasing Air Tightness Requirements. Ted Winslow

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: THERMAL INSULATION REPORT HOLDER: DEMILEC (USA) LLC

Transcription:

Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Technical Training Jamie Lyons, P.E. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home 1 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Ducts are Trending - Get them tight, tested, & inside! 2006 IECC 2009 IECC 2012 IECC 2015 IECC ENERGY STAR V3.1 Duct Insulation R-8 supply & returns; R-6 if in floor joist* R-8 supply (attics) R-6 return & other supplies* R-8 supply (attics) R-6 return & other supplies* R-8/R-6 Supply & Return(attics) R-6/R-4.2 Supply & Return (other) (>3 /<3 )* R-8 supply (attics) R-6 return & other supplies Duct Leakage Testing** (Mandatory unless noted) N.R. Total 12 cfm25/100 SF CFA (post)* Total 4 cfm25/100 SF CFA (post)* Total < 4 CFM25/100 SF CFA (post or rough-in)* Testing Mandatory, but not Targets Ref Design: Total 4 cfm25/100 F CFA (rough-in) Building Cavities? No supplies No supplies No supplies or returns No supplies or returns Restrictions w/ exceptions Cond. nd Space Location N.R. N.R. but waives duct leakage test and Insulation *Not Required if Ducts & Air Handler Located in Conditioned Space N.R. but waives duct leakage test and Insulation ** Not all duct leakage thresholds shown; we highlight leakage here for sake of comparison N.R. but waives duct leakage test and Insulation Ref. Design: Ducts in cond.nd space 3 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Why the Trends towards Ducts in Conditioned Space? Significant Thermal Losses: Thermal losses triple for ducts in unconditioned vs. conditioned space Total thermal losses can range from 10-45% Extensive unconditioned space penetrations Significant Performance Impacts: IAQ Comfort Durability 5 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Motivations Code Compliance: Duct leakage testing required since 2009 IECC Increasingly stringent leakage levels required 09 2012 2015 But code offers exceptions if ducts & air handler located in conditioned space Efficiency: which is better? 90 AFUE furnace & 60% efficient distribution system. or 80 AFUE furnace & 90% efficient distribution system 54% Total System Efficiency vs. 72% Total System Efficiency - Variable speed HVAC systems. - SEER 21 has twice the run time vs SEER 13-40% savings (cond space) vs just 27% (uncond.) 6 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Energy Penalties Climate Zone 4 2600 ft 2 High Performance Home Configuration 100% Conditioned space 50% Conditioned / unconditioned 100% Unconditioned (attic R-8, exposed) Design Heating (kbtu/hr) Design Cooling (kbtu/hr) HERS Index 23 19 52 30 26 55 34 30 56 7 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Zero Energy Ready Homes & Ducts For a home to qualify with DOE Zero Energy Ready Home, ducts must be located within the home s thermal and air barrier boundary. Several alternate compliance approaches are allowed b/c of comparable performance. Selected strategically and implemented correctly this toolkit of approaches offers cost-effective solutions for highly efficient distribution systems This training will cover several possible approaches to locating ducts within the home s air and thermal barriers, with particular emphasis on the spray foam encapsulation approach. 9 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov

Design Options for Locating Ducts within Conditioned Space

Mandatory Requirements

Ducts in Condit. Space Exemptions Short Duct Run up to 10 of total length is permitted to be outside of the home s thermal and air barrier boundary. Jump Ducts may be located in attics if all joints, including boot-todrywall, are fully air sealed with mastic Ductless HVAC system e.g. mini-splits can offer a non-ducted alternative

Ducts in Condit. Space Options Conditioned Floor Space [3 options] within the thermal boundary Conditioned Basement which is within the home s thermal boundary Unvented / Insulated / Air Sealed Crawlspace Unvented Attic regardless of whether conditioned with a supply register Vented Attic hybrid approach with ducts very well air sealed and embedded in home s thermal envelope

Available Options Multiple Interior duct options exist Selecting the best option depends on multiple factors

Option: Ducts in Unvented Attic By moving the thermal boundary from the ceiling plane up to the roof plane, additional interior volume is created allowing the placement of ducts and HVAC equipment within the conditioned space

Option: Ducts in Unvented Attic Insulation at the roof-deck can be used to form a vaulted-ceiling living space (left) or to create an attic-level mechanical space within the thermal envelope (right)

Option: Ducts in Unvented Attic This method of protecting the HVAC is well suited for retrofits when relocating existing equipment is impractical

Insulating/Air Sealing Options Humid indoor air keep it out What R-value?

Insulation for Condensation Control Minimum R-value of Impermeable Insulation Climate Zone Minimum Impermeable Insulation R-Value* 2012 IECC Ceiling R-Values 2B and 3B Tile Roof None Required 30 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C R-5 38 4C R-10 38 4A, 4B R-15 49 5 R-20 49 6 R-25 49 7 R-30 49 8 R-35 49 *contributes but doesn t supersede 2012 IECC insulation requirements

Insulating/Air Sealing Options

Insulating/Air Sealing Options

Thermal & Ignition Barriers - Attic with Limited Access & No Storage Image Source: SPFA Presentation at 2012 RESNET Conference: Decoding 2012 Steven Winter Thermal Associates, and Inc. Ignition All rights reserved. Barrier Requirements for SPF

Thermal & Ignition Barriers - Attic with Storage Image Source: SPFA Presentation at 2012 RESNET Conference: Decoding Thermal and Ignition Barrier Requirements for SPF

Option: Ducts in Unvented Attic Advantages and Limitations Provides option for AHU placement as well as ducts Not as plan-dependent as other options Viable for retrofits Often the highest cost option Code requirements on roof deck insulation Increases heating/cooling loads by increasing surface area of thermal boundary IRC Sections R806.4 Unvented Attic Assemblies, and R316 FOAM PLASTIC control these assemblies

Option: Ducts in Dropped Soffit Ducts are placed in soffits and dropped ceilings below the primary ceiling plane level Architectural integration and aesthetics are critical considerations

Option: Ducts in Dropped Soffit This option can be viable in both economy construction and more high-end designs.

Linear Dropped Soffit Config.

Perimeter Dropped Soffit Config.

Soffit Construction Details

What we re trying to avoid

Option: Ducts in Dropped Soffit Advantages and Limitations Low-cost in simple plans Easy to understand and implement Minimal code restrictions Heavily plan dependent Advanced planning and design integration is essential May be limited by throw distance duct design critical Additional air barrier step and unique air-sealing No provision for AHU

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss A space for ducts is created above the ceiling plane by using a modified roof truss configuration and moving the thermal boundary up into the attic.

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss Plenum space area

Modified Scissor Truss Method Plenum Truss Detail

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss View of scissor truss bottom chord from attic View of plenum space from below

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss View of scissor truss bottom chord from attic after and during application of ccspf skim application

Plenum Space Thermal Testing 100 90 Temp ( F) 80 70 60 Dining Room 50 Duct Chase Attic 40 Outside 2/5/01 0:00 2/5/01 12:00 2/6/01 0:00 2/6/01 12:00 2/7/01 0:00 2/7/01 12:00 2/8/01 0:00 2/8/01 12:00 2/9/01 0:00 2/9/01 12:00 Date & Time

Option: Ducts in Modified Truss Advantages and Limitations Low-cost in simple plans Not as plan dependent as dropped soffit solution Minimal code restrictions Works best in linear plans Additional air-barrier and unique air-sealing Requires custom, nonstandard roof trusses No provision for AHU

Option: Floor Truss-Integrated Ducts HVAC ducts and supply registers are placed within the vertical space created by the floor trusses

Option: Floor Truss Integrated Ducts A high degree of planning and coordination between the floor structure and the HVAC design is required 12 member depth or greater generally Need to coordinate duct sizes with permissible opening size, location

Option: Floor Truss Integrated Ducts Ceiling registers blowing down and floor registers blowing up can be used. High wall registers are better than floor registers for cooling and can also be accommodated.

Option: Floor Truss Integrated Ducts Advantages and Limitations Low-cost in simple plans Easy to execute w/ no changes to enclosure Uses existing conditioned space volume Flexible register locations Minimal code restrictions Works best in two-story plans Requires structural, HVAC, and architectural coordination Requires deeper trusses No provision for AHU

Option: Ducts in Sealed Crawlspace Bring the crawlspace (or basement) inside conditioned space and use the volume to place HVAC equipment and ducts

Option: Ducts in Sealed Crawlspace Advantages and Limitations Improves enclosure performance Accommodates AHU and other equipment Flexible register locations HVAC/ducts accessible for service Only an option with a crawl foundation Code thermal insulation requirements Code mechanical ventilation requirements

Buried/Encapsulated Duct Categories Buried Ducts Buried and Encapsulated Ducts Encapsulated Ducts

Ducts in Vented Attic: Moist CZs Buried Encapsulated Ducts (BEDs) Leakage to Outdoors 3 CFM25 per 100 ft 2 CFA under min 2 (~R-25)

Ducts in Vented Attic: Dry CZs Buried Ducts Leakage to outdoors 3 CFM25 per 100 ft 2 CFA under min 3.5 Effective R-Value: R-23.5

Effective R-values R-value metrics: Nominal listed values for duct insulation Effective heat loss/gain from duct to attic Buried duct effective R-values calculated using FEA Heat flux magnitude through a hung duct, and an encapsulated and fully-buried 8-in diameter duct

Effective R-values Duct Configuration R-4.2 Ducts R-6 Ducts R-8 Ducts Traditional hung ducts 4.6 5.9 7.2 Hung ducts encapsulated in 1.5 of ccspf 11.3 12.0 12.7 Partially-buried 8.1 10.2 12.3 Fully-buried 12.0 14.1 16.2 Deeply-buried 20.7 22.1 23.5 Encapsulated in 1.5 of ccspf and partially-buried 18.4 19.7 21.0 Encapsulated in 1.5 of ccspf and fully-buried 22.6 23.8 25.0 Encapsulated in 1.5 of ccspf and deeply-buried 29.6 30.3 31.1

Condensation Potential - Monitoring of ATL Test Site Temperature ( F) 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 Attic Temperature Attic Dewpoint ccspf Surface 1 Temp ccspf Surface 2 Temp ccspf Surface 3 Temp ccspf Surface 1 RH ccspf Surface 2 RH ccspf Surface 3 RH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Relative Humidity (%) 60 20 50 10 40 0 4:00 AM 7:00 AM 10:00 AM 1:00 PM 4:00 PM 7:00 PM 10:00 PM 1:00 AM 4:00 AM

Install Low-Profile, Compact Duct Design Before ceiling drywall After ceiling drywall

Mastic seal ducts, and test Test leakage to assure performance levels are met (leakage to outdoors < 3 cfm25 per 100 ft2 of conditioned space)

Apply 1.5 minimum ccspf Apply min. 1.5 ccspf prior to or after ceiling gypsum board

Install Loose-fill insulation Insulation covering the SPF-encapsulated ducts must meet IRC R316.5.3, which includes 1.5 mineral fiber and 1.5 cellulose (added to 2012 IRC) Some foams are exempt from this requirement

Code Compliance 2012 IRC requires that spray foam insulation applied to the exterior of ductwork (Section M1601.3) in attics (Section R316.5.3) meet several requirements: Flame spread index less than 25 Smoke-developed index less than 450 No attic storage or occupancy Spray foam protected by ignition barrier (1.5 mineral fiber or 1.5 cellulose insulation) Or meets R316.6 Specific Approval (no ignition barrier required)

Option: Buried Encapsulated Ducts Advantages and Limitations Low-cost in simple plans Easy to execute w/ no changes to enclosure Minimal plan coordination Flexible register locations Requires HVAC design coordination No provision for AHU

Performance Comparison - Total Heating & Cooling Energy for a CZ5 Home Roof slope 4:12 6:12 8:12 10:12 Benchmark 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Improved benchmark 1,2 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% Partially-buried (R-33) 10.4% 10.4% 10.4% 10.5% Fully-buried (R-42) 11.6% 11.7% 11.7% 11.7% Deeply-buried (R-51) 13.2% 13.4% 13.4% 13.4% Unvented 1 13.7% 13.3% 12.7% 12.2% Encapsulated 1 11.9% 11.9% 12.0% 12.0% Partially-buried & encapsulated (R-37) 12.9% 13.0% 13.0% 13.0% Fully-buried & encapsulated (R-46) 14.2% 14.3% 14.4% 14.4% Deeply-buried & encapsulated (R-54) 15.3% 15.5% 15.5% 15.6% Interior ducts 1 15.4% 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 1 Benchmark ceiling or roof deck insulation is R-38 in Zone 5B. Ceiling insulation R-values for buried ducts may be higher than the benchmark. 2 Improved Benchmark includes IECC 2012 requirements for infiltration (3 ACH50) and duct sealing (4 cfm per 100 sq ft conditioned living space).

Builder Resources Code-related considerations: Building America Solution Center www.basc.pnnl.gov IRC Sections R806.4, M1601.3, R316.5.3, R316.6 California Title 24 Technical References: Multiple research reports since 2000 Published BA Technical Reports Published BA Measure Guidelines 63

Thank You Questions? For More Information: www.buildings.energy.gov/zero e-mail Contact: zero@newportpartnersllc.com 64 INNOVATION & INTEGRATION: Transforming the Energy Efficiency Market Buildings.Energy.gov