ANNEX 2 GUIDELINES TO DEFINE THE CORE TRANSPORT NETWORK IN ND AREA

Similar documents
Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Financing Opportunities

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0294 (COD) PE-CONS 42/13 TRANS 316 ECOFIN 533 ENV 546 RECH 265 CODEC 1403

The process of developing and financing port development

FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND GATEWAYS: DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND EVALUATION CRITERIA COMPARISON IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

TEN-T policy, TENtec System and related data needs

CEF Transport Info day 2016 Greece

THE BALTIC SEA MOTORWAY - RECENT DEVELOPMENT AND OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE

EUROPEAN SEA PORTS ORGANISATION ASBL/VZW ORGANISATION DES PORTS MARITIMES EUROPEENS ASBL/VZW

TEN-T POLICY REVIEW. UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Geneva, 7-8 September 2010

2015 CEF Transport Calls

Trade & Transport Corridors. European Projects & Initiatives

DIGITALISATION AND THE EU SINGLE TRANSPORT AREA : LEGAL PERSPECTIVES

Joint contribution of the Conference of Atlantic Arc Cities-CAAC and the Atlantic Arc Commission Transport Group-AATG

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

25 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 5 % Share rail, inland waterways and oil pipelines 0 %

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

WHITE PAPER Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system

Supply and Demand Analysis

Use of ITS technologies for multimodal transport operations River Information Services (RIS) transport logistics services

Measure 43: Intermodal Loading Units and freight integrators First page:

NORWAY (NO) The tables work in the following way: Dear TEN-TaNS partner.

Motorways of the Sea. Who What When How Much? NOVEMBER 2015 Goteborg Jose Anselmo Policy Advisor TEN-T/MoS

Atlantic Area Transnational Cooperation Programme

INTERMODAL TRANSPORT IN THE POLICY DOCUMENTS CONTEXT

European Perspectives

Intermodal transport project BIMH: Bucharest Ilfov Multimodal Hub

Strategic Choice of Measures A new step for planning of transportation solutions Handbook

UNECE Workshop Role of freight forwarders and logistics in intermodal transport chains

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): TRANSPORT (RAIL TRANSPORT [NONURBAN])

2016 Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Transport Calls for Proposals COUNTRY FACTSHEET. Spain

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan {SEC(2007) 1320} {SEC(2007) 1321}

THE ROUTE MAP TO A CONNECTED EUROPE

Orient-East Med Corridor

Helsinki-Tallinn Transport Link Feasibility Study of a Railway Tunnel February 2018

The Baltic-Adriatic Corridor (BAC)

BARCELONA, October 2015

North Adriatic Intelligent Transport System Technical seminar

A CER Statement on Brexit

EUTRAIN Europe Neighbourhood Cooperation Countries (incl. Russia, CIS, Black Sea, Balkan States) 3rd Regional Workshop Moscow, Russia

SUPPORT IN THE PREPARATION OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) FOR THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA S TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Berlin Transport Policy and Berlin interests in Rail Baltica Growth Corridor

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

CENTRAL EUROPE Annual event 2009 Cross fertilization workshop

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 May /1/07 REV 1

Key Speech: Programme character towards real projects

Improved Accessibility in North-Eastern Baltic Sea Region NSB CoRe project

Rail Baltica Global Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. 24 April 2017

Eu Public- Private Smart Move High Level Group

Rail Freight Corridor North Sea - Baltic. Corridor Information Document. Book 1

DECEMBER This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission.

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Executive Summary. 1

European Transport Workers Federation. Bruxelles, 18/19 May Katarina Mindum, ETF

IPCSA Port Community Systems Port authority perspectives, challenges and expectations

The Macroregional Transport Action Plan - streamlining public policies and market strategies

STANDARDISATION MANDATE FORWARDED TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARDISATION BODIES IN THE FIELD OF ROAD TRANSPORT TELEMATICS

DIRECTIVE 2012/34/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (recast)

- Chapter 1 - Introduction

FINAL PUBLISHABLE REPORT

Annex III EU Common Transport Policy: Trans-European Networks

Clean Power for Transport. The Directive on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2348(INI)

CEF-Transport General. Intermodal Platform- Port of Huelva

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

2010-EU S MIELE Multimodal Interoperability E-services for Logistics and Environment sustainability

STATE OF INTERMODAL TRANSPORT IN CROATIA AND SERBIA

17 April To whom it may concern, Response to the consultation on the draft Strategic Transport Plan

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Greater Tumen Initiative Perspective

European Truck Platooning Challenge (pilot) 2016

Increasing Russia's Transit Potential. Mikhail Goncharov Advisor to President of RZD

Definition of the Award Criteria for the different actions

%HUOLQ%UDQGHQEXUJ,QWHJUDWHG*RRGV7UDIILF6WUDWHJ\

Moving to a Super Administration for transport in Sweden. Gunnar Malm Former Director-General, Trafikverket

EUROPEAN UNION HORIZON 2020 RESEARCH & INNOVATION PROGRAMME. ALLIANCE Fact Sheet N o 1:

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

The Ecobonus and Ferrobonus Experiences and their contribution to the TEN-T Networks

Ralf-Charley Schultze

DG TREN Making Co-Modality work BESTUFSII 24-25TH May John Berry - European Commission DG TREN

THE DANUBE CORRIDOR A DEVELEOPMENT GENERATOR. a company of

GROUPE DE TRAVAIL INTERCOMMISSION SUR LE RTE-T TEN-T INTERCOMMISSION WORKING GROUP TEN-T POLICY REVIEW. Zaragoza (ES) 7 June 2010 MINUTES

MODAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

Development of China-EU Intermodal Transport and Exchange of Electronic Data

EU and urban mobility. Transport

Introduction of Project for Formulation of Master Plan on Logistics in Northern Economic Corridor

Management and Development of Inter-modality and Maritime Transport. Major international transport policies, national and regional

The case FOR inland waterway transport. Inland Navigation Europe Geneva, 23 February 2010

CONFÉRENCE EUROPÉENNE DES MINISTRES DES TRANSPORTS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT

SEETAC South East European Transport Axis Cooperation

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

UNECE s role in the promotion of Intelligent Transport Systems. Road Map for promoting ITS 20 global actions

SHIFT2RAIL STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN

ITS Mobile Information Society

5. Dealt with in Brussels by The Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council Working Party on Land Transport

GLOBE LINK CONNECTING SOUTH AUSTRALIA TO THE WORLD

Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes

CHAPTER II. TRANSIT TRANSPORT ISSUES IN LANDLOCKED AND TRANSIT DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

The True Costs of Transport

Transcription:

ANNEX 2 GUIDELINES TO DEFINE THE CORE TRANSPORT NETWORK IN ND AREA Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 1

Preface This deliverable covers the guidelines used for the definition of the NDPTL (Northern Dimension Partnership for Transport and Logistics) Regional Transport Network and the proposal for the NDPTL Regional Transport Network. The proposed network is the result of a negotiation process aiming at a harmonised and widely accepted result based on the agreed guidelines and principles. It is continuation to the preliminary work that started already during the NORDIM project in 2011. The negotiation process included during the spring 2012 several rounds of discussions and versions of the network and the respective guidelines. The proposal is later on subject to comments and approval of the Steering Committee. The wide consensus behind the proposal increases the proposal s weight. It forms, thus, a good basis already now for further studies and for the coming definition process of the priority projects of the network. The work has been executed in the context of the activities carried out in collaboration with the European Commission for the mission assignment Definition of the core transport network in the Northern dimension area Specific Contract Nr 2011/276404 under the Framework Contract COM 2011 Lot 1: Studies and Technical Assistance in all sectors (Europeaid/129783/C/SER/MULTI). The lead consultant for the assignment is Business & Strategies in Europe, S.A.. The project started in November 2011. This deliverable will be supported by another one reviewing the socio-economic background, planning policies and other relevant background data in the NDPTL area. The work for this deliverable has been led by Kari Lautso/WSP Finland Oy. The supporting GIS work has been the responsibility of John McDaniel/Ramboll Sverige AB. The authors want to thank all the representatives of the Partnership Countries, the European Commission representatives and the NDPTL Secretariat for their constructive and supportive guidance and work that eventually made it possible to come to commonly accepted conclusions and results. Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 3

Contents Preface... 3 I Background and introduction... 5 1.1 NDPTL activities by June 2011... 5 1.2 TEN-T core network proposal, October 2011... 5 II Definition of the NDPTL Regional Transport Network... 6 III The process for the definition of the transport network... 7 Sources... 3 Annexes... 3 Annex I NDPTL Regional Network (Draft), Roads, Railways and Sea connections... 4 Annex II Lists of nodes, Airports, Maritime ports and border crossing points in the TEN-T core network... 5 Annex III The TEN-T Core Network... 10 Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 4

I. Background and introduction 1.1 NDPTL activities by June 2011 As noted by the NDPTL Infrastructure Working Group already in Brussels 28.4.2010, a definition for a NDPTL Regional Transport Network is needed, as this could also support the definition of NDPTL priority projects. A priority project is likely to correspond with the overall aims of the ND transport system if it supports the regional network of the area. This was also agreed to be one of the selection criteria for the Preliminary list of projects presented in the NORDIM report in June 2011. The need for the definition of the Regional Network was also noted in most of the regional meetings held with all the eleven ND countries in July October 2010. Based on this process and these discussions the Draft of the NDPTL Regional Network was first discussed and then presented in the NORDIM report in June 2010 (Annex I). 1.2 TEN-T core network proposal, October 2011 The European Commission published in October 2011 a proposal for the TEN-T Core Transport Network within the European Union. The network comprises networks of all transport modes and also defines the major border crossing points, airports and ports. The core network overlays the comprehensive network and consists of its strategically most important parts. It constitutes the backbone of the multi-modal mobility network. It concentrates on those components of the TEN-T with the highest European added value: cross border missing links, key bottlenecks and multi-modal nodes. The core network is to be in place by 31 December 2030 at the latest. The EU transport funding is tightly focused on the core network, whereas the comprehensive network will be mainly nationally funded. The overall objective of the Core Network is to enhance the European added value of the TEN-T. This is defined as a benefit that goes beyond those achieved on national level and includes not only economic benefits but also those derived in the cohesion, environmental and safety and security areas. The aim of the new EU transport policy is to focus on a smaller number of projects where real EU added value can be realised. Other general goals for the approach were: - The network should remove bottlenecks, upgrade infrastructure and streamline cross border transport operations for passengers and freight - The network should be linked to the corresponding infrastructure in neighbouring countries and regions - The network should reduce disparities, in particular in peripheral, insular or landlocked regions - The system should emphasize multimodality, including multimodal links and facilities for co-modal and/or combined transport, as well as interoperability and improved efficiency of all modes of transport - The system should support applications of advanced technology and ITS - The network should contribute to climate change objectives - The transport network should deliver o Safer and less congested travel o Smoother and quicker journeys The TEN-T core network has been defined in two steps: Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 5

1. Definition of main nodes Firstly, the main nodes are the capitals of the member states and other large urban areas (86 nodes). The ports and airports belonging to the urban node are part of the core network. Secondly, outside these areas ports exceeding certain volume threshold can be regarded as nodes (83 nodes) especially if they serve as entry/exit points to the union. Thirdly, the most relevant border crossing points, one per mode between each member state and neighbouring country (46 nodes) are regarded as nodes 2. Connecting the main nodes The nodes are connected with multimodal links (road, rail, inland waterway), according to availability or feasibility, taking into account effectiveness and efficiency and preferably using existing infrastructure. The implementation of the core network is facilitated using a corridor approach. Corridors covering at least three modes, three member states and two cross border sections will bring together the member states concerned. II. Definition of the NDPTL Regional Transport Network The definition of the NDPTL Regional Network has taken place by applying the above approach including the general objectives and the 2-step methodology, by taking into account the special features of the NDPTL area and by focusing on the connections between the EU and non-eu countries where the NDPTL co-operation is mostly needed and most productive. In fact, the proposal presented in the NORDIM report already followed the above principles by e.g. connecting the capitals of the NDPTL countries and by providing connections to the main ports. The Steering Committee Meeting in Berlin 29.3.2012 agreed on the following definition: - the NDPTL Regional Network is a strategic network that: - connects the capitals and other large urban areas of the region - connects the major ports and airports to the network - defines the major border crossing points - connects the major entry and exit points to and from the NDPTL Region to the network - connects the TEN-T Core Network to the neighbouring non-eu countries - the links of the network should carry (or have potential to carry) a remarkable amount of international traffic - on the EU side the TEN-T Core Network links should be included in the NDPTL network. Other NDPTL links should normally be part of the TEN-T comprehensive network. The comprehensive network will underlay the NDPTL network in any case. The above statement summarises the principles used when designing the network. Other, as well as more detailed design criteria applied are explained below. Similarly to the TEN-T Core Network policy the NDPTL Regional network policy should: - enhance the Northern Dimension added value. This is defined as a benefit that goes beyond those achieved on national level and includes not only economic benefits but also those derived in the cohesion, environmental and safety and security areas. Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 6

- focus on a smaller number of projects where real ND added value can be realised. The introduction of a node also means that the node will be linked to other parts of the network. From the NDPTL point of view these network links are well justified if they fulfil as many as possible of the following criteria: - Carry a remarkable amount of international traffic - Solve a bottleneck problem - Clearly support and complement other parts of the network - Support peripheral areas that have high transport demand or development potential - Form part of a corridor between at least three countries - Have a clear cross border impact - Co-operation of two or more countries is needed for their implementation or for making them economically feasible - The implementation is foreseen by 2030 or by 2050 at the latest The above list is not prioritised by the NDPTL countries and it is recommended that this would be done before starting the prioritising process. Regarding the nodes, the NDPTL Regional Network includes on the EU side all ports, airports, border crossing points and RRTs (Road and Rail Terminal) of the TEN-T Core Network. In addition to these, a few additional ports, airports, border crossing points and RRTs deemed important for the NDPTL cooperation have been defined, as proposed by the partnership countries. The following aspects related to the nodes needed special consideration: - Definition of large urban areas (in addition to the capitals) to be considered as nodes: St. Petersburg and Hamburg were considered to be such areas. - Definition of the main border crossing points between the EU-countries and non-eu countries within NDPTL: The crossing points are indicated on the maps, especially the identification of the border crossing points between the EU and non-eu countries is important, as consensus of the respective countries is needed In order to avoid confusion, the terminology in the NDPTL context is different from that in TEN-T context. As decided by the Steering Committee in March 2012, the NDPTL Regional Transport Network is not categorised to a core network and a comprehensive network. On the EU side normally all the NDPTL Regional Network links belong either to the Core or to the Comprehensive Network of the TEN- T. This way the two networks are well harmonised. As also already in NORDIM phase, the partnership countries have not prioritised inland waterway connections at this stage from the NDPTL co-operation point of view and, thus, inland waterway connections are not shown on the maps. III. The process for the definition of the transport network The goal of the assignment was to present a proposal for the NDPTL Regional Network by the end of May 2011. The process for reaching this goal included the following steps: The definition of criteria: Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 7

- Discussion based on this memorandum (v1) at the meeting on 15.2.between partnership countries (PC). Necessary revisions after the meeting (v2) by the consultant (C) - Further comments and proposals by 12.3.2012 by the partnership countries (PC) - New version (v3) based on the above comments by 22.3. and validated in Berlin 29.3. (C) - Comments by 20.4. (PC) - Final version based on discussions in Regional and Steering Committee meetings and PC comments by 22.5. (C) The NDPTL Regional Network: - The NORDIM draft updated by 29.2., v1 by the Consultant (C) - Preliminary proposal for new/revised nodes (urban areas, airports, harbours, border crossing points) by partnership countries by 12.3. by the Partnership Countries (PC) - Drafting the next network proposal, v2, by 22.3. and validated in Berlin 28-29.3. (C) - Further comments based on the discussions in Regional meetings (PC) by 20.4. - Draft Final for comments on 26.4. (C) - Comments by partnership countries on 14.5. at the latest (PC) - Final version by 22.5. (C) The final means the version to be reported and it will, of course, be subject to comments and approval by the Steering Committee at later stages. However, the version to be reported can already now well serve as basis for defining the priority projects. Month Week Criteria Meeting 15.2., v1 Revisions, v2 Comments Revisions v3 Steering Committee, Berlin Comments Regional Meetings (RMs) Core Network First Draft updated v1 Proposal for new nodes Core Network v2 Discussions in RMs, comments Draft Final Final Comments Final February March April May 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Action by Partnership Countries Action by Consultant Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 8

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 3

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 4

Sources Preparing the Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics, Final Report updated 30.6.2011, European Commission, Directorate General Move, WSP Finland Oy www.nordim.fi Proposal on TEN-T Network Planning, Final document http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/revision-t_en.htm Connecting Europe: The new EU core transport network, Memo 11/706, 10/2011 http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/revision-t_en.htm Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-european transport network, 19.12.2011, COM(2011) 650 final/2 Annexes I.A The NDPTL Regional Network (draft 6/2011) I. B Lists of nodes, Airports, Maritime ports and border crossing points in the TEN-T core network I. C The TEN-T Core Network Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 3

Annex I.A NDPTL Regional Network (Draft), Roads, Railways and Sea connections Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 4

Annex I.B Lists of nodes, Airports, Maritime ports and border crossing points in the TEN-T core network Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 5

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 6

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 7

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 8

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 9

Annex I.C The TEN-T Core Network Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 10

Definition of the Core Transport Network in the Northern Dimension area, FWC COM Lot 1 Page 11