Skagit River General Investigation NEPA Public Meeting

Similar documents
PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING AGENDA

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SKAGIT COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINDINGS OF FACT. APPLICATION NUMBER: Shoreline Substantial Development Application PL

COASTAL TX PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock Replacement Project Public Scoping Meeting

DALLAS FLOODWAY PROJECT

Santa Clara River Watershed Feasibility Study. Information Meeting City of Santa Clarita August 16, 2007

PMP Last Revised 9/10/07

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

Record of Decision for Issuing a Presidential Permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express,

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Lower Green River Corridor Plan Request for Proposals:

Agenda NC Turnpike Authority 2008 Legislative Support Garden Parkway Draft EIS Stakeholder Involvement Major Milestones The Recommended Alternative Wh

US Army Corps of Engineers

Atlantic Coast of New York East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY

RECORD OF DECISION MAY RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

All Aboard Florida Project Status Update TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL

DES MOINES RIVER RESERVOIRS WATER CONTROL PLAN UPDATES IOWA ASCE WATER RESOURCES DESIGN CONFERENCE

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Intake. Diversion Dam Fish Passage Project, Dawson County, Montana

Distribution Restriction Statement

GIWW Brazos River Floodgates and Colorado River Locks Feasibility Study

PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Project

Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Newsletter

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

Lower Snake River Programmatic Sediment Management Plan

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

32. Relationship Between Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity

Joint Public Notice. LOCATION: In Salmon Bay, Lake Washington Ship Canal, at Seattle, Washington.

AGENCY: Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers; and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Chapter 9 Wetlands Park Study Team

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

2.1 Overview. Chapter 2 Project Objectives and Purpose and Need

PROJECT SCOPING PHASE ~ SCOPE OF SERVICES MAIN STREET BRIDGE OVER WINOOSKI RIVER CITIES OF BURLINGTON & WINOOSKI VERMONT

Farmington Dam Repurpose Project

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY

Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Monument

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

Hydrology and Flooding

Spring Forecast Based Operations, Folsom Dam, California

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Chehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS

County of San Diego DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION. Administrative Office: (858) Fax: (858) Reservations: (858)

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas Coastal Storm Risk Management and Ecosystem Restoration

SEATTLE DISTRICT CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM

Project Planning area. King County Department of Transportation Road Services Division

LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS WATER SUPPLY

Climate Change Impacts on Water in NW Washington

Natural Resource Conservation. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Partnership. Working Together Toward Shared Goals

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Outcomes. Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Margaret Barondess - MDOT

APPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

SUTTER BASIN PILOT FEASIBILITY FINAL REPORT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Executive Summary Page

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Notice of Intent to Prepare the Columbia River System Operations Environmental

MISSOURI RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM. Cora Island Missouri River Recovery Project St. Charles County, Missouri

Project Overview. Northwest Innovation Works LLC and the Port of Kalama propose to develop and operate

2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.0 EIS DEVELOPMENT

Response to Comments of Don and Tricia Nevis (Letter I25) See the master response to Public Outreach Process.

Good morning, Chairman Yaw, Chairman Yudichak, Chairman Vulakovich, Chairman Costa,

Skagit River Flood Risk Management General Investigation Skagit County, Washington. Draft Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement

Missouri River Bed Degradation Feasibility Study. Technical Report

Plan Formulation Strategies for Ecosystem Restoration Projects

Technology News from the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program October 1999

SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT: SPARTINA CONTROL PROGRAM

Trails Permitting Process

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AND HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Dam Safety & Planning: Examples of Collaboration and Lessons Learned

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NORFOLK DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT NORFOLK 803 FRONT STREET NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Practical Needs and Approaches for Water Resources Adaptation to Climate Uncertainty

Appendix J. Existing Efforts for Identifying Multi-Benefit Projects

Information for File # PRH

Project Goals and Scoping

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

Appendix I Cost Engineering Pigs Eye Lake Ramsey County, MN Section 204 DRAFT. Draft Feasibility Study Report with Integrated Environmental Assessment

LAKE OKEECHOBEE WATERSHED PROJECT

PUBLIC NOTICE. REPLY TO: Denver Regulatory Office 9307 South Wadsworth Blvd 30 DAY NOTICE Littleton, CO FAX (303)

DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. for. Tioga Sports Park

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT

Environmental Benefits and Performance Measures: Defining National Ecosystem Restoration and how to measure its achievement.

SPECIAL AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (SAMP) UPPER TURKEY CREEK WATERSHED Prepared by Frank Austenfeld, Executive Director

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

LOWER DUNGENESS RIVER SECTION 544 ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

Request For Proposal (RFP) Millennium Bulk Terminals Longview, LLC Project. NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement Development

SONOMA CREEK & TRIBUTARIES FEASIBILITY STUDY

DECISION DOCUMENT (Feasibility Study) REVIEW PLAN

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE SAM PAH U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL

American River Watershed Common Features General Reevaluation Report

LAW OFFICE OF BRETT VANDENHEUVEL 620 SW MAIN ST., STE 615, PORTLAND, OR OFFICE: , CELL:

RECORD OF DECISION I. INTRODUCTION

b. Projects Without PED Agreements. Credit for PED Coordination Team activities will be provided under the following criteria:

Assessment of Agricultural Flood Damages Along the James River in South Dakota

CEQA Scoping Meeting. West Desert Hot Springs Master Drainage Plan Program Environmental Impact Report

CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Department of Army Permitting Process: Dredging

Sabine Pass to Galveston Bay, Texas Coastal Storm Risk Management and Ecosystem Restoration

Transcription:

Skagit River General Investigation NEPA Public Meeting U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District June 19, 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers

Executive Summary Flood risk management project Population at risk: ~25,000 Flood fight efforts have prevented loss of life & flood damages = high risk Protect critical infrastructure in floodplain Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) identified, draft FR/EIS out for public review & comment TSP: least environmental impacts, among plans considered/final array 2

Study Area 3

4

TSP: CULI Alternative Improve approximately 9 miles of existing levees New Northern Burlington levee New Riverbend levee Non-structural measures Operation modification to Upper & Lower Baker Dams No modifications to I-5 or bridges Least environmentally damaging alternative 5

Economic Benefits of Comprehensive Urban Levee Improvement Alternative NED Plan 1.3% ACE (75-year) 1% ACE (100-year) 0.4% ACE (250-year)* Withoutproject EAD (Residual Benefits (EAD EAD (Residual Benefits (EAD EAD (Residual Benefits (EAD Damage Reach(es) EAD Risk) Reduced) Risk) Reduced) Risk) Reduced) Burlington (Reach 1A) $14,737,000 $2,925,000 $11,812,000 $1,770,000 $12,967,000 $955,000 $13,782,000 Mount Vernon (Reaches 2A, 4A, and 5A) 3,740,000 837,000 2,904,000 338,000 3,401,000 99,000 3,640,000 La Conner (Reach 7) 872,000 283,000 589,000 134,000 738,000 86,000 786,000 Rural Floodplain (all other reaches) 20,550,000 19,453,000 1,096,000 19,099,000 1,452,000 18,974,000 1,577,000 Total Expected Annual Damages/Benefits $39,899,000 $23,498,000 $16,401,000 $21,341,000 $18,558,000 $20,114,000 $19,785,000 Total Investment Cost (Sep 2013 price level) Total Annual Cost (3.5% discount rate, 50 years) Net Benefits (Annual Benefits - Annual Costs) Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) (Annual Benefits / Annual Costs, 3.5% discount rate) $203,226,000 $215,278,000 $227,687,000 $9,565,000 $10,079,000 $10,608,000 $6,836,000 $8,479,000 $9,177,000 1.7 1.8 1.9 *National Economic Development (NED) Plan = plan that reasonably maximizes net benefits; Federal interest/objective is to contribute to National Economic Development where benefits > costs (i.e. BCR>1.0) 6

Overview of Environmental Analysis Hydrology & Hydraulics Geomorphology & Sediment Transport Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases Noise Soil Resources Water Quality & Quantity Wetlands Habitat Riparian Habitat Aquatic Habitat Fish & Wildlife Threatened & Endangered Species Cultural Resources HTRW Land Use, Planning & Zoning Agricultural Resources Socioeconomics & Environmental Justice Transportation & Traffic Public Services & Utilities Public Health & Safety 7

Study Schedule Draft FR/EIS public review/comment June 6 July 21, 2014 Future Corps Planning Milestones: Agency Decision Milestone Fall 2014 Civil Works Review Board 2015 Final Report 2015 Future steps: Congressional Authorization & Appropriations Pre-Construction, Engineering, and Design Construction 8

NEPA EIS Steps NOI and Public Scoping Period Draft EIS Final EIS Record of Decision (ROD) NEPA Scoping Meeting (Aug. 11) Public Meeting (June 19, 2014) Notice of Availability (2015) (2015) Comment Period (July 29 Aug. 29, 2011) Comment Period (June 6 July 21, 2014) 9

Draft FR/EIS and Commenting For more information or to submit comments: Mail: Ms. Hannah Hadley U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CENWS-EN-ER P.O. Box 3755, Seattle, WA, 98124 Phone: (206) 764-6950 Email: Skagit.River@usace.army.mil Website: http://1.usa.gov/1i0kjzk Comments must be received by July 21, 2014. 10

Tonight s Formal Comment Period Individuals who have signed up will comment first (3 minutes/person) State and spell your name prior to providing your comment Time permitting, additional comments from others All comments are on the record and will be recorded Verbal & written comments will be included in the Final Report 11

Thank you for attending! Comments must be received by July 21, 2014 Draft FR/EIS is available in the La Conner, Burlington, and Mount Vernon Libraries; Skagit County Office Draft FR/EIS is also available online at: http://1.usa.gov/1i0kjzk Submit comments: Mail: Ms. Hannah Hadley U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CENWS-EN-ER P.O. Box 3755, Seattle, WA, 98124 Phone: (206) 764-6950 Email: Skagit.River@usace.army.mil 12