Regulation of Biologics in The United States: From a Rich Tradition To A Challenging Future

Similar documents
Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

HCT/P Regulation vs 361 Products

Cellular and Gene Therapy Products - CBER Update

FDA Approach to the Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells (HPC)

Beth Hutchins, PhD PhRMA ICH Gene Therapy Discussion Group

Overview of Biologics Testing and Evaluation: Regulatory Requirements and Expectations. Audrey Chang, PhD, Senior Director Development Services

US FDA: CMC Issues for INDs

IS HE SPEAKING ENGLISH? cgmp: : Current Good Manufacturing Practice PHS Act: : Public Health Service Act CFR: : Code of Federal Regulations CP: : Comp

FDA Oversight of Gene Therapy

Ancillary Materials for Cell & Tissue Therapies Definitions, US Regulatory Approach, and USP s Risk-Tiered Approach

Oncology for Scientists Christopher Choi, PhD Director, TCPF Assistant Professor of Oncology

FAQ ABOUT. 21CFR Part 1271 FDA REGULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE TISSUE LABS

KFDA Regulatory Framework on Biopharmaceuticals - Focus on Biosimilar

Janice Soreth, M.D. Deputy Director FDA Europe Office Liaison to EMA. Making Gene and Cell Therapy a Reality July 10-11, 2012 Dublin

Regulation of Microbiota- Based Products

Regulatory Pathways for Rare Diseases

Regulatory Implications for Global Manufacturing Development of Regenerative Medicines

Regulatory considerations for manufacturing and testing of investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products

Case Study: Examples Relating to the Quality Control of Cell-based Products

Outcomes in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Manufacturing. Athena Russell, MT(AAB) Human Cellular Therapy Laboratory Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL

BIOPHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS EVALUATED FOR VIRAL CLEARANCE

Regulatory Schema for Blood Transfusion Microbiotal transplant conference

Combination Products at US FDA

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

Regulatory Approval of Modern Gene-Based Cancer Immunotherapies CAR T Cells A product perspective

Special Report. medicine? Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., and Scott Gottlieb, M.D.

Guidance for Industry

USP Standards for Ancillary Materials

Comparative Study of Regulatory Requirements for Biologics Filing in United States and European Union

FDA Perspective on the Preclinical Development of Cancer Vaccines

Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing CBER Perspective

Small Scale Bio-Manufacturing for Clinical Trails; an Introduction to the Clinical Biotechnology Centre

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 101

Name: Score: / Quiz 7 on Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. Part 1. A. organ transplantation. B. xenotransplatation. C. animal cloning. D.

The Role of Mass Spectrometry for Developing Biotherapeutics: Regulatory Perspectives

Development Stage of Therapeutic Vaccines: The Regulator s View

Appropriate Control Strategies Eliminate the Need for Redundant Testing of Pharmaceutical Products

Biotechnology: Genomics: field that compares the entire DNA content of different organisms

The Role of Standards in U.S. FDA Regulation of Cellular Therapy Products

Manufacturing Challenges with Cell and Gene Therapy Products: A Health Canada Perspective

Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies PACT

Alliance for Regenerative Medicine

Individualised medicine: regulatory challenges

Defining Clinical Benefit in Clinical Trials: FDA Perspective

ICH Considerations on Viral/Vector Shedding; and Overview of Gene Therapy Activity in Canada

PPTA Regulatory Workshop June 13, 2016

Supplies and Reagents

CGMP for Phase 1 INDs

Utility of a Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Reference Standard BY Terence R. Flotte, Parris Burd, and Richard O. Snyder

Investigator-Initiated INDs

CQAs for C&GT Products to Enable Comparability Assessment. Ben Thompson Snr Director, Biopharmaceutical CMC RA GlaxoSmithKline

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

GMO Technology Conference

Establishment of Clinical Trial Infrastructure

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

FDA Perspectives On Viral & Vector Shedding Studies. Daniel Takefman, Ph.D. Chief, Gene Therapy Branch FDA/CBER ICH Workshop: October 31, 2007

Update from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER): Advancing the Development of Complex Biologic Products

[DOCKET NO. 96N-0400] Points to Consider on Plasmid DNA Vaccines for Preventive Infectious Disease Indications

Mitochondrial Manipulation Technologies: Preclinical Considerations

PACT. PACT Program. Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies

Biosafety and the NIH Guidelines

Title: Department: Approved by: Director, Human Research Review and Compliance

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Overview of biological product evaluation in CDE, CFDA

Update on Current FDA Policies and Priorities

Basic Concepts and History of Genetic Engineering. Mitesh Shrestha

Gene therapy. Findings by Alert

Cell and Gene Therapy Medicinal Product Management Act (Draft) General Information

Korean Perspective : Recent Trends in the Regulation of Biopharmaceuticals

"From Bedside to Bench and Back: regulatory requirements for collaborations between pharma industry and academia

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Advanced Therapies in Europe

PRIME-XV Cell Therapy Products by

The Role of a Notified Body in Defining Risk Assessment for a Recombinant Protein Used in a Medical Device Case Study

Where Quality Meets Flexibility

The Elite Provider. Cell & Gene. Therapy Manufacturing

Academic and Industry Partnerships

THE FDA, THE DRUG APPROVAL PROCESS, AND THE PATIENT VOICE

Gene Therapy for Fanconi Anaemia Hope or hype? Dr Phil Ancliff Great Ormond Street Hospital / UCL Institute of Child Health Twycross Zoo October 2017

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

Chin Koerner Executive Director US Regulatory and Development Policy

FDA Perspective on Plasma Quality and GMPs

Office for Human Subject Protection. University of Rochester

Baek, Kyung-min. Recombinant Protein Products Division. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety

FDA Update on Compounding

The Integrated Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program

Regulatory Challenges of Global Drug Development in Oncology. Jurij Petrin, M.D. Princeton, NJ

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. CDER Small Business and Industry Assistance. (CDER SBIA) and New Drug Review.

FDA Public Hearing: Approval Pathway for Biosimilar. Products. November 2-3, 2010

Guidance for FDA Review Staff and Sponsors

Current Japanese Regulation for Cell Therapy and NCC strategy

FDA Technology Transfer. Dr. Vicki Seyfert Margolis Senior Advisor for Science and Innovation Office of the Chief Scientist December 6, 2010

What are ATMP s: Why do they Require Special Scientific and Regulatory Attention? Christopher A Bravery.

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

Sonja Brajovic Medical Officer, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration

Transcription:

Regulation of Biologics in The United States: From a Rich Tradition To A Challenging Future Chris Joneckis,, Ph.D. Senior Advisor For CMC Issues Center For Biologics Evaluation And Research Food and Drug Administration

Presentation Overview History - A Rich Tradition History - CBER Update Current Approach to Regulation Challenging Future Scientific Research

History of Biological Products Regulation 1798 Marine Hospital Service Original Public Health Agency 1850 1886 Louis Pasteur (Rabies Vaccine) 1888 Heat-Killed Vaccine 1888 Roux + Yersin (Diphtheria Toxin) 1894 Public Health Labs Produce Diphtheria Antitoxin 1902 Biologics Control Act 1800 Smallpox Vaccination Public Service Koch Lab Of Hygiene Isolated J. Kinyoun Anthrax Bacillus 1887 1878 1890 13 Children Died of Tetanus due to Contaminated Diphtheria Antitoxin Antitoxins 1901

History of Biological Products Regulation (continued) 1906 The Food and Drug Act 1930 National Institute of Health 1938 Food and Drug Cosmetic Act Section 505 1941 Cohn Fractionation of Blood 1948 National Microbiological Institute 1912 Public Health Service Created 1937 Rh Blood Group Division System of Biologics Control 1940 1944 1 st Live Polio Vaccine in The Public Health Humans Service Act (Lab of Biologics Control) 1950

History of Biological Products Regulation (continued) 1955 1973 1988 Cutter Polio Vaccine Incident 1962 Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendment New Provisions of PHS Act 1980's Biotechnology Era CBER Founded 1997 FDAMA 2002 MDUFA 1955 Division of Biologics Standards (DBS) (NIH) 1972 Division of Biologics Standards (NIH) to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Bureau of Biologics (BoB) 1982 National Center for Drugs and Biologics 1992 1992 1997 2002 PDUFA 1, 2, 3

Historical Legacy Scientists regulated biologic products and are actively involved developing therapies Scientist conducted research on problems related to development, manufacture and testing of biologics Scientists conducted studies to assure safety, purity, and potency of biologic products, to improve existing products and develop new products. Emphasis on licensing/ inspection of manufacturing facilities Adverse public health events precipitate change/ regulation

C B E R The Mission of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research is to protect and enhance the public health through the regulation of biological products including blood, vaccines, therapeutics and related drugs and devices, according to statutory authorities. The regulation of these products is founded on science and law to ensure their purity, potency, safety, efficacy and availability.

Blood Derivatives Blood Components Whole Blood Devices Biological Products Regulated By CBER Vaccines Tissues Allergenic Extracts Monoclonal Antibodies Biotech Derived Therapeutics Somatic Cell & Gene Therapy Xenotransplantation

Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies (OCTGT) Increase in promise of, and resultant regulatory activities in, cellular and tissue-based products, gene therapies, xenotransplantation,, unique associated reproduction Consolidation of products into one office Increasing complexity of products New scientific advances, unique safety issues Need for creative clinical, regulatory and risk management approaches Need for seamless and transparent coordination and communication

Gene Therapy, Somatic Cell Therapy, Xenotransplantation INDs/IDEs Received FY 1984 - FY 2002 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 GT INDs 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 19 19 26 41 33 40 37 55 31 36 24 SCT INDs/IDEs 1 4 3 5 16 7 14 15 31 57 36 73 92 75 84 108 115 81 86 Xeno INDs 1 0 7 8 2 5 4 7 1 1 3 Note: A total of 7 INDs were for Xeno and GT, and are included in the counts for both. (148ir)RIMS:10/03/02

Gene Therapy, Somatic Cell Therapy, and Xenotransplantation IND/IDE Amendments Received FY 1984 - FY 2002 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 GT Amend's 13 12 40 54 137 268 369 488 650 834 892 1670 1378 1285 SCT Amend's 1 14 180 337 328 403 405 488 494 730 728 1033 1023 1036 1105 1068 1315 1386 1453 Xeno Amend's 3 43 82 103 139 96 124 68 82 Note: A total of 317Amendments were for INDs that are both Xeno and GT and are included in the counts for both.. (147ir)RIMS:10/03/02

Biological Products Biological Medical Device Combination Products Combination Products Medical Devices +

TODAY Blood Derivatives Blood Components Whole Blood Vaccines Devices Monoclonal Antibodies Tissues Allergenic Extracts Monoclonal Antibodies Biotech Derived Therapeutics Somatic Cell & Gene Therapy Xenotransplantation SOME PRODUCTS AT CBER TOMORROW Therapeutic Vaccines Therapeutic Vaccines rdna Therapeutic Proteins Blood Derivatives and recombinant analogues Ancillary products Blood Derivatives and recombinant analogues Ancillary products

Current Approach To Regulation

Regulation of FDA Products Based on Sound Science, Law, and Public Health Impact Review Research Surveillance Policy Compliance

FDA Policy Development More focused More specific Legislative Laws FDA Regulation - public rule making FDA Guidance - public notice and comment Communicate CBER s current thinking on topic Often provides acceptable approaches However, alternate and acceptable approaches may also be used Option to submit draft guidance to FDA for consideration

Policy Development Transparent Process & Opportunity to Comment Meetings Public Hearings FDA/ HHS Advisory Committees focus specific products, specific concerns Scientific Meetings/ Workshops specific topic Scientific Research International component (e.g., ICH, WHO) Policy is revised as appropriate Regulation and Rules always open for comment

Product Development and Regulation GOAL: Balanced, flexible, responsive regulatory approach Assure the safety and rights of subjects Protect the public health Not impede technological innovation & product development Influences Available scientific knowledge, pre-clinical, clinical knowledge & experience Crises/ tragic events Timing to develop policy, especially written policy Appropriate Risk Assessment

Gene Therapy Experience Increase in subject protection Increased transparency on GT clinical studies Investigator disclosure Increased monitoring of clinical trials Described in IND cgmp information An adequate QA/ QC program for manufacture of clinical gene therapy products Description of segregation and cleaning procedures to prevent cross-contamination contamination from production of multiple GT vectors in the same facility

Cells and Tissues Some Human Cells and Tissues and Cellular/ Tissue- Based Products regulated by a fragmented approach Examples musculoskeletal tissue ocular tissue cellular therapies hematopoeitic stem cells reproductive tissue combination tissue/device; tissue/drug human heart valves dura mater

New FDA Approach to Regulation of Cells and Tissues - Tissue Rule (February 1997) Objective Provide a unified, comprehensive regulatory framework Provide greater flexibility and innovation in this field of medicine Increased predictability of regulatory requirements Provide a tiered regulatory approach with the level of regulation proportional to the degree of risk

Five Areas of Regulatory Concern Preventing transmission of communicable disease Safe processing and handling Clinical safety and effectiveness, where appropriate Promotional claims Monitoring of industry

Product Characteristics Autologous vs. allogeneic Viable vs. nonviable Banked vs. unbanked Homologous vs. non-homologous function Minimal vs. more than minimal manipulation Structural vs. systemic function Combination tissue/device or tissue/drug

Banked Human Cells/Tissues Intended For Transplantation Tissue recovered, processed, stored, or distributed by methods not intended to change tissue function or characteristics Minimally manipulated, homologous use, metabolic tissue for self or close blood relative, or for reproductive use Examples: bone, muscle, cornea, reproductive tissue, heart valves, dura mater and hematopoietic stem cells (if minimally manipulated) Regulated only under communicable disease provisions of PHS Act ( 361( Products ) Comply with Tissue Rule (Registration, GTP Premarket approval not required, no submission GTP s, Donor Suitability)

Cells & Tissues Regulated as Biologics or Devices The cells or tissues are: Expanded, activated, genetically modified or encapsulated Non-normal/ normal/ Non-homologous use (ex: skeletal muscle in heart) Clinical effect is systemic or dependent upon the metabolic activity of the cells for its primary function (e.g., pancreatic islets, hepatocytes, neurons) Combined with another drug, device or biologic Regulated under more stringent safety and efficacy provisions of PHS Act (351) and FD&C Act (regulated as Biologic or Device) Comply with Tissue Rule (Registration, GTP s, Donor Suitability) Premarket review required controlled clinical trials needed to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

Standards Development Leveraging Standards Organizations Non governmental organizations (NGO) Serve as facilitators to develop standards Identify Standard to be Developed Participation by interested parties Transparent Process Agreement on standard reached by consensus Option for FDA to participate in development of standards Option for FDA to adopt standards

Adenovirus Vector Reference Material

Development of Adenovirus Vector Reference Material Issue Determination of infectious particle/ dose of Adenoviral gene vector Workshop participation by interested parties including industry & regulators Development of requirements for reference material specified by FDA Open Bid for services to develop & test material Reference material manufactured and released Transparency of process and results Reference: www.wilbio WilBio.com

Challenges

CBER s Public Health Challenges Vaccine Safety and Availability Blood Safety and Availability Emerging Infectious Diseases Gene Therapy Xenotransplantation Human Tissues and Cell Products Counter-Bioterrorism New Technologies

Emerging New Technologies- Biomedical Research and Technology Proteomics Genomics Mass Spectroscopy Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Plasma Resonance Spectroscopy PCR methods, e.g. MAPREC, TAQ-MAN

Product Quality Application Complex Biological Product Characterization Release Testing Manufacturing process monitoring Adventitious Agent Detection and Quantitation Transitioning from Animal/Human Testing to Analytical, In Vitro, or Biochemical Testing Biological Assessments Mechanisms of Immunity or Immunomodulation Biological Responses Mechanisms of Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms of Product Toxicity

The Future Challenges of New Quantitation Validation Robustness Standards Technologies Imagination and creativity in their application

Scientific Research

Shepherding Safe and Effective Products Regulatory Research FDA Bench Bedside Marketplace Translational Research NIH Academia Industry APPLIED BASIC Pharmaceutical Research Industry SAFETY & QUALITY

Functions of CBER Research Encourages industry-wide adoption of new technologies Facilitates development of industry-wide standards and methods Contributes to improving existing products and developing new products Aids in recruiting and retaining excellent scientists

Other Approaches To Research Leveraging Collaborative Research CBER NIH CBER Industry Pharmaceutical Quality Research Institute (Traditional Pharmaceuticals) consortium of participants provide funding to research a specific issues typically impacting on a regulatory issue potential for reduction in regulatory burden

CBER Available Documents On-line www. www.fda.gov/cber/publications. /publications.htm Outside US: 301-827 827-3844 Email -Manufacturers assistance: MATT@CBER.FDA.GOV Email CBER Voice Information System at: 1-800-835-4709 or 301-827 827-1800