P.O. Box 2800 Pagosa Springs, CO Business Office: (970) Ski Report 800-SKI-WOLF Fax: (970)

Similar documents
Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

Rio Grande National Forest Update

Decision Memo. Wolf Creek Ski Area Summer Projects

Dry spring weather conditions have created critical conditions in Arizona s forests

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

Rocky Mountain Regional Office

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Mountain Shadows June 23, 2012

Post-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

LITTLE PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOREST: B2B October 12, 2016 Presented by Jeff Beale, RPF

Public Rock Collection

Fire Management in. Rocky Mountain National Park

Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, :30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

SHAREHOLDER FIREWOOD PROCEDURE

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Forsythe II Project. September 2015

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Boulder Ranger District

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Forest and climate change

General Description WOLF CREEK PASS LINKAGE LANDSCAPE ZOOLOGICAL AREA. Proposed Designated Area Rio Grande National Forest Divide Ranger District

Black Mesa Vegetation Management Project

Red Pine Management Guide A handbook to red pine management in the North Central Region

Sustainable Forest Management

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

The guidelines are to be applied for all forest harvesting and forest planning activities within the Champagne and Aishihik Traditional Territory.

2/24/2009. The factors that determine what type of forest will grow in a region are temperature precipitation growing season soil land forms

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Appendix C. Activity Codes

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

Proposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project

COLORADO STATE FOREST SERVICE. Orientation for Master Volunteer Forest Steward

File Code: 1950 Date: March 22, 2011

Watershed Management in the Crooked River Basin:

Mechanical Site Preparation

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

RIM FIRE Preliminary Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Report

Environmental Assessment

Forest Restoration and Fire Prevention in the Lake Tahoe Basin

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

Site Preparation: The First Step to Regeneration

Photo Guide for Assessing Wildfire Severity Peter Kolb (PhD) Montana State Extension Forestry Specialist

J. R. Ford P.O. Box 4490 Pagosa Springs, CO I m a business man trying to use a viable financial model to

SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER

SANTA CLARA Protections in place:

Elkhorn Project Proposed Action

Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Forest Sustainability: An Approach to Definition and Assessment at the Landscape Level Michael P. Amaranthus

Low-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire

3. The poor condition of Connecticut s forests in the late 1800s and early 1900s helped spur the conservation movement in CT.

Yankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact

Fire Management CONTENTS. The Benefits of Guidelines...3 Considerations...4

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

BMPs TO CONSERVE WOODED AREAS AT THE SUBDIVISION LEVEL

Pros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations

Galiuro Exploration Drilling Project

Forest Recreation Management

Forest Dilemmas This lesson is the culmination of a unit on Idaho s forests, or can serve as an anticipatory set to such a unit.

Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado, 2016

Visual Management System and Timber Management Application 1

Guide to safe manual tree felling

Evaluating the Effects of Projected Climate Change on Forest Fuel Moisture Content

The Role of. Wildland Fire. in Our Forests

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations

Climate Change Specialist Report final

Acres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned

Managing Forested Wildlife Habitats

Sustainable Forests, Sustainable Communities

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan. What will you do with your woodland? Some landowners choose to let nature take its course.

Managing for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 5, SYNOPSIS Establishes forest stewardship program for State-owned lands.

The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

OTBA. THEME: Forests - Friends for Life

Forest Resources of the Ashley National Forest

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

FORDYCE LAKE PLANNING UNIT Yuba-Bear River Watershed

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

Peter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

Jan FauntLeRoy, Interdisciplinary Team Leader

NEW Vision 2020 CFLRP Work Plan Template 2012

Louisiana-Pacific Canada Ltd.

Practice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

Forensic Forestry Reading the Land

Environmental Impact Statement

Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order

Project Name: Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract CX Log #: OR-014 CX Chase Mtn./ Upper Bear Valley Plantation Thinnings

SBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Nov 7, 2011 Re: Current Conditions in Lodgepole Pine Stands on the Black Hills; RCSC-02-12

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Transcription:

P.O. Box 2800 Pagosa Springs, CO 81147 Business Office: (970) 264-5639 Ski Report 800-SKI-WOLF Fax: (970) 264-2392 Web Site: www.wolfcreekski.com Email: wolfcreekski@wolfcreekski.com INTRODUCTION The spruce beetle has impacted all 1,581 acres of Wolf Creek Ski Area s (WCSA) Special Use Permit within the Rio Grande National Forest. Wolf Creek identifies that the spruce beetle outbreak is a natural process, and accepts that a dramatic change to our existing landscape is unavoidable. Total infestation is inevitable, and we urge the general public to embrace this reality. We have explored many options, conducted internal research, and solicited information from specialists in drafting our Vegetation Management Plan (VMP). Wolf Creek is committed to upholding the standards of good stewardship of public land; therefore, our VMP is consistent with the management direction provided in the Rio Grande National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan. The WCSA Special Use Permit (SUP) falls within the 8.22 Management Area (Ski Areas-Existing and Potential) of the Forest Plan, which includes the following vegetation management standard: Resort management plans are developed that include action items for vegetation management. Forest Plan Management Area 8.22 also states: public Insects and disease will be managed to protect the recreation resource and to ensure safety. The WCSA VMP will also satisfy the requirements our SUP, which states: The provisions of the Operating Plan and the annual revisions shall become a part of this permit and shall be submitted by the holder and approved by the authorized officer or their designated representatives. This plan shall consist of at least the following sections: 10. Vegetation management. Vegetation Management Plan Page 1

FOREST INVENTORY The WCSA SUP is predominatley Engleman spruce (Picea engelmannii), which can stand for decades after the infestation. The rest of the forest is composed of Subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), White fir (Abies concolor), a couple stands of Aspen (Populus tremuloids) and a few planted Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Limber pine (Pinus flexilis). Please see the attached Forest Service Map which delineates forest cover types. Below is a list of the major cover types and composition within the WCSA SUP. Forbes w/spruce/fir= 783 acres Grass like/willow= 60 acres Bare= 36 acres Rock/soil= 29 acres Spruce/fir, sapling/pole (less than 40%) = 15 acres Spruce/fir, sapling/pole (40-69%)= 150 acres Spruce/fir, sapling/pole (greater than 70%)= 4 acres Spruce/fir, mature trees (less than 40%)= 94 acres Spruce/fir, mature trees (40-69%)= 492 acres Spruce/fir, mature trees (greater than 70%)= 185 acres GOALS WCSA has six major goals in our VMP. Remove hazard trees and reduce fuels. Facilitate regeneration. Identify the needs of wildlife. Stop erosion. Protect the watershed. Provide a safe and enjoyable experience for our guests. STRATEGIES In order to meet these goals, we have laid out respective straegies. Remove hazard trees and reduce fuels. In dealing with the spruce beetle invasion, we have accepted that there are many moving parts, and therefore must be dynamic with our policy decisions. Our major priority is the removal of hazard trees, primarily within the lift corridors, around buildings, and within our parking lots. We will fell all hazard trees within a lift corridor that have potential to contact the lift or be a fuel source that could cause damage in the case of a fire. We plan to remove 100% of the hazard trees within the parking lots and around buildings. Summer crews are instructed to identify hazard trees throughout the Special Use Permit as well, and we will fell these as soon as possible. Remote hazard trees may be identified for being rotted, excessively leaning, or a general hazard to the skiing public. Vegetation Management Plan Page 2

We also see the value of standing wood, which in many cases may be worth more for wind buffing, shade promotion, or habitat protection than as a forest industry product. Over the course of time we may decide to thin these trees in consideration of the hazard they come to pose. Facilitate regeneration. Trees are a natural resource that can be managed over time, and should be utilized in a manner consistent with the long term interest of the ski area. Professional arborists will first identify the small percentage of high quality timber that can be harvested by a single tree selection process for timber sale. Then we decide which hazard trees need to be removed from the permit area, and which ones can be laid down to fortify the regeneration of the understory. Next we will identify options for regeneration. Trees that might hamper future regeneration will be felled. There will be a determination about the best use of a felled tree, which may be laid down for erosion control or may be buried to improve skiable terrain and attract moisture to the soil (these trees should be buried two to three feet underground and never within a potential road area). We will move some regeneration to promote shade, and move other transplants to provide wind protection. In addition to trees, we will continue fostering the growth of wooly bushes, and promoting the irregular mosaic of the permit area. It is important to mitigate the impact of down trees by removing the left over sharp edges, stumps, and branches from felling operations. Professional foresters will determine which trees grow naturally in this area, and identify which species can be replanted in this largely homogenous forest. The untreated stands will most likely revert back to a spruce/subalpine forest as they are the most shade-tolerant species, whereas an aggressive treatment could change the natural forest trajectory. Furthermore, the understory will respond best to a largely untreated environment because the standing dead cover still provides sun and wind protection for saplings. We will also continue to bring in high quality top soil (mushroom dirt or mulch) to facilitate transplanting and re-vegetate clear cut slopes which will promote grasses and help with erosion control. We continue to buy fertilizer from the Monte Vista Co-Op. We are waiting on more guidance for the timing of transplanting saplings. We do not want to move saplings prematurely before the beetle is gone, but we have approximately 10,000 little trees that can be effectively moved by hand this summer. We are interested in available grant money to enlist the Southwest Conservation Corp for hand transplanting of new trees, revegetation, and erosion control. The noxious weeds within the ski area boundary are controlled annually by Larry Lynch, a certified contractor. WCSA will continue to monitor outbreak areas, and summer crews are instructed to identify noxious weeds. Crews will notify management, who will line out either hand pulling or spraying. A map of the noxious weeds locations will be created annually and kept on file. Mulch material shall be weed free. Identify the needs of wildlife. Vegetation Management Plan Page 3

We will be extremely thoughtful throughout this process to identify and protect wildlife habitats. We will keep trees that provide dens, inspect for birdlife before felling trees, and make sure critical shade habitats remain for populations that depend upon them wherever possible. Downed logs and woody debris of old forests are needed for denning, escape, and protection from severe weather. Existing snags and large diameter standing dead will be left to protect wildlife habitats. If there is any sign of lynx, boreal owl, goshawk, flycatcher, ptarmigan or marten, the crew will cease disturbing activity and alert the Permit Administrator. Stop erosion. Felled trees will be repositioned in a manner that decreases erosion and increases snow retention. When thinning vegetation to reduce fuel loads, trees will be removed by our ground crews, traditional skidders, and snowcats. In the spring, we fell trees using snow cover to skid over enviornmentally sensitive areas, thus reducing impact to sapplings, ground cover and topsoil. Once the snow melts, we will fell dead trees throughout the designated area, but will hold off skidding these trees until conditions dry out. Helicopters may be used in environmentally sensitive and roadless areas with proper approval. When removing down trees, we will allow only one designated route up and down the mountain, so as to minimize soil disturbance. We will be attentive to soil erosion problems, and have related water flow directly into a drainage with filter strips and sediment traps. Protect the watershed. Healthy forests protect the watershed by preventing erosion, enhancing ground storage, reducing flooding, and filtering contaminants. Unlike beetle infested trees or standing dead trees, a healthy tree intercepts, slows, absorbs and stores water through normal tree functions. By removing dead and dying trees and replanting saplings, as deemed necessary, we will improve the quality of water being filtered through our SUP at the headwaters of the Rio Grande River. Prior to commencing work, WCSA will conduct a watershed analysis with the help of our local foresters. This type of forest management can reduce the risk of a catastrophic wildfire in our high-priority watershed. These activities are an integral part of enhancing the protection of our watershed and water supplies. A high-intensity fire would lead to soil damage and debris flow into a vital American water source. Provide a safe and enjoyable experience for our guests. Wolf Creek is recognized for its abundant natural snowfall and lift-assisted quasi-backcountry experience which combine to offer a unique skiing experience which is aggressively sought, Vegetation Management Plan Page 4

yet remarkably rare, within Colorado. Wolf Creek is resolutely committed to the long-term preservation of these unique attributes that form "the Wolf Creek Experience". This VMP will prioritize this heritage, carefully selecting trees to be removed while keeping as natural a setting as possible. Our first priority is to remove dead and down hazard trees from our lift cooridors and those surronding critical infrastructure. WCSA is aware that the remaining mature green trees will bemore at risk to windthrow and breakge hazard post-outbreak due to the additional wind they ll be exposed to, and therefore must be monitored closely. Reducing ground fuel loading and crown fire potential on State and Federal lands is a core component of the Mineral County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. In order to mitigate the potential impact of a wildfire, WCSA will continue to remove standing dead and down trees following fuel treatment recommendations. We will consult with professional foresters from Colorado State Forest Service and USFS on best management practices. Wolf Creek will engage its guests in a public information campaign about the impacts of the beetle invasion, and ways they can protect the next generation of spruce trees that may survive this attack. CONCLUSION Our Vegetation Management Plan should be understood as part of a greater acceptance of our changing landscape in order to mitigate certain effects and prepare for its consequences. These strategies are based on the known experience with the spruce beetle; there are unforeseen consequences that must be dealt with as they arise. We will use an adaptive management strategy with a strong monitoring component in order to test unknown assumptions. This preponderance of information will be considered with the best available science as we continue to adapt to the forest around us. Vegetation Management Plan Page 5