AASHTO WEBINAR Practitioner s Handbook 18: Air Quality Analyses in the NEPA Process for Highway Projects

Similar documents
18 June 2017 PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK AASHTO ADDRESSING AIR QUALITY ISSUES IN THE NEPA PROCESS FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS

I-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report

5.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Air Report. Project Information PPTA/LAP. Traffic Data I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE. Project Number: , C501, P101 UPC:

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming

Qualitative Hot Spot Analysis for PM2.5 February 4, 2008

Air Quality and Transportation Conformity

NCHRP Task 78. Programmatic Agreements for Project-Level Air Quality Analyses

Transportation Conformity 101. Session I: Course Overview

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

FINAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION for the Cloverdale Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Resort Casino Project, Sonoma County, California.

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

ITEM 9 Action October 18, 2017

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

Air Quality, General Conformity & Class Exercise

Determining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

Boundary Guidance on Air Quality Designations for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or Standard)

DRAFT PREPARED FOR: VDOT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISON PREPARED BY: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH: SC&A INC. KB ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, INC.

NEPA OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter

AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS. I-77/I- 81 Overlap Improvements , P100 (UPC 51441) Prepared by:

Dispersion Modeling for Mobile Source Applications

The No-Build Alternative would not result in any project-related construction and would therefore not directly impact energy consumption.

NYSDOT Project Development Manual (PDM)

The Supreme Court and EPA Carbon Rules. Michael B. Gerrard Environmental and Energy Study Institute briefing March 6, 2014

Status of 8-hour Ozone and PM 2.5 Standards. Lydia N. Wegman STAPPA / ALAPCO Meeting Stowe, Vermont September 30, 2002

INVENTORY OF POTENTIAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENTS

TCAPP: A SHRP 2 Web Tool for Facilitating Project Planning and Development. June 26, 2013

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

Congestion Management Process Update

Appendix K. Detroit River International Crossing Study Air Quality Impact Analysis Technical Report Addendum

Notice Cover photos:

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Appendix. B RTP Checklist REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Updates on FAA Order F. Agenda. Communicate FAA Order Updates. Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order

Berth [TraPac] Container Terminal Project Final General Conformity Determination

Technical Methods Part 2

ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIR QUALITY

CONFORMITY DETERMINATION REPORT

Clean Air Act. Compliance

Florida Department of Transportation, District Three

ECONOMIC IMPACT/ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. OU Meteorology Field Trip October 20, 2017

Air Quality Technical Report

A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY

4.2 Air Quality Introduction Environmental and Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting. Existing Air Quality Conditions

Corridor mapping widths of either 1-mile wide or 1000 feet wide were used for resources identified below.

Appendix 6-1 CO Screening Memorandum

Introduction. CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13

YORK TOLL PLAZA MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY AIR QUALITY REPORT. September 28, 2016 NOISE ANALYSIS REPORT MAINETURNPIKE AUTHORI TY

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL OF CERTAIN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

CEQA AIR QUALITY HANDBOOK. Guidelines for the Implementation of the. California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended

Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report NEPA MPO (Carbon County) 2015 TIP

OZONE IN NORTH TEXAS AND THE CLEAN AIR ACT

Air Quality Community of Practice Air Quality Interagency Coordination State-of-the-Practice

AIR POLLUTION. History of Clean Air Act Clean Air Update The Role of APCD

EPA Air Quality Modeling Updates

Documenting Climate Change Considerations in the National Environmental Policy Act Process. Jeff Houk FHWA Resource Center June 7, 2010

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Redesignation Demonstration and Maintenance Plan

1.0 Introduction. The USACE Fort Worth District s goals for the REIS are to:

Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report Johnstown Area Transportation Study (JATS) TIP and 2040 LRTP

2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD

WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD

Guidelines for TxDOT Regional Toll Road Authority. Cooperation AND. Coordination

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

In Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1408

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Clean Air Act History

Current Topics In Air Quality

Implementation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Opportunities for Public Participation

Air Quality Memorandum

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

PENNSYLVANIA CLEAN VEHICLES PROGRAM. Comment/Response Document

Air Quality Memorandum

INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS

11/10/2014 Oklahoma s SIP Submittal Infrastructure Checklist 2010 Primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Update 1

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule. March 2014

Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Integrated Feasibility Study. Appendix F Air Quality

CHAPTER V COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Why Should Every Day Count For You?

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

OVERVIEW of SIP for Annual PM2.5 Standard MWAQC December 12, 2007

Understanding AB 32 and SB 375 A Legal Analysis for Local Government Officials

4.12 AIR QUALITY INTRODUCTION

Chapter 1 Introduction

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

Kendra Abkowitz & Quincy Styke III

Transcription:

AASHTO WEBINAR Practitioner s Handbook 18: Air Quality Analyses in the NEPA Process for Highway Projects March 6, 2017

Today s Webinar Welcome Melissa Savage, AASHTO Presentation: Addressing Air Quality Issues in the NEPA Process for Highway Projects Bill Malley, Perkins Coie LLP Q&A with Panel Cecilia Ho, FHWA Tim Sexton, Minnesota DOT Bill Malley (moderator)

Center for Environmental Excellence Visit our website: http://environment.transportation.org/ Use our resources: Weekly Website Updates Broadcast Emails Practitioner's Handbooks Climate Change Webinars Programmatic Agreement Library Case Law Database (CLUE) Recently updated with 2016 cases

Practitioner s Handbook Series Goals of the handbooks: Easy-to-read synthesis of requirements Practical advice on how to comply List of reference sources Topics covered: NEPA and related environmental requirements Where to find them: http://www.environment.trans portation.org

The Air Quality Practitioner s Handbook Authors: Rich Denbow, Cambridge Systematics Bill Malley, Perkins Coie LLP Work Group: Cecilia Ho, FHWA Victoria Martinez, FHWA Karen Perritt, FHWA Marilee Mortenson, Caltrans Daniel Burgin, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Tim Sexton, Minnesota DOT Michael Baker, Pennsylvania DOT Jackie Ploch, Texas DOT

The Air Quality Practitioner s Handbook Target audience: NEPA practitioners generalists Air quality conformity specialists may also find it useful. Primer on topics an air quality analysis in a NEPA document may need to cover, including: Criteria pollutants Conformity determinations Mobile source air toxics (MSATs) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Practical tips on: Deciding what issues to cover in the air quality analysis Coordinating NEPA with conformity What to look for when reviewing an air quality analysis Considering air quality issues after completion of NEPA

Caveats What the handbook is not... Not agency guidance Not a detailed compliance manual Keep in mind: Agency policies and interpretations may change Court decisions, legislation, etc. could affect requirements Always be sure to check federal agency regulations and guidance to ensure you have current information.

Additional Information Sources NEPA FHWA NEPA Technical Advisory https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/guidebook/vol2/doc15d.pdf FHWA MSAT interim guidance https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/air_toxics/ CEQ climate change guidance https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/policy_ and_guidance/ghgnepa.cfm Transportation Conformity FHWA conformity resources https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/conformity/guide/ EPA conformity resources https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation

Presentation: Air Quality Analyses in the NEPA Process for Highway Projects

NEPA and Air Quality A Very Quick Review of Current Requirements and Practices

Overview What does NEPA require in an air quality analysis? What are the basics of transportation conformity and how are those requirements met in the NEPA process? What are mobile source air toxics and how are they addressed in the NEPA process? Under the new CEQ guidance, how should greenhouse gas emissions be addressed in the NEPA process?

NEPA Requirements for Air Quality Analysis NEPA 101 NEPA requires... Comparative analysis of reasonably foreseeable direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the alternatives Documentation of compliance with other legal requirements Public involvement and agency coordination For air quality, NEPA compliance may address: Criteria pollutants and air quality status of project area Documentation of transportation conformity findings Mobile source air toxics (MSATs) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Construction emissions Indirect/cumulative effects on air quality Mitigation, if appropriate

Transportation Conformity Requirements Transportation Conformity 101 Prohibits federal agencies from funding, approving, supporting in any way projects that do not conform to States plans for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Key Concepts: NAAQS established for six criteria pollutants, four of which are associated with vehicle emissions: CO, PM, NO 2, Ozone. Nonattainment Area area where NAAQS are not met State Improvement Plan (SIP) plan for achieving the NAAQS Conformity Determination: Regional: for a transportation plan or TIP in an MPO area Project-Level: for an individual FHWA or FTA project Exempt and non-exempt projects Exempt: conformity does not apply (neutral/positive effect on AQ) Non-Exempt: all other projects; conformity applies

Regional Conformity When it s required: Required in nonattainment and maintenance areas each time an MPO updates or amends a transportation plan or TIP What it involves: Regional emissions analysis for all projects in a plan or TIP Air quality conformity determination for the plan/tip as a whole Modeling shows total emissions within SIP s emissions budget Fiscal constraint determination Funding is reasonably available for all projects in plan/tip How long it takes: Months-long lead time to allow for modeling, public involvement NEPA practitioners should know: Project must be in conforming plan/tip before NEPA completion

Project-Level Conformity When it s required: Required for all non-exempt projects in nonattainment and maintenance areas Must be done prior to completion of NEPA for the project What it involves: Regional conformity determination must have been made for the plan/tip that includes the project Project definition must be consistent in design concept and scope Hot-spot analysis also may be required Required only for CO, PM2.5, PM10 nonattainment areas Must demonstrate no localized exceedances of the NAAQS NEPA practitioners should know: Plan/TIP may be need to be amended if project to be approved is not consistent in design concept & scope with plan/tip

Mobile Source Air Toxics What are MSATs? Seven pollutants associated with mobile sources (cars, trucks) Believed to cause cancer or other serious health effects Not criteria pollutants, therefore not subject to conformity How did they become a NEPA issue? Lawsuits challenging FHWA NEPA docs for failing to consider public health effects of air toxics on near-roadway populations Solution = guidance to standardize MSAT analysis What the MSAT guidance requires: If no potential for meaningful effects analysis not required If low potential for meaningful effects qualitative analysis If higher potential for meaningful effects quantitative analysis Discussion of unavailable/incomplete information regarding effects of MSATs on public health per 40 CFR 1502.22

Greenhouse Gas Emissions What are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions? CO2 and other pollutants that contribute to global warming CO2 = 95% of transportation GHG emissions Effects are not localized global total is what matters Do GHG emissions need to be addressed in NEPA? Case law mixed on this issue... But August 2016 CEQ guidance calls for considering GHG emissions as part of NEPA process What does the CEQ guidance require? Qualitative or quantitative analysis depending on significance of GHG emissions (and no bright line for determining significance) Use quantity of GHG emissions as proxy for effects Also requires consideration of effects of climate change

Air Quality & NEPA: Odds and Ends NEPA Assignment Conformity decision can be assigned to State DOT under CE assignment program (23 USC 326) Conformity decision cannot be assigned to State DOT under full NEPA assignment program (23 USC 327) Tiering Project must be included in conforming plan/tip by the completion of the Tier 2 (project-level document) Required at Tier 1 if it includes a project-level approval Outside MPO Areas Conformity applies in nonattainment and maintenance areas that are located outside MPO boundaries Called donut areas and isolated rural nonattainment areas Conformity decision made at the project level in these areas.

Tips for Practitioners How to Make Sure You ve Covered the Bases in an Air Quality Analysis in a NEPA Document

Overview Practical tips for: 1) Determining what air quality issues need to be covered 2) Determining whether a conformity determination is needed 3) Coordinating NEPA and conformity determinations 4) Reviewing an air quality analysis for sufficiency 5) Preparing a hot-spot analysis 6) Keeping air quality analysis current after NEPA completion 7) What to include in an air quality technical report Issues to watch out for when preparing an air quality analysis for a highway project

1) What Air Quality Issues to Cover? Determine the universe of issues to be covered and level of detail needed in the air quality analysis. Key issues: Criteria pollutants Existing conditions and attainment status Projected emissions with No Action and Action alternatives MSATs Which level of review is required under MSAT guidance? GHGs Qualitative or quantitative analysis required under CEQ guidance? Construction emissions Analysis needed? If so, what level of detail? Indirect and cumulative impacts Any notable issues requiring discussion?

2) Is a Conformity Determination Needed? Determine if a conformity determination is needed, and if so, for which pollutants. Key issues: Is the project an exempt project? If so, conformity does not apply. Is the project in a nonattainment or maintenance area? If so, for which specific pollutants? Are there any recent or anticipated changes in area s status? Is the project included in the applicable Plan and TIP? If not, are there plans to include it? If so, when? Are there any known obstacles to including it? Fiscal constraint? Ability to meet emissions budget? Will the project require a hot-spot analysis (for CO or PM)?

3) How to Fit Conformity Into NEPA Schedule? Determine the timing of regional and project-level conformity determinations relative to NEPA schedule. Key issues: MPO s schedule for plan/tip approves What is MPO s schedule for plan/tip updates, amendments? When will project be amended into the plan/tip? How much lead time is needed for modeling etc. Inconsistencies in design concept and scope If project is already in plan/tip, it is consistent in design concept and scope w/ project that is to be approved in NEPA? If inconsistencies arise, when will plan/tip amendment occur and how will it affect NEPA schedule? Other factors that could cause delay Changes in air quality status, new version of emissions model, etc.

4) How to Review an Air Quality Analysis? Review the air quality analysis in the NEPA document for clarity, completeness, & consistency. Key issues: Uses terminology correctly Covers all relevant topics (or explains why not addressed) Criteria pollutants MSATs GHGs Explains choices regarding data, models, level of detail Uses tables to present key data Describes agency coordination, especially re: conformity. Includes conformity findings uses correct language Avoids overstating air quality benefits Include supporting data in appendices

5) What s Needed in a Hot-Spot Analysis? If hot-spot analysis is needed, ensure analysis closely follows applicable EPA regs and guidance. Key issues: Required only for three pollutants: CO, PM2.5, PM10 May be qualitative or quantitative. CO: for certain congested intersections as defined in regs. PM: projects of air quality concern as defined in regs. Must use latest planning assumptions & latest emissions model Must follow detailed requirements in EPA regs and guidance No hot-spot analysis needed for CO if categorical CO hot-spot determination applies (only in CO maintenance areas). For additional information: https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/project-level-conformity-and-hot-spot-analyses

6) What to Consider after NEPA Completion? Monitor changes in air quality status, conditions, and project impacts after NEPA is completed. Key issues: NEPA issue: Is there new info that requires a reevaluation of air quality impacts? Or even a supplemental EIS? Conformity issue: Is a new conformity determination needed? Triggered by: significant change in the project's design concept and scope; three years since most recent major step to advance project; or a supplemental NEPA document is initiated for air quality purposes. Planning Issue: Is the MPO required to update its plan/tip? (req d every 4 years) If so, new fiscal constraint and conformity determination needed.

7) What to Include in Air Quality Tech Report? Use the air quality technical report to document methodology and provide supporting data. Key points: Technical report typically should include: Description of methodology, including model versions used Summary of traffic data used in analyses Detail on air quality modeling analyses, including tables of results Full documentation of project-level (hot-spot) analyses for EPA and/or for transportation conformity Documentation of agency coordination relating to air quality, including meeting notes and correspondence where applicable. Maintain electronic copies of all supporting data and model runs in project files

Potential wrinkles and complications... MPO changes the land use assumptions in its model Conformity must be based on latest planning assumptions New emissions model is released Conformity must be based on latest emissions model Project area is newly designated as nonattainment Conformity requirements apply within 1 year after designation Changes made to project after being included in plan/tip Must ensure consistency in design concept and scope Project located in proximity to sensitive populations May need to address comments regarding potential health effects of air MSATs on near-roadway populations May warrant consideration of opportunities to avoid, minimize, mitigate

Potential wrinkles and complications (cont d) Project induces development that will itself have air quality impacts May need to be address in indirect effects analysis Project area has other major emitters e.g., power plant May need to be address in cumulative impacts analysis Project changes or new information arises about air quality effects after NEPA has been completed May require NEPA reevaluation and/or supplement May require new conformity determination

Q&A Panel We want your questions! Submit questions via text in the panel on your screen.

Q&A Panel Panelists Cecilia Ho, FHWA Tim Sexton, Minnesota DOT Moderator: Bill Malley, Perkins Coie LLP