Fred Below Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Similar documents
Use our knowledge of crop physiology and partner with industry leaders to maximize corn and soybean s yield potential.

Fred Below Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The Seven Wonders of High Corn Yield

Fred Below, Jason Haegele, Ross Bender, and Adam Henninger Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at

Fred Below, Jason Haegele, Ross Bender, and Adam Henninger

Seven Wonders of The Corn Growing World

Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Quest for 300 Bushel Corn

Secrets of Soybean Success WHAT FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH HAS TAUGHT US

Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF WATER AND NUTRIENT RESOURCES: ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL FOR DRIP IRRIGATION AND FERTIGATION (year 3 of 3)

2017 Soybean Management Yield Potential. Part 1: Yields

Institute of Ag Professionals

2014 Results Report Six Secrets of Soybean Success- Phase 3 Abstract Introduction

2016 Management Yield Potential

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Maximizing Soybean Yields

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Nitrogen Management to Increase Nutrient Use Efficiency and Corn Grain Yield

PROCEEDINGS 2017 Crop Pest Management Short Course & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show

Independent Farm Research 2015 Research Data

Drought Stress and Ontario Soybean Yields: Unravelling the Mystery. Hugh Earl, U of G Horst Bohner, OMAFRA

Risk vs. Reward: Can We Resolve Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Questions in Soybean?

2004 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Area Crops Contest

ON-FARM NETWORK SOYBEAN TRIAL RESULTS

Grain Yield. Soybean Growth and Development. Yield Components of Soybean. Plants/Branches per area Lauer

Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Planting Population and Nitrogen Fertility

ENGINEERED FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE GROWTH. IgniteS HEALTHIER SOILS STRONGER PLANTS HIGHER YIELDS

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Evaluation of Sidedress Applications of Potassium and Nitrogen on Corn Grain Yield

2014 GULF COAST UNIFORM CORN HYBRID TRIALS

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES GUIDE

NACHURS. Field Notes. In this issue...

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Strip-till Research Results: Rotation, Automatic Guidance, and Fertilizer Placement. Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, Colleagues & Farmers

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Maize yield increases since the 1930s have been attributable

Brian Lang, Extension Agronomist, Iowa State University; Kenneth Pecinovsky, Farm Superintendent, Iowa State University Northeast Research Farm

Evaluation of Grain Sorghum Hybrid Varieties in Dryland Farming Conditions in Nueces County

Soil Fertility: Current Topic June 19, 2010

Cropping System Nutrient Management

THE NACHURS HIGH YIELD POTATO PROGRAM PROVIDING POTATO GROWERS PREMIUM LIQUID STARTER AND FOLIAR NUTRIENTS SINCE

Impact of Planting Date and Maturity Group Selection on Soybean Yield

AgWeb Brand Quality Study 2014

RESEARCH REPORT SUWANNEE VALLEY AREC 92-5 August, 1992 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS N SCHEDULING METHODS FOR SNAPBEANS

Institute of Ag Professionals

CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE?

Irrigated Spring Wheat

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

SEED RELABELING REPORT FARMERS BUSINESS NETWORK 2017 SEED RELABELING REPORT

PINNEY-PURDUE AGRICULTURAL CENTER RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS 2012

Common and Not So Common Fertility Issues in the Region for Soybean and Wheat

NDSU Soybean Production Factors - Research and Recommendation Update

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Phosphate h Fertilizer Needs in Quebec

Biological Help for the Human Race. Field Crops. Case Study. Jilin Agricultural University, China. BiOWiSH -Crop. Background.

Planting and Harvesting Crops

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015)

Evaluation of Plant Density and Row Spacing to Optimize Hybrid Performance. Ty Barten Monsanto Company

Fertilizer Management for Plant Health and Environmental Water Quality Protection

Assessing Potassium Needs

Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Modern Soybean Varieties

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

Strong Yields Start In-Furrow

Supercharging your P fertilizer Does it Work? Cynthia Grant,

Grain Sorghum 101. Copyright 2015 Sorghum Partners All Rights Reserved

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management. Larry Zibilske, Ph.D.

Kiberashi integrated soil fertility management trials. Protocols 2010

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2013 Demonstration Reports

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management

Understanding How Precision Ag Works Regardless of Your Farm Size

High-Yielding Irrigated Soybean Production North Central USA Soybean Benchmarking Project

Effect of Added Micronutrients on Corn Yield (1996) Effect of Micronutrients Added to Corn Planter Fertilizer (2004) Sulfur Addition to Corn Planter

Tillage Systems and Soil Conservation for Corn-on-Corn. Tony J. Vyn, assisted by colleagues, graduate students, technicians, and farmers

SMart On-Farm Part 1. Michigan Soybean Committee, PO Box 287, Frankenmuth, MI FRANKENMUTH, MI PERMIT 20 PAID US POSTAGE NON-PROFIT

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

Row Crop Responses to Nitrogen Rate, Application Timing and Irrigation Schedule

Evaluation of 15 inch Row Wheat and Double-Crop Soybean in the Mid-South

If you feed it, you need it! BENEFITS

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

Managing Pistachio Nutrition. Patrick Brown Muhammad Ismail Siddiqui

Evaluation of Mosaic MicroEssentials Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Tillage Systems to Sustain Soil and Yield in Continuous Corn. Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, T.D. West, Colleagues, & Farmers

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

La venue de ce conférencier a été rendue possible grâce au soutien financier du ministère de l Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l Alimentation

Greene County Fair Livestock Barn Fundraiser

Nutrient management. Cassava

Manitoba Flax Production

POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames

Transcription:

Fred Below Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Le Rendez-vous Vegetal Brossard, Quebec February 10, 2016

Do Growers Adequately Manage Soybean?

The Soybean Yield Gap US average soybean yield of about 3.1 tons per hectare (46 bushels per acre) World record yield 10.8 tons per hectare (161 bushels ) Illinois record 7.24 tons per hectare (108 bushels)

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success What Factors Have the Biggest Impact on Soybean Yield?

Not Secrets of Soybean Success, but Important to Overall Crop Productivity Corn yields 1.6 tons better when it follows soybean and needs 40-50 kg less nitrogen fertilizer

Not Secrets of Soybean Success, but Important to Overall Crop Productivity Soybean improves soil tilth compared to corn Soybean root system is a taproot while corn roots are fibrous

Soybean Improves Soil Tilth

Crucial Prerequisites, but not Secrets of Success Drainage Weed Control Proper Soil ph

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 Factor Weather 2 3 4 5 6 Given key prerequisites

Above Average Precipitation during June, 2015 Source: NOAA Midwestern Regional Climate Center

2015 Weather Challenges

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 Factor Weather Fertility 4 5 6 Given key prerequisites

Soybean Gets Some N from Fixation by Nodules

N Uptake (kg N ha -1 ) N Uptake & Partitioning for 4 Ton Soybean 275 220 165 110 55 Grain Flowers, Pods Stem, Petioles Leaves Soybean needs to accumulate 70 kg of N per ton of grain, half of which comes from the nodules 100 80 60 40 20 Percent of Total (%) 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days After Planting 0 Planting V2 V4 V7 R2 R4 R5 R6 R8 Growth Stage Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015)

Nitrogen Needs and Removal by 4 Ton Soybean Crop Amount Required *Amount from Nodules Removed with Grain Net Removal from Soil kg hectare -1 275 137 200 63 * Assuming 50% of total N accumulation supplied by N fixation from nodules Data averaged across two varieties, two fertility regimes, and three site-years during 2012 and 2013

Soybean Needs More N than it Can Fix N uptake (kg ha -1 ) 600 500 400 300 200 100 Total N uptake Biological N fixation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Yield (Mg ha -1 ) Adapted from Salvagiotti et al. 2008. Field Crops Res. 108:1-13.

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 Factor Weather Fertility 4 5 6 Given key prerequisites

Typical Fertilization for Corn and Soybean in the US 200 kg N, 100 kg P 2 O 5 and 112 kg K 2 O per hectare applied to corn. No S or micronutrients No fertilizer applied to soybean

Nutrient Uptake and Removal by Nutrient 4 Ton Soybean Required to Produce Removed with Grain Harvest Index kg hectare -1 % N 275 201 73 P 2 O 5 48 39 81 K 2 O 190 78 41 S 17 10 61 Zn (g) 335 140 44 B (g) 325 111 34 Data averaged across two varieties, two fertility regimes, and three site-years during 2012 and 2013. Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015)

Nutrient Uptake and Removal by Nutrient 4 Ton Soybean Required to Produce Removed with Grain Harvest Index kg hectare -1 % N 275 201 73 P 2 O 5 48 39 81 K 2 O 190 78 41 S 17 10 61 Zn (g) 335 140 44 B (g) 325 111 34 Data averaged across two varieties, two fertility regimes, and three site-years during 2012 and 2013. Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015)

Typical Fertilization for Corn and Soybean in the US 200 kg N, 100 kg P 2 O 5 and 112 kg K 2 O per hectare applied to corn. No S or micronutrients No fertilizer applied to soybean

P and K Uptake and Removal by 4 Ton Soybean vs 14.4 Ton Maize Nutrient Required to Produce Removed with Grain Remain in Stover Corn Soy Corn Soy Corn Soy kg hectare -1 P 2 O 5 113 48 90 39 23 9 K 2 O 202 190 66 78 136 112 Corn data from Agron J. 105:161-170 (2013); Soybean data from Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015)

K Uptake & Partitioning for 4 Ton Soybean K Uptake (kg K 2 O ha -1 ) 180 150 120 90 60 30 Grain Flowers, Pods Stem, Petioles Leaves Most (50%) K accumulation is in the stem and leaf petioles 100 80 60 40 20 Percent of Total (%) 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days After Planting 0 Planting V2 V4 V7 R2 R4 R5 R6 R8 Growth Stage Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015)

P Uptake & Partitioning for 4 Ton Soybean P Uptake (kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 ) 48 40 32 24 16 8 Grain Flowers, Pods Stem, Petioles Leaves Season long uptake and no reservoir of P in the stem and leaf petioles 100 80 60 40 20 Percent of Total (%) 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days After Planting Planting V2 V4 V7 R2 R4 R5 R6 R8 Growth Stage Agron. J. 107:563-573 (2015) 0

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Given key prerequisites

All Soybean Varieties are Not Created Equal Variety Yield Variety Yield Variety Yield ton ha -1 ton ha -1 ton ha -1 1 4.7 7 5.3 13 5.7 2 4.8 8 5.4 14 5.7 3 4.8 9 5.5 15 5.8 4 5.0 10 5.6 16 5.9 5 5.1 11 5.6 17 6.0 6 5.2 12 5.6 17 varieties with high-input management at Champaign, IL 2015

All Soybean Varieties are Not Created Equal MG Yield MG Yield MG Yield ton ha -1 ton ha -1 ton ha -1 3.0 4.7 2.9 5.3 3.9 5.7 2.5 4.8 3.7 5.4 3.8 5.7 2.5 4.8 3.6 5.5 3.8 5.8 2.9 5.0 3.7 5.6 3.3 5.9 2.6 5.1 3.1 5.6 3.5 6.0 2.8 5.2 3.1 5.6 17 varieties with high-input management at Champaign, IL 2015

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Given key prerequisites

Soybean is Indeterminate Flower and leaf development at the same time Closest leaf provides most of the energy for pods at that node Typical plant has 20 nodes Source: Fig. 14 from Pedersen, 2009, Soybean Growth and Development.

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Foliar Protection Given key prerequisites

Soybean Yield Components Yield = Pod number/ha x Seeds per pod x Weight per seed

The Legendary 5 Bean Pod Champaign, 2013

Soybean Yield Components Yield = Pod number/ha x Seeds per pod x Weight per seed

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Foliar Protection Given key prerequisites

Soybean Yield Components Yield = Pod number/ha x Seeds per pod x Weight per seed

How Does Pod Number Effect Soybean Yield 3.0 Pod Number (per node) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 3.4 tons 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Node Number

How Does Pod Number Effect Soybean Yield 3.0 Pod Number (per node) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 3.4 tons 4.2 tons 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Node Number

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Foliar Protection Seed Treatment Given key prerequisites

Impact of Seed Treatment on Emergence Untreated Fungicide, Insecticide, Nematicide Photos courtesy of AJ Woodyard, BASF

Impact of Seed Treatment on Soybean Growth Fungicide only R2 growth stage, Champaign, IL 2012 Fungicide, Insecticide, Nematicide

Impact of Seed Treatment on Soybean Growth Plants at growth stage R2 at Champaign, IL 2012

The Six Secrets of Soybean Success Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 Factor Weather Fertility Genetics/Variety Foliar Protection Seed Treatment Row Arrangement Given key prerequisites

Row Spacing Affects Light Interception And Canopy Air Movement 76 cm Rows 51 cm Rows Champaign, IL 2012

Standard vs High Tech System 2014-15 Phosphorus Potassium P and K Foliar Protection Seed Treatment Row Arrangement P applied year before to corn 84 kg P 2 O 5 as MESZ (N, P, S, & Zn) Banded 10-15 cm under row at planting K applied year before to corn 84 kg K 2 O as Aspire (K & B) Broadcast and incorporated at planting P & K applied year before to corn MESZ and Aspire applied as above No foliar protection Fungicide and Insecticide at R3 Untreated or Fungicide only Fungicide, Insecticide, Nematicide 76 cm row spacing 51 cm row spacing

Banding Fertilizer 10-15 cm Deep Directly Under the Future Crop Row

Seeding Soybean Crop 4 cm Deep Directly Over the Fertilizer Band

Without banded fertility but with adequate soil test values With banded fertility to provide 28 kg N, 84 kg P 2 O 5, 20 kg S, 2 kg Zn per acre

Standard vs High Tech System 2014-15 Phosphorus Potassium P and K Foliar Protection Seed Treatment Row Arrangement P applied year before to corn 84 kg P 2 O 5 as MESZ (N, P, S, & Zn) Banded 10-15 cm under row at planting K applied year before to corn 84 kg K 2 O as Aspire (K & B) Broadcast and incorporated at planting P & K applied year before to corn MESZ and Aspire applied as above No foliar protection Fungicide and Insecticide at R3 Untreated or Fungicide only Fungicide, Insecticide, Nematicide 76 cm row spacing 51 cm row spacing

Soybean Management Trials 2014 and 2015 3 sites in Illinois with: 6-7 plots at 3 locations Banded phosphate or broadcast potassium, or both at planting Different company seed (Asgrow, Syngenta, Croplan) and foliar protection products: BASF or Syngenta DeKalb (42 o N) Champaign (40 o N) Normal and full maturity variety All in 76 cm vs 51 cm rows, at a seeding rate of 384,000 plants/ha Harrisburg (37 o N)

Yield Response to Management 2014 Location Standard High Tech Δ tons hectare 1 DeKalb 4.67 5.30 +0.63* Champaign 5.15 6.54 +1.39* Harrisburg 4.13 4.78 +0.65* Average 4.65 5.57 +0.92* *Significant at P 0.05. Average of two varieties in each trial

Yield Response to Management 2015 Location Standard High Tech Δ tons hectare 1 DeKalb 3.78 4.94 +1.16* Champaign 5.38 6.64 +1.26* Harrisburg 5.04 5.58 +0.54* Average 4.73 5.72 +0.99* *Significant at P 0.05. Four to six varieties in each location

Standard vs High Tech System 2014-15 Phosphorus Potassium P and K Foliar Protection Seed Treatment Row Arrangement P applied year before to corn 84 kg P 2 O 5 as MESZ (N, P, S, & Zn) Banded 10-15 cm under row at planting K applied year before to corn 84 kg K 2 O as Aspire (K & B) Broadcast and incorporated at planting P & K applied year before to corn MESZ and Aspire applied as above No foliar protection Fungicide and Insecticide at R3 Untreated or Fungicide only Fungicide, Insecticide, Nematicide 76 cm row spacing 51 cm row spacing

Add Technology Decrease Technology Soybean Omission Plot Design MANAGEMENT FACTORS Treatment Phosphate Potassium P & K Foliar Protec Seed treatment HIGH TECH Yes Yes Yes Yes Full -Phosphate None Yes Yes Yes Full -Potassium Yes None Yes Yes Full -P and K Yes Yes None Yes Full -Foliar Protection Yes Yes Yes None Full -Seed Treatment Yes Yes Yes Yes Basic TRADITIONAL None None None None Basic +Phosphate Yes None None None Basic +Potassium None Yes None None Basic +P and K None None Yes None Basic +Foliar Protection None None None Yes Basic +Seed Treatment None None None None Full Treatments evaluated in 76 and 51 cm row spacing

Add One Enhanced Factor to Standard Management Standard System Add One Enhanced Factor Yield D Standard Management 4.70 tons hectare -1 +Phosphorus (as MESZ also N,S, Zn) 5.01 +0.31* +Potassium (as Aspire also B) 4.67-0.03 +Phosphorus & Potassium 4.99 +0.29* +Fungicide & Insecticide (R3) 4.87 +0.17* +Seed Treatment (at planting) 4.79 +0.09 +Row Spacing (51 cm rows) 4.99 +0.29* *Significantly different from standard at P 0.05. Average of 10 trials over 2014 and 2015 with two varieties in each trial

Omit One Enhanced Factor from High Tech System High Tech System Omit One Enhanced Factor Yield D tons hectare -1 High Tech all Six Factors 5.65 -Phosphorus (fertility previous corn) 5.29-0.36* -Potassium (fertility previous corn) 5.69 +0.04 -Phosphorus & Potassium 5.25-0.40* -Fungicide & Insecticide 5.44-0.21* -Seed Treatment (none or base) 5.48-0.17* -Row Arrangement (76 cm rows) 5.08-0.57* *Significantly different from standard at P 0.05. Average of 10 trials over 2014 and 2015 with two varieties in each trial

Soybean Omission Plots Ave of 2014 & 2015 Trials *Significantly different at P 0.05. Average of 10 trials over 2014 and 2015 with two varieties in each trial Standard High Tech Factor Yield D Yield D tons hectare -1 None or All 4.70 5.65 Phosphate 5.01 +0.31* 5.29-0.36* Potassium 4.67-0.03 5.69 +0.04 P & K 4.99 +0.29* 5.25-0.40* Fung. + Insect. 4.87 +0.17* 5.44-0.21* Seed Treatment 4.79 +0.09 5.48-0.17* Row Arrangement 4.99 +0.29* 5.08-0.57*

Conclusions Soybean yield can be increased with better crop management Soil fertility, particularly phosphorus is one of the most important management factors for increasing soybean yields Variety makes a big difference and usually the fullest maturity gives the highest yield

Conclusions 60% of soybean yield comes from nodes 7-13, so it is important to protect leaves at those nodes Each of the six secrets of soybean can independently increase yield and when combined into a system they can act synergistically

Acknowledgements Personnel Brad Bandy Tryston Beyrer Tom Boas Ryan Becker Ross Bender Brad Bernhard Fernando Cantao Narjara Cantelmo Renato Carmargos Laura Gentry Claire Geiger Jason Haegele Andrew Harmon Cole Hendrix Adam Henninger Brandon Litherland Shelby Mann Jack Marshall Adriano Mastrodomenico Katie Parker Ellie Raup Alvero Santos Ana Scavone Juliann Seebauer Jiying Sun Martín Uribelarrea Mike Vincent Alison Vogel Kyle Vogelzang Wendy White

Crop Physiology Lab Sites & Farm Cooperators DeKalb DeKalb - Eric Lawler H.B. Babson Farms Champaign University Research Farm Champaign Harrisburg - Scott Berry Berry Farms Harrisburg

Acknowledgements Financial Support AGCO Agricen Agrium AgroFresh Albion BASF Calmer Corn Heads Crop Production Services Dawn Equipment Dow AgroSciences DuPont Pioneer Fluid Fertilizer Foundation Goemar GrowMark Honeywell Helena Chemical Company Illinois Soybean Association IPNI John Deere Koch Agronomic Service Midwestern BioAg Monsanto Mosaic Nachurs Netafim Orthman Rentech Syngenta Stoller Enterprises Valent BioSciences West Central WinField Solutions Wolf Trax Wyffels Hybrids

Very Special Thanks Le Rendez-vous Committee Mike Sevey The Mosaic Company For more information: Crop Physiology Laboratory at the University of Illinois http://cropphysiology.cropsci.illinois.edu