CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND EVALUATION OF COWPEA GERMPLASM FOR GREEN FODDER AND GRAIN YIELD UNDER RAINFED CONDIANDNS OF ISLAMABAD

Similar documents
"Depanment of Agricultural Economics INTRODUCTION

Vikas Kumar and Maharaj Singh ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), India.

By P. Shabarish Rai. & P. R. Dharmatti University of Agricultural Sciences, Karnataka, India

Screening of Maize Genotypes under Rainfed Condition of Madhya Pradesh, India

Genetic Variability Studies in Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. Var. Cerasiforme Mill)

Impact of Time of Sowing, Spacing and Seed Rate on Potential Seed Production and Fodder Quality of Cowpea [Vigna Unguiculata (L.

Calibre BMR Forage Sorghum

VARIETAL EVALUATION OF COWPEA IN EASTERN UTTAR PRADESH

Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. Pak. j. life soc. sci. (2009), 7(1):25-30

Research Article Assessment of combining ability for various quantitative traits in summer urdbean

Yield and agronomic characteristics of 30 pigeon pea genotypes at otobi in Southern Guinea Savanna of nigeria

K. S. SOMASHEKAR*, B. G. SHEKARA 1, K. N. KALYANA MURTHY AND L. HARISH 2 SUMMARY

Varietal evaluation of garden pea under semi-arid conditions of Vidharba region

PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS HYBRIDS OF SUNFLOWER IN PESHAWAR VALLEY

EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION ON MAIZE HYBRIDS

Forage peas a potential new break crop option for SA

The Sugarcane: An Agriculture Aspect

Weed Indices as Influenced by Propaquizafop and Imazethapyr Mixture in Soybean

Relative efficiency of different breeding methods for improvement of yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND FARM YARD MANURE ON AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

HARI RAM*, GURJOT SINGH, G S MAVI and V S SOHU

A. K. M. S. Islam and P. K. Rai 1. Hybrid Rice Research Division BRAC Agricultural Research and Development Centre Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh.

Economics of Weed Management Methods as Influenced by Row-Spacing in Cowpea

STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF RATIOS AND LEVELS OF NPK FERTILIZER NUTRIENTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF HYBRID SUNFLOWER UNDER RAINFED FARMING SITUATIONS

PERFORMANCE OF CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION LEVELS

Yield and yield attributes of hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671) grown for seed purpose as influenced by plant density and irrigation

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Effect of Plant Spacing on Yield and Fruit Characteristics of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)

EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS AND POTASSIUM ON QUANTITY TRAITS OF TWO VARIETIES OF MUNG BEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L.)

UPL Group of Companies

Research Article Response of Wheat Crop to Humic Acid and Nitrogen Levels

Agronomic performance of mash bean as an intercrop in sesame under different planting patterns

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS APPLICATION ON WHEAT AND RICE YIELD UNDER WHEAT- RICE SYSTEM

USING TITHONIA AS A FERTILISER

PERFORMANCE OF PROMISING SUGARCANE CLONE FOR YIELD AND QUALITY CHARACTERS 11. STABILITY STUDIES

Keywords: crop density, dry matter, digestibility, yield

Tropical forages to enhance sustainable intensification of mixed systems in Central America and the Caribbean

Journal of Natural Sciences Research ISSN (Paper) ISSN (Online) Vol.4, No.7, 2014

EFFECT OF BIO-FERTILIZERS ON GROWTH, YIELD ATTRIBUTES AND YIELD OF FRENCH BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)*

Genetic Studies of Association and Path Coefficient Analysis of Yield and its Component Traits in Pigeon Pea ( Cajanus Cajan L. Millsp.

Response of sesame to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in Northern Sudan

Challenges for increasing crop productivity: Farmer & scientist solutions

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA/ CICER ARIETINUM) AT KELEMEDA, SOUTH WOLLO, ETHIOPIA

Enhanced utilization of Sorghum Exploring Domestic and International markets

Effect of spacing and phosphate fertiliser on forage and seed yield of Dolicho8 lab lab var. lignosus

Cereal Silage Options for Western Canada

Key words: smallholder farmers, seed production, pigeonpea, seed system

Effects of Zinc on variety performance in terms of Yield and Yield Attributing Characters of Rice at Karma R & D Center, Jyotinagar

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOWING TECHNIQUES AND MULCHES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD BEHAVIOR OF SPRING PLANTED MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)

CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

CLUSTER BEAN (GUAR) CULTIVATION IN PAKISTAN GUAR: CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBUS (L.) FAMILY: LEGUMINOSAE

OPTIMUM IRRIGATION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION AT BAU FARM

Response of Different Seed Rate on the Productivity of Hybrid Fodder Sorghum (Sugar graze) in South East Rajasthan

Effect of Improved Production Technologies on Growth and Yield of Hybrid Maize

EVALUATION OF DIRECT-SEEDED UPLAND RICE-BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS UNDER STRIP PLANTING GEOMETRY

Sustainable Pulpwood Supply in India

Effect of Integrated Use of Fertilizer and Manures on Growth, Yield and Quality of Pearl Millet

Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

Performance of Makhangrass (Lolium multiflorum) under Various Seed Rate in South East Rajasthan, India

Agronomy and Integrated Soil Fertility Management

CHAPTER 4 EFFECT OF NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION AND CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT OF BLACK GRAM

RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO PLANTING METHODS AND FERTILIZER N

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Variability and Heritability in Selection Schemes of Desi Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Studies on Genetic Variability, Association of Characters and Path Analysis in French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS OF THE MAIZE CROP UNDER MECHANIZED AND TRADITIONAL FARMING SYSTEMS IN THE NWFP

Effect of different dose of fertilizer application on growth parameter of chilli and uptake and micronutrient concentration after harvest of the crop

Switchgrass for Forage and Bioenergy

EFFECT OF PLANTING METHODS AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON THE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF MAIZE

A guiding manual for the utilization of cultivated oatvetch and tree Lucerne fodder in the Africa RISING sites of the Ethiopian highlands

WATER AND ENERGY INPUTS FOR WHEAT PRODUCTION UNDER PERMANENT RAISED BEDS

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

INTRA AND INTER CLUSTER STUDIES FOR QUANTITATIVE TRAITS IN GARLIC (Allium sativum L)

Fodder quality and its impact on animal value chains in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Germany

PLANTING RATE OF SOME YIELD, QUALITY, AND COST CONSIDERATIONS // m K 5 ^ jqr\m?,r,d A R \ AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

A Comparative Study between Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana Kunth) with Local Grass Forages

Forage peas a potential new break crop option

Cowpea Cultivation in the Sahelian Region of West Africa: Farmers' Preferences and Production Constraints

STUDY ON FORAGE QUALITY OF VARIOUS MAIZE CULTIVARS PRODUCED UNDER DIFFERENT USE PATTERNS

GENERATION MEAN ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN YIELD IN MAIZE ABSTRACT

BENEFITS OF COMPOSTED MANURE

Utilization Workgroup. Breeding Forage Bermudagrass for the U.S. Transition Zone Charles M. Taliaferro Oklahoma State University

On-Farm Evaluation of Improved Pearl Millet Varieties in Namibia

CHARACTER CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT IN SOYBEAN GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

EARLINESS AND YIELD PERFORMANCE OF SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS IN UPLANDS OF BALOCHISTAN, PAKISTAN

Solving the SOIL HEALTH Puzzle? WE HAVE YOU COVERED. lacrosseseed.com soil1st.com SEED. Soil First Mix Decision Tree

THE INFLUENCES OF PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF COMMON BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

EVALUATION OF VARIOUS METHODS OF FERTILIZER APPLICATION IN POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Cover Cropping Strategies. To forget how to dig the earth and to tend the soil is to forget ourselves. - Gandhi

Dry matter accumulation studies at different stages of crop growth in mesta (Hibiscus cannabinus)

Studies on Combining Ability for Yield and Its Component Traits in Forage Sorghum

Nutrient management. Cassava

Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists

HIGH YIELDING AND DISEASE RESISTANT ELEPHANT GRASS SUITABLE FOR INTENSIVE SMALLHOLDER DAIRY FARMERS IN KENYA. A.B. Orodho

The University of Queensland, Australia; 2. ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 3. Central Queensland University, Australia.

EMERGING FORAGE LEGUME VARIETIES

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF NEWLY SELECTED SUGARCANE VARIETIES

Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems - Dickinson

FEEDING HORSES WHEN FEED IS SHORT R.J. (Bob) Coleman Ph.D. PAS

The Potash Development Association Grain Legumes need Potash

Transcription:

Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 26, No. 3, 2010 319 CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND EVALUATION OF COWPEA GERMPLASM FOR GREEN FODDER AND GRAIN YIELD UNDER RAINFED CONDIANDNS OF ISLAMABAD M. IMRAN*, ASHIQ HUSSAIN*, SAJJAD HUSSAIN**, SARTAJ KHAN*, ALLAH BAKHSH*, M.S. ZAHID* and DOULAT BAIG * Fodder Research Programme, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad Pakistan. ** Plant Genetic Resources Programme, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad Pakistan. *** Oilseed Programme, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad-Pakistan. ABSTRACT An experiment involving 14 local lines of cowpea germplasm including one promising line (P-518 as check) was conducted at Fodder Research Program, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad during the summer of 2006. The main objective of this study was to assess the level of genetic variability exhibited by a germplasm collection of cowpea on morphological basis and to identify the lines suitable for fodder and grain yield. Data were collected on eight agro-morphological characters (tendril length, number of branches plant -1, number of leaves main branch -1, leaf area, pod length, number of seeds pod -1, green fodder and grain yields. Number of branches plant -1 showed a significant correlation (r =0.585) with leaf area but non-significant association with number of leaves per main branch and green fodder yield. Leaf area showed a negative and significant correlation (r =0.583) with pod length which is indicative of the fact that a plant having more vegetative growth (i.e., leaf area) produces small pods. It also showed a negative and non-significant association with number of seeds per pod and grain yield. In total two clusters were obtained in dendogram based on Ward s method. Out of the 14 lines studied three lines -CP/V4, CP/V2 and CP/V6 were found to be suitable for obtaining higher green fodder yield, whereas the lines CP/V10, CP/V5, No.1, SA-Dandy, CP/V2, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V7, CP/V8, CP/V11, CP/V9 and CP/V12 were found to be suitable for maximum grain yield. The data also suggested that two line CP/V2 and CP/V6 could be used both for fodder and grain yield, on the other hand line CP/V4 proved to be suitable exclusively for green fodder yield under rainfed conditions of Islamabad. Key words: Cowpea, yield components, fodder, grain, rained. Citation: Imran, M., A. Hussain, S. Hussain, S. Khan, A. Bakhsh,S. Zahid and D. Baig. 2010. Character association and evaluation of cowpea germplasm green fodder and grain yield under rainfed conditions of Islamabad. Sarhad J. Agric. 26 (3): 319-323 INTRODUCTION Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) is an important leguminous crop and cultivated on 12.5 million hectares with an annual production of over three million metric tons worldwide (Quin, 1997). It is a crop of warm season, grown for grain, vegetable, and fodder purposes in moderately humid areas of tropics and sub tropics, although, some varieties show a considerable drought resistance (Muhammad et al. 1993). It cannot withstand frost and excessive heat reduces its growth as well (Bogdan, 1977). It can be grown in neutral to acidic soils but cannot tolerate alkalinity. The nutritional value of cowpea lies in its protein contents of 20-40%. It is a good source of quality protein, phosphorus, iron and vitamins. Cowpea young leaves, pods and peas contain vitamins and minerals, which have fuelled its usage for human consumption and animal feeding (Nielsen et al., 1997). Legume fodder is important for livestock production because it is rich in protein, minerals, phosphorus, calcium and vitamins (Rupela et al., 1997; Unkovich et al., 1997). Being a legume crop, it improves nitrogen status of the soil. Cowpea fodder is also a rich source of crude protein of 18.4% (Narayanan and Dabadghao (1972). Cowpea is a multipurpose crop for the production of fodder, hay, grain or green manure while providing the rotational benefits of legumes (Bull and Mayfield 1992). In Pakistan, cowpea is planted as spring or summer crop and about 20% it is consumed as vegetable. Many scientists across the world have studied genetic divergence of V. unguiculata. Kumawat and

M. Imran et al. Character association and evaluation of cowpea germplasm for green fodder 320 Raje (2005) evaluated 50 genotypes of cowpea for seed yield and its components and grouped the germplasm into 6 clusters. Seed yield per plant had the highest contribution towards the total genetic divergence; followed by seeds per pod, days to 50 % flowering, plant height and reproductive period. Khan et al. (2005) conducted a trial for screening high yielding cowpea varieties for fodder in the rainfed conditions of Kohat (Pakistan). Maximum green fodder yield was recorded for line P-518. This experiment was thus conducted to assess the level of genetic variability exhibited by a germplasm collection of cowpea on morphological basis and identify a set of the most suited lines both as fodder and grain crop for rainfed conditions of Islamabad area,. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirteen lines of cowpea obtained from Barani Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) Chakwal were sown in augmented design on field area of Fodder Research Programme, NARC, Islamabad during the summer of 2006. Each line was grown in four rows each of six meter length. Row to row distance was maintained as 30 cm. Inter-line distances was maintained as one meter. A fertilizer dressing of 23-60 NP kg ha -1 was applied at the time of seed bed preparation. All other cultural practices including weeding, inter-culturing and pesticide application were kept uniform in all the plots. Cowpea line P-518 was used as check to estimate the degree of genetic variation among the lines studied. Data were recorded on quantitative traits including tendril length (cm), number of branches plant -1, number of leaves main branch -1, leaf area (cm 2 ), pod length (cm), number of seeds pod -1, green fodder yield (t h -1 ) and grain yield (t h -1 ) (Table-I) of three randomly selected plants from each line. However, green fodder and grain yield were recorded by harvesting two lines from each plot. Days to maturity were given a single value for each line. The collected data were statistically analysed using MS Excel 2000. Yield data of P-518 (check variety) was used for comparison to identify a set of lines with specificquantitative traits. Table I Quantitative traits recorded in the cowpea germplasm Quantitative trait Description of the traits TL (cm) Length of main branch from soil level to the tip of inflorescence B/P The branches whose origin is in the leaf axils in the main stem; mean of three randomly selected plants; Recoded at the time of harvesting L/B Mean of three randomly selected plants; counted at the time of harvest LA (cm 2 ) Mean of three randomly selected leaves; counted at the time of harvest PL (cm) Mean of three mature pods from three randomly selected plants S/P Mean of number of seeds per pod of three randomly selected plants GFY (t/ha) Mass of above-ground portion of the plants; measured per unit area basis and converted to t/ha Grn Y (t/ha) Dry seed weight of threshed plant material; measured per unit area basis and converted to t/ha RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Basic statistics for quantitative traits are presented in Table-II. High genetic variability was observed in green fodder yield, leaf area and tendril length whereas low to medium variability was observed in the rest of the traits studied. Tendril length ranged from 39.33 cm (CP/ V3) to 62.00 cm (CP/ V5). Tendril length of check variety was very close to the mean value (49.05 cm) for this trait. A bulk of six lines were in the range of 45.01-50.00 cm, followed by that of 35.01-40.00 cm. Some lines had the very short tendril length in this set of germplasm. High variation in tendril length may be attributed to its varietal characters (Table-IV). Table II Basic statistics of 14 lines along with check line (P-518) of Vigna unguiculata Traits Mean + SE SD Range Min. Max TL (cm) 49.05+1.88 7.05 39.33 62.00 B/P 6.29 + 0.25 0.94 5.00 7.67 L/B 12.50+ 0.74 2.76 8.33 18.00 LA (cm 2 ) 52.02+ 1.91 7.14 38.7 68.4 PL (cm) 15.75+ 0.45 1.67 13.17 19.33 S/P 13.02 + 0.57 2.15 9.33 16.67 GFY (t/ha) 84.52+ 7.51 28.09 33.33 116.67 Grn Y (t/ha) 1.21+ 0.13 0.48 0.3 2.1 SE=Standard error, SD=Standard deviation

Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 26, No. 3, 2010 321 Table III Superior lines of Vigna unguiculata identified for specific traits Traits Check variety Identified genotypes TL (cm) 49.00 CP/V10, CP/V5, CP/V4, SA-Dandy, CP/V6, CP/V9 B/P 7.33 CP/V10, CP/V4 L/B 18.00 P-518 LA (cm 2 ) 49.03 CP/V10, CP/V4, No.1, CP/V2, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V7, CP/V8, CP/V11, CP/V12, PL (cm) 116.67 CP/V4, CP/V2, CP/V6 S/P 15.50 CP/V5, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V7, CP/V9, CP/V12 GFY (t/ha) 13.00 CP/V5, CP/V4, SA-Dandy, CP/V2, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V11, CP/V12 Grn Y (t/ha) 0.80 CP/V10, CP/V5, No.1, SA-Dandy, CP/V2, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V7, CP/V8, CP/V11, CP/V9, P/V12 Number of branches per plant ranged from 5.00 (S-A Dandy) to 7.67 (CP/ V10 and CP/ V4). Most of the accessions (8) were in the range of 5.01-6.00 as compared to those in the check variety, in which case the value fell closer to the mean value (6.29) for this trait (Table-IV). Number of leaves per main branch ranged from 8.33 (CP/ V4) to 18.00 (P-518) with an average of 12.50 with the most (6) lying in the range of 10.01 to 12.00 (Table-IV). The exceedingly high value of this trait for the check variety (18.00) when compared to other lines proves its superiority over the existing cowpea cultivars. Leaf area (length x breadth in cm 2 ) showed an incredibly high variation ranging from 38.70 (CP/ V5) to 68.40 cm 2 (CP/ V 10) with an average value of 52.02 cm 2 (Table-IV). Most of the lines (6) were in range of 50.01-55.00 cm 2 followed by three lines falling in the range of 55.01 to 60.00 cm 2 (Table IV). Table IV Varieties Average yield and yield components of cowpea under test TL B/P L/B 1 LA GFY (cm) (cm 2 ) (t ha -1 ) PL (cm) S/P Grn Y (t ha -1 ) CP/ V10 50.00 7.67 12.00 68.40 66.67 13.17 10.00 1.50 CP/ V5 62.00 5.33 14.67 38.70 33.33 19.33 14.67 1.90 CP/ V4 56.33 7.67 8.33 53.50 116.67 15.00 13.67 0.30 S-A Dandy 49.67 5.00 9.00 45.77 83.33 13.83 14.00 0.80 No. 1 48.67 6.00 11.00 51.27 100.00 14.67 12.67 1.40 CP/ V2 39.67 6.00 11.00 52.47 116.67 15.33 13.33 1.10 CP/ V6 59.00 6.67 10.00 50.40 116.67 16.50 15.00 2.10 CP/ V3 39.33 5.00 12.00 51.00 50.00 17.33 14.00 1.50 CP/ V7 39.67 6.00 11.00 52.03 50.00 16.83 9.33 1.00 CP/ V8 45.00 7.00 14.00 57.60 100.00 15.00 10.00 1.40 CP/ V11 46.00 5.33 13.33 55.47 83.33 13.97 14.67 0.90 CP/ V9 54.33 6.00 14.33 43.60 66.67 16.90 11.33 1.40 CP/ V12 48.00 7.00 16.33 59.00 83.33 17.17 16.67 0.90 P-518 (Check) 49.00 7.33 18.00 49.03 116.67 15.50 13.00 0.80 SE 1.88 0.25 0.74 1.91 7.51 0.45 0.57 0.13 TL, B/P, L/B, LA, GFY, PL, S/P and Grn Y denote tendril length, branch -1, leaves branch -1, leaf area, green fodder yield, pod length, seeds pod -1 and grain yield, respectively. Green fodder yield is an important trait which is attributed to the tendril length, number of branches per plant, number of leaves per branch and leaf area. Green fodder yield also showed very high variation ranging from 33.33 (CP/ V5) to 116.67 t ha -1 (CP/ V4, CP/ V2, CP/ V6, and P-518) t ha -1 with an average of 84.52 t ha -1 (Tabl e-iv). Pod length ranged from 13.17 (CP/ V 10) to 19.33 cm (CP/V5) with an average value of 15.75 cm. Most of the lines were in the range of 14.01to-18.00 cm. Here, again, the check variety fell very close to the mean value for this trait (Table IV). Number of seeds per pod ranged from 9.33 (CP/ V7) to 16.67 (CP/ V 12) with an average of 13.02. Most of the lines (6) fell in the range of 12.01 to 14.00. Grain yield ranged from 0.3 (CP/ V4) to 2.1 t ha -1 (CP/ V6) with an average of 1.21 t ha -1. Most of the lines (6) were in the range of 1.01-1.50 t ha -1. Comparing green fodder yield and grain yield data of all the lines studied,one can easily identify the lines that transfer more photosynthesis to their reproductive part (seed) than from those the lines with higher proportionate from their biomass to vegetative part ( fodder). Four lines CP/ V10, P/ V5, CP/ V3 and CP/ V9 correspond to the earlier group whereas three lines/varieties CP/ V4, CP/ V2 and P-518 correspond to the later group (Table-IV). These results are in agreement with that of Kumawat and Raje

M. Imran et al. Character association and evaluation of cowpea germplasm for green fodder 322 (2005) and Khan et al. (2005).Similarly index was determined by generating a dandogram by Ward s method. The Fig. 1 shows a total of two clusters based on morphological data. Cluster I consists of six genotypes while cluster II consists of eight lines. Data for quantitative and qualitative parameters of cowpea varieties are given in Tale- IV. Tendril length, number of branches, number of leaves main branch -1, green fodder yield, number of seeds per pod, and grain yield showed non-significant differences among various varieties of cowpea. Cowpea variety CP/ V5 produced plants of maximum tendril length (62.00 cm). Significantly lowest tendril length (39.33 cm) was recorded in variety CP/ V3. Regarding number of branches plant -1, it was observed that cowpea varieties CP/ V4 and CP/ V10 recorded higher and with value of 7.67. Cowpea varieties CP/V3 and S-A Dandy produced the lowest with value of 5.00. The highest number of leaves per main branch (18.00) were observed in variety P-518 and the lowest (9.00) in accession S-A Dandy. With regards to leaf area, variety CP/ V10 had the highest (68.40 cm 2 ). However, the lowest leaf area (38.70 cm 2 ) was recorded in variety CP/ V5. As far as green fodder yield is concerned, varieties CP/ V2, CP/ V4, CP/ V6, and P- 518 produced the highest and similar green fodder yields. The highest pod length (19.33 cm) was recorded in accession CP/ V5 while the lowest (13.17 cm) in cultivar CP/ V10. Accession CP/ V12 produced the highest number of seeds per pod (16.67) whereas the lowest and similar (10.00) in lines CP/ V8 and CP/ V10. The highest grain yield (2.1 t ha - 1 ) was obtained from line CP/ V6 while the lowest (0.3 t ha -1 ) in accession CP/ V4. Table-V revealed that a total of twenty eight values for coefficient of correlation ( r ) among traits under study were obtained. Out of which 'r" values for leaf area vs. branches plant -1 and green fodder yield vs. branches plant -1 were positively significant. Number of branches per plant showed a positive and significant correlation (r =0.585) with leaf area and green fodder yield (5.03) whereas positive non-significant association with number of leaves per main branch and green fodder yield was observed. Leaf area showed a negative and significant correlation (r =0.583) with pod length which is indicative of the fact that a plant with more vegetative growth (i.e., leaf area) produces small pods. It also showed a negative and non-significant association with number of seeds per pod and grain yield. Green fodder yield showed a negative and non-significant correlation with pod length and grain yield. However, pod length showed a positive and non-significant association with number of seeds per pod and grain yield. Table V Correlation coefficients among different morphological traits for cowpea accessions Traits TL (cm) B/P L/B LA (cm 2 ) GFY (t/ha) PL (cm) S/P B/P 0.205 L/B 0.002 0.153 LA (cm 2 ) -0.374 0.585* -0.040 GFY 0.028 0.503* -0.152 0.214 PL (cm) 0.239-0.273 0.340-0.583* -0.485 S/P 0.306-0.236 0.087-0.260 0.162 0.282 Grn Y 0.293-0.215 0.078-0.174-0.327 0.407-0.041 TL, B/P, L/B, LA, GFY, PL and S/P denote tendril length, number of branches plant -1, number of leaves main branch -1, leaf area, green fodder yield, pod length, number of seeds pod -1 and grain yield, respectively. Fig. 1 Tree diagram for 14 lines of cowpea Ward s method Euclidean distances (both on green fodder and grain yields)

Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 26, No. 3, 2010 323 CONCLUSION Pakistan is endowed with a rich floristic diversity in grain legumes in which cowpea enjoys a remarkable importance. Being drought tolerant crop it can be grown on a wide area of marginal lands of Sindh, NWFP and Punjab provinces. Out of the fourteen lines under study CP/V4, CP/V2 and CP/V6 were found suitable for getting higher green fodder yield whereas the lines CP/V10, CP/V5, No.1, SA-Dandy, CP/V2, CP/V6, CP/V3, CP/V7, CP/V8, CP/V11, CP/V9 and CP/V12 were found more suitable for maximum grain yield. CP/V2 and CP/V6 may be used both as fodder and grain crop whereas CP/V4 seems to be suitable exclusively as green fodder yield. REFERENCES Bogdan, A.V. 1977. Tropical pastures and fodder plants (grasses and legumes) published in USA by Longman Inc., New York. pp. 423-426. Bull, B. and A. Mayfield. 1992. Growing Vetch. (Bold images; Cowandilla, S. Aust.). Khan, M., M. Niaz, A. Naveed, K. Azim and J. Iqbal. 2005. Evaluation of high yielding cowpea varieties for green fodder yield under rainfed conditions of NWFP. Indus J. Plant Sci. 4 (4): 576-578. Kumawat K.C. and R.S. Raje. 2005. Genetic divergence in cowpea (Vigna unguiculat L. Walp.) Arid Legumes for Sust. Agric. and Trade. 1: 25-27. Muhammad, D., A. Hussain, S. Khan and M.B. Bhatti. 1993. Variability for green fodder yield and quality in cowpea under rainfed conditions. Pakistan Agric. Res. 14 (2, 3): 154-158. Narayanakutty, C., C.K. Dunanda and U. Jaikumaran. 2005. Genetic divergence in pole type vegetable cowpea. Indian J. Hort. 62 (4): 354-357. Narayanan, T.R. and P.M. Dabadghao. 1972. Forage Crops of India. Indian Council of Agric. Res. New Delhi. pp.243-247. Nielsen, S., T. Ohler and C. Mitchell. 1997. Cowpea leaves for human consumption: production, utilization, and nutrient composition. In: Singh, B., D.R. Mohan Raj, K. Dashiell, L. Jackai (eds) Advances in Cowpea Res. Int. Instt. of Trop. Agric. (IITA) and Japan Int l. Res. Center for Agric. Sci. (JIRCAS), Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 326-332. Quin, F.M. 1997. Introduction. p. ix xv. In: Singh, B.B., D.R. Mohan Raj, I.E. Dashiell and L.E.N. Jackai (eds.), Advances in Cowpea Res. Co-publication of Int. Instt of Trop. Agric. (IITA) and Japan Int l. Res. Center for Agric. Sci. (JIRCAS), IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Rupela, O.P., C. Johnsen and D.F. Herridge. 1997. Extending nitrogen fixation in farmer s fields. Int l. Crop Res. Instt. in Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324 Andhra Pradesh, India. Unkovich, M.J., J.S. Pate and P. Sanford. 1997. Nitrogen fixation in Australian Mediterranean agriculture. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48: 267-293.