Effects of Corn Population

Similar documents
Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Row Configuration and Population

SOUTHERN STATES HYBRID SEED CORN

EVALUATION OF COVER CROP TERMINATION METHODS IN CORN PRODUCTION

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2013 Demonstration Reports

Response of 4 Asgrow Brand Soybean Products to Common Planting Errors

DELIVERING A SYSTEM FOR HIGHER YIELD IN CANOLA

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2015 Demonstration Reports

YieldGard VT Triple : the stacked hybrids with enhanced trait performance.

Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Planting Population and Nitrogen Fertility

Acceleron Seed Treatment Products

CLEAN FIELDS. BIG INCENTIVES. MADE SIMPLE.

2016 Product Use Guide for Enlist Cotton

Roundup Ready PLUS Crop Management Solutions A platform designed to provide you the tools for effective, economical and sustainable weed control.

COTTON PRODUCT USE GUIDE

2011 SSF and Acceleron Webinar

Evaluations of the FLEX Characteristics of Three DEKALB Brand Corn Products

Kansas State University Working with Industry Boot Camp

SOYBEANS THAT GENERATE GROWTH. Seed Guide. Western Canada

PREHARVEST STAGING GUIDE

OPTIMIZING CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS

quarryseed.com

Corn Agronomy Update

Quest for 300 Bushel Corn

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

Institute of Ag Professionals

Evaluation of Plant Density and Row Spacing to Optimize Hybrid Performance. Ty Barten Monsanto Company

Roundup Ready Sugarbeet Production. Your Way To Grow 2008

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

MULTI-HYBRID PLANTING MAKING THE MOST OUT OF EVERY ACRE

2017 SEED GUIDE. epley hybrids, inc Yale Ave, Shell Rock, IA

EXPERIENCE ADVANTAGE. the B- H Product Guide

Research & Development and Product Development Update Scott Staggenborg, VP, Research & Development

SEED GUIDE. Seed Corn Soybeans Forages Conservation Products Small Grains

2018 REGIONAL GUIDE MID-SOUTH REGION

2018 PROGRAM INFORMATION

Emergence Uniformity in Corn: Is it Essential for Ear Size Consistency and Improved Yield?

CORN PRODUCT USE GUIDE

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Tillage Systems and Soil Conservation for Corn-on-Corn. Tony J. Vyn, assisted by colleagues, graduate students, technicians, and farmers

Pioneer Hi-Bred 2011 North America Harvest Data

It s still winter in Indiana. Developments in Agronomy & Maize Management. Outline. Herbicide resistant weeds. Examples of HR weeds

Fred Below, Jason Haegele, Ross Bender, and Adam Henninger

GMO Crops, Trade Wars, and a New Site Specific Mutagensis System. A. Lawrence Christy, Ph.D.

Fred Below, Jason Haegele, Ross Bender, and Adam Henninger Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at

Institute of Ag Professionals

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

The Seven Wonders of High Corn Yield

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

COMMITTED TO HELP YOU GROW.

2012 Minnesota Canola Production Center (CPC)

DEKALB CORN SILAGE GUIDE 1

Seedcorn. 12 For use only by commercial seed -treaters. Enhance AW imidacloprid captan vitavax. Danger 5 oz per 100 lbs seed --

GPS/GIS Applications for Farming Systems

4.3 Irrigated corn best practice guide

Strategic View. Kerry Preete Executive Vice President, Global Strategy

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

2010 Vermont Organic Grain Corn Performance Trial Results

2018 Product Use Guide ENLIST WEED CONTROL SYSTEM

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

Introduction- Project Background

Soybean Irrigation Management

CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE?

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Drought Traits in Corn. Rob Aiken, K-State Northwest Research Extension Center, Colby 2014 No-till Oklahoma Conference

Purpose and Introduction:

TALK N F R VOLUME

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Chapter 1 Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement an Introduction

Current Impact of Changes in Corn Plant Density

Strip-till Research Results: Rotation, Automatic Guidance, and Fertilizer Placement. Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, Colleagues & Farmers

Seven Wonders of The Corn Growing World

Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques

SOYBEAN WEED MANAGEMENT Mark VanGessel and Brad Majek

Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Corn. Michael Luethy Jacqueline Heard March 5, 2007

Corn Row Width and Plant Density Then and Now. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

K-State Research and Extension. Abnormal Corn Ears

Overcoming farm level constraints

Evaluation of Grain Sorghum Hybrid Varieties in Dryland Farming Conditions in Nueces County

CORN SOYBEANS ALFALFA PASTURE MIXES QUALITY SEEDS FOR SUCCESSFUL YIELDS

Methods The trial was designed as a randomized complete block.

Impact of Planting Date and Maturity Group Selection on Soybean Yield

Hybrid selection Crop rotation Planting date Stand establishment Seeding rate Row spacing

on Target 2014 Annual summary of field crop insect management trials,

Agriculture Advancements and Cellulosic Ethanol

Northwest Regional Certified Crop Adviser

VEGETATIVE WEED ID. 1. This weed is

Corn Residue Removal by Grazing and Effects on Grain Yield. Introduction

Introduction Growth Habits and Requirements Recommended Cultural Practices Pest Control Harvesting and Handling...

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

Managing Pesticide Resistance

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER. Local Performance Objectives For Exams and Continuing Education Programs

Efficient Management of Water and Nutrient Resources: Assessing the Potential for Drip Irrigation Fertigation

2011 AGRONOMY KANSAS FFA CDE AGRONOMIC QUIZ. WRITE ANSWERS ON BLANKS USING CAPITAL LETTERS (4 points each)

Fred Below. Professor University of Illinois. U.S. Fertilizer Demand and Nutrient Use Issues Session

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

BECK S Yield King Red Study

Independent Farm Research 2015 Research Data

Developing New GM Products and Detection Methods

Transcription:

Effects of Corn Population Dave Heimkes 30-inch row spacing Twin-row spacing Skip-row 2-1-2 or 2-2-2 arrangement

Plant Population Through the Years Corn populations have been steadily increasing over the last 25 years by increasing approximately 300 to 425 plants/acre/year based on a Purdue University study. 1,2 Population (plants/acre) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Plant Density Grain Yield 1935 1945 1955 1965 1970 1985 1995 2010 2013 Year 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Figure 1. Trend of plant density and grain yield in U.S. maize production over past 80 years. Grain Yield (bu/acre) Graph Source: Mainsfield and B.D. Mumm, R.H. 2013. Survey of plant density tolerance in U.S. maize germplasm. Crop Science. Vol. 54.

General Information About Populations Corn populations have been steadily increasing over past 25 years from approximately 300 to 425 plants/acre/year based on a Purdue University study. 1,2 Yields have been increasing due to better genetics, stronger agronomics, and grower management, which includes increasing populations. Environmental conditions, soil types, and moisture all influence crop production and factors relating to population decisions. Selecting the right product for the right field along with the right population is important for a successful result. Research shows that newer genetics perform better at higher populations.

General Information About Populations Understanding population versus seeding rate Population is the measurement of the final plant stand/acre. Seeding rate is the calculation based on the desired final stand and the seed germination (typically around 95% for most products) and expected plant survival. Other factors that contribute to population decisions include: Row spacing Planting speed Germination Fertility Weed management Equipment

Population and Yield Components Yield increases with modern corn products are related to the ability of plants to withstand stress and produce an ear on every plant. More plants per acre are expected to lead to more ears per acre. In addition to ears per plant, kernels per ear and weight per kernel are also affected by plant population.

Effects of Plant Population Important agronomic considerations include standability, disease and drought tolerance, insect and herbicide resistance, and good emergence in cool conditions. Emergence and Vigor: A strong emergence and vigor rating for a product is especially beneficial if that product will be planted in a no-till or reduced tillage field, or planted early. Disease Tolerance: It is important to evaluate products for tolerance to diseases that are common in your geography. End of Season Characteristics: Drydown, stalk quality, and root strength can help plan out harvest. Trait Consideration: Planting products with multiple mode protection, such as products with the Genuity SmartStax technology can help minimize risks from insect damage.

Response of Yield to Plant Populations Figure 2. Response of yield to plant populations. Yield increases with increasing seeding rates to a point and then levels off. Yields that level off, rather than drop off as populations become greater, is an important factor for Variable Rate Seeding. Graph Source: Adapted from Nafziger, 1994. University of Illinois dataset published in Nielsen, R.L. 2008. More thoughts on late corn planting. Purdue University. www.agry.purdue.edu.).

Ear Type and the Effect on Population Fixed: Consistent size across plant populations. Fixed ear corn products tend to perform best at higher-than-average plant populations. Limited Flex: Slight increase in ear size at lower plant populations. Flex: Significant increase in ear size at lower plant populations. Flex ear corn products have the capacity to sustain yield potential at lower plant populations under good growing conditions. Many Flex ear corn products also have the ability to perform at higher plant populations. Prolific: Produces more than one harvestable ear per plant at lower plant populations.

Ear Effect on Populations: Monsanto Research Farm Trial at West Lafayette, IN Each row of each product gets progressively thinner as you move down the row, from 30K, to 22K, to 12K. 12K 22K 30K

30,000 PPA at pollination 22,000 PPA at pollination 12,000 PPA at pollination

12,000 24,000 30,000 1 2 3 1 2 3 Plant Plant 1 2 Plant 3 Hand harvested 3 consecutive plants from each population at harvest time.

12,000 24,000 30,000 This may look good, but. There are 2 ½ times as many plants per acre here.

12,000 24,000 30,000

12,000 24,000 30,000

12,000 24,000 30,000

Effects of Plant Population: Product Selection Each year farmers select specific corn products to be planted in particular fields at certain planting populations, while carefully weighing the potential for increased yield with the potential for stalk and root lodging or lack of return on the investment for increased seeding rates. Advancements in biotech traits have helped reduce the risk of stalk and root lodging due to damage from target insects like ECB and CRW. Advancements in germplasm have helped reduce plant and ear heights, which may help reduce the risk of stalk lodging due to conditions which cause stalks to weaken and lodge (windstorms).

Effects of Plant Population: Soil Consideration Soil can influence population decisions. Understanding your soils and fertility levels is crucially important when increasing populations. When increasing populations, applied nutrients must also increase. Figure 3. Soil textural triangle. Figure 4. Aerial map of field identifying different soil types with FieldScripts. Source: Figure 3. Soil Texture Triangle Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available online. Accessed [11/10/14].

Effects of Plant Population: Corn Product Response to Population, Row Configuration, and Soil Type Figure 5. Effect of population on corn yield across seven corn products in 30-inch single rows in sandy loam vs. silty clay locations. Source: Corn response to population, row configuration, and soil type. 2011. The Learning Center at Scott, MS.

Effects of Plant Population: Nutrient Consideration Corn Nutrient Removal Grain Only (lbs) Actual nutrient removal may vary based on many factors.* Bu/Acre 300 240 200 180 160 100 Nitrogen (N) 201 161 134 120 107 67 Phosphorus (P) 105 84 70 63 56 35 Potassium (K) 75 60 50 45 40 25 *N, P, and K numbers courtesy of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI). These numbers are estimations. Figure 6. Corn nutrient removal based on yield. Source: 2014. Nutrient removal in the harvested portion of selected crops, Table 4.5. International Plant Nutrition Institute. http://www.ipni.net

Effects of Plant Population: Populations, Seed Spacing, and Placement Higher populations means that the placement of every plant - every seed is critical. Corn plants closer than 4 inches sense stress and respond. Today's planters can achieve spacing accuracy of 97% or more. Figure 7. Corn yields for seed products with and without corn rootworm protection as plant population increases. Source: 2013. Corn populations by stress mitigation. Demonstration Report. Monsanto Learning Center at Monmouth, IL.

Effects of Plant Population: Impact of Planting Speed on Corn Data shows that as planting speed increased, the average plant population decreased. Population R 2 = 0.5 For each 1 MPH increase in planting speed, the corn population decreased by 1,738 plants/acre when averaged across planter meter types under the conditions of this trial. Figure 8. Bivariate fit of average plant population by planting speed when analyzed across planter meter types (Linear Fit: Ave Population = 39177.53 (1738.11 x speed); Summary of fit: R2 = 0.483492, adjusted = 0.468734). Source: 2013. The Impact of Planting Speed on Corn Seed Distribution and Yield. Demonstration Report. Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, MS.

Effects of Plant Population Twin rows are a popular planting method in some areas of the country Benefits Cons Better weed control Potential compaction issues Less water loss to evaporation Options for herbicides and Use of less equipment cultivation may be more More equal planting distance in difficult the row Equipment updates to move Potentially higher yields to twin row equipment Figure 13. Yield response of corn to 15-, 30-, and 36-inch single row and 30-inch twin row spacings at the Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE. 2010. Figure 14. Yield response of 114 RM product and 116 RM product to single and twin row spacing at the Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, MS 2012. Source: 2010. Irrigation and row spacing in corn. Demonstration Report. Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE; 2012. Evaluation of three row configurations in Midsouthern corn production. Demonstration Report. Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, MS.

Effects of Plant Population When selecting a product for narrow rows, consider Stalk strength Root strength High yield potential products Upright leaf type products Stress and disease tolerant products Seeds planted Row Spacing (in) (per acre) 20 30 24,000 13.1 8.7 26,000 12.1 8.0 28,000 11.2 7.5 30,000 10.5 7.0 32,000 9.8 6.5 34,000 9.2 6.1 36,000 8.7 5.8 38,000 8.3 5.5 40,000 7.8 5.2 42,000 7.5 5.0 44,000 7.1 4.8 46,000 6.8 4.5 48,000 6.5 4.4 50,000 6.3 4.2 52,000 6.0 4.0 54,000 5.8 3.9 Figure 15. Row spacing for 20- and 30-inch rows by planting population. Source: Table modified from Waitrak, P. Planting populations. Clemson University. http://www.clemson.edu/

Grain Yield (bu/acre) 240 235 230 225 220 215 210 Row Spacing Study at Champaign, IL in 2013 20s 30s 205 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Population (plants/acre) Figure 16. Yield response of 20 and 30 inch rows to planting population. The biological maximum yield for 30-inch rows occurs at 36,000-38,000 plants/acre. Overall, response to 20- inch rows showed the most value at higher plant densities. Specific corn products had greater yields with narrower row spacing. Source: Bandy, B. 2013. Response of planting density for corn hybrids grown under narrow and conventional row spacing. University of Illinois Crop Physiology.

Effects of Plant Population Irrigation and water needs play an important role when increasing population. Along with water, one should increase nutrients when irrigating a crop at higher populations. Figure 17. Average crop water use (ET) by growth stage for 113 day maturity corn grown in South Central Nebraska 1 Table 2. Average crop water use (ET) by growth stage for 113-day maturity corn grown in South Central Nebraska. 3 Growth stage Average water use rate (inches/day) Duration* (days) Water needed to reach stage (inches) Water needed cumulative (inches) 4-leaf (V4) 0.08 0-10 0.8 0.8 8-leaf (V8) 0.10 11-29 1.8 2.6 12-leaf (V12) 0.18 30-46 2.9 5.5 Early tassel (R1) 0.26 47-55 1.8 7.3 Silking (R2) 0.32 56-68 3.8 11.1 Blister kernel 0.32 69-81 3.8 14.9 R3 0.32 82-88 1.9 16.8 Beginning dent 0.24 89-104 3.8 20.7 R4.7 0.20 105-125 3.8 24.5 Full dent (R5.5) 0.10 126-140 1.4 25 *Long-term average number of days since planting required to progress from the previous growth stage to the next. For example, to go from the blister kernel stage to the beginning dent stage requires approximately 15 days (day 89 to day 104). Days to each growth stage were determined using the Hybrid- Maize Corn Growth Model for the period 1982-2005 at Clay Center, NE. Source: Hybrid-Maize Corn Growth Model for the period 1982-2005 at Clay Center, NE. University of Nebraska.

PNW Differences Positives Sunlight Day to Night Temp Differences Water / Water Timing Negative Considerations Soil Attributes - Organic Matter, PH, Water Holding Ability

Effects of Plant Population: Product Positioning What is Product Positioning? The process of positioning your product under the right conditions/fields to meet your needs, field conditions, management practices and create a success for your operation. In simple terms: Placing the right product on the right ground.

Effects of Plant Population: Increasing Yield Potential with VRS Variable rate seeding (VRS) has helped increase yield potential in fields: Plant populations can vary 5-12,000 plants/acre depending on the field conditions. VRS allows the grower to adjust populations based on the conditions and soil variability of the field. VRS also allows the grower to match products with the field conditions and populations. FieldScripts is a technology developed by Monsanto to help growers maximize their yield potential and use VRS.

Effects of Plant Population: Variable Rate Seeding (VRS) 2013 Lower Resolution FieldScripts 2013 Higher Resolution FieldScripts 1. SSURGO soil attributes 2. Grower provided yield data 3. NED10 elevation data 1. Grower provided more yield data layers 2. Grower provided soil sample data (< 2.5 acres represented per sample) 3. High resolution elevation data 4. More Rigorous Rules Seed product selection and seeding rate recommendations can be improved with knowledge of field areas. Knowledge of areas where moisture limitations are most common, and spatial characterization of the factors (higher elevation, increased slope percentage, lower organic matter, etc.) that most influence yield in a particular field help form seeding rate recommendations.

Summary Increasing populations can result in increased yield potential. New genetics may perform better with increased populations. Management decisions including nutrient application, irrigation, soil management, and product selection can all enhance yield potential based on increased populations. Asking your agronomist and/or seed representative to help with your product decision making.

Questions? Thank you!

Sources/Legal 1 Nielsen, R.L. 2012. Thoughts on seeding rates for corn. Purdue University. http://www.agry.purdue.edu (verified 1/4/2013). 2 Elmore, R. and Abendroth. L. 2007. Corn seeding rates and variable-rate seeding. Iowa State University. www.ipm.iastate.edu (verified 1/4/2013). Monsanto Company is a member of Excellence Through Stewardship (ETS). Monsanto products are commercialized in accordance with ETS Product Launch Stewardship Guidance, and in compliance with Monsanto s Policy for Commercialization of Biotechnology Derived Plant Products in Commodity Crops. Commercialized products have been approved for import into key export markets with functioning regulatory systems. Any crop or material produced from this product can only be exported to, or used, processed or sold in countries where all necessary regulatory approvals have been granted. It is a violation of national and international law to move material containing biotech traits across boundaries into nations where import is not permitted. Growers should talk to their grain handler or product purchaser to confirm their buying position for this product. B.t. products may not yet be registered in all states. Check with your Monsanto representative for the registration status in your state. IMPORTANT IRM INFORMATION: Genuity RIBComplete corn blend products do not require the planting of a structured refuge except in the Cotton Growing Area where corn earworm is a significant pest. See the IRM/Grower Guide for additional information. Always read and follow IRM requirements. Individual results may vary, and performance may vary from location to location and from year to year. This result may not be an indicator of results you may obtain as local growing, soil and weather conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible. ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Roundup Ready crops contain genes that confer tolerance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup brand agricultural herbicides. Roundup brand agricultural herbicides will kill crops that are not tolerant to glyphosate. Fieldscripts & Design and FieldScripts, Genuity and SmartStax are trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC. Leaf Design is a registered trademark of Monsanto Company. LibertyLink and the Water Droplet Design, are registered trademarks of Bayer. Respect the Refuge and Corn Design and Respect the Refuge are registered trademarks of National Corn Growers Association. John Deere is a trademark of Deere and Co. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2014 Monsanto Company. 141112111423 111214CRB