MOUTH DISSOLVING FILM: A NOVEL APPROACH TO DELIVERY OF LISINOPRIL

Similar documents
Kulkarni Parthasarathi Keshavarao et al. IRJP 2 (3)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND BIO-SCIENCE

Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Films of Loratidine by Solvent Casting Method

Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Buccal Films Containing Zolmitriptan

Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Oral Films of Zolmitriptan

Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biotechnology

TASTE MASKING OF BITTER DRUG BY USING ION EXCHANGE RESIN

Development and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Films of Sumatriptan Succinate for Better Therapeutic Efficacy

Excipient Development at NCL

THE DISSOLUTION PROCEDURE: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

DIRECTLY COMPRESSIBLE MEDICATED CHEWING GUM (MCG) FOR STAYING ALERT

Design and Dosage Form. Dr. Deny Susanti

Preparation and evaluation of loratadine tablets by using novel polacrilin potassium

Reflection paper on the dissolution specification for generic solid oral immediate release products with systemic action

Formulation & Evaluation of Sustained Release Mucoadhesive Buccal Patch of Pantoprazole

Research Article. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of orodispersible tablets of olanzapine for the improvement of dissolution rate

WHITE PAPER: Amorphous Solid Dispersions-One approach to improving Bioavailability

OPTIMIZATION OF OLANZAPINE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS USING MICRONIZATION

Formulation and Optimization of Taste Masked Rapimelt Dolasteron Mesylate Tablets

Recent FDA Guidance For Industry; BCS Class 1 and 3 August 2015

CHAPTER 8: SOLID DOSAGE FORM COATING TECHNOLOGY NOOR MUHAMMAD SYAHRIN BIN YAHYA INTRODUCTION

Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of pregabalin mini tablets for sustained release

Astellas Formulation Development for Global Health. Feb 29, 2016 Yu Hasegawa CSR group, Corporate Planning Astellas Pharma Inc.

Preparation and Evaluation of Buccoadhesive Patches of an Antihypertensive Drug

Formulation, Development and Optimization of Fast Dispersible Oral Films of Domperidone Maleate

Performance Testing of Novel Dosage Forms

Soluplus. Technical Information. October _090801e-01/Page 1 of 8. = Registered trademark of BASF group. Pharma Ingredients & Services

Design, evaluation and optimization of fluconazole trandermal patch by 2 2 factorial method

Formulation and Evaluation of Oro-Dispersible Tablets Containing Meclizine Hydrochloride

Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Buccal Films of Enalapril Maleate

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF FAST DISSOLVING ORAL FILM OF LEVOCETIRIZINE DIHYDROCHLORID

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF FLOATING MICROSPHERES OF CEPHALEXIN

"NOT FOR IMPLEMENTATION" GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY

Formulation and Evaluation of Gastro retentive Bilayer Tablets- Glimepiride as Sustained Release and Lisinopril as Immediate Release

Design of a Novel Buccoadhesive System for Unidirectional Release of Valsartan

METHOCEL. TM Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ( Dow ) or an affiliated company of Dow

Method Development and Validation for Online UV-Dissolution Methods Using Fiber-Optic Technology

Kollidon SR: A polyvinyl acetate based excipient for DCsustained-release

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & LIFE SCIENCES

Application of Quality by Design (QbD) in product development. James E. Polli September 16, 2015

Discriminating power of dissolution medium in comparative study of solid dispersion tablets of Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 2 drug

DEVELOPMENT OF A TASTE-MASKED ORODISPERSIBLE FILM CONTAINING DIMENHYDRINATE

Design and evaluation of sildenafil citrate fast dissolving film for treatment of erectile dysfunction

Scholars Research Library

Rajesh Kaza. et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.1(4), 2009,

Biowaivers and Harmonization Guidelines for Class I and 3 Drugs: Biowaiver Case Studies

TASTE-MASKING - Pharmaceutical Taste-Masking Technologies

PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING

Preface... iii Contents...vii Contributors...xv. 1 Introduction to Hot-Melt Extrusion, Continuous Manufacturing: Scale-up via Hot-Melt Extrusion...

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TASTE MASKING METHODS OF ONDANSETRON HCl

Computation of Solubility parameters using Molecular. dynamics simulation

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATED STABILITY PROTOCOL FOR SILDENAFIL TABLETS A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE REVIEW

How to Identify Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters

Design and Evaluation of Sustained Release Tablets containing Solid dispersion of Ziprasidone hydrochloride

Pharma & Food Solutions. ETHOCEL One of the Few Water-Insoluble Polymers Approved for Global Pharmaceutical Applications

Model-based Technology Selection for Bioavailability Enhancement CPHI DAVID K. LYON, PH.D. OCTOBER 25, 2017

Outline CLINICALLY RELEVANT SPECIFICATIONS. ISPE Process Validation Conference September 2017 Bethesda, MD

BRITISH BIOMEDICAL BULLETIN

Study the Optical Properties of Methyl Blue Doped Polyvinyl Alcohol

Oromucosal film preparations: points to consider for patient centricity and manufacturing processes

Development of paediatric formulations - points to consider

RapidFACT: Accelerated Formulation Development for Poorly Soluble Drugs and Modified Release Products

Drug exhibiting absorption from only a. Design and Clinical Evaluation of Floating Mini Matrix Tablets of Pyridoxine Hydrochloride ORIGINAL ARTICLE

THE PHARMA INNOVATION - JOURNAL Formulation and Development of Floating and Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Clarithromycin

Table 1. Particle size distributions and peroxide levels of various superdisintegrants. D50 (μm) D10 (μm)

Developing and Validating Dissolution Procedures for Improved Product Quality

Pelagia Research Library

The Emerging Technology Program: FDA s Perspective

Formulation, Evaluation and Optimization of Fast dissolving tablet containing Tizanidine Hydrochloride

ADVANTAGES OF MULTIPARTICULATES (PELLETS):

Novel Floating Pulsatile Approach for Chronotherapeutic Release of Indomethacin

Roles And Applications of Cellulose Ether in Environmentally Friendly. Building Materials

Figure 4 DSC Thermogram of Paracetamol

Maximizing Roller Compaction Benefits with Proper Excipient Selection

Design and Evaluation of Pulsatile Drug Delivery of Losartan Potassium

Approaches to the formulation of poorly soluble drugs

Quality by Design for ANDAs: An Example for Immediate-Release Dosage Forms

Preparation of Cefpodoxime Proxetil - Polymeric Microspheres by the Emulsion Solvent Diffusion Method for taste masking

Pharma Ingredients & Services. Soluplus. Technical Information. = Registered trademark of BASF group. July 2010 Supersedes issue dated May 2010

Investigation on Physical-Mechanical Properties of Natural Polymer Films

Approval Review of Generic Drugs. Office of Generic/OTC Drugs, PMDA Kazuyuki SAITO, Ph.D.

The oral cavity has been investigated

Abstract. Technical Aspects. Applying GastroPlus for Extensions of Biowaivers for BCS Class II Compounds 2

Formulation and in vitro evaluation of bosentan osmatic controlled release tablets

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF POLYMER EFFECT ON in-vitro KINETICS OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF CARVEDILOL USING MODEL DEPENDENT METHODS

Practical Guide to Hot-Melt Extrusion: Continuous Manufacturing and Scale-up

Kalyani G. et al.; International Journal of Pharmamedix India, 2013, 1(2),

Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Capsules of 3 rd Generation Cephalosporin

Design and development of floating In-Situ gel of pantoprazole

Balancing the time, cost and risk of drug development. Christina Gustafsson, PhD Pharm, Formulation Scientist at Pharmaceutical Development, APL

Biowaiver Approaches for Generic Drug Products in the US: Case Studies

Pharma Ingredients & Services. Ludiflash. Technical Information

QbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case-Study

SUSTAINED RELEASE From Coated Ion Exchange Resins. H.S. Hall Coating Place, Inc. Verona, WI 53593

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF ORODISSOLVING TABLET OF ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUG BY SUPERDISINTEGRANTS ADDITION METHOD

FORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF FAST DISSOLVING TABLETS OF CEFIXIME TRIHYDRATE

USP Hypromellose Phthalate

Preparation and Evaluation of Isoniazid Microbeads by using Different Membrane

NISSO HPC for Pharmaceutical Applications

Transcription:

MOUTH DISSOLVING FILM: A NOVEL APPROACH TO DELIVERY OF LISINOPRIL POONAM PHASATE*, VIJAYALAXMI CHAVAN, NITIN TRIBHUVAN, POONAM PADAMWAR Department Of Quality Assurance, Shri Bhagwan College of Pharmacy, N-6, CIDCO, Aurangabad, Maharshtra, INDIA Pin : 431003 Email i.d. : phasatepoonam006@gmail.com Contact no. 9922716802 Abstract Purpose: Orodispersible dosage forms are promising new approaches for drug delivery for patients. They are easy for application, no need to drink high amounts of water or swallow large solid dosage forms. The aim of this study is to formulate and evaluate the mouth dissolving film of Lisinopril as an ACE inhibitor used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension), congestive heart failure and improved bioavailability of drugs as compared to conventional solid oral dosage forms. Method: The films were prepared using combination of Hydroxy propylmethyl cellulose E15 and PVA (polyvinylalcohol) polymers by solvent casting method. Glycerine as plasticizer, aspartame as sweetener. Result: The IR spectral studies showed no interaction between drug and the polymers. Satisfactory results obtained when subjected to physico-chemical tests such as weight uniformity, thickness, folding endurance, drug content and disintegration time. Films in vitro drug release studies also done by using USP dissolution apparatus. In case of F4 and F5 formulations about 99.529% and 95.29% of drug was released at 2min. Conclusion: The Lisinopril mouth dissolving film was formulated. The given film disintegrates within eleven second which release drug rapidly and gives action. Keywords: Mouth dissolving film, HPMC, PVA, Lisinopril, Solvent casting method. Introduction Oral route is commonly used route for the delivery of the drugs till date as it bears various advantages over the other route of drug delivery, but oral drug delivery systems still a date need some advancements to be made because of their some drawbacks related to particular class of patients which includes geriatric, pediatric patients associated with many medical conditions as they have difficulty in swallowing or chewing solid dosage forms. Many pediatric and geriatric patients who having difficulty in swallowing are unwilling to take solid preparations as a result of concern of choking. So, fast-dissolving drug-delivery systems came into existence in the late 1970 s as another to tablets, capsules and syrups for pediatric and geriatric patients who experience difficulties in swallowing traditional oral solid-dosage forms. It was developed on the basis of technology of the transdermal patch. The fast dissolving drug delivery system consists of a very thin strip that is just placed on the patient s tongue or any oral mucosal tissue, instantly wet by secretion the film rapidly hydrates and adheres onto the location. It then quickly disintegrates and dissolves to release the drug for oromucosal and intragastric absorption. The development of mouth dissolving films containing Lisinopril offers an alternative to conventional tablets, syrups and suppositories for the treatment of hypertension. Lisinopril is angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor that category is employed to treat high blood pressure, congestive heart failure(chf) and to improve survival after a heart attack. Drug belongs to the BCS class ІІІ & shows water solubility. The drug has low dose i.e. 10 mg. Duration of action is found to be 24 hours (once daily dosing). The drug absorption is found to be absorbed slowly and incompletely from GI tract (oral) and peak plasma concentration is achieved after 7 hours.the drug distribution i.e; protein binding is not significantly bound i.e., is up to 25%.Thus aim of study is to develop and characterise mouth dissolving film which disintegrate in oral cavity without need of water. This helps in easy swallowing, increases bioavailability of drug and quick onset of action can takes place. In the view of above fact, in the present investigation an attempt was made to develop mouth dissolving film of Lisinopril using suitable polymer like hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC E15) and Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in different ratios and in combination with Aspartame as sweetener,citric acid as saliva stimulating agent, glycerine as plasticizer. ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 398

Material and Methods Lisinopril was obtained as gift sample from Lupin Ltd, Aurangabad, and Maharashtra. HPMC E15, PVA polymers, aspartame, citric acid and glycerine used were of analytical grade. Compatibility studies IR (Infrared Spectroscopy) spectroscopy study was carried out for the following drug and polymers: (a) pure drug Lisinopril (b) HPMC E15 (c) PVA (d) Lisinopril with HPMC E15 and PVA. Figure 1 Infra red spectra of Lisinopril Spectra shows peaks Groups Observed Value cm -1 Reported Value cm -1 C=O 1654 1600-1900 N-H 1609 1500-1700 O-H 1388 1200-1500 Figure 2 Infra red Spectra of HPMC E15 Spectra shows peaks Groups Observed Value cm -1 Reported Value cm -1 C-O 1055 900-1300 C-H 1540 1300-1500 Figure 3 Infra red Spectra of PVA Spectra shows peaks Groups Observed Value cm -1 Reported Value cm -1 C=O 3333 3300-3600 C-H 818 800-830 O-H 1248 1200-1500 C-C 1086 800-1200 ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 399

Figure 4 Infra red spectra of Lisinopril +HPMC E15+ PVA Spectra shows peaks Groups Observed Value cm -1 Reported Value cm -1 C=O 1654 1600-1900 N-H 1609 1500-1700 C-O 1043 900-1300 C-H 1542 1300-1500 Figure shows no incompatibility in physical mixture of drug, polymer and plasticizer. Full factorial design A 3 2 randomized full factorial design was utilized in the present work. In this full factorial design two factors were evaluated, every at three levels, and experimental work were distributed at all nine possible combinations. The amount of polymer HPMC E15and PVA (X1) and amount of plasticizer, Glycerin (X2) were selected as independent variables and each factor being studied at -1, 0, +1 level. Percent drug release was selected as dependent variable.the table 1 lists the design variables with its coded values and actual values, and table 2 provides the factorial design layout i.e. all possible 9 combinations respectively. Table1 Design variables Actual values Coded values X1 X2-1 300+75 50 0 300+100 60 +1 300+125 70 Table 2 Full Factorial Designs Layout Formulation code Variable level X1 X2 F1-1 -1 F2 0-1 F3 +1-1 F4-1 0 F5 0 0 F6 +1 0 F7-1 +1 F8 0 +1 F9 +1 +1 ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 400

Formulation Drug HPMC E15+PVA Table 3 Factorial Batches Composition Glycerin Aspartame Citric Acid Water (ml) F1 200 300+75 50 50 18 10 F2 200 300+100 50 50 18 10 F3 200 300+125 50 50 18 10 F4 200 300+75 60 50 18 10 F5 200 300+100 60 50 18 10 F6 200 300+125 60 50 18 10 F7 200 300+75 70 50 18 10 F8 200 300+100 70 50 18 10 F9 200 300+125 70 50 18 10 Preparation of mouth dissolving film Solvent casting method was selected to prepare Mouth dissolving film of Lisinopril. HPMC E15 and PVA used as polymer. Add PVA in 10 ml distill water was mixed using magnetic stirrer then HPMC E15 was added slowly. Subsequent to that Lisinopril was added to the aqueous solution of the polymers then after citric acid is added to the above solution followed by addition of the sweetener and plasticizer. The solution was casted on the casting surface (Teflon mold) and dried at room temperature for 10 hours. Then film was removed from the surface and cut into the desired size of equivalent dose of Lisinopril. The same method was used to cast all batches as shown in figure The figure shows teflon mold was prepared with help of local carpenter and used for casting films. Figure 5 Film of HPMC E15+PVA The figure shows films of plasticizer and polymer-plasticizer blend were casted using petri plate Figure 6 Film of polymer HPMC E15 ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 401

The figure shows film of polymer HPMC E 15 was casted using Teflon mold. Figure 7 Film of polymer PVA The figure shows film of polymer PVA was casted using petri plate. Figure 8 Lisinopril mouth dissolving film casting using Teflon mold. The figure shows final batch film casting of Lisinopril Evaluation of mouth dissolving film Weight Variation The weight variation test is determined by measuring the weight of the individual film of 2cm x2 cm area. For the measurement of the weight digital analytical balance was used. The weight of three films was measure and min is taken. Thickness The thickness of film was measured by digital vernier caliper at different locations. This is essential to ascertain uniformity in the thickness of the film as this is directly related to the accuracy of dose in the strip. Folding endurance Folding endurance is determined by repeated folding of the strip at the same place till the strip breaks. How many times the film is folded without breaking is computed as the folding endurance value. Disintegration time The disintegration time deadline of 30 s or less for orally disintegrating tablets described in CDERGuidance can be applied to fast dissolving oral strips. There is no official guidance is available for oral fast disintegrating films/strips, this strip may be used as a guideline for quality control test or at development stage. Typical disintegration time for strips is 5 30 s. For the present work disintegration was measured by taking the 25 ml water in50 ml beaker and individual film is dipped into that solution and disintegration time was recorded. In Vitro dissolution study The in vitro release of drug from all formulations was determined using USP apparatus type II (Paddle method). The following conditions were followed to study the in-vitro dissolution study of Lisinopril mouth dissolving film 1. USP dissolution apparatus: Type II (Paddle method) 2. Volume of dissolution medium: 900 ml 3. Speed: 50 rpm 4. Temperature: 37±0.50 C 5. Dissolution medium: simulated salivary fluid (ph6.75) ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 402

6. Sampling interval: 1 min 7. Quantity of sample withdrawn: 5ml Aliquots of dissolution medium of 5 ml were withdrawn at 1min interval for 3min. The volume withdrawn was replaced by fresh volume of dissolution medium. The filtered samples were analyzed by UV at 206 nm and absorbance was noted. Cumulative percent drug release was calculated. Drug content For determination of the drug content Lisinopril moth dissolving film equivalent to dose of 10 mg was dissolved in 50 ml of Distill water.the solution was solution was sonicated for 10 minutes and then filtered through Whatmann filter paper no. 41, to separate out the insoluble excipient. 1ml of filtrate was diluted to 100ml with Distill water. The absorbance of resultant solution was measured using U. V. spectrophotometer at 206 nm and drug content was calculated. Result and Discussion Evaluation of mouth dissolving film Weight Variation The weight of all factorial batches observed between 29 to 33 mg with standard deviation less than 0.2% for all batches which indicates uniformity in the weight. Thickness The thickness of the film lies between 0.06 to 0.08 mm.with uniformity in the thickness. It was observed that increase in the polymer concentration the thickness of film increases with 0.01mm. Folding Endurance The folding endurance of all batches observed between209 to 280. For the batches F4, F7, F9 the folding endurance observed 247,280,300 respectively. Form the evaluation of folding endurance it was concluded that with increase in polymer concentration folding endurance decrease and with increase in plasticizer concentration folding endurance increases. Disintegration Time The in vitro disintegration time for all batches measured between 9.2 to 18.4 seconds which indicated faster disintegration time as compared to the mouth dissolving tablet which have normal disintegration time 30 seconds in many reported literature. Surface PH The Surface ph of all formulation observed between 6 to 6.8.It was observed that after addition of the plasticizer the ph moves slightly towards basic ph. The ph between 6 to 6.8 indicates the ph of formulation near to ph of saliva. % Drug content The percent drug content observed between 97.09 to 99.17 %.The values ensures good uniformity in the drug content in mouth dispersible film of Lisinopril. All the evaluation parameters are discussed of F1 to F9 formulation are discussed in following table no 4. Table 4 Evaluation of Lisinopril Mouth Dissolvinge Films Batches Thickens (mm) Weight Folding Endurance Surface ph %Drug Content In vitro disintegration time (s) F1 0.06±0.00 29.13±008 230.22±2.08 6.45±0.3 98.10±006 12.3±1.23 F2 0.07±0.00 31.14±007 217.13±17.5 6.61±0.8 99.11±003 9.4±1.52 F3 0.08±0.00 33.15±012 209.24±9.24 6.65±0.12 99.17±004 9.2±1.34 F4 0.06±0.00 29.26±005 247.09±5.14 6.45±0.5 99.16±008 11.2±2.34 F5 0.07±0.00 33.47±008 232.33±11.25 6.48±0.24 99.12±003 13.8±1.28 F6 0.08±0.00 29.42±004 212.33±7.01 6.56±0.32 98.12±002 15.2±2.34 F7 0.06±0.00 31.53±014 280.26±13.12 6.74±0.12 99.11±001 18.2±1.42 F8 0.07±0.00 32.12±002 236.14±4.17 6.82±0.18 99.10±007 17.9±1.52 F9 0.08±0.00 33.4±004 300.35±10.42 6.76±0.14 97.09±007 17.6±1.42 ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 403

In Vitro dissolution study The in-vitro drug release from film of all formulation was performed in triplicate using USP apparatus II (paddle method). Dissolution study was performed in simulated salivary fluid and the obtained results are summarized below. Table 5 % Drug release of formulation F1 to F9 Time F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 1 71.47 68.82 66.17 76.76 87.35 82.05 82.05 76.76 84.70 2 94.76 90 95.29 99.529 95.29 92.64 92.38 89.47 91.32 120 100 %Drug Release 80 60 40 20 0 0 0.5 1 Time(min) 1.5 2 2.5 Figure 9 Dissolusion profile of batches F1 to F9 Stability studies The stability study of the Lisinopril was done in stability chamber. Stability studies were carried out at 40 0 C / 75 % RH for 2 months and following result were obtained. The optimized film did not show any significant change in appearance and weight loss on storage, disintegration time and % drug content. From these results it was concluded that, formulations containing Lisinopril is stable and retained their original properties. The results of disintegration time, drug content and transparency are shown in the Table, which indicates no alteration after storage. Table 6 Stability study for optimized batch Parameter 0 day 30 days 30 days 60 days 60 days A B C D Appearance Transparent Transparent Transparent Transparent Transparent Folding 247.09 247.06 247.06 246.05 246.05 Endurance Disintegration 11±00 12±2 12±2 12±2 12±2 time(sec) Weight 29.26 29.25 29.25 29.25 29.25 % Drug Content 99.16+00 99.14±00 99.14±00 99.12±00 99.12±00 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 404

Conclusion This study shows that it is possible to formulate fast dissolving films of Lisinopril with the intention of obtaining better therapeutic efficiency with increasing bioavailability and improving patient compliance. Plasticizer used Glycerine resulted in better films in respect to physicochemical parameter like, tensile strength, % elongation, folding endurance and flexibility. Aspartame used as a sweetener will successfully mask the bitter taste of the drug Lisinopril. The given film disintegrates within eleven second which release drug rapidly and gives action. As compared to that of conventional dosage form mouth dispersible film has rapid onset of action. In case of F4 and F5 formulations about 99.529% and 95.29% of drug was released at 2min. In case of F2, F8 formulation about 90 % and 89.47 % of drug released at 2 min. This drug release pattern indicates was that the increased concentration of polymer decreases drug release and increased concentration of plasticizer increases drug release. Figure 10 Lisinopril Mouth dissolving film Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to Lupin Ltd, Aurangabad for providing Lisinopril drug as a gift sample. References [1] N. Siddiqu, G. Garg, P.K. Sharma, et al. A Short Review on A Novel Approach in Oral Fast Dissolving Drug Delivery System and Their Patents. Advances in Biological Research, 2011, 5 (6): 291-303. [2] B. Bhyan, S. Jangra, M. Kaur, H. Sing. Orally fast dissolving films: innovations in formulation and technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 2011, 9: 50-56. [3] M. Kaur, A.C. Rana, N.Seth. Fast Dissolving Films: An Innovative Drug Delivery System. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences, 2013, 2( 1):14-24. [4] M.S.Panchal, H.Patel,A. Bagada, K.R.Vadalia, Formulation and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Film of Ropinirole Hydrochloride by Using Pullulan Polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research &Allied Sciences, 2012, 1(3): 60-72. [5] P.V. Shelke, A.S. Dumbare, M.V. Gadhave, S.L. Jadhav, A.A. Sonawane, D.D. Gaikwad, Formulation and evaluation of rapidly disintegrating film of amlodipinebsylate,.journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics, 2012, 2(2): 72-75. [6] A. Tomar, K. Sharma, N.S. Chauhan, A. Mittal, U.Bajaj, Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Oral Film of Dicyclomine as potential route of Buccal Delivery.,International Journal of Drug Development & Research, 2012, 4 (2): 408-417. [7] M.S.Panchal, H.Patel, A.Bagada, K.R.Vadalia, Formulation and Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Film of Ropinirole Hydrochloride by Using Pullulan Polymers, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research &Allied Sciences, 2012, 1(3): 60-72. [8] K.A. Qadir, R.N. Charyulu, P. Prabhu, S. Bhatt, C.S. Shastry,Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving film of loratidine for sublingual use, International research journal of pharmacy, 2011, 3(7): 157-162. [9] P. Desu, M. Sahu, Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving film of Zolmitriptan, International research journal of pharmacy, 2012,3(5): 373-376. [10] M. Nagar, M. Nagar, C. Chopra, Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving film of antipsychotic drug Aripiprazole, Scholars Research Library, 2012, 4 (4): 1221-1227. ISSN : 0975-9492 Vol. 6 No.2 Feb 2015 405