Riding HSR to a Sustainable Future

Similar documents
- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Michael Gillam Deputy Program Director - Southern California

California State Rail Plan. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission November 2, 2017

Transit and Reducing Greenhouse Gases: A Look at the Numbers

The Smart Location Calculator: A new tool for measuring the social and environmental benefits of workplace location efficiency

Can They Peacefully Coexist? Presentation by Al Herson, JD, FAICP Attorney, Sohagi Law Group SSU 2014 Planning Commissioners Workshop

Integrating High Speed Rail, Regional Rail, and Transit Services in California

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

Re: Mobility Plan 2035 FEIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

Memorandum. Date: RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Mixed Use Trip Generation (MXD) Tool: Development, Validation and Examples

Best Practices in Shared-Use High-Speed Rail Systems, MTI Report 02-02

The Business of Operating a HSR System. May 3rd Denis DOUTÉ CEO, SNCF America, Inc.

Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD REPORT ON REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION TARGETS PURSUANT TO SB375

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

FACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

Urban Containment: The Social and Economic Consequences of Limiting Housing and Travel Options by Wendell Cox Project Director: Dr. Adrian T.

Jeff Gulden, PE, TE, JP Goates, MCMP, and Reid Ewing, Ph.D. Page 1 MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION MODEL

CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE RURAL INTERCITY BUS STUDY. California Department of Transportation Division of Mass Transportation.

Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report

Montgomery County, MD

NJTPA Region. Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Jersey City Middlesex Monmouth Morris. Newark Ocean Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren

Appendix S. Monitoring Performance. Monitoring Performance. Appendix Contents

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGY for the CITY OF SAN JOSÉ June, 2011 Updated December 2015

Intelligent Transportation Systems Master Plan

Transportation Planning and Climate Change

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

SMART GROWTH AND URBAN CONTAINMENT: MISGUIDED URBAN POLICY

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2009 AGENDA ITEM: 10

Overcoming Barriers to Mixed-Use Infill Development: Let s Get Trip Generation Right

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Memorandum. Da,e /olz[n~ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

UC Davis Recent Work. Title. Permalink. Author. Publication Date

6.9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

The role of externalities in the Cost Benefit Analysis of Rome Milan HS line

Introduction. CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

Recommend Approval

Sustainability Indicators. Public Transit

Documenting Climate Change Considerations in the National Environmental Policy Act Process. Jeff Houk FHWA Resource Center June 7, 2010

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. Case No.: E Reception: 41.

Developing Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates Using an Activity Based Travel Demand Model

Development of performance measures for rural counties in California

1.1.1.b. Agencies share best practices as they integrate COMPASS facilitates

Transit Demand Analysis

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. Fast Forward 2040 RTP-SCS Preliminary Scenarios Analysis and SB 375 Targets Update Process

Development of a Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory and Analysis of Emissions Reduction Strategies for Aviation

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Accept the report on Priority Response to SPUR and Staff Identified Work Items.

High Desert Corridor: Investment Grade Ridership & Revenue Forecasts

Local Action Moves the World!

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transportation Sources in Minnesota

Energy Efficiency Action Plan

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

4.7.1 Regulatory Framework and Methodology

CITY OF SAN DIMAS GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY AND TECHNICAL SUPPORTING DATA

Circella, G., J. D. Hunt, K. J. Stefan, A. T. Brownlee and M. McCoy 1 SIMPLIFIED MODEL OF LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICES

Executive Summary. ES.1 Project Background

THAT Council adopt the Congestion Management Strategy as outlined in this report

City of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

Appendix C: GHG Emissions Model

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Method to Adjust ITE Vehicle Trip-Generation Estimates in Smart-Growth Areas Robert J. Schneider, Kevan Shafizadeh, & Susan L. Handy University of

Chapter 4 Future Demand Forecasts

Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Performance Management & Goals

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

This page intentionally left blank.

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

9 Before and After Study Plan

San Diego County Greenhouse Gas Inventory. An Analysis of Regional Emissions and Strategies to Achieve AB 32 Targets. Other Fuels Report

Working with Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas

IFreeway and Arterial

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Planning Commission Study Session. Presentation

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

Intermodal Facility Study

California High-Speed Train Program FEIR/EIS

COMPARISON OF PROJECT AGAINST EXISTING CONDITIONS

LARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN. Public Workshop December 3, 2013

CTUP. Norman W. Garrick

Quantifying the Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Urban Parks

Transcription:

Riding HSR to a Sustainable Future

HSR & Community Benefit Changing how we live Providing efficient, civilized transportation Sustainability outcomes Catalyst for planning

Scale

Changing How We Live The Train à Grande Vitesse (TGV) has changed the psychological distance between places. For the French, mobility has created a feeling of belonging to a common or interconnected city. Alain L'Hostis, Geographer, Universite Paris-Est

Smaller Urban Footprint Legacy of Cheap Gas & Land: Low density, big acreage cities US density/acre pre-wwii: 6,472/sq. mile US density/acre today: 3,802/sq. mile Density Supports: Public Transportation Mixed use development Non-automobile dependent life style HSR Thrives Where It Connects Dense Urban Centers Madrid 5,200/sq. km Barcelona 4,800 Tokyo 4,750 Paris 3,550 Los Angeles 2,750 New York 2,050 Chicago 1,500

A More Civilized Public Transportation Alternative

Another sustainability tool UIC: High Speed Rail: Fast track to sustainable mobility Himbergen, UIC presentation 2008

HSR Sustainability Benefits Environmental Benefits Healing on our World Adding value to communities Beyond Gridlock Transportation System How We Get Around HSR uses 1/3 the space of highway

GHG Emissions Benefit 1/12 th of Auto Emissions

Catalyst For Community Building Transit & Pedestrian Oriented Development Create Communities Helps create critical mass of activity/people to support mixed-use development Station as the focal point for the community A catalyst for connecting communities Reduces dependence on the automobile

California Planning Activities EPA-HUD-DOT Livability partnership CaHSR Authority Planning Grants SB 375

California 100% Renewable Energy Sustainability Partnerships Land Use Planning

California High Speed Rail Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment

The California High Speed Rail project will run from Sacramento and San Francisco to Los Angeles and San Diego. Trains will operate at speeds of up to 220 mph; the express travel time from downtown San Francisco to Los Angeles will be just under 2½ hours. Intercity travelers (trips between metropolitan regions) and longer-distance commuters will enjoy the benefits of a system designed to connect with existing rail, air and highway networks.

California s High Speed Rail Project will affect: o The number of intercity airplane trips o Roadway Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) o Power generation for the High Speed Train

In order to determine the GHG emissions of the project: o A baseline had to be established, and o Each of the affected modes had to be quantified.

Baseline numbers were established from inventories compiled by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA).

It was very difficult to establish the baseline CO 2 emission budget for intrastate airplane trips. To determine the project s impact on airplane CO 2 emissions, a future No Build CO 2 plane emission budget was established based on: o The number of potentially affected air trips o The length of the average trip o An average CO 2 emission as calculated by a CO 2 emission factor calculator

The project s impact was calculated based on the number of flights removed due to the project.

CO 2 emissions from roadway vehicles were calculated based on their energy use. The energy use, expressed in Btus, takes into account: o Average travel speed o Vehicle mix o Average vehicle fuel efficiency

Based on the CO 2 emission factors per Btu, CO 2 emission burdens were established for the No Build and Build scenarios for roadway vehicles.

CO 2 Burden (Autos)

At the time of the initial analysis, it was not clear which facilities would be supplying power to the HSR system. Because of this, all emission changes from power generation, including CO 2, could only be predicted on a statewide level for the full HSR system.

CO 2 Burden (Rail)

Summing all affected elements quantifies the project s impact on GHG emissions. The project has a beneficial effect on emissions Statewide.

For more information, visit the California High Speed Rail document library, Bay Area to Central Valley Revised Final Program EIR at: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/ba_cv_program_eir.aspx