Performance Tests & RATAs. Our Mission: To protect and improve the health and environment of all Kansans

Similar documents
Fully Extractive Vs. Dilution Extractive CEMS

Part 60 vs. Part 75 RATA Testing Requirements. Bob Finken President Delta Air Quality Services, Inc. Orange, California

Update on ICI Boiler MACT

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

A Higher Standard of Monitoring Systems & Customer Service

Stack Gas Analyzer ENDA-7000 ULTIMATE. Ultimate Reliability. Ultimate. Ultimate. Dependability. Accessibility

Assessment of Bias in Measurement of Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants Comparison of Electronic CEMS and Sorbent Traps

CISWI and solid-waste-identification rules

Source Emissions Testing Services. Statement of Qualification

Continuous Emissions Monitoring in Support of the Cement MACT

Southwest Clean Air Agency NE 99 th St, Suite 1294, Vancouver, WA 98682

CEM Istanbul, 14 th May 2014

Comparison of Dry Sorbent Injection of Sodium Bicarbonate, Lime, and Carbon and Their Control of Dioxins/Furans, Mercury, Chlorides and Sulfur Dioxide

Are You Really Ready for a RATA? August 5, 2015 CIBO Portland Maine Bob Davis Project Director TRC Environmental

Mercury Control Technology Development in the Laboratory: International HgCEM Research and Development Applications

COMAR Amendments and Regulation.12 Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

The Proposed Combustion Turbine (CT) and Industrial Boiler (IB) MACT Rules The Potential Impact on the Utility Industry

Compliance Measurements. Mike Klein & Robert Kettig BTS (609)

ROCK CRUSHING PLANT APPLICATIONS ADVICE

Boiler MACT & Related Rules. Western Regional Boiler Association 45 th Annual Meeting Portland, Oregon March 14, 2013

John Downs Environmental Manager, B&W PGG, KVB-Enertec Products. January 29, 2015

RATA/Compliance Testing. Judith Aasland

AIR QUALITY PERMIT Issued under 401 KAR 52: Wolohan Drive, Suite 1 Ashland

Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) Rules Final Reconsidered Rules Requirements Summary

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Greenhouse Gas Regulation (new Federal)

Regulatory Factors Effecting Fly Ash Supply.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT

MONITORING PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF THE CANADA-WIDE STANDARDS FOR MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION PLANTS

XCEL ENERGY MERCURY MONITORING EXPERIENCES. David Hillesheim November 11, 2015

27.0 SAMPLING AND TESTING METHODS

GENERAL TESTING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Continuous Emissions Monitoring - Program 77

PM Compliance Options for MACT and MATS Rules. Ed McCall PCME

State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division. Temporary Permit

Update on EPA s Rulemakings Affecting Biomass-Fired Boilers

ENVIROENERGY SOLUTIONS. Presentation of APC and Wet Electrostatic Precipitation Technology

FINE PARTICULATE COLLECTION USING DRY ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

BetaGuard PM Measuring Particulate Continuously

Industrial and Institutional Boilers after Boiler MACT

Best Practices Learned from Greenhouse Gas Reporting

CH-13 Applicability Of State Rules Air Quality Permit Program

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial Coal-Fired Boilers

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA

Advances in NOx Compliance Testing with Portable Electrochemical Analyzers

Global Calibration Gases LLC

A Comparison of Proposed PM CPMS Limits

CAM does have exemptions for certain emission units as follows: Page 1 of 8

Mercury Monitoring in a Cement Kiln

NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE (NOC) WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR 63 SUBPART EEE FOR THE FIXED BOX INCINERATOR #2

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

US Army Task N256 Scrubbers Technology

2013 Air Emission Inventory

Mercury Sampling: A Comparison of Common Test Methods

Electrostatic Precipitator Performance Improvement Through Computational Fluid Dynamic Modeling

Member State Perspectives PROMOTING HIGH- EFFICIENCY LOW-EMISSION COAL POWER PLANTS JAPAN

ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET AIR RESOURCES DIVISION

Training for Personnel to the MCERTS standard Level 1 Technician and Level 2- Team Leader. Syllabus

EPA EMISSION RULES - BOILERS

Potential PM2.5 and CPM Pitfalls in Permitting, Testing and Compliance NCASI Southern Regional Meeting June 10, 2014

Control of pollutants in flue gases and fuel gases

PORTABLE FLUE GAS ANALYZER

DAILY LIFE of CEMS QA & PM

Calibration of Light Scatter PM-CEMs to Satisfy PS-11 on Wet Stacks in Coal Fired EGUs

Environmental Air Emissions Testing Services Solicitation

WHITEPAPER: AMMONIA MEASUREMENT FOR COMBUSTION SOURCES

Hg CEMS Improvements and Updates

TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT STATEMENT OF BASIS

Air Permitting for Major Sources/Title V (Part 2)

Particulate Matter (PM) CEMS

Biomass Boiler Emission Abatement Technologies. Simon Wakefield

2. How can the University have an expansion of the Cogeneration Facility without an increase in the amount of coal used?

Overview of Mercury Monitoring Technologies and Regulatory Requirements

Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

A. The New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Env-A 100 et seq., New Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution; and

Stationary source emissions control

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Policy No Draft Div Pol Yr

Mercury Emissions Control from Existing Utility and Industrial Boilers

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

Biomass Emissions Permitting in Pennsylvania

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

TRAINING PLAN APPROVED BY CENSARA MEMBERSHIP MARCH 2008

Sustainable, Clean Energy from Waste

ABB Measurement & Analytics Monitoring cement plant stack emissions using FTIR

Continous Emission Monitoring: Methods, Regulations and QA/QC. Anders Arvidsson, Opsis AB, Sweden

INDUSTRIAL COAL GASIFICATION SYSTEM FOR US MIDWEST ETHANOL PLANT. Gasification Technologies Conference

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Environmental Compliance and Impacts. June 2011

Proposed Guidelines for the Reduction of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Natural Gas fuelled Stationary Combustion Turbines

Emission Monitoring Technologies for Combustion and Gasification Plant

Emission Control Technology Review for NorthMet Project Processing Plant RS58A

Potential to Emit. Calculating your PTE Jenifer Dixon Public Affairs and Outreach

Comments on Draft Permit #12-POY-079. FTS International Proppants, LLC. Acadia, Trempealeau, Wisconsin. March 15, 2013

Guidelines for Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems

6NYCRR Part 212 Process Operations

Fpollutant-free zero air for analytical

Combustion Source Evaluation

Transcription:

Performance Tests & RATAs

What is a Performance Test? Commonly referred to as a stack test, trial burn or performance test A performance test is used to: Measure the amount of regulated pollutants that are emitted from a point source; Verify capture efficiency from a capture system; Verify destruction/removal efficiency of a control device.

Types of Performance Testing Most common types of testing are: Isokinetic Sampling Instrumental Sampling (Analyzers) To determine percent isokinetic:

Types of Performance Testing Most common types of testing are: Isokinetic Sampling Particulate matter (PM) RM5/202, RM17, RM201A Dioxins/Furans (D/Fs) RM23 Chrome & other metals RM29, RM306 Lead RM12

USEPA Reference Method 5

USEPA Reference Method 5

Coal burning Sources of Particulate Matter Cement production Asphalt Production Grain Storage/Distribution

Baghouses Common PM Controls Cyclones Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs)

Types of Performance Testing Most common types of testing are: Instrumental Sampling CLD (Chemiluminescence Detector)» NOx RM7E FID (Flame Ionization Detector)» VOC - RM25A NDIR (Non-dispersive Infrared)» CO RM10» O 2 / CO 2 RM3A Pulsed Fluorescence» SO 2 RM6C FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy)» Non-diatomic molecules (mainly used for HAPs) RM320

Refineries Sources of NOx, CO, SO 2, VOC, HAPs Printing Presses Ethanol Plants Combustion sources

Common Gaseous Scrubber Controls Thermal Oxidizer

Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) Similar to analyzers used for instrumental sampling CEMS also available for measuring PM, mercury (Hg), flow rates, moisture, opacity

RATAs Relative Accuracy Test Audits Quality assurance test for CEMS Tested by comparing the Relative Accuracy (RA) between a tester s analyzers (RM) against the CEMS RATA consists of nine to twelve 21-minute runs RA = ( avg diff + cc / avg RM ) * 100

Avoiding Problems

Avoiding Problems Time management Don t wait until the last minute to conduct the test

Avoiding Problems Time management Don t wait until the last minute to conduct the test Make sure to notify within the specified deadline

Avoiding Problems Time management Don t wait until the last minute to conduct the test Make sure to notify within the specified deadline Must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the test date, unless specified differently in the regulation

Avoiding Problems Time management Don t wait until the last minute to conduct the test Make sure to notify within the specified deadline Must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the test date, unless specified differently in the regulation Make sure to submit the test report timely

Avoiding Problems Time management Don t wait until the last minute to conduct the test Make sure to notify within the specified deadline Must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the test date, unless specified differently in the regulation Make sure to submit the test report timely Submit test report within 30 days after the final day of testing, unless specified differently in the regulation

Avoiding Problems Time management (con t) Try to give us an actual day if at all possible rather than the week of testing. We understand that dates and start times can change for the testing, try to keep us in the loop.

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening Stress to Operations the importance of the testing

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening Stress to Operations the importance of the testing Tests must be run at max load (>90%)

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening Stress to Operations the importance of the testing Tests must be run at max load (>90%) Must follow the test protocol

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening Stress to Operations the importance of the testing Tests must be run at max load (>90%) Must follow the test protocol Changes to the schedule should be made no later than 7 days prior to the test

Avoiding Problems Be ready Make sure all parties know what is happening Stress to Operations the importance of the testing Tests must be run at max load (>90%) Must follow the test protocol Ensure testers have what they need e.g. electricity, proper test ports, safe testing location

Avoiding Problems Be ready (con t) We try to notify the facility in some way when we are coming to observe a test. Expect us It should be no surprise when we show up Any check in/security measures taken before we arrive will expedite the process and get us out of your hair sooner!

Avoiding Problems Be ready (con t again) Monitor required operating parameters during the test; be sure they are included in the report Examples: Load (lb/hr, ft/min, MW, tph, bhp, etc) Controls (temperatures, pressure drops, water flow, etc) Operating Parameters (fuel flow, HHV, manifold pressure, etc)

Performance Tests/RATAs Total number of Performance tests in FFY 2016: 112 tests were conducted. 59 were RICE tests Total number of RATAs from FFY 2016: 57 RATAs were conducted

Most importantly Summary

Most importantly Summary Stay under your emission limits!

Performance Testing & Asbestos Control Unit Performance Testing/RATA Adam Irvin Unit Supervisor Allyson Prue Performance Testing Tina Gustafson - RATAs Asbestos Control Program Phil Schlaman Asbestos Expert Tina Gustafson - Inspector Sophia Brunetti - Admin