PLANNING A HORIZONTAL SILO FOR BEEF OPERATIONS

Similar documents
Cow-Calf Ranch Input Worksheet- Unit Cost of Production Workshop Users Guide

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Beef Cattle Handbook

FORAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

THREE YEARS OF GRAZING CORN by Clif Little Extension Agent Agriculture/Natural Resources

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Saskatchewan Herd Size Economics June 26, th Annual WBDC Field Day. Kathy Larson WBDC Beef Economist

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Background and Assumptions

Cattle Feeder's Planning Guide

Determining Livestock Facility Needs

Background and Assumptions

Your Dairy In Transition

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Two Parts to Making Quality Silage

2007 PLANNING BUDGETS FOR DAIRY PRODUCTION IN MISSISSIPPI COSTS AND RETURNS. 112 and 250 COW DAIRY ENTERPRISES LARGE BREED CATTLE MISSISSIPPI, 2007

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

Drought-Stressed Corn Silage for Beef Cows

TEXAS A8cM UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

Emmit L. Rawls Professor Agricultural Economics

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

NutbalPro 201. Training Case Tutorial

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

LABOR and EQUIPMENT FEEDING SILAGE. for OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. Research Bulletin 820 November and J. H.

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

Calving Month Feed Budget Relative Cost

Some contributors to poor animal health and performance

Total 2, ,519

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

Effects of Corn Crop Residue Grazing on Soil Physical Properties and Subsequent Soybean Production in a Corn Soybean Crop Rotation (A Progress Report)

Guidelines for Estimating. Beef Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

4-H Dairy Project Record Dairy Cow

Crop Residue Utilization by Beef Cows

THE EFFECTS OF CO-ENSILING WET DISTILLER S GRAINS PLUS SOLUBLES WITH CORN SILAGE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BRED BEEF HEIFERS DURING LATE PREGNANCY

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

Defining Value and Requirements in Cow Rations: What is a Calorie Worth?

Guidelines for Estimating. Bison Cow-Calf Production Costs 2017 in Manitoba

TOC INDEX. Feeding Systems. Dennis Darby and Robert Borg. Take Home Message. Feed Storage

Pros and Cons of Centralized Calving J.F. Smith 1, J.P. Harner 1, M.J. Brouk 1, and S. Mosley 2

Grazing Opportunities. Craig Saxe UW-Extension, Juneau Co. 211 Hickory Street Mauston WI (608)

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

2017 Beef Cattle Market Outlook

Nutrition (young/old) - Cattle Score (male/female)

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXII November 29, 30, & December1, 2011, Mitchell, NE

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Cover Crop Grazing. Jim Church University of Idaho Extension

TRADE-OFF BETWEEN COW NUMBERS, CALF SIZE, AND SALE DATE INCORPORATING SEASONAL FACTORS AND SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING

Haylage Production & Utilization in Florida. Dr. Matt Hersom Dept of Animal Sciences

Inoculants for Silage

Introduction BEEF 140

CRUMP RANCH ADEL, OR $5,950, CASH REDUCED!! ACRES 2, PRIMARY WATER RIGHTS BEAUTIFUL MEADOWS BLM and STATE LEASES THREE HOMES

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond: A Comparative Analysis Of ND - Demo Cow Herd To North Dakota Database

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Silage Triangle to June 7, 2003 KSU Silage Home page. Better Bagged Silage: What s Important??

Managing For Today s Cattle Market And Beyond A Comparative Analysis Of Demo Herd 1997 Herd To McKenzie County Database

Utilizing Coproducts in the Grazing Program

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Guidelines and tools to get the most from grazing in Ireland

Other Unique Components

Management Calendar for North Carolina Producers

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

FARMFEED LIMITED. Adding value to Zambian crops through livestock SOME OF THE BASICS FOR DAIRY FARMING IN ZAMBIA

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Got Barnyard Runoff? By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University

The Cattle Feeding Industry

LARGE ANIMAL DISPOSAL. On-Farm Composting Option South Coastal Region of BC

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Estimating Forage Need. Estimating Forage Need. Basic Grazing Numbers. Dr. Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist Univ.

A GRAZING AND HAYING SYSTEM WITH WINTER ANNUAL GRASSES. Steve Orloff and Dan Drake 1 ABSTRACT

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

Elko County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns, 2006

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

Stockpiling Forages. Stockpiling Perennial Grasses. Stockpiling. Risky business? 8/22/2010. Rocky Lemus August 25, 2010 MSPFSC

Making The Best Use of Alfalfa in Dairy Rations

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Keeping the Cows in the Corn Even During the Winter Storm. SARE National Conference August 15-17, 2006 Oconomowoc, Wisconsin Don Struxness

CATTLE FEEDING INVESTIGATIONS, C. W. MCCAMPBELL, F. W. BELL, H. B. WINCHESTER

Organic Burial Composting of Cattle Mortality

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

Griffin s Pen Condition Discussion Thoughts & Notes: Using stocking density to help control dust and mud.

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock University of Georgia ECONOMICS OF IMPROVED GRAZING SYSTEMS

Transcription:

Farm Structures Order No. 372.300-3 Revised December 2015 PLANNING A HORIZONTAL SILO FOR BEEF OPERATIONS This factsheet outlines the essential considerations in planning a horizontal silo including location and site preparation, sizing the storage, structural requirements and typical costs. INTRODUCTION Silage is an effective and economical method of harvesting and storing forage. It is especially suited to areas of the Province where weather conditions are not favourable to quality hay harvesting. Horizontal silos can be economical to build and use. A well constructed and managed horizontal silo can be used to store and supply high quality feed throughout the feeding period. Provide flexibility for expansion. Don t box yourself into a corner. Well drained, preferably south facing site to permit a 1 to 2% floor slope to the front face. Sited to prevent drainage of silo juices into natural watercourses. LOCATION AND SITE PREPARATION Consider the following points and Figure 1 when determining the location of a horizontal silo (see Figure 1) Access to feeding areas. Access from croplands during harvest. Integration of the silo within the overall farmstead plan recommend drawing a farmstead plan prior to any construction Figure 1 Well Sited Horizontal Silo Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 1 of 6

SIZING THE SILO A silo is usually sized to store the maximum volume of feed required for the feeding season. Alternatively, the silo may be sized on the expected crop yield to be stored. Plan for expansion either by allowing room for construction of a second silo or by allowing for extension of the silo towards the front. Extending the silo towards the back adds extra expense in removing and reconstructing the back wall. In sizing the silo to store feed necessary for animal consumption, the guidelines in Table 1 can be used for silage (without hay) feed consumption rates for beef cattle. Once the daily consumption is known, the total storage capacity can be calculated. Add a 20% safety factor for storage losses and feed wastage. See factsheet No. 240.100-4 Forage Harvesting, Storage and Feeding Losses available online. Table 1 TYPICAL SILAGE FEEDING RATES FOR BEEF CATTLE Feed Requirement Silage Grain LIVESTOCK ( lbs per day )* 1100 lb MATURE COWS - MID PREGNANCY 75.0 0.0 - LATE PREGNANCY 73.0 2.1 - LACTATION 66.9 4.2 800 lb YEARLING HEIFERS - MID PREGNANCY 38.4 7.2 850 lb YEARLING HEIFERS - LATE PREGNANCY 48.5 6.3 900 lb FIRST CALF HEIFERS - LACTATING 44.0 9.8 700 lb STEER CALVES - GAINING 1.5 lb/day 36.6 8.1 600 lb HEIFER CALVES - GAINING 1.0 lb/day 27.3 7.2 * 30% dry matter silage; 90% dm grain Example 1: A ranch in Quesnel is overwintering an 80 cow herd. Calculate the silage requirements assuming no hay is fed. Feed is required from October 15 to April 30 (200 days) and calving begins March 1. Silage required = 45 days MID PREGNANCY x 75 lbs/days = 3,375 lbs per head (Oct 15 Dec 1) + 90 days LATE PREGNANCY x 73 lbs/day = 6,570 lbs per head + 60 days LACTATION x 67 lbs/day = 4,020 lbs per head (Mar 1 Apr 30) Total intake requirement = 13,965 lbs per head Total Silage Required = 13,965 lbs x 80 head = 1,117,200 lbs or 559 tons Head Add 20% for losses = 670 tons Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 2 of 6

Example 2: A rancher in Kamloops is backgrounding 200 beef calves from 500 lbs/head to 850 lbs/head through the winter (about 200 days). Average weight of the calves is 700 lbs and average daily gain, 1.5 lbs. Silage Required = 200 head x 36.6 lbs x 200 days = 1,464,000 lbs or 732 tons day Add 20% for losses = 878 tons MINIMIZE SPOILAGE AT THE FACE Once the silo is opened for feeding, the silage is exposed to the air. During the warmer periods of the feeding season, it can spoil, otherwise, it may freeze in mid-winter. To minimize spoilage and freezing, size the silo face area (i.e., the vertical cross section) to permit a minimum 4 inches/day silage removal rate from the face. Example 1: The maximum silo face area for the 80 cow herd in Quesnel is calculated as follows: Maximum 80 head x 70 lbs (avg.) face area = day/head = 420 sq ft (sq ft) 40 lbs x 4 in x 1 ft cu ft day 12 in Example 2: The maximum silo face area for the 200 head backgrounding operation in Kamloops is calculated using the feeding rate of 37 lbs per day/head. Maximum 200 head x 37 lbs face area = day/head = 555 sq ft (sq ft) 40 lbs x 4 in x 1 ft cu ft day 12 in Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 3 of 6

SELF FEEDING ilage may be self-fed from the face. A self-feeding fence or electric wire is used to limit access and minimize feeding wastage. The vertical face of the settled silo should be no more than 8 feet. The feeding face width at the floor should be 6 to 8 per cow provided the cattle have access to the feeding face 24 hours per day. DETERMINE FINAL SILO DIMENSIONS Once the total storage capacity and maximum silo face area have been determined as outlined above, the silo dimensions can be finalized. Use Table 2. Table 2: Silo width Silage depth Silage Face (ft) (ft) area (sq ft) CAPACITY OF PACKED HORIZONTAL SILO (tons) (Based on packed density = 40 lbs/cu ft) Length of Silo (ft) 56 64 72 80 88 96 104 112 120 136 152 20 6 120 120 139 158 178 197 216 235 254 274 312 350 20 8 160 154 179 205 230 256 282 307 333 358 410 461 20 10 200 184 216 248 280 312 344 376 408 440 504 568 30 8 240 230 269 307 346 384 422 461 499 538 614 691 30 10 300 276 324 372 420 468 516 564 612 660 756 852 30 12 360 317 374 432 490 547 605 662 720 778 893 1008 40 8 320 307 358 410 461 512 563 614 666 717 819 922 40 10 400 368 432 496 560 624 688 752 816 880 1008 1136 40 12 480 422 499 576 653 730 806 883 960 1037 1190 1344 40 14 560 470 560 650 739 829 918 1008 1098 1187 1366 1546 50 10 500 460 540 620 700 780 860 940 1020 1100 1260 1420 50 12 600 528 624 720 816 912 1008 1104 1200 1296 1488 1680 50 14 700 588 700 812 924 1036 1148 1260 1372 1484 1708 1932 50 16 800 640 768 896 1024 1152 1280 1408 1536 1664 1920 2176 60 10 600 552 648 744 840 936 1032 1128 1224 1320 1512 1704 60 12 720 634 749 864 979 1094 1210 1325 1440 1555 1786 2016 60 14 840 706 840 974 1109 1243 1378 1512 1646 1781 2050 2318 60 16 960 768 922 1075 1229 1382 1536 1690 1843 1997 2304 2611 N.B. This table gives actual wet matter capacity in tons assuming the silo is filled and packed to the top of the sidewall with no crowning. The table takes into account a 1:2 sloping front face. Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 4 of 6

Example 1 The 80 cow herd operation: storage volume = 670 tons maximum silo face area = 420 sq ft face area From Table 2, we can select several options that meet these requirements. For example: 1. 30 wide x 12 high x 108 long, or 2. 40 wide x 10 high x 96 long. Example 2: The 200 head backgrounding operation: storage volume = 878 tons maximum silo face area = 555 sq ft face area From Table 2, we can select several options that meet these requirements. For example: 1. 40 wide x 12 deep x 104 long, or 2. 50 wide x 10 deep x 100 long. STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS Engineering drawings must be prepared and followed in constructing a horizontal silo. Figure 2 shows many critical points to which attention must be given; amongst others, these are: Sloping silo walls to permit tractor packing up to the wall. The silo wall must be designed with foundations and bracing to resist the tremendous pressures. The wall should be lined with plastic to establish an airtight seal and thus improve silage preservation. Use pressure treated wood. (CCA not PCP). Earth may be used as a backfill to minimize silage freezing. If the silo is constructed below grade, the walls must be designed as retaining walls to resist earth pressures. Perimeter drains will also be necessary. A concrete floor is designed to reduce feed losses. This floor must be properly reinforced to carry heavy tractor loads. Use quality concrete. Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 5 of 6

Figure 2 Typical Structural Requirements - Pole Type Horizontal Silo TYPICAL COSTS TO CONSTRUCT A HORIZONTAL SILO The cost of a structure can vary greatly depending on the site preparation requirements, local supplies, materials used, type of structure to be erected, manpower costs and construction techniques used. A typical 40 ft wide x 96 ft long x 8 ft high structure would involve the following costs: Site Preparation: $ 1,500 or $0.40/ sq ft Materials: 15,360 or 4.00/ sq ft Labour: 4,200 or 1.10/ sq ft Total: $21,060 or $5.50/ sq ft FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE Phone: 604.556.3001 1767 Angus Campbell Road Toll Free: 1.888.221.7141 Abbotsford, B.C. V3G 2M3 Factsheet 372.300-3 Page 6 of 6