Standard on Quality Control (SQC-1) CA Gautam Shah Khimji Kunverji & Co

Similar documents
Standard on Quality Control (SQC) 1. Presentation to the ICAI January 18, 2014

A Firm s System of Quality Control

EXPLANATORY GUIDE Au6 Applying PES 3 Proportionately with the Nature and Size of a Firm Issued February 2013

Standard on Quality Control (SQC)-1 Need for Documentaton. Abhay Vasant Arolkar

The World Bank Audit Firm Assessment Questionnaire

International Standard on Quality Control

AICPA Peer Review Program Compliance: Responding to Latest Developments

STANDARD ON QUALITY CONTROL (SQC) 1

STANDARD ON INTERNAL AUDIT (SIA) 7 QUALITY ASSURANCE IN INTERNAL AUDIT *

Compilation Engagements

REPORT WRITING & INDEPENDENT REVIEW

ISA Quality Control For Audits of Historical Financial Information

Review of agreed-upon procedures engagements questionnaire

Professional Competence for Engagement Partners Responsible for Audits of Financial Statements (Revised)

Audit quality a director s guide

PwC Kenya Transparency Report 2015

PricewaterhouseCoopers, Papua New Guinea Transparency Report Legal structure and ownership of the firm (Article 40(1)(a))

A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY. KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY February 2014

Code of Corporate Governance

Arnold Schilder Chairman International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board 529 Fifth Avenue 6th Floor New York, NY

SA 230 Audit Documentation SA 300 Planning an Audit of FS

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. External audits of banks. Issued for comment by 21 June 2013

Compilation Engagements

AICPA Peer Review Program Compliance: Responding to Latest Developments

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS

Internal Audit Policy and Procedures Internal Audit Charter

Informa PLC TERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT COMMITTEE. Adopted by the Board on

Statement on February 2014 Auditing Standards 128. Using the Work of Internal Auditors

Auditing Standard for Islamic Financial Institutions No. 6

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

IAASB Main Agenda Page Agenda Item

Dena Jansen, CPA Partner Maxwell Locke & Ritter LLP

Transparency Report KPMG Hong Kong. kpmg.com/cn

Audit Transparency Report 2014

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 300 PLANNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

PHILIPPINE STANDARD ON AUDITING 300 PLANNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

Audit Transparency Report 2016

Auditing & Assurance Services, 7e (Louwers) Chapter 2 Professional Standards

Achieve. Performance objectives

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DROPBOX, INC.

ASB Meeting January 12-15, 2015

See your auditor clearly. Transparency report: How we perform quality audit engagements

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 620 USING THE WORK OF AN AUDITOR S EXPERT CONTENTS

GoldSRD Audit 101 Table of Contents & Resource Listing

The Auditor s Consideration of the Internal Audit Function in an Audit of Financial Statements

Audit programs that can be easily tailored to address the risks associated with your individual audit engagements. 2

Internal Audit Charter

Case Report from Audit Firm Inspection Results

AICPA STANDARDS FOR PERFORMING AND REPORTING ON PEER REVIEWS. Effective for Peer Reviews Commencing on or After January 1, 2009

PART 6 - INTERNAL CONTROL

MKO Partners, Chartered Accountants Audit Transparency Report 2016

Quality Assurance as a Requirement to Membership of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (Sudanese Case)

IAASB Main Agenda (December 2009) Agenda Item. Engagements to Compile Financial Information Issues and IAASB Task Force Proposals I.

AICPA ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT MANUAL 1

Bank of Botswana Internal Audit Charter March 18, 2013 INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER BANK OF BOTSWANA

Our relentless focus on quality

REGISTERED CANDIDATE AUDITOR (RCA) TECHNICAL COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS

Dexia Group Audit Charter

Internal Audit Mandate

Statements of Membership Obligations 1 7

NSW Government Capability Framework - Benchmark Job Evaluations. NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet

CMI LEVEL 5 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING Top Up Document

Audit Committee Charter

RISK AND AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Concepts Common to All Attestation Engagements

An Examination of an Entity s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated With an Audit of Its Financial Statements

Planning an Audit 259

APES 305 TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT

Enhancing Audit Quality and Transparency

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 300 PLANNING AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTENTS

Internal Audit Quality Analysis Evaluation against the Standards International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (2017)

Monitoring Group Proposals to Strengthen the Governance and Oversight of Audit-related Standard Setting in the Public Interest

Planning an Audit of Financial Statements

AUDITING AND ATTESTATION CHAPTER 1 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, AUDIT PROCESS, AND AUDIT PLANNING. Magic Memory Outline

THE IFRS WORKSHOP. Hilton Hotel. Saturday, 11 February /02/2017 Uphold Public Interest

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 620 (Revised June 2016)

MKO Partners, Chartered Accountants Audit Transparency Report 2015

BDO LUXEMBOURG TRANSPARENCY REPORT 2016

General Principles for Engagements Performed in Accordance With Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services

LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

3. STRUCTURING ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Requirements for New Zealand Licensed Auditors

Our System of Audit Quality Controls

The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct

Transparency Report 2015

Sharing experiences on audit quality. A selection of ideas and initiatives intended to assist the promotion of consistent audit quality in Australia

Report. Quality Assessment of Internal Audit at <Organisation> Draft Report / Final Report

Standard on Assurance Engagements ASAE 3500 Performance Engagements

and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Implementation Guides

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (updated as of August 2016)

PwC Nigeria Transparency report 2015

PGDBFS 103 International Financial Accounting and Policy (IFAP)

ANZ Audit Committee Charter

CGIAR System Management Board Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference

Audit and Risk Committee Charter

Your committee: Evaluates the "tone at the top" and the company's culture, understanding their relevance to financial reporting and compliance

IAASB Main Agenda Page Agenda Item

International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 500 Audit Evidence

Transcription:

Standard on Quality Control (SQC-1) CA Gautam Shah Khimji Kunverji & Co

Agenda Setting the Context Elements of SQC SQC and SMP Challenges and Benefits

Setting the Context

Setting the Context COMPANY LAW AUDITING STANDARDS ICAI CODE OF ETHICS

Setting the Context COMPANY LAW AUDITING STANDARDS ICAI CODE OF ETHICS QUALITY CONTROL STANDARDS

Setting the Context OLD New Simple business Complex business Manual IT Systems,Real Time Small Entities, Less Transactions Large, Growing and Volume Simple regulations Complex Regulations, IFRS Trust Frauds, Litigations Traditional Audit Risk Based Audit Hence Need for Standard.

SQC-1 ICAI issued SQC in 2007, effective from April 1, 2009 This standard will be applicable to all the professional firms* that performs : Audit of Historical Financial Information Review of Historical Financial Information Assurance and Other Related Services Engagements * Proprietorship & Partnership. 7

SQC-1 To establish a system of quality control The firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements, Reports issued by the firm or engagement partner(s) are appropriate Hence it deals with COMPLIANCE and QUALITY 8

ObjectivesofSQC-1 Establish Standards for Firms i.e SOP Provide Guidance to achieve its Objective Value Services to Clients To Grow TohaveGoodTeam Provide outlines for designing and implementation of Policies & Procedures to ensure Quality in firm s performance 9

SQC-1 Nature of Policies & Procedures, & Manner, Contents & Form of Documentation, depends upon factors like: Size of the firm and number of offices; Nature and complexity of the firm s practice; and Risks associated with the firm s practice and specific engagements

Elements of SQC 11

ElementsofSQC-1 SQC-1 System of Quality control (QC) should include Policies & Procedures (P&P) addressing: Leadership responsibilities for QC within the firm Ethical Requirements Acceptance and continuance of client Human Resources Engagement Performance Monitoring Documentation 12

ElementsofSQC-1 DOCUMENTATION & COMMUNICATION 13

ElementsofSQC-1 Firm should also Review QC P&P periodically Monitor it & get the feedback on QC P&P Update it s QC P&P, if required Make sure its operations Put in place the crises management system(i.e. course of action, in case of non-compliance)

1. Leadership of QC To promote an internal culture to recognisethe fact that Quality is essential in performing engagements ; Managing Partner/CEO or equivalent must assume responsibilities for Firm s System of QC;

1. Leadership of QC Partners Quality Control Operational Responsibility Experience Ability Authority Identify Issues Develop Policies & Procedures

1. Leadership offor QC QC Next big Question How to promote & take lead? Reply: Leaders must set example by their own conduct Communicate System of QC to the firm s personnel by way of organizing Training, workshops, formal newsletters etc. 17

2. Ethical Requirements.Code of Ethics

2. Ethical Requirements Integrity Professional Behaviour Fundamental Principles Objectivity Confidentiality Professional Competence & Due Care

2. Ethical Requirements For all these Independence matters, this SQC-1 has put lot of responsibilities on the shoulders of Engagement Partner Threats Independence Safeguards Public Interest Communicate to Personnel

2. Ethical Requirements At least Annual Written Confirmation

2. Ethical Requirements High Risk: 10 Years Listed Audits: 7 Years Rotation of Audit Partners Other Audits: 10 Years Safeguards Safeguards to reduce the familiarity threat

3. Acceptance/ Continuation Relationships Specific Engagements

3. Acceptance/ Continuation New Clients Continue an existing engagement New engagement existing client

3. Acceptance/ Continuation (a) Competence, capabilities, time, resources (b) Ethical Requirements (c) Integrity of Client

3. Acceptance/ Continuation New Client Communicate with previous auditors Conflicts of Interest Engagement Letter Withdrawal Policies and Reporting

3. Acceptance/ Continuation Integrity of client Business Reputationof the client s principal owners, key management, related parties Business Practices of the client Client s Intentions as regard reductionof the firm s feeas low as possible or try to limit the scopeof work Indulge in any illegal activities etc Past record with the professionals 27

3. Acceptance/ Continuation own capability Desired knowledge of relevant industry Experienced personnel, who have got knowledge of relevant regulatory or reporting requirements Sufficient personnel with the necessary capabilities and competence. Capability to complete the assignment and issue report within given timeframe 28

4. Human Resources QC Manual HR Manual

4. Human Resources To ensure it has sufficient personnel with the # Capabilities # Competence # Commitment to ethical principles Required to perform engagement as per professional standards to enable the firm or engagement partner to issue reports. 30

4. Human Resources Recruitment Performance Evaluation Competence, Capabilities, Time Career Development Promotion Compensation Estimation of Personnel Needs

4. Human Resources Assignment to Engagements Partners Teams Communicate to client Define Role

4. Human Resources Appraisal Forms: Quality Control Understanding Compliance

4. Human Resources Training Effective?

5. Engagement Performance Engagements are consistently performed in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements, and the firm or the engagement partner issues reports that are appropriate in the circumstances.

5. Engagement Performance P&P to address : How the assignment is to be performed? How engagement team would be briefed about the objectives of the assignment to be achieved? How to supervise & Review the work performed? When & how to take Consultation, in case it requires to resolve the complicated issues? How to resolve the difference of opinion? 36

5. Engagement Performance QC over each engagement Consultations Engagement QC Reviews Differences of Opinion Engagement Documentation

5. Engagement Performance Consistency Supervision Review

5. Engagement Performance Consistency Team Briefing Engagement Standards Processes supervision, training, coaching Processes review of work, judgements and reports Documentation

5. Engagement Performance Supervision: Tracking progress Team management Issues Consultations

5. Engagement Performance Review: Professional standards/law Issues raised Consultations Revise plans Work supports conclusions Sufficient appropriate evidence Engagement objective

5. Engagement Performance Encourage Consultation Document Both agree * Process Implement

5. Engagement Performance Engagement Quality Control Reviews Which engagements Nature, timing and extent Listed entities Criteria for eligibility reviewers (internal/ external) Documentation

5. Engagement Performance Engagement Quality Control Reviews Consultation with Engagement Quality Control Reviewer encouraged Objectivity Not selected by Engagement Partner No decisions for team

5. Engagement Performance Difference of opinion could be exist between: Engagement partner& Reviewer; Engagement partner& Quality Control Reviewer Engagement partner& Audit staff Engagement partner & Independent consultants. In that case it is mandatory as per SQC-1 to document those matters, where the difference of opinion exist and firm should not issue report until matter is resolved. 45

5. Engagement Performance Documentation Confidentiality, Safe Custody, Integrity, Accessibility & Retrievabilityof Client Documentation Retention of documents For firm For law Ownership

5. Engagement Performance Documentation Assembly of Final Engagement Files: The P&P of the firm ensure the assembly of engagement files after the issue of engagement reports. The P&P of the firm should ensure that the confidentiality of information as contained in the Engagement Letter must be maintained unless client or law of the land permits otherwise. 47

5. Engagement Performance Retention of Engagement Documents: The P&P of the firm should ensure that engagement documents should retain for a period sufficient to meet the needs of the firm or as required by law or regulation. SQC-1, in this regard says that The retention period ordinarilyisnoshorterthan7yearsfromthedateofthe auditor s report, in case of Audit engagement. Unless otherwise specified by law or regulation, engagement documentation is the property of the firm 48

6. Monitoring Monitoring procedures may be accomplished through the performance of: Engagement quality control review Post-issuance review of engagement Inspection procedures like peer review, internal review

6. Monitoring The firm should establish P&P to ensure that the System of QC are : Relevant Adequate Operating Effectively and Complied with in practice by firm & its personnel. 50

6. Monitoring Ongoing evaluation of appropriateness of design and operating effectiveness Assign responsibilityfor the monitoring process to a partner Assign performanceof the monitoring process to competent individuals Perform sufficiently comprehensive procedures

6. Monitoring Review of selected administrative and personnel records pertaining to the quality control elements Review of engagement working papers, reports, and clients' financial statements Discussions with the firm's personnel Summarization of the findings from the monitoring procedures, at least annually, and Assess causes of findings that indicate that improvements are needed

6. Monitoring Assessment of The appropriateness of the firm s guidance materials and any practice aids; Updates on New developments in professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements The effectiveness of continuing professional development, including training; Decisions related to acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements; and Firm personnel s understanding of the firm s quality control policies and procedures and implementation thereof

6. Monitoring Self-inspection Not prohibited Higher risk that noncompliance with policies and procedures will not be detected

6. Monitoring Complaints & Allegations Procedures to deal appropriately with complaints and allegations Clear channels for personnel to raise concerns without fear of reprisal Documentation of complaints and responses

7. Documentation Document evidence of the operation of each element of its system of quality control. Form and content based on firm characteristics Retain this documentation for a period of time sufficient to permit those performing monitoring procedures and peer review to evaluate the firm s compliance.

7. Documentation Evidence of operation Retention of documents Documentation of complaints/allegations

7. Documentation QC Manual X-ref to SQC 1 X-ref each Policy to a Procedure X-ref each Procedure to a Form to Monitor Each Standard to: Manual Work program/checklist

SQC and SMPs IAASB This is based on document prepared by IAASB staff. It is a nonauthoritative document issued for information purposes only. 59

SQCandSMP IAASB(Q&A) To apply SQC 1 in a relevant and cost-effective way. To avoid Standards Overload Proportionate application, including that: Firms need only comply with those requirements that are relevant to the services provided Firms can exercise appropriate judgment in implementing a system of quality control, for example, in deciding how formal certain processes need to be to comply with the requirements of ISQC 1 or in documentation of the system. Firms can draw on external resources to meet some of the requirements of SQC 1 like quality review Developing policies and procedures tailored to the firm s circumstances

SQCandSMP IAASB(Q&A) How does SQC 1 address the fact that the characteristics of a smaller firm are significantly different from those of a larger firm? The objective of implementing a system of quality control is the sameforallfirmsregardlessoftheirnatureorsize. However, this does not mean that all firms have to design and implement exactly the same specific policies and procedures, or policies and procedures at the same level of detail, to achieve the objective and requirements of SQC. SQC 1 recognizes that the nature and extent of the specific policies and procedures to be developed by a firm to comply with ISQC 1 will depend on various factors, such as the size and operating characteristicsofthefirmandwhetheritispartofanetwork

SQCandSMP IAASB(Q&A) Consider the case of a sole practitioner, with no staff, that performs only compilation engagements in accordance with SRS 4410 (Revised) and does not perform audit, review or other assurance engagements. In this circumstance, there are requirements in SQC 1 that would not be relevant and, accordingly, need not be implemented. SQC 1 also acknowledges the importance of exercising appropriate judgment in implementing a system of quality control. For example, SQC 1 indicates that the form and content of documentation is a matter of judgment and will dependonanumberoffactors.

SQCandSMP IAASB(Q&A) Further, some requirements of ISQC 1 may be easier for smaller firms to implement. For example, in relation to the requirement that addresses the importance of promoting an internal culture recognizing that quality is essential, smaller firms may be able to achieve this simply through leading by example and various communications between staff and leadership as they occur on a regular basis. Finally, the approach to establishing quality control policies and procedures in a smaller firm may be less formal and structured. For example, smaller firms may employ less formal methods in carrying out performance evaluations for their staff.

SQCandSMP IAASB(Q&A) SQC 1 states that a firm needing to consult externally for example, a firm without appropriate internal resources, may take advantage of advisory services provided by: Other firms; Professional and regulatory bodies; or Commercial organizations that provide relevant quality control services. Need for sufficient personnel with the competence and capabilities to perform engagements in accordance with professional standards, firms may use a suitably qualified external person, Often, this will likely be an effective (and cost effective) way to achieve the aims of the requirements.

Challenges and Benefits 65

Challenges on Compliances of SQC 1) Leadership Responsibility Policies /Procedures not reviewed and Documented Staff not confirming have read and understood 2) Independence and Ethical Requirements Independence declaration from Staff not obtained 3) Client Acceptance and Continuance No integrity checks including client identification Firm s competency not assessed Engagement letter not issued

Challenges on Compliances of SQC 4) Human Resources References not obtained for new staff Insufficient training Staff appraisal not done or informal, No defined roadmap for employees 5) Engagement Performance Audit Methodology not effective, Ineffective Team Allocation Lack of supervision and Control Improper Documentation

Benefits of SQC Firm Level Standardized Process, Controls Ethics Independence and Values Ensure Compliance with all Relevant Standards, Regulations Client KYC, Risk Mitigation Strengthening of Documentation process Alerts and Actions on wrong practices within organisation

Benefits of SQC Clients Enhancing Client s Confidence in services provided by Firm Continuous Improvement in Quality of Audit Builds Competitive Edge HR Recruitment and Retention of Employees Good Working Environment Proper Utilization of Resources, which helps to increase Efficiency

Questions?

Thank You Gautam Shah gautam@kkc.in