Stormwater line will be ABOVE ground corrugated pipe (No need to bury) running down to basin on NW 99 th St. It is simple and approved.

Similar documents
How to Build a Residential Soakage Trench

Ordinance No Lot Surface Drainage

STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

4.8. Subsurface Infiltration

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program. Drainage Guidelines for Residential Development

LOT GRADING GUIDELINES

Infiltration Guidelines

SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. Alternative Names: Sump, Drywell, Infiltration Trench, Infiltration Galleries, Leach Fields

CHAPTER 6 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLYING TO SHORELAND AREAS AND PUBLIC WATERS

CITY OF ASTORIA PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT

Construction Inspection Checklists

Residential Site Development Inspection Process

LOT GRADING GUIDELINES

Infiltration Trench. Image: Cahill Associates, Inc.

Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Pre-Application Checklist. Pre-Application Optional Checklist. Application Checklist

Natural Gas Service Installation and Meter Clearance Requirements

Highway Drainage 1- Storm Frequency and Runoff 1.1- Runoff Determination

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval and provides the following motion for the commission s consideration:

BMP 6.4.4: Infiltration Trench

Fence and Wall Requirements

Chapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw

GRAY WATER SYSTEMS (Reference California Plumbing Code Chapter 16 and 16A) Revised: 6/11/14

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

GRADING & DRAINAGE PERMIT SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT PROGRAM OVERVIEW

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 700 STORM DRAINAGE STANDARDS...

Planning & Building Department. Requirements for Erosion and Sediment Control

Application For Graywater Irrigation System Permit

Scope of work (To be completed previously, shown here as reference.) DIVISION 2- SITEWORK: Site work (Scheduled to start September 18 th, 2017)

Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Task Order Authorization

15. Detailed, specific REVISION STATEMENT on plan and or letter attached to each set of plans (for permit revisions only)

LOT GRADING. LOT GRADING REQUIREMENTS The following lot grading requirements came into effect on May 1, 2007:

Building Permit Application Office Use Only Please Print Clearly in Ink or Type

SECTION TRENCHING & BACKFILLING

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

Storm. Section. B. General Design and Drawing Standards Design

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

StormwaterWise Landscapes: Pervious Surfaces Specifications

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

CITY OF WINTER PARK SETBACK/COVERAGE WORKSHEET GUIDE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS, GRADING AND/OR DRAINAGE PLANS, LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE PLANS

Garage Construction. Permit Guide. Development Center. General Information. Zoning Ordinance Requirements. Building Code Requirements

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

STORM DRAINAGE CHAPTER 11

Construction Best Management Practices Handbook BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Sand Filter T-6. Description. Site Selection

STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Section 1 Non-Conforming Structures and Uses Allowed to Continue. 12

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 11, 2013

Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Report and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction Activities

Understanding Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) (SWPPPS)

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PHONE Residential Accessory Structures

The exam is enclosed with this correspondence. This test emphasizes standard requirements for installing gravity-fed septic systems.

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Permit Requirements for Landslide-Prone Areas in the City of Seattle. Slope Stability and Vegetative Soil Stabilization in the Puget Sound Region

Section 401. PIPE CULVERTS

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1

Project Need and Evaluation

CHAPTER 7 - INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE... 2

Choctaw Lake Property Owners Association DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS (Approved by the Board of Trustees January 9, 2018)

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA

BLOCK, LOT ; Section Requirement Status of Permit Review Status of C.O. Review The first 6 items are relevant to the principal building (house):

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

Subsurface Infiltration SMP One-Sheet - download a summary of this tool, with quick reference facts for. clients and developers.

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Appendix K: Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Check List

B. Install storm drain inlet protection to prevent clogging of the stormsewer and sediment loads to downstream stormwater facilities or waterbodies.

CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN

WASTEWATER REVIEW CHECKLIST. Project Number: Reviewed By: Telephone:

Feasibility Study for Groundwater Availability for Spring Creek Creation at Squalicum Creek Park

CHAPTER 13 R-5 MANUFACTURED MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

GWINNETT COUNTY STORM SEWER PIPE STANDARDS

Siphonic. Drain System. Engineered Water Solutions for Today s Building Design Needs

In preparation for constructing buildings on a property, the builder. Site Preparation CHAPTER

GRAY WATER SYSTEMS FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

SECTION UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND GRADING

PART 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Keys Edge Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

Index. Composition and Order of Plan Set. Utility Plan... 5

OWNER S GUIDE TO A BETTER FOUNDATION

Last Updated March 15, 2016

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., 2010

Ingham County Drain Commissioner Patrick E. Lindemann 707 BUHL AVENUE P. O. BOX 220 MASON MI PH. (517) FAX (517)

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

TOWN OF WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

CITY OF SPRING HILL Water Quality Buffer Zone Policy (Adopted April 22, 2008)

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALLS

Transcription:

Stormwater Drainage: Stormwater line will be ABOVE ground corrugated pipe (No need to bury) running down to basin on NW 99 th St. It is simple and approved. Please see pages 11 and 12 of the document below for the approved Stormwater Drainage Plan.

Accessor Parcel Number: 057900-0175 Scale: 1 = 10 Figure 1. Plan Overview with Schedules for Windows and Doors

City of Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections Issued for Permit Issued By: Rudy Camacho 07/19/2017 NORTH 33 31 32 34 35 36 19 37 27 29 28 30 1936 NW 99th Street, Seattle, WA 98177 38 17 21 Parcel # 057900-0175 SDCI Project #: 3022916, 6488248 FIGURE 3-1. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1 = 3

25 12 15 3 NORTH 11 7 2 9 10 5 8 1936 NW 99 th Street, Seattle, WA 98177 Parcel # 057900-0175 SDCI Project #: 3022916, 6488248 Scale: 1 = 3 FIGURE 3-2. SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

25 NORTH 18 38 37 18 18 27 27 1936 NW 99 th Street, Seattle, WA 98177 Parcel # 057900-0175 SDCI Project #: 3022916, 6488248 30 18 Scale: 1 = 3 FIGURE 3-3. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

NORTH ELEVATION 263.5 FT SOUTH VIEW OF ROOF WEST VIEW OF ROOF NORTH VIEW OF ROOF EAST VIEW OF ROOF Scale 1 = 4 Figure 4. Roof Plan PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1936 NW 99 TH STREET, SEATTLE, WA 98177 TAX PARCEL #: 057900-0175 SDCI PROJECT #: 3022914, 6488248

Overall 263.5 FT Roof Top 258.5 FT Second Level 249.5 FT SOUTH First Level 240.5 FT Average Grade Level 234 FT Lower Level 231.5 FT Ground 226 FT EAST Garage Entrance WEST NORTH Grade Average Level calculation is based on SDCI Director s Rule 4-2012. Figure 5. Elevation 1936 NW 99 th Street, Seattle, WA 98177 Parcel # 057900-0175 SDCI Project # 3022914, 6488248 Use Formula 1: The Grade Average Level = 234.3 FT

SITE PLAN PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1936 NW 99 TH STREET, SEATTLE, WA 98177 PROPERTY OWNER: QIAN ZHANG TAX PARCEL #: 057900-0175 SDCI PROJECT #: 3022914, 6488248 WETLAND AREA = 346 SQFT TOTAL LOT SIZE = 7112 SQFT DEVELOPMENT AREA = 1557 SQFT TOTAL STEEP SLOPE AREA = 5270 SQFT OVERALL PERCENTAGE OF INTRUSION INTO STEEP SLOPE = 29.5% < 30% RIPARIAN AREA = 280 SQFT LOT COVERAGE = 16% AVERAGE GRADE LEVEL = 233.26 FT NOTES: Markers are surface mounted monuments in accordance with Director s Rule 4-2007 Stormwater pipe will lay on the surface and its placement will not require any ground disturbance and will be outside of wetland buffer area. Utility Lines: A Sewer, Trenched; B Water, Trenched; C Gas, Trenched; D Power, Overhead; E Cable/Phone, Trenched 51 PL 95.23 RIPARIAN AREA SIDE YARD 5 10 Wetland Land Disturbing Area: Marker 1,2,3,8,7,6,5 (inside red lines); Access on NW 100 th St: Driveway Entrance Markers 5 and 6; Utility lines will be outside of the tree protection area. 20 FRONT YARD 12.9 NW 100 th St NON-DISTURBANCE AREA (for both wetland and Steep Slope) 50 20 FRONT YARD PL 74.69 22.3 Sewer, Water, Gas, Power, cable/phone Marker 1 Tree 15 3 Marker 5 Marker 7 PROPOSED HOUSE 14.2 Marker 6 Marker 2 Wetland Buffer Boundary Utility lines Entrance Marker 8 Marker 3 9.5 Tree 5 SIDE YARD 4 PL 95.23 20.5 16.1 6.2 11.6 Stormwater; see Note 21 95.23 30 PL 74.69 57 Center Line of NW 99 th Street SCALE: 1 = 13.5 Updated on 1/27/17 per ECA Wetland Correction Notice #5

NOTE: Markers are surface mounted monuments in accordance with Director s Rule 4-2007 NW 100 th Street MODIFIED WETLAND DELINEATION BOUNDARY 10 74.69 22.3 14.2 9.5 15 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1936 NW 99 TH STREET, SEATTLE, WA 98177 TAX PARCEL #: 057900-0175 SDCI PROJECT #: 3022914, 6488248 51 RIPARIAN AREA 20 FRONT YARD 12.9 PL 74.69 Marker 1 Power Marker 5 3 PROPOSED HOUSE Tree 5 SIDE YARD 20.5 16.1 4 Marker 8 6.2 *Stormwater pipe will lay on the surface and its placement will not require any ground disturbance. SIDE YARD 5 MODIFIED WETLAND DELINEATION BOUNDARY 50 Tree Marker 2 Marker 3 Stormwater Pipe Location * 11.6 95.23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 16, 17, 18 BLOCK 3, THE BAYVIEW ADDITION TO SALMON BAY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOL. 34 OF PLATS, PAG 77, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PL 95.23 Wetland 20 FRONT YARD PL 95.23 30 PL 74.69 SCALE: 1 = 13.5 Center Line of NW 99 th Street

1936 NW 99 th Street Drainage Plan Notes: 1. A perimeter drain/dewatering system should be installed to reduce the potential for groundwater entering into foundation and slab areas. 2. The subgrade beneath a structural floor system should be graded so that water does not pond. In addition, drain laterals that span the crawl space are recommended to prevent ponding of water within the crawlspace. 3. As a minimum, the subsurface drainage system should consist typically of 4-inch minimum diameter perforated rigid PVC pipe surrounded by at least one pipe diameter of free draining gravel. The pipe should be wrapped in a geosynthetic to prevent fine soils from clogging the system in the future. The pipe should drain by gravity to a suitable all-weather outlet or to a properly designed area underdrain system. Surface cleanouts of the perimeter drain should be installed at minimum serviceability distances around the addition. A properly constructed drain system can result in a reduction of moisture infiltration of the subsurface soils. Drains which are improperly installed can introduce settlement or heave of the subsurface soils and could result in improper surface grading only compounding the potential issues. 4. The entire design and construction team should evaluate, within their respective field of expertise, the current and potential sources of water throughout the life of the structure and provide any design/construction criteria to alleviate the potential for moisture changes. 5. In general, proper surface drainage should be maintained at this site during and after completion of construction operations. The ground surface adjacent to buildings should be sloped to promote rapid run-off of surface water. A minimum slope of six inches in the first five horizontal feet for landscaped or graveled areas is recommended. These slopes should be maintained during the service life of buildings. 6. Landscaping should be limited around building areas. Irrigation should be minimal and limited to maintain plants. Roof downspouts should discharge on splash-blocks or other impervious surfaces and directed away from the building. Ponding of water should not be allowed immediately adjacent to the building. 7. It is important to follow these recommendations to minimize settling of the foundation elements throughout the life of the facility. Construction means and methods should also be utilized which minimizes saturation of soils during construction. 8. Positive drainage away from the new structures is essential to the successful performance of foundations and flatwork, and should be provided during the life of the structure. Paved areas within 10 feet of structures should slope at a minimum of 2 percent away from foundations, and landscape areas within 10 feet of structures should slope away at a minimum of 8 percent. Downspouts from all roof drains, if any, should cross all backfilled areas such that they discharge all water away from the backfill zones and structures. Drainage should be created such that water is diverted away from building sites and away from backfill areas of adjacent buildings.

Figure 6. Storm Water Drainage System - continued Notes: 1. Existing corrugated pipe that captures and direct runoff from the neighborhood above is shown on the left. 2. The proposed storm water drainage system will not use this pipe. 3. The proposed drainage system will use a larger pipe and direct runoff to the existing drainage collection point at NW 99 th Street. 4. The overall drainage capacity from the subject lot will not increase after the development. Therefore the proposed development will not adversely impact the drainage capacity of the existing corrugated pipe that captures and directs runoff from the neighborhood above. 1936 NW 99 th Street, WA 98177 Parcel # 057900-0175 DPD Project # 3022914, 6488248

Site Plan Calculation: 1. Wetland According to the wetland report generated b the Wetland Professional Scientist (WPS), the wetland area inside the subject lot is approximately 346 SQFT. Figure 3. Non-disturbance Area

2. The percentage of the wetland area among the total lot area: 346 ft 2 / 7050 ft 2 = 5% According to the wetland report by the Wetland Professional Scientist: 3. Stream: According to the wetland report, Riparian Management Area is located in the northwest corner of the property. The proposed construction is outside this area. The area of Riparian Management Area is 280 SQ FT. 4. Steep Slope: According to the ECA Topographic Survey performed by Chadwick & Winters, the area of on-site step slopes 40% or greater = 5,270 SQFT or 74% of the total parcel area. (Note 8 from ECA Topographic Survey) 5. LOT COVERAGE The area of footprint of all structures on the entire lot = 1114 ft 2 ; Lot size = 7112 ft 2 according to Topographic Survey Lot coverage = 1114 / 7112 = 16 % According to Seattle Land Use Code (23.44.010), homes (principle structures) and associated structure may cover 35% of the lot on lots 5,000 square feet in area. Lot coverage requirement is met. 6. AVERAGE GRADE LEVEL = 234.3 FT. 7. Yards: The lot has the following features: (1) The yard borders both NW 99 th Street and NW 100 th Street; (2) The yard is a through lot ( a lot with two street frontage opposite of each other); (3) The yard is on a sloping lot that is greater than 35 percent.

6 2 16 The area of structural roots traveling north of the trunk No Construction An ISA certified arborist to be present to inspect FENCE REQUIREMENT