Review For Final Exam. Review For Final Exam

Similar documents
Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost

FUNDAMENTALS OF GRANULAR MEDIA FILTRATION. Gordon Williams, PhD, PE East Bay Municipal Utility District

CE 370. Filtration. Overview of the Process Location in the Treatment Plant

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

BayFilter Design Manual

How Far Can You Push Your Filters? Optimization Lessons

High-Rate Stormwater Treatment with Up-Flow Filtration

CGN 6933: Drinking Water Treatment Processes Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of South Florida Cunningham Spring 2013

Enhanced Filtration. CEE 453: Laboratory Research in Environmental Engineering Spring 2001

Filter Surveillance PSW Rocky Mountain Summit April 5, Advanced Process Control and Optimization

BAYFILTER SPECIFICATIONS

Copyright Pecivilexam.com all rights reserved- Breadth Exam 120 solved Problems.

ENGINEERING MATERIALS Assignment #8: Concrete Mix Design

Dr. Mark Risse Dr. Sidney Thompson Xianben Zhu Keith Harris Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Comparison of Length Changes, Flexural Strengths and Compressive Strengths. Between Concrete Made with Rounded Gravel

Investigations on Some Properties of no-fines Concrete

Lake County WTP Improvements and Capacity Increase. OTCO 9 th Annual Water and Wastewater Workshop. Nick Pizzi Aqua Serv

INDUSTRIAL FILTRATION EQUIPMENT LWS Filter Series

BACKGROUND: SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:

In Florida, the requirements for both highlevel

Underwater Avalanche: Turbidity Currents Investigating Density Currents

Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete. Properties of Concrete

SECTION 1 STALOK FIBER FOR TURF PARKING / EVENT STAGING AND FIRE LANES

2. To determine Normal Consistency, Initial & Final setting time, Specific Gravity, fineness & compressive strength of Cement (IS: )

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

CHAPTER 3 CHARACTERIZATION OF MANUFACTURED SAND

Florida Method of Test for NONREPETITIVE STATIC PLATE LOAD TEST OF SOILS AND FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT COMPONENTS

Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-I

Suspended Metal lath and Cement Plaster. Coverings Rigid Insulation, 1/2 - in 0.75 psf. Floor Fill Lightweight Concrete, per inch 8 psf

MONTHLY OPERATION REPORT (MOR)--ALL WATER SYSTEMS

NJCAT TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION. HydroStorm Hydrodynamic Separator. Hydroworks, LLC

The Next Generation of Storm Water Treatment Technology

M.C. Christianson Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Name Lab Section Date. Sediment Lab

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

SILVA CELL 2 ENGINEERING REPORT AND TESTING CONCLUSIONS. Prepared by: Derek Barkey, Innova Engineering

Pilot Testing and Evaluation of Three Filtration Technologies for the Eugene / Springfield Wastewater Treatment Plant

Effect of Grain Size Distribution on Elastic Velocity

Grain Silo Strengthening South Dakota. Prepared for Vector Construction Group

OPTIMIZED 3/4" GRADATION LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE REPORT

MODEL SPECIFICATIONS: Hydraulically Driven Steel Underpinning Pile Specifications

The Mechanical Properties of High Strength Concrete for Box Girder Bridge Deck in Malaysia

Hydrodynamic Separation Product Calculator

Water Treatment Math

DISTRIBUTION TECHNOLOGY SAVES WATER. SAVES SALT. SAVES THE ENVIRONMENT. Where Innovation Flows

RESILIENT MODULUS TESTING OF OPEN GRADED DRAINAGE LAYER AGGREGATES FOR INTERLOCKING CONCRETE BLOCK PAVEMENTS

Full-Scale Bending Tests of Strongwell s SE28 Fiberglass-Reinforced Polymer Poles

Masonry Wall Bracing. A Simplified Approach To Bracing Masonry Walls Under Construction. Masonry Bracing Task Force.

W H I T E P A P E R. The Effect of Low Uniformity Coefficient Anthracite on Dual Media Filtration

Detection of Thermal Cracks in Early-Age Concrete by AE

Your Clear Choice for Filtration and Water &Wastewater Treatment equipment

Recommended Specifications For Portland Cement Pervious Pavement

DOWNSTREAM DEFENDER TESTING USING MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTOCOL UTILIZING OK-110 FEED SAND

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 )

Interaction Testing Report. 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids. Stone Strong Systems Lincoln, Nebraska

A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF CLOTH FILTER MEDIA APPLIED IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

STANDARD SPECIFICATION STORMWATER QUALITY MEMBRANE FILTRATION TREATMENT DEVICE

FIELD PERFORMANCE FOR UP FLOW FILTRATION DEVICE

Alternative Filter Media for Potable Water Treatment

Project ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

ULTRA HIGH PERFORMANCE AND HIGH EARLY STRENGTH CONCRETE

Kinds of Mortars. Mortar. Specifying Mortar. Proportion Specifications. M a S o N w O r K. Specification for Mortar Cement

Design Data 6. Loads and Supporting Strengths Elliptical and Arch Pipe. Values of B d

Water Utility Science Water Math and Hydraulics 050. Name: Date:

Drinking Water Production Using Moving Bed Filtration

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.3. Soil Compaction (Das, Ch. 5)

Head versus Volume and Time

FOR 274 Forest Measurements and Inventory. Written Take Home Exam

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Optimizing Dual Media Filtration for Particulate Removal

Lecture Notes. Elasticity, Shrinkage and Creep. Concrete Technology

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR RIPRAP. Conditions Where Practice Applies

80 Fy (ksi)= 50 2 nd Floor = 61. Length (ft) Plan View. Penthouse

AALSO Proficiency Program Level I, II & III

EES 1001 Lab 9 Groundwater

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 130 Department of Transportation January Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Section Two: Steel Pipe Design

Aggregate Optimization. Quality Assurance Workshop February Justin Bryan. Frank Bryan Inc. Bryan Materials Group

Topic #4 Soil Compaction

Effects Of Bedding Void On Internal Moment Increase In Concrete Pipes

Stream Ecology Lab Module 4/5 Determining Discharge and Sediment Yield in a Small Stream

SPECIFICATIONS - DETAILED PROVISIONS Section Controlled Low Strength Material C O N T E N T S

SECTION AGGREGATES

Optimizing the Ballasted Sedimentation Process at the Anacortes Water Treatment Plant Jeff Marrs Plant Manager Greg Pierson - HDR

How are My Filters Doing? Filter Profiling Reveals All

SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations

Concrete Vibration Handbook

Putting the Misconceptions to Rest:

Small-Scale Pilot Testing of Stormwater Treatment Systems to Meet Numerical Effluent Limits in the Lake Tahoe Basin

Wet Detention Ponds, MCTTs, and other Options for Critical Area Stormwater Control. Robert Pitt University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE OPTIMAL THICKNESS OF A SAND LAYER IN A SAND FILTER WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE. July 1994

DURABILITY of CONCRETE STRUCTURES. Part- 3 Concrete Cracks

RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE EXPOSED TO ELEVATED TEMPERATURE

OPTIMISING FILTRATION AT DUNGOG WTP. David Turner. Hunter Water Australia

PRISM TEST, FLAT JACK TEST, REBOUND HAMMER, & MECHANICAL PULSE VELOCITY

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Harrisburg, PA

Alternate Systems Guidance

Transcription:

1. A random error of ±0.11 ft. is estimated for each of 12 length measurements that are added together to get the total length. What is the estimated total error? ETotal E n 0.11ft. 12 0.3811 0.38 A. ±0.38 ft. B. ±0.33 ft. C. ±0.28 ft. D. ±0.19 ft. E. ±0.01 ft.

2. What is the distance to the flag pole if the pole is 35.0 ft. in height and the measured angle a = 7 45 30. A. 4.87 ft. B. 35.0 ft. C. 100 ft. D. 257 ft. E. 295 ft. opposite side tan adjacent side d 35.0 ft. adjacent side 35.0ft tan 7.7583 257ft. 3. Complete and check the above set of level notes and estimate the height of the instrument between points TP 2 and TP 3. Station BS HI FS Elevation A. 102.42 ft. B. 101.58 ft. C. 100.56 ft. D. 97.36 ft. E. 95.48 ft. BM 1 1.23 101.23 100.00 TP 1 2.25 98.96 4.52 96.71 TP 2 6.25 100.56 4.65 94.31 TP 3 4.23 101.58 3.21 97.35 TP 4 1.47 97.36 5.69 95.89 BM 2 8.42 88.94

4. Complete and check the above set of level notes and estimate the elevation of point BM 2. A. 101.02 ft. B. 100.02 ft. C. 98.02 ft. D. 97.35 ft. E. 88.94 ft. Station BS HI FS Elevation BM 1 1.23 101.23 100.00 TP 1 2.25 98.96 4.52 96.71 TP 2 6.25 100.56 4.65 94.31 TP 3 4.23 101.58 3.21 97.35 TP 4 1.47 97.36 5.69 95.89 BM 2 8.42 88.94 5. Develop and check a set of level notes from the above figure. What is the FS at point TP 2? 1.21 6.71 BM 2.34 7.53 Elevation 432.91 TP 1 TP 2 Station BS HI FS Elevation BM 1 1.21 434.12 432.91 TP 1 2.34 429.75 6.71 427.41 TP 2 422.22 7.53 422.22

5. Develop and check a set of level notes from the above figure. What is the FS at point TP 2? A. 1.34 ft. B. 3.20 ft. C. 4.41 ft. D. 6.71 ft. E. 7.53 ft. Station BS HI FS Elevation BM 1 1.21 434.12 432.91 TP 1 2.34 429.75 6.71 427.41 TP 2 422.22 7.53 422.22 6. What is the change in elevation between points BM 1 and TP 2? A. -16.40 ft. B. -10.69 ft. C. 4.54 ft. D. 10.94 ft. E. 432.91 ft. TP2 BM1 422.22ft. 432.91ft. 10.69 ft. Station BS HI FS Elevation BM 1 1.21 434.12 432.91 TP 1 2.34 429.75 6.71 427.41 TP 2 422.22 7.53 422.22

7. Estimate the elevation of Point A? 100 ft. 95 ft. 90 ft. 85 ft. 80 ft. 75 ft. 70 ft. 65 ft. 500 ft. 500 ft. B A. 65 ft. B. 68 ft. C. 70 ft. D. 73 ft. E. 75 ft. A 60 ft. 55 ft. 8. Which of the following values is most nearly slope between Point A and Point B? 100 ft. 95 ft. 90 ft. 85 ft. 80 ft. 75 ft. 70 ft. 65 ft. 500 ft. 500 ft. B A. 1% B. 3% C. 5% D. 7% E. 9% A 60 ft. 55 ft. Slope h 80 ft. 73 ft. 0.014 L 500 ft.

9. For the following site data, what would be an appropriate square grid spacing to develop a contour map using one-foot intervals? A. 5 foot B. 10 foot C. 15 foot D. 20 foot E. 25 foot Side Distance Point Elevation AB 100.0 A 100.0 BC 150.0 B 105.0 CD 200.0 C 108.0 DA 100.0 D 105.0 100 ft. AB 20.0 5ft. 150 ft. BC 50.0 3ft. CD 200 ft. 66.7 3ft. 100 ft. DA 20.0 5ft. 10. If the bar fails at strains greater than 0.05, what is the largest allowable deformation of bar to prevent failure? A. 11 in. B. 9 in. C. 7 in. D. 5 in. E. 2 in. 15 ft. 25,000 lb. 0.0515ft. 12in. L L ft. 9in.

11. If the bar yields at a deformation of 0.25 in. under an axial load, estimate the yield stress in the material if the modulus of elasticity of 29,000 ksi? A. 20 ksi B. 40 ksi C. 60 ksi D. 80 ksi E. 100 ksi 15 ft. 25,000 lb. 0.25in. E 29,000ksi 15ft. 12in. ft. =40ksi 12. What is the deformation of the bar shown above if its cross-sectional area is 0.5 in. 2 and the modulus of elasticity of the material is 29,000 ksi? A. 0.03 in. B. 0.31 in. C. 0.62 in. D. 1.25 in. E. 2.50 in. 15 ft. P PL E E A L AE PL 25 kips(180in.) 0.31in. 2 AE 0.5in. (29,000 ksi) 25,000 lb.

Construct ten beams, each having the dimensions shown in the figure below. Include a make-sure-you-have-enough factor of 1.2 in your mix calculations. Assume a w/c ratio of 0.35 and a mix design of 1:2:3. All weights should be reported in quarter pound. Assume concrete weights about 145 lb./ft. 3 for all calculations. 30 in. 6 in. 4 in. 13. The total volume of concrete required for this application is estimated to be: 30 in. V 104in. 6in. 30in. 1.2 6 in. 4 in. Number of beams make-sure-you-have-enough factor A. 1,080 in 3 B. 2,700 in 3 C. 7,200 in 3 D. 8,640 in 3 E. 9,640 in 3 3 8,640in.

14. The weight of cement required to make 600 lb. of the concrete mix describe above is: Cement ratio Cement 1 600lb. 6 100lb. A. 40 lbs B. 60 lbs C. 80 lbs D. 100 lbs E. 120 lbs Sum of mix portions 15. The weight of course aggregate required to make 300 lb. of the concrete mix describe above is: 3 Coarse Aggregate 300 lb. 6 Coarse aggregate ratio 150 lb. A. 75 lbs B. 100 lbs C. 125 lbs D. 150 lbs E. 175 lbs Sum of mix portions

From the data given below, develop a particle-size distribution plot. Use the table and blank graph shown below: 16. The percent passing the #30 sieve may be most closely approximated as: A. 100% B. 80% C. 40% D. 20% E. 10%

17. The effective size of the soil may be most closely approximated as: A. 0.01 mm B. 0.10 mm C. 0.20 mm D. 0.25 mm E. 0.40 mm 0.25 mm 18. The effective size of the soil shown in the graph above is most closely approximated by: 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Percent Finer A. 0.3 mm B. 0.4 mm C. 0.5 mm D. 0.6 mm E. 0.7 mm 0% 0.1 0.3 mm 1.0 10.0 Sieve Size (mm)

19. The particle-size D 30 is most closely approximated as: 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Percent Finer A. 0.55 mm B. 0.65 mm C. 0.75 mm D. 0.85 mm E. 1.05 mm 0% 0.1 0.55 mm 1.0 10.0 Sieve Size (mm) 20. Which of the following filtration mechanisms is not involved in removing suspended solids in a granularmedia filter? A. interception B. straining C. flocculation D. hydration E. sedimentation

21. The hydraulic loading rate in the 3.5 in. diameter filters in lab, with a flowrate of 1,250 ml/min, is most nearly approximated as: Flowrate Loading Rate Area 1, 250 ml min 1gallon 144in. 3,785ml 2 ft. 2 4.94 2 (3.5in.) 4 A. 1.0 gpm/ft. 2 B. 2.0 gpm/ft. 2 C. 3.0 gpm/ft. 2 D. 4.0 gpm/ft. 2 E. 5.0 gpm/ft. 2 2 gpm ft. 22. The backwash velocity required to expand a sand bed filter to a porosity of 0.70 for a sand with a settling velocity is 0.20 ft./s and the initial porosity of the sand is 0.35 is most nearly approximated as: v v s 4.5 e 0.20 ft 0.70 4.5 s A. 0.01 ft./s B. 0.03 ft./s C. 0.04 ft./s D. 0.05 ft./s E. 0.07 ft./s 0.04 ft. s

23. The results of a filter run, operated in a manner identical to that used in lab, are shown in the table above. Which of the following volumes most closely estimates the total volume treated after 60 minutes? A. 24,000 ml B. 36,000 ml C. 48,000 ml D. 54,000 ml E. 72,000 ml 24. Which of the following values most closely estimates the average turbidity after 60 minutes? A. 0 NTU B. 3 NTU C. 5 NTU D. 7 NTU E. 9 NTU

25. If the average turbidity is 10 NTU at the end of 60 minutes, which of the following values most closely estimates the %NTU removed? 100 10 % Turbidity ( NTU) Removed 100% 90% 100 A. 100% B. 95% C. 90% D. 85% E. 75% End of Review