Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

Similar documents
NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Short-term and long-term studies of the co-treatment of landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Constructed Wetlands

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

TREATMENT OF FISHERY WASTEWATER BY SEQUENCING BATCH MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (SBMBBR)

TALBINGO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE. Kay White

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Treatment of palm oil mill effluent using biological sequencing batch reactor system

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Removal of High Ammonia Levels from Municipal Wastewater Using Humic Acid and Selective Bio-Augmentation

Available online at I-SEEC Proceeding - Science and Engineering (2013)

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Photo-Activated Sludge System (PAS): A novel algal-bacterial biotreatment for nutrient rich wastewater

Activated Sludge Treatment Extended Aeration (EA) and Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Systems

BIOTECTOR TOC Analysers

Treatment of coke plant wastewater by SND fixed biofilm hybrid system

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Biological Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal from Anaerobic Digestate in a Demonstration Sequencing Batch Reactor

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

NITROUS OXIDE EMISSION DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF ELECTRON ACCEPTOR BY A DENITRIFYING PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SLUDGE

Modeling biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems _ The case of Crowborough Sewage Treament Works, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Impacts of blackwater co-digestion upon biogas production y in pilot-scale UASB and CSTR reactors

Application of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater

Treatment of Contaminated Waters with Petroleum by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)

ASA Analytics ChemScan Process Analyzers Reprint ASA Publication #194

Evaluation of gradual hydroponic system for decentralized. wastewater treatment and reuse in rural areas of Palestine.

Lysis and Autooxidation. Organic Nitrogen (net growth) Figure by MIT OCW.

Nutrient Removal Enhancement Using Process Automation at Holly Hill

LABORATORY PROJECT: IMPACT OF VARIABLE LOADING ON A FIXED FILM REACTOR VERSUS A SUSPENDED GROWTH REACTOR

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC , Hurghada, Egypt

MODIFIED SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTOR (MSBR) A NEW PROCESS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Future Directions In Wastewater Treatment

Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify

Increasing Biological Phosphorus Removal: Texas Case Study

ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEM OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING IN- SITU AMMONIUM AND NITRATE PROBES

Biological Nutrient Removal Processes

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL QUALITY AT SOME SELECTED SAND MINING LOCATIONS OF THE LOWER REACHES OF KALUGANGA

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Project Report AFFORDABLE AND SUSTAINABLE WATER RECYCLING THROUGH OPTIMAL TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

N2O EMISSION FROM A NITRITATION DOUBLE-SLUDGE SYSTEM TREATING WASTEWATER WITH A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF AMMONIUM

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

Study on Novel Bioreactors Technology for Biodegradation of Oil Sands Process-Affected Water

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

How to define performance parameters for verification including parameters relevant for energy efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

Selenium Reduction. Caroline Dale

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

TRICKLING FILTER WITH HEXAGONAL CLOSE - PACKED MEDIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATERS JOAN DOLLY CHUNG ZIE WEI

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS OXYGENATED FUN WITH LESS CARBON COST KELLY MARTIN AND SANDEEP SATHYAMOORTHY

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

Effect of supplying a carbon extracting solution on denitrification in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

AEROBIC GRANULATION - AN ECONOMICALLY VIABLE OPTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

SEWAGE FLOW AND LOAD STUDY CASE OF UiTM SHAH ALAM

COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN WASTEWATER - A MODELLING APPROACH

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

COD REMOVAL OF CARDBOARD FACTORY WASTEWATER BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER

Implementing an Improved Activated Sludge Model into Modeling Software. A Thesis. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements.

Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents

Evaluation of the Performance of Vetiveria zizanioides in Removing Nutrients from Wastewater

EFFECT OF PROCESS CONFIGURATIONS AND ALUM ADDITION ON EBPR IN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. Erik Johannessen,* Randal W. Samstag,** H.

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

Transcription:

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes by Guo, Lei (Eric) A thesis submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering 2011 Faculty of Science and Technology University of Macau

CONTENT VITA...iii ABSTRACT... iv LIST OF FIGURES... vi LIST OF TABLES...viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... xi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION... 1 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW... 3 2.1 Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR)... 3 2.1.1 Stoichiometry...3 2.1.2 History and current situation...5 2.2 A 2 O and SBR processes... 8 2.2.1 SBR process...8 2.2.2 A 2 O process...9 2.3 Influencing factors for organic and nutrient removal... 10 2.3.1 Influencing factors for organic removal...10 2.3.2 Influencing factors for nitrogen removal...12 2.3.3 Influencing factors of phosphorus removal...16 CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS... 19 3.1 Reactor Setup and Operation... 19 3.1.1 Experimental set-up...19 3.1.2 Synthetic and real wastewater...20 3.2 Analytical Methods... 21 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION... 28 4.1 Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT)... 28 4.1.1 Effect of HRT on SBR process...28 4.1.2 Effect of HRT on A 2 O process...40 4.1.3 Comparison of HRT effect on SBR and A 2 O processes...43 4.2 Effect of influent COD/TP (C/P) ratio... 45 4.2.1 Effect of influent C/P ratio on SBR process...45 4.2.2 Effect of influent C/P ratio on A 2 O process...53 4.2.3 Comparison of influent C/P ratio effect on SBR and A 2 O processes...56 4.3 Effect of influent chloride concentration... 57 4.3.1 Effect of chloride on SBR process...57 4.3.2 Effect of chloride on A 2 O process...68 4.3.3 Comparison of Cl - effect on SBR and A 2 O processes...69 4.4 Real wastewater test... 73 4.4.1 SBR performance fed with real wastewater...73 i

4.4.2 A 2 O performance fed with real wastewater...76 4.4.3 Comparison of organic and nutrient removal in SBR and A 2 O processes fed with real wastewater...79 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION... 81 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH... 84 BIBLIOGRAPHY... 85 ii

University of Macau ABSTRACT Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes by Guo, Lei (Eric) Thesis Supervisor: Prof. Shim, Hojae Master of Science in Civil Engineering Comparative study of biological nutrient removal (BNR) in lab-scale SBR (sequencing batch reactor) and A 2 O (anaerobic/anoxic/oxic) reactor was conducted using synthetic and real wastewater. In synthetic wastewater test, the effects of HRT (hydraulic retention time), as an operating parameter, and some characteristics of influent wastewater, such as COD (chemical oxygen demand)/tp (total phosphorus) (C/P) ratios and chloride concentrations were investigated for the two processes. The optimum performance of the two reactors was both realized at 13.8-h HRT. Relatively higher TN (total nitrogen) and TP removal efficiencies were observed in the SBR. Adverse effect of influent C/P ratio on phosphorus removal was observed in both reactors. The highest TP removal efficiencies in the two processes were realized with influent C/P ratio of 200, at 91.0 and 83.3%, respectively. As PAOs (phosphorus accumulating organisms) competed with denitrifiers for external carbon source, nitrogen removal was affected with influent C/P ratios lower than 80 in A 2 O process. Excellent COD removal (higher than 95%) was always achieved for different influent C/P ratios in the two reactors. Organic and nutrient removal was obviously affected by the changing of influent Cl - concentration from 150 to 5,000 mg/l in both reactors. COD removal efficiency decreased linearly from 96.4 and 94.8 to 48.4 and 63.0% for SBR and A 2 O reactor, respectively, with the increase of chloride concentration from 95 to 5,000 mg/l. Regarding nitrogen removal, only nitrification process was influenced when 5,000 mg/l chloride was introduced into the influent of SBR. Phosphorus removal was negatively affected when influent chloride concentrations were higher than 1,500 mg/l, and effluent TP concentration kept increasing with iv

further increase of influent chloride concentration. In real wastewater test, percentages for COD, BOD 5 (biochemical oxygen demand), NH 3 -N, TN, and TP removals were averaged at 88.6, 97.5, 89.3, 82.7, and 71.5%, respectively, for SBR process, while the values were 86.0, 97.5, 88.9, 84.7, and 67.5, respectively, for A 2 O process. The effluent from SBR and A 2 O processes can almost meet the wastewater discharge permit of China (1st grade B), except for a little higher effluent TP concentrations. There is a great potential to upgrade the UNITANK and traditional activated sludge processes to SBR and A 2 O systems for advanced wastewater treatment in Taipa and Macau plants, respectively. v