Standard Operating Procedure. Vendor Management

Similar documents
Computer System Validation & Backup

R&D Manager Hillingdon Hospital. Revision History Effective Date Reason For Change. recommendations Version no:

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Confirming Research Study Capacity and Capability

Trial oversight SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

Marie-Claire Good, RG and GCP Manager James Rickard, Deputy Chief Pharmacist Technical Services Cheryl Lawrence, Senior Research Pharmacist

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

IMP Management and Accountability

Study Files and Filing

Standard Operating Procedure: Obtaining Informed Consent from Competent Adults for Research Studies. SOP Number: UoA-NHSG-SOP-010 Version No: 2

Date: 21 st May 2014 Version: 5 Page 1 of 11. Principal Author Name D. Skelhorn Signature: D. Skelhorn Date: 22 nd May 2014

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 410. Set up and Initiation of an Investigator Site

Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Management Standard Operating Procedure

Use of computerised equipment, software and systems in clinical research

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Trial Master File / Investigator Site File Index Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

Competence in Clinical Trials the Regulators Perspective.. (Jennifer Martin Senior GCP Inspector, 9 June 2014)

Author Signature: Date: 10 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 310

STUDY CLOSURE AND ARCHIVING

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 320. Developing a Research Protocol

Primary Care mcta 2013: Guidance for use

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

Sponsorship of Clinical Research Studies

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Development Safety Update Report Guidance

SOP01a: Standard Operating Procedure for Developing, Reviewing and Approving Standard Operating Procedures

GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE TRAINING POLICY FOR PERSONNEL UNDERTAKING RESEARCH. UHB015 Version No: 2 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No:

Inspections: an academic perspective

Research Governance Policy

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

ECTU Central Office SOP ECTU_TM_17 Management of Trial (IMP) Supplies

Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic) for management, audit and inspection of clinical trials

Management and Accountability of Investigational Medicinal Products in the King s Clinical Research Facility

Standard Operating Procedures

etmf A Regulators Perspective Paula Walker, GCP Operations Manager & Senior GCP Inspector

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Cheryl Lawrence, Senior Research Pharmacist Damien Kelly, Barts Pharmacy Site and Clinical Trials Lead

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

5 th Training Workshop for Micro-, Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL

Date: 2 nd June 2010 Version: 3 Page 1 of 16 AND LABELLING (NWORTH 3.08) Principal Author Name: E. Bedson Signature: E. Bedson Date:15/06/10

Supply of aseptically - prepared doses of IMPs across legal boundaries. Edition 1. December 2017

Research Governance Policy and Procedure

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Ireland

HANDLING AND SHIPPING OF INFECTIOUS SUBSTANCES FOR CLINICAL TRIALS

1 The Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC)... 1

THE IPSWICH HOSPITAL NHS TRUST. Divisional Board. TERMS OF REFERENCE Version 1.0

RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

MRC. Clinical Trials. Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. Medical Research Council

European Academy of Hospital Pharmacy Biotechnology Educational Summit. Clinical trials David Gerrett (Acknowledgment Mark Howells)

OFFICE FOR RESEACH PROCEDURE. Sponsor Responsibilities in Investigator Initiated Studies

OCTC 2012 CRO Selection

Storage of Clinical Trials Materials and Investigational Medicinal Products

GCP Basics - refresher

Hospital Authority (HA) Guide on Research Ethics (for Study Site & Research Ethics Committee)

Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module V- Pharmacovigilance System Master File

Department At-A-Glance

INDUCTION POLICY AND PROCEDURE

This policy supersedes the following which much now be destroyed:

Lead Employer Flexible Working Policy. Trust Policy

INSPECTION OF INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES (IEC) The Italian Experience

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

How to rescue a clinical trial

Quality Site Visit Report FGK Clinical Research (FGK) GmbH, Munich Germany. Audit No. CT6018. Date of Audit: 3rd to 5th May 2017

Constructing an etmf 12/2/2011. consider your current etmf structure!! The do s and don ts of EDM. Disclaimer

How to Apply for Ethics (Non-CTIMPs) including Sponsorship

Data Collection Tools Functions, Indicators & Sub-Indicators

Pharmacovigilance Post July 2012 The new frontier

DATA QUALITY POLICY. Version: 1.2. Management and Caldicott Committee. Date approved: 02 February Governance Lead

Hours of Work: 37.5 hours per week (part time hours negotiable)

Recording, Managing and Reporting Adverse Events in the UK

Records management policy. Document author Assured by Review cycle. Audit and Risk Committee. 1. Introduction Purpose or aim Scope...

B Can be disclosed to patients and the public

Safer Recruitment Policy

Honorary Contracts Procedure

Information Governance Management Framework

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Precision-Panc Master Protocol: Personalising treatment for pancreatic cancer.

H.E.S.T. Australia Limited. (as Trustee for the Health Employees Superannuation Trust Australia) Governance Disclosures

JOB DESCRIPTION. Medical Director

GOVERNANCE STRATEGY October 2013

Standard Operating Procedure

Reflection paper on guidance for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples

Date ratified June, Implementation Date August, Date of full Implementation August, Review Date Feb, Version number V02.

POLICY ON MANAGING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Decision Tree for selection of model agreements for collaborative commercial clinical research

Guidance on conducting consultations in the HRA Internal HRA guidance only

Board Charter Z Energy Limited

Ethics Committees/IRBs Today: Challenges for Efficiency and Quality

Employment Appeals Procedure

Transcription:

REFERENCE: VERSION NUMBER: 2.0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 28-03-18 REVIEW DATE: 28-03-20 AUTHOR: Clinical Trials Manager, Contracts & Quality Management Officer REVIEWED BY: Research & Innovation Group APPROVED BY: Deputy Director of Research CONTROLLER: Contracts & Quality Management Officer Document Version History VERSION EFFECTIVE NUMBER DATE 1.0 13-06-16 REASON FOR CHANGE SOP renamed and updated to include a robust system for vendor oversight Adapted with the kind permission of University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust DO NOT USE THIS SOP IN PRINTED FORM WITHOUT CHECKING IT IS THE LATEST VERSION Current versions of all Research & Innovation SOPs and accompanying documents are available online. If you are reading this document in printed form, please check that the version number and date match the most recent version on the Research & Innovation website: www.nbt.nhs.uk/research Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 1 of 7

i. SOP Flowchart Standard Operating Procedure Vendor identified R&I, in collaboration with CI, undertake an assessment of vendor suitability. This assessment should be documented in the TMF Vendor selected R&I, in collaboration with CI agree an appropriate vendor monitoring plan. Vendor contract negotiated by R&I The vendor monitoring plan should be filed in the TMF Vendor monitored in accordance with vendor monitoring plan Final contract signed on behalf of NBT by the Deputy Director of Research or an appropriately delegated member of R&I Vendor monitoring plan reviewed and revised as necessary throughout the trial following protocol amendments, updates to relevant legislation or changes to the sponsorship risk assessment Contract reviewed and revised as necessary throughout the trial following protocol amendments, updates to relevant legislation or changes to the sponsorship risk assessment Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 2 of 7

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this SOP is to describe the process for selection, evaluation and oversight of current and potential vendors for NBT-sponsored CTIMPs. This SOP also describes the process for managing agreements with external parties such as participating sites and/or service providers. NBT-sponsored CTIMPs may require research related-activities to be provided by organisations external to NBT. NBT may delegate activities to these other organisations, however as Sponsor, NBT retains ultimate responsibility for the clinical trial and must maintain sufficient oversight of all external vendors to ensure compliance with the applicable legislation and ICH GCP. All vendors must show due diligence when performing any functions that have been delegated to them. Although the focus of this SOP is CTIMPs sponsored by NBT, the principles outlined in this SOP apply to all research studies sponsored by NBT. 2. DEFINITIONS/ABBREVIATIONS CI CTIMP ICH GCP mnca NBT PI R&I SOP Sponsor TMF vendor Chief Investigator Clinical Trial of an Investigational Medicinal Product International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice Model Non-commercial Agreement developed by the UK Clinical Research Collaboration North Bristol NHS Trust Principal Investigator NBT Research & Innovation Office Standard Operating Procedure The individual, company, institution or organisation, which takes on ultimate responsibility for the initiation, management (or arranging the initiation and management) of and/or financing (or arranging the financing) for that research Trial Master File Organisation to which research related activities have been contracted, other than other NHS Trusts recruiting patients which should be considered research sites 3. WHO SHOULD USE THIS SOP This SOP should be used by investigators, research team members, and any other staff involved in CTIMPs sponsored by NBT. 4. WHEN SHOULD THIS SOP BE USED This SOP should be used to assess, select and maintain oversight of third party vendors undertaking any contracted research-related activities for CTIMPs sponsored by NBT. Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 3 of 7

This SOP should also be used when putting in place contractual arrangements between NBT and any organisation involved in the management and delivery of a CTIMP. 5. PROCEDURE 5.1. Vendor assessment and selection (a) As Sponsor, NBT may be required to delegate certain research-related activities to other organisations. R&I (in collaboration with the CI, where relevant) will assess the suitability of a vendor, to ensure that the vendor can perform the services to applicable standards and regulations prior to signing a research contract. This does not apply to academic/nhs collaborations, except in circumstances where the vendor service constitutes an essential function for a CTIMP e.g. randomisation. (b) A variety of assessment methods will be used when assessing the suitability of a vendor, including but not limited to: Requesting the vendor to complete a pre-qualification questionnaire. Review of marketing material. Assessment of CVs and expertise. Prior experience of working with the vendor. Obtaining appropriate references. Confirmation of relevant GCP, GMP or GLP certification (if appropriate). Assessment of the vendor s quality system and/or written procedures. Summary of recent inspections or audits. Ability to meet the needs of the trial. Capacity to deliver within required timeframes. Cost/budget. (c) The type of assessment undertaken will be determined on a case by case basis; however the process of assessment and the selection decision should be clearly documented in the TMF. (d) Some services may already be provided for NBT by external organisations in the clinical setting. Where this is the case, a separate assessment of suitability may not be required for the same organisation to provide the same services for research purposes. (e) A list of vendors who have previously provided research services will be maintained by the R&I department. This will be used by R&I for future vendor selection. Full reassessment will not be required if the vendor has previously been assessed as suitable unless the vendor is offering different services, has changed its SOPs, or R&I has concerns over the quality of service previously received. New vendors may also be approached. Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 4 of 7

5.2. Contractual arrangements (other than funding arrangements) Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 5 of 7 Standard Operating Procedure (a) For all CTIMPs sponsored by NBT, R&I will assess what type of contracts are required to be put in place with the other organisations involved in the trial, including but not limited to: Site Agreements, with other NHS organisations recruiting patients into the trial. Collaboration Agreements. Service Level Agreements. Material Transfer Agreements. Data Sharing Agreements. Confidentiality Agreements. (b) Where possible, NBT will utilise national templates and guidance for contractual arrangements for research (www.ukcrc.org/regulation-governance/modelagreements), for example the model non-commercial agreement (mnca) developed by the UK Clinical Research Collaboration. (c) Where national templates do not exist, NBT will use locally adapted template agreements, where available. (d) In instances where a template for a particular agreement does not exist, R&I may review a template provided by another organisation. Any amendments requested by other organisations to national or R&I templates will be reviewed and agreed with R&I, with a further legal review on behalf of NBT if appropriate. (e) Where existing overarching research agreements exist between NBT and its partner organisations, trial-specific research contracts may not be required. These will be assessed on a case by case basis. (f) Contracts are used to document and agree the relationship between NBT and the vendor, including but not limited to: Delegated tasks, duties, roles and responsibilities. Financial and legal considerations, including indemnity. Required standards of service and regulatory obligations. Intellectual property and publication provisions. Confidentiality provisions. Termination provisions. Subcontracting process by vendor, to ensure that subcontracting does not occur without Sponsor s knowledge or approval. Clear instructions that contract should not take precedence over protocol. Procedure for informing Sponsor of statutory inspections. Procedure for informing Sponsor of protocol non-compliance issues. Flow of relevant safety information. (g) All contracts will be signed on behalf of NBT by the Deputy Director of Research or an appropriately delegated member of R&I. Hard copies, or electronic copies, of the final contract shall be issued to the third party for signature. In general, NBT shall be

the last party to sign the agreement. It is acceptable to sign a PDF copy of a contract, and to make an agreement in counterparts. A fully executed copy of the contract will be circulated to all the parties and also to the CI and/or Trial Manager for inclusion in the TMF. (h) R&I will review such contracts following protocol amendments, updates to relevant legislation or changes to the sponsorship risk assessment to ensure the contract remains current. For further guidance on protocol amendments, please refer to the SOP on Research Study Amendments (RI/QMS/SOP/003). 5.3. Oversight of vendors (a) Once the vendor has been selected, R&I (in collaboration with the CI, where relevant) will consider how oversight of vendor activities is maintained to ensure compliance with the terms of the research contract, the protocol, ICH GCP and applicable regulations. A variety of assessment methods will be used, including but not limited to: Regular communications with the vendor (i.e. regular teleconference/meeting). Review of progress reports from the vendor. Review of trial management meeting minutes. Review of TMF and specific vendor activities. Visiting vendor premises/ conducting audit of vendor performance. Becoming a signatory on key documentation i.e. process documents (SOPs) or trial documents (data management plans, statistical analysis plans etc.) Developing a plan for escalation and resolution of non-compliance issues. Defining a process for the flow of relevant safety information. Vendor and collaborator engagement will be regularly reviewed at the meetings between Sponsor and Trial Manager, which are held approximately every two months. (b) A vendor monitoring plan should be defined prior to the commencement of clinical trial activities and filed in the TMF. Please refer to the SOP on Monitoring (RI/QMS/SOP/014). (c) The vendor monitoring plan should set out the level and frequency of monitoring. Minutes should be taken of all meetings and decisions should be clearly documented. Should any significant concerns be raised, R&I will review and recommend any appropriate corrective and preventative measures. 6. DISSEMINATION AND TRAINING SOPs will be distributed in accordance with the SOP on Preparation of Research SOPs (RI/QMS/SOP/001). Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 6 of 7

This SOP and any associated templates and forms will be uploaded to the Trust website (www.nbt.nhs.uk/research) and the Managed Learning Environment (MLE) system on the Trust intranet shortly after having been released. All staff whose activities are subject to this SOP should ensure that they read and understand the content of this SOP. The training log within the Investigator Site File/Trial Master File should be completed to document that members of staff have read and understood the content of this SOP. 7. RELATED SOPS AND DOCUMENTS UK Clinical Research Collaboration Model Agreements www.ukcrc.org/regulation-governance/model-agreements The following NBT documents are available on the R&I website: www.nbt.nhs.uk/research RI/QMS/SOP/003 RI/QMS/SOP/014 Research Study Amendments Monitoring Version 2.0/28-03-18/ Page 7 of 7