Roger A. Dall Antonia

Similar documents
IMPACT OF US GAAP IMPLEMENTATION

The Load Forecast and Load Resource Balance do not reflect more recent information that is expected to be material.

Question 1 Question 2

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITOR STANDARD-SETTING AGENDA MARCH 2012

ALI-ABA Audio Seminar. Moving from GAAP to IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) February 18, 2009 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast

New revenue guidance Implementation in the technology sector

Companion Policy Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

September 9, 2016 kpmg.ca

Convergence of IFRS & US GAAP

New revenue guidance. Implementation in the consumer markets industry. At a glance

Comparison between FASB Amendments and IASB tentative decisions

GUELPH MUNICIPAL HOLDING COMPANY BUSINESS CASE STUDY PHASE 1: STRUCTURE AND DESIGN. Corporate Administration May 2010 DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

STANDARD-SETTING AGENDA OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITOR JUNE 30, 2016

Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)

RE: Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities (File Reference No.

Tel: ey.com

New revenue guidance Implementation in the software industry

Preparing for IFRS: What your company can do to stay ahead of the curve

KPMG LLP Telephone Park Avenue Fax New York, N.Y Internet

Auditing Standard 16

Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. MV/288 Mark Vaessen.

New revenue guidance Implementation in entertainment and media

Financial Statements Framework

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

August 29, Attention: Mr. Karl E. Gustafson, Q.C. Dear Sir:

EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

Post-implementation Review: IFRS 8 Operating Segments

Implementation Tips for Revenue Recognition Standards. June 20, 2017

IASB Meeting Project Post-implementation review IFRS 3 Business Combinations Paper topic Findings

The software revenue recognition picture begins to crystallize

FORTISBC ENERGY AES OFFERING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES EXHIBIT A2-4

Global Convergence of Harmonization of Indian GAAP with IFRS & US GAAP. D.S. Rawat FCA BANSAL & CO.

Elimination of US GAAP Reconciliation in SEC Reports for Companies that use IFRS: A Guide for the 2007 Financial Reporting Season (and beyond)

IFRS 8 Operat a i t ng S e S gme m nts

SAS Quadra 05. Bloco J. CFC Brasília, Distrito Federal Brazil

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The Auditor s Response to the Risks of Material Misstatement Posed by Estimates of Expected Credit Losses under IFRS 9

Getting a Better Framework Reliability of financial information Bulletin

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER AMENDED MARCH 2016

STANDARD-SETTING UPDATE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITOR DECEMBER 31, 2017

METHANEX CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Revenue from contracts with customers

2017 Changes to Part I. AcSB Due Process Endorsement Activities

IN THE MATTER OF. and

Defining Issues. FASB Proposes Clarifications to License and Performance Obligation Guidance for Revenue. May 2015, No

Re: Comments on IASB s Discussion Paper, A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting

STANDARD-SETTING UPDATE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITOR MARCH 31, 2018

The Impact of Applying the IFRS Accounting Rules on the Business Environment

Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A Resource Center available exclusively to PCPS members

IIROC 2015 Financial Administrators Section Conference

VALUATION observations

BC Hydro Revenue Requirements Application Information Request #1

VIA June 20, 2008

Attached please find Terasen Gas Application to the British Columbia Utilities Commission (the Commission ) seeking the following:

Ramp Up to the New Revenue Standards in the Subscription World: Zuora

TEEKAY TANKERS LTD. Corporate Governance Guidelines

Deutsches Rechnungslegungs Standards Committee e.v. Accounting Standards Committee of Germany

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Seminar in Arabic. Sheraton Hotel Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 23 April 2014

Date of Request for Comment: April 7, 2017 Period of Comment: April 7, 2017 through May 5, 2017

STANDARD-SETTING UPDATE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF AUDITOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

June 30, c/o Mr. John Stevenson, Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West Suite 800, Box 55 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3S8

Public Sector Executive Compensation Report School District No. 44 (North Vancouver)

Revenue for chemical manufacturers

Working Draft: Airlines Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition

Re: IASB discussion paper on 'Preliminary views on accounting standard for small and medium-sized entities'

National Policy Corporate Governance Principles. Table of Contents

STANDING ADVISORY GROUP MEETING

Quarterly accounting roundup: An update on important developments The Dbriefs Financial Reporting series Robert Uhl, Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP

Introduction to IFRS Accounting and Auditing Conference May 20-21,2009

Introduction. Background

Office of the Secretary PCAOB 1666 K Street, N.W. Washington DC USA. 15 February Dear Sir or Madam,

CFO Financial Forum Webcast

PREPARING FOR THE NEW REV REC STANDARD WITH NETSUITE.

The Honorable Richard Cordray July 2, 2012 Page 2

REVISITING THE FASB S CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council March 2004

IFRS v. U.S. GAAP: Impact on a Company's Earning and Activities

AMENDED AND RESTATED ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Questionnaire. Short description of the general activity of your organisation Global accounting firm providing advisory and audit services.

TOPIC 606, REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

AN AUDIT OF INTERNAL CONTROL THAT IS INTEGRATED WITH AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FOR AUDITORS OF SMALLER PUBLIC COMPANIES

Moving From GAAP to IFRS with Oracle E-Business Suite

Revenue from contracts with customers

ATCO Electric Ltd. ATCO Gas (a division of ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd.) ENMAX Power Corp. EPCOR Distribution and Transmission Inc. FortisAlberta Inc.

IVSC Agenda Consultation 2017 Feedback form

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 48

IFRS - Transformation Agenda for Saudi Corporates. Organized by ICAP KSA Chapter

ABA Section of Business Law. Internal Control Reporting Under Section 404: An Update and Current Assessment. November 19, 2004

Notice to Readers Use of the Standards Individual Enrollment in the Program... 5

Business vs. Asset In Practice Potential Impacts of ASU , Clarifying the Definition of a Business

January 5, Dear Scott:

EB Hydro One Networks Request for an Extension to the Exemption for Time-of- Use Billing

The new revenue standard

basic corporate documents, in particular the company s articles of association; The principle is applied.

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

C H A P T E R 2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

7-1. Prepared by Coby Harmon University of California, Santa Barbara Westmont College

ISO New England - ISO New England Inc. Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff

CP:

CPAB Public Report on Inspections of the Quality of Audits in Canada: Highlights

Transcription:

Roger Dall Antonia Vice President, Strategic Planning, Corporate Development and Regulatory Affairs FortisBC 10 th Floor, 1111 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6E 4M3 Tel: (604) 443-6570 Cell: (604) 312-5996 Fax: (604) 443-6534 Email: roger.dall antonia@fortisbc.com May 23, 2014 Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Gas: gas.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com Electric: electricity.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com Sixth Floor 900 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 2N3 Attention: Ms. Erica M. Hamilton, Commission Secretary Dear Ms. Hamilton: Re: FortisBC Utilities 1 Application to Continue to Report in Accordance with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) effective January 1, 2015 Attached please find an application by the FortisBC Utilities to the British Columbia Utilities Commission for approval, pursuant to sections 23, 49, 60 and 61 of the Utilities Commission Act, to continue to report in accordance with US GAAP for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes, effective January 1, 2015. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Brett Henderson, Director Finance and Accounting (250) 717-0876. Sincerely, on behalf of the FORTISBC UTILITIES Original signed by Diane Roy: For: Roger A. Dall Antonia Attachment 1 comprised of FortisBC Inc. and the FortisBC Energy Utilities (comprised of FortisBC Energy Inc., FortisBC Energy (Vancouver Island) Inc. and FortisBC Energy (Whistler) Inc., set to amalgamate on January 1, 2015).

Page 1 1. OVERVIEW Pursuant to the (the Commission) Order G-117-11, the FortisBC Utilities 1 are applying under sections 23, 49, 60, and 61 of the Utilities Commission Act (the Act) to continue to use US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes effective January 1, 2015 (the 2014 Application). US GAAP continues to be the most appropriate accounting standard for the FortisBC Utilities as it aligns with external financial reporting; is a long-term, permanent, well established and accepted standard for rate-regulated accounting; is the most cost effective accounting standard for the FortisBC Utilities customers; and is consistent with the accounting used in the FortisBC Utilities Multi-Year Performance Based Ratemaking Applications for 2014 to 2018 (2014-2018 PBR Application) which were filed in mid-2013. The alternative to US GAAP, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), continues to present uncertainty with respect to accounting for rate-regulated activities and is not regarded by the FortisBC Utilities as a prudent or cost-effective option under the current circumstances. 2. BACKGROUND On February 9, 2011, the FortisBC Utilities filed an application with the Commission for approval to adopt US GAAP, effective January 1, 2012, for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes for the calculation of cost of service, revenue requirements, rate base, and the preparation of regulatory schedules and filings (the 2011 Application). On July 7, 2011, the Commission issued Order G-117-11 approving the 2011 Application to adopt US GAAP effective January 1, 2012 until December 31, 2014. As part of Order G-117-11, the Commission requested that by September 1, 2014, the FortisBC Utilities apply to the Commission for approval of its regulatory accounting standard effective January 1, 2015. Furthermore, the Commission requested that the application include a cost estimate of adopting or continuing with the desired accounting standards and a comparison to other standards available at that time. Also, within the application, the FortisBC Utilities should provide the Commission an update of rate-regulated financial accounting activities. This Application addresses the Commission s requests as outlined above and in Order G- 117-11 to continue to report in accordance with US GAAP for regulatory accounting purposes, effective January 1, 2015. Once approved, US GAAP will continue to be used for the calculation of cost of service, revenue requirements, rate base, and the preparation of regulatory schedules and filings. 3. THE FUTURE OF US GAAP CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS Over the past several years, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the primary US GAAP regulator, and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the IFRS 1 comprised of FortisBC Inc. and the FortisBC Energy Utilities (comprised of FortisBC Energy Inc., FortisBC Energy (Vancouver Island) Inc. and FortisBC Energy (Whistler) Inc., set to amalgamate on January 1, 2015).

Page 2 regulator, have been working together on the convergence of certain standards; however there are still many differences that remain between US GAAP and IFRS. While progress is being made towards convergence of certain standards, whether full adoption of IFRS in the United States will be achieved is currently undeterminable. Accounting for the effects of rate regulation is one of the several differences that remain, due to the lack of long-term guidance on accounting for rate-regulated activities under IFRS. Although the FASB and the IASB are working to improve US GAAP and IFRS through convergence of certain standards, the FASB has stated they have concerns with full adoption of IFRS, including the impacts on the US investor community. Similarly, the IASB has a policy of publishing a single set of standards that are universally applied. Therefore, working towards aligning with specific accounting standards that exist under US GAAP is not in the best interests of maintaining the IFRS brand globally. As a result, significant barriers to full adoption of IFRS in the United States still remain. It should be noted that a March 2014 meeting between the FASB and the IASB resulted in divergent views on lease accounting, which has been a joint project between the two standard-setters for several years. Additionally, recent decisions in the development of financial instruments guidance has also resulted in divergence between the FASB and the IASB, when the original intent of the project was to bring accounting in this area closer together. The established set of accounting principles that exist for rate regulation under US GAAP is the fundamental reason why US GAAP remains the most reasonable and prudent accounting standard for rate-regulated entities. There is no guarantee at this point in time that similar guidance will ever be published under IFRS. 4. INTERIM IFRS 14 REGULATORY DEFERRAL ACCOUNTS IS STILL A TEMPORARY STANDARD After adding a project on Rate-Regulated Activities to its technical agenda in 2008 and publishing an Exposure Draft in 2009, the IASB suspended the project in September 2010 due to many divergent views on the topic and the realization that the matter could not be resolved quickly. In September 2012, the IASB staff recommended restarting the project on Rate-Regulated Activities as the issues require its own standards-level project. The IASB staff recommended that a comprehensive project should focus on how the IASB should develop an IFRS (or amend existing IFRS) to reflect the impact of rate regulation. As a result of the IASB staff recommendations, the IASB started a comprehensive Rate-Regulated Activities project (the Project) to consider the broad issues of rate regulation which will eventually be published in a future Discussion Paper. Pending the outcome of this Project, on January 30, 2014, the IASB issued an optional interim standard, IFRS 14 Regulatory Deferral Accounts (the Standard). The Standard permits first-time adopters of IFRS to continue to recognize amounts related to rate regulation in accordance with their previous GAAP requirements. However, to enhance comparability with entities that already apply IFRS and do not recognize amounts related to rate regulation, the Standard requires:

Page 3 i. That other IFRS standards be first applied, thereby potentially adding to or reducing amounts recorded in an entity s regulatory deferral accounts; and ii. That the effect of rate regulation be presented separately from other items. An entity that already presents IFRS financial statements is not eligible to apply the Standard. The Standard is effective from January 1, 2016, with early application permitted. The IASB has clearly stated that by publishing this Standard it is not anticipating the outcome of the Project. So while the IASB has released this interim, optional Standard, it is not yet known when the Project will be completed or whether IFRS will, as a result, include a permanent, mandatory standard to be applied by entities with activities subject to rate regulation. It is also not known whether a permanent standard would be consistent with how the FortisBC Utilities are currently applying rate-regulated accounting for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes, in accordance with US GAAP. There are already 90 countries that have adopted IFRS and have not recognized rate-regulated accounting, therefore a permanent standard on rate-regulated accounting is not a certainty. In the absence of a permanent standard for rate-regulated activities, the adoption of IFRS at this time would be premature and could result in volatility in the FortisBC Utilities future cost of service and revenue requirements as compared to that which would otherwise be recognized under US GAAP. The continued recognition of regulatory assets and liabilities best reflects the effect that regulatory activities have on the FortisBC Utilities financial position, the economic realities of their businesses and the regulatory model they operate under. The only set of accepted and well-established accounting standards that currently exist that allow for regulatory assets and liabilities to continue to be recognized is US GAAP; therefore, US GAAP is the reasonable and prudent accounting standard under which the FortisBC Utilities should continue to report for both financial and regulatory reporting purposes. 5. CONTINUING TO USE US GAAP FOR EXTERNAL FINANCIAL REPORTING Since the FortisBC Utilities are continuing to report in accordance with US GAAP for external financial reporting, the continued use of US GAAP for regulatory accounting purposes will allow for financial transparency and comparability. FortisBC Utilities have received Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) Exemption to Continue to use US GAAP In August 2013, the FortisBC Utilities parent company, Fortis Inc. (Fortis), filed a confidential application with the OSC on behalf of Fortis utility subsidiaries to extend the exemption granted in 2011 allowing them to prepare and file financial statements in Canada in accordance with US GAAP, without becoming US Securities and Exchange Commission Issuers (SEC Issuer) as defined in National Instrument 51-102. This application was made so that Fortis and its utility subsidiaries could continue to account for their rate regulated activities in a manner consistent with past practice and avoid the long-term uncertainty with respect to accounting for rate regulated activities that continues to exist under IFRS.

Page 4 In January 2014, the OSC issued a relief order which permits the FortisBC Utilities to continue to prepare financial statements in accordance with US GAAP, until the earliest of: (i) January 1, 2019; (ii) the first day of the financial year that commences after the FortisBC Utilities cease to have activities subject to rate regulation; or (iii) the effective date prescribed by the IASB for the mandatory application of a standard within IFRS specific to entities with activities subject to rate regulation. The OSC relief order replaces and extends the OSC s previous relief order, which was due to expire effective January 1, 2015. The FortisBC Utilities believe that the same set of accounting principles should be used for regulatory purposes as is used for external financial reporting purposes so that the underlying economic substance of the entities operations are appropriately reflected. If the Commission sets accounting requirements that differ from those used to account for the same transaction for external financial reporting purposes, this would result in the FortisBC Utilities having to maintain two sets of accounting records which would result in a significant amount of additional work and costs. 6. COST ESTIMATE OF CONTINUED USE OF US GAAP Continuing to use US GAAP for regulatory purposes is still the most cost effective accounting standard for the FortisBC Utilities customers. No request for incremental costs resulting from continued use of US GAAP in conjunction with recent OSC exemption The continued use of US GAAP for regulatory accounting purposes effective January 1, 2015, will not result in any incremental costs, due to the recent extension of the OSC exemption applicable from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. The OSC exemption is in effect, a continuation of the previous relief order and maintains the status quo. Therefore the FortisBC Utilities are not requesting approval for any incremental costs related to the continued use of US GAAP for regulatory purposes as part of this application. Incremental costs would result from adopting IFRS Adopting an accounting standard other than US GAAP effective January 1, 2015, such as IFRS, would require significant resources and incremental costs. If the FortisBC Utilities were required to adopt IFRS for regulatory purposes, it is not possible to provide a reliable estimate of costs without a comprehensive review of the differences between US GAAP and IFRS that would exist at the time of conversion. Such a comprehensive review and transition plan has not been initiated, in part due to receiving the OSC exemption, but also due to the 2014-2018 PBR Application having been prepared under US GAAP. Since the FortisBC Utilities are utilizing US GAAP for external reporting purpose, the cost and effort to reconcile between regulatory accounting and external financial accounting is significantly less than it would be under a scenario whereby IFRS is used for regulatory reporting purposes and US GAAP is used for external financial reporting. Incremental costs resulting from becoming an SEC Issuer Should the FortisBC Utilities become SEC Issuers in order to continue preparing external financial statements in accordance with US GAAP, there would be incremental costs. Becoming an SEC Issuer could be required in the event that the OSC exemption is no longer

Page 5 provided as relief, or should other unforeseen reporting requirements arise. In the event of becoming an SEC Issuer, the FortisBC Utilities would put forth a separate application with an estimate of the associated incremental and ongoing costs, or would include these costs and justification as part of their next revenue requirements reviews. 7. 2014-2018 PBR APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED USING US GAAP The forecasts, including those used to determine the O&M and capital formulas, in the 2014-2018 PBR Applications which were filed in mid-2013 were prepared using US GAAP. Any deviation from using US GAAP for regulatory purposes would require changing these forecasts. However, the approval to continue to use US GAAP will ensure consistency with the PBR Applications and provide all relevant stakeholders with the accounting that they are familiar with not only for the next five years, but what they have been accustomed to seeing in the past. 8. CONCLUSION Due to the fact that IFRS does not currently have a permanent standard for rate-regulated activities and the uncertainty in terms of the outcome of the Project, the FortisBC Utilities have made the prudent decision to continue to report in accordance with US GAAP for external financial reporting purposes as it is currently the only option available that allows for recognition of regulated assets and liabilities. The continued use of US GAAP for the calculation of cost of service, revenue requirements, rate base, and the preparation of the regulatory schedules and filings is in the public interest since it maintains transparency and comparability between regulatory and financial reporting and reduces the regulatory impact and costs that the FortisBC Utilities would experience if converting to IFRS. 9. APPROVAL SOUGHT The FortisBC Utilities request approval to continue to use US GAAP for regulatory accounting and reporting purposes effective January 1, 2015.

B RITISH COLUMBIA U TILITIES COMMISSION O RDER N UMBER SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, BC V6Z 2N3 CANADA web site: http://www.bcuc.com TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 DRAFT ORDER IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473 and An Application by the FortisBC Utilities (comprised of FortisBC Inc., FortisBC Energy Inc., FortisBC Energy (Vancouver Island) Inc. and FortisBC Energy (Whistler) Inc.) For Approval to Continue to use US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles effective January 1, 2015 BEFORE: (Date) WHEREAS: A. On July 7, 2011, the (the Commission), pursuant to sections 23, 49, 60 and 61 of the Utilities Commission Act (the Act) issued Order G-117-11, granting approval for the FortisBC Utilities to adopt US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) for regulatory and accounting purposes; B. Order G-117-11 directed the FortisBC Utilities to apply to the Commission, by September 1, 2014, for approval of their regulatory accounting standard effective January 1, 2015; C. On May 23, 2014, the FortisBC Utilities applied to the Commission to continue to use US GAAP for regulatory and accounting purposes, effective January 1, 2015; D. The Commission has reviewed the Application and concludes that the Application should be approved. NOW THEREFORE pursuant to sections 23, 49, 60 and 61 of the Utilities Commission Act, the Commission orders as follows:

BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION 2 ORDER NUMBER 1. Approval for the FortisBC Utilities to continue to use US GAAP for regulatory and accounting purposes, effective January 1, 2015. DATED at the City of Vancouver, In the Province of British Columbia, this day of <MONTH>, 2014. BY ORDER