TEXPACK Integrated Travel Demand Modeling Application. Texas Planning Conference June 2016

Similar documents
STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Statewide Model Application Using the Texas SAM

A Comparison of CEMDAP Activity-Based Model With DFWRTM 4-Step Model

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-14/

GIS-based Modeling for Statewide and Corridor Freight Planning

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Origin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices

Roadway Traffic Assignment (Last Edit August 26, 2005)

Developing A Traffic Data Performance Measure Program

Buffalo Niagara Integrated Corridor Management Project. ENTERPRISE Webinar Keir Opie, Cambridge Systematics September 26, 2016

AN INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVE TOLL FACILITY ASSIGNMENT METHODS

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

TEXAS MEXICO TRANSPORTATION BORDER MASTER PLAN UPDATE

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Request for Proposal

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Transportation Planning and Climate Change

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

TPB Scenario Study Task Force: Proposal for Development and Analysis of Two New Scenarios

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES

National Governors Association

Manage Lanes, AET & Technology Summit April 23, 2018 Dan Lamers, P.E. Senior Program Manager

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

INCLUSION OF TIME-DEPENDENT NETWORKS IN MARYLAND STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS

Advanced Freight Forecasting Models

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN

Florida Freight Supplychain Intermodal Model

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

WHAT MATTERS MOST IN DEMAND MODEL SPECIFICATIONS: A COMPARISON OF OUTPUTS

Chapter 4: Developing the Recommendations

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

Business Plan for FY14 FY15

AN INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND OPERATIONS MODEL FOR MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL METHODOLOGY AND AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

Forecast and Capacity Planning for Nogales Ports of Entry

FRESNO COG TRANSPORTATION MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT

Hyperion Financial Management Course Details

Incorporating TMS into Planning. Jianming Ma, Ph.D., P.E.

Chapter 1: The 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 1. Challenges & Opportunities 2 VTrans2035: The Precursor 2 The VSTP and VTrans2035 2

This page intentionally left blank.

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. Regional Transportation Council Chad McKeown, AICP January 14, 2016

Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

Strategic Transportation Plan. Presented to: ECO-Rapid Transit Board of Directors Presented by: Gill V. Hicks, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 REGIONAL/STATE UPDATE

Building Interstate 69 As A Series of Upgrade Projects

Vehicle Occupancy Detection

WISCONSIN DOT PUTTING RESEARCH TO WORK

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

SUTRA : Sustainable Urban Transportation for the City of Tomorrow

Consideration of Shale Oil and Gas Development in Long-Range Transportation Planning

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT Enhancing personal mobility for all travelers

SPECIAL GENERATORS. Thoughts and Strategies for Travel Demand Modeling Jerry Shadewald October 9, 2013

Section 11: Transportation Strategies Toolbox

North Carolina Statewide Freight Plan

Texas Urban Mobility Plan: Breaking the Gridlock

Continuous integration for BI

METRO VANCOUVER MOBILITY PRICING INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FINAL TERMS OF REFERENCE. Revised - June 30, 2017

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

MPPM II INITIATIVE OVERVIEW

San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (SF FCMS)

Washtenaw Area Transportation Study Request for Proposal for Model Update and Improvements

Amdocs Network Rollout Solution

Travel Time Reliability in the SLOCOG Region. October 27, 2014 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Transportation Education Series

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Update

URFinancials Project Project Kick-Off

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

Testing Activity-Based Model Component Transferability at the Individual Component and System Level

ITIL Intermediate Lifecycle Stream:

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Interactive Data Visualization Tools for Travel Demand Model Datasets. Shuyao Hong

TRAFFIC FORECASTING REQUIREMENTS BY PROJECT TYPE. August Research Report

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

LARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN. Public Workshop December 3, 2013

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

Why You Should Take a Holistic Approach

Public/Private Partnership Approach to Develop a Next Generation Analytics Platform

PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY

Potential Transit and Highway Revenue Options. Outline

Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) The 2017 Traffic Operations Program Plan

The Transportation dividend

OPEN DATA & PROJECT TRACKER. Michael Chamberlain TPP, Data Management

PennDOT s Statewide Operations Strategy

Twin Cities Metro Freight Study Summary of Results

Vehicle Miles Traveled Trends and Implications for the US Interstate Highway System

Transcription:

TEXPACK Integrated Travel Demand Modeling Application Texas Planning Conference June 2016

Presentation Overview What is it and what is different? Why do this? What does it look like? Where are we now? Where are we going with this? 2

What is TexPACK? Texas Package Suite of Travel Demand Modeling Software Trip generation and distribution techniques Integrated into TransCAD travel demand modeling platform Takes advantage of inherent GIS capabilities 3

What is TexPACK? No longer need to invoke sequential models one step-at-a-time Although an end-user certainly still has that option Automates a number of steps Application/model familiarity Hopefully minimizes potential for errors Reporting and mapping mechanisms 4

What is TexPACK? Continues with initiative to standardize: Folder structures File naming conventions Attribute/data naming conventions Model architecture Common platform for interpreting results statewide 5

Why Implement TexPACK? 1. Increase use of demand model applications by improving application interface, 2. Create a standard platform to create, apply and deploy models throughout the state, 3. Create a common system for measuring and communicating results, and 4. Create a system that permits flexibility for enhancement 6

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Manager Apply single stage Apply all stage Stage settings Stages Version information 7

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Setup 8

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Steps Folder/Path Modify Steps Input Files Scenario description 9

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Status Folder/Path Step Input Files Description 10

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Status Folder/Path Step Output Files Description 11

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Scenario Value of Parameter Step Parameter Description 12

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Toll/Generalized Cost 13

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Reporting Feature 14

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? 15

TexPACK: What Does it Look Like? Mapping Feature 16

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? 17

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Folder structure All folders stored in C:\TxDOT\study area TxDOT requirement 18

TexPACK: What Does It Look Like? Attribute/data conventions TxDOT requirement 19

What Has Been Converted? Base and Forecast Base and Forecast Base and Forecast Base and Forecast Base and Forecast Base and Forecast 20

What Has Been Converted? Forecast Only Base Only 21

What Has Been Converted? Base and Forecast With Interim Years Base and Forecast With Interim 22

What Has Been Converted? Under Development Pending Conversion Under Development 23

What Has Been Converted? Alternative System Alternative System 24

Deployment Pending? Needs to be scheduled Needs to be scheduled 25

Where are we going? Version 1.1 Has been or will be delivered Version 1.2 ish Laredo 2008-2040 travel models Generalized cost (account for tolls) Multi-class assignment Truck Auto Utilizes bi-conjugate assignment technique Delivered to MPO 26

Where are we going? Bi-Conjugate 1.210E-03 1.010E-03 8.100E-04 Relative Gap 6.100E-04 FW BFW 4.100E-04 Did not converge 2.100E-04 1.000E-05 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Number of Iterations 27

Where are we going? Version 1.2 ish Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 Base Year with 2040 pending Forecast Application Integer 100 th s trip matrices (previously delivered) X100 format Generalized cost MMA assignment technique Truck and auto-only toll lane capability Bi-conjugate assignment technique Time-of-day (TOD) models This functionality has not been delivered to Valley MPOs yet 28

Where are we going? Version 2.0 (pending) Envisioned as new approach to modeling in Texas Time-of-day models No longer daily models 29

Where are we going? Version 2.0 (pending) Generalized-cost MMA Truck and Auto trip tables Capability to address truck and auto-only toll facilities Facility types for HOV, HOT, and toll lanes Capability to study alternative demographic scenarios for same year 30

Where are we going? Version 2.0 (pending) Utilize TxDOT purchased INRIX speed/travel time data Iterative feedback resolution No longer integer trip matrices Additional reporting mechanism(s) 31

Where are we going? Other enhancements under consideration Generation of person trips rather than direct generation of auto trips Auto-occupancy models Preservation of trips by income category Stronger accounting of truck/freight flows Mode choice 32

Where are we going? TexPack has been tested in Version 7.0 Results delivered to TxDOT-TPP Examining flow-chart options So what is this? 33

Where are we going? 34

Where are we going? Team Management of the TDM Development and Application Process 35

Questions? TPP offers additional on-site assistance: Help Desk: 512-486-5177 or, Email: TPP TRANSCAD- HELPDESK@txdot.gov 36

THANK YOU