Growing Corn in a Computer: The Hybrid Hybrid-Maize Simulation Model and its Application to Production Agriculture

Similar documents
Proceedings of Indiana Crop Adviser Conference 2004

Corn Yield Potential and Optimal Soil Productivity in Irrigated Corn/Soybean Systems

Institute of Ag Professionals

High-Yielding Irrigated Soybean Production North Central USA Soybean Benchmarking Project

Yield potential and resource-use efficiency of maize systems in the western U.S. Corn Belt

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Irrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water

Row Crop Responses to Nitrogen Rate, Application Timing and Irrigation Schedule

2017 Farm Management Competition Banquet Report

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

COVER CROP. Sponsored by: In partnership with:

Incorporating Annual Forages into Crop-Forage-Livestock Systems

VALUE OF CROP RESIDUE FOR WATER CONSERVATION

10/22/2012. Current Land Values & Cash Rental Rates. Nebraska Land Values Know how. Know now.

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Purpose and Introduction:

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Risk and Uncertainty in Crop Model Predictions of Regional Yields under Climate Change and Variability

Evaluation of Organic Corn and Popcorn Varieties and Fertilization

2017 Wyoming Forage Sorghum Trial Results

A BRIEF RESEARCH UPDATE ON SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

FOCUS Groundwater - Introduction (Part I)

COVER CROP. Sponsored by: In partnership with:

Institute of Ag Professionals

Research & Development and Product Development Update Scott Staggenborg, VP, Research & Development

2014 Winter Canola Soil Preparation x Fertility Timing Trial

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

Effects of Corn Population

Agroecosystems, Nitrogen-use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Management

ABSTRACT: 344 SOYBEAN YIELDS AND YIELD GAP ANALYSIS IN THE PAMPAS REGION OF ARGENTINA

Institute of Ag Professionals

SmartIrrigation Apps. K.W. Migliaccio, G. Vellidis, C. Fraisse, K.T. Morgan, J. Andreis, D. Rowland, L. Zotarelli

SplitN.AgClimate4U.org

Corn Residue Removal by Grazing and Effects on Grain Yield. Introduction

Institute of Ag Professionals

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

Irrigation & Fertilizer Affects on Productivity, Water Use and N Balance in Rice & Maize Cropping Systems in Telangana Region, India

Economics of Irrigation Ending Date for Corn 1

October 2014 Crop growth 15 October 2014 Pergamino

Climate induced reduction in U.S.-wide soybean yields underpinned by region- and in-season-specific responses

Impact of Crop Management Diagnostic Clinics on Advisors' Recommendations and Producer Practices

Nitrogen For Corn Production

Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Planting Population and Nitrogen Fertility

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

Irrigation Scheduling: Sensors, Technical Tools, and Apps

Hybrid selection Crop rotation Planting date Stand establishment Seeding rate Row spacing

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

The Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA)

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Biofuels from Crop Residue: Soil Organic Carbon and Climate Impacts in the US and India

Improving Nutrient Management in Agriculture. Industry Perspective

Climate Change and Climate Variability: El Salvador Impacts on Productivity of Grain Crops and Opportunities for Management and Improvement

LIMITED IRRIGATION OF FOUR SUMMER CROPS IN WESTERN KANSAS. Alan Schlegel, Loyd Stone, and Troy Dumler Kansas State University SUMMARY

Proceedings of the 3 rd Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Participatory design of farm level adaptation to climate risks in an arable region in the Netherlands

Double- and Mono-cropped Corn and Soybean Response to Tillage.

Organic Row Cropping Systems, Cover Crops, and Soil Health

PLANTING GEOMETRY AND ITS EFFECT ON GROWTH AND YIELD. 3. Sowi ng behind the country plough (manual and mechanical drilling)

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research Site

2017 Trends in Nebraska Farmland Markets: Declining Agricultural Land Values and Rental Rates

Modeling crop losses caused by pests & diseases and management

Improving Crop Input Use Efficiency Through Use Of Precision Ag Tools John Shanahan, Agronomy Research Manager

EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF WATER AND NUTRIENT RESOURCES: ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL FOR DRIP IRRIGATION AND FERTIGATION (year 3 of 3)

soil losses in a small rainfed catchment with Mediterranean

4.3 Irrigated corn best practice guide

Weather Effects on Expected Corn and Soybean Yields

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2013 Demonstration Reports

Procedure to easily Fine-Tune Crop Coefficients for Irrigation Scheduling

Challenges for increasing crop productivity: Farmer & scientist solutions

Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum News

5.5 Improving Water Use Efficiency of Irrigated Crops in the North China Plain Measurements and Modelling

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTIVE CROP PRODUCTION STRATEGIES IN HIGH ALTITUDE AND TRIBAL AREAS OF VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P

Kansas Irrigated Agriculture s Impact on Value of Crop Production

Corn and Soybean Practices following Severe Drought. Roger Elmore and Andy Lenssen Department of Agronomy, ISU

Corn Row Width and Plant Density Then and Now. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

Factors Affecting Timing and Intensity of Calving Season of Beef Cow-Calf Producers in the Midwest

The Climate Impact Report (Updated 25 January 2018) The Immediate Past

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

2008 Sunflower Performance Tests

Can cover crops replace summer fallow?

PROCEEDINGS 2017 Crop Pest Management Short Course & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show

2010 UNL ORGANIC WINTER WHEAT BREEDING REPORT

Response of Sunflower to Deficit Irrigation

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Switchgrass for Forage and Bioenergy

DETERMINING THE GROWTH STAGES OF CORN AND SOYBEANS

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

Agricultural Outlook Forum Presented: February 17, 2006 STRATEGIES IN THE APPLICATION OF BIOTECH TO DROUGHT TOLERANCE

Location: Grant County, W. side of Dodson Rd, between Rd 8 and 8.5 NW Soil: Ephrata/Malaga gravely sandy loam Cropping system

Two on farm irrigation water management of corn demonstrations were conducted in Colorado County in 2011 with:

Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing

Urban Greening and the UHI: Seasonal Trade-offs in Heating and Cooling Energy Consumption in Manchester, UK

Growing Season ET. This presentation posted at The Importance of Winter Wheat to Cropping Systems

Current Impact of Changes in Corn Plant Density

Managing Variable-Rate Irrigation Using NDVI

Transcription:

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 2003 Growing Corn in a Computer: The Hybrid Hybrid-Maize Simulation Model and its Application to Production Agriculture Achim R. Dobermann University of Nebraska - Lincoln, adobermann2@unl.edu Haishun Yang University of Nebraska - Lincoln, hyang2@unl.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Dobermann, Achim R. and Yang, Haishun, "Growing Corn in a Computer: The Hybrid Hybrid-Maize Simulation Model and its Application to Production Agriculture" (2003). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 528. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/528 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.

[ 2003 ] Growing Corn in a Computer The Hybrid-Maize Simulation Model and its Application to Production Agriculture Achim Dobermann Haishun Yang

Outline 1. Definition of yield potential and yield gaps 2. Hybrid-Maize model description and validation 3. Potential applications of Hybrid-Maize in corn management

Yield potential and yield gaps 100 Gap 1 80 Gap 2 Yie ld (%) 60 40 20 Solar radiation Temperature Genotype Plant density Attainable yield with available water supply Other limiting factors: Nutrients Weeds Pests Others 0 Yield potential Water-limited yield Actual yield

To achieve yield potential of an environment: Utilize the entire growing season (= optimal planting date and variety choice) Optimize plant population Grow the crop with minimal possible abiotic and biotic stresses (nutrients, water, pests)

Hybrid-Maize model Corn specific. Simulates growth and development of corn driven by light interception and temperature. Simulates corn yield potential and water-limited attainable yield. Nitrogen component is in work. Sources: Ceres-Maize, INTERCOM, own components & modifications. Predicts date of silking based on GDD for a corn hybrid. Allows simulating single growing seasons or long-term climate data. Easy import of online weather data. Authors: H. Yang, A. Dobermann, K. Cassman, J. Lindquist, T. Arkebauer, D. Walters (UNL).

Hybrid-Maize model Input data Daily weather (solar radiation, max. and min. T, rainfall) Crop management (date of planting, GDD for hybrid, plant density, sowing depth) For simulating water-limited yield: max. rooting depth, texture class and bulk density in topsoil and subsoil) Optional: change model parameters (model uses default values, but those can be changed) Hybrid-specific crop coefficients Soil physical properties for different soil texture classes General model coefficients describing crop growth and development

www.hprcc.unl.edu

www.hprcc.unl.edu

Hybrid-Maize validation Plant DM, Y2001 Mg/ha 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 31,000 pl/acre 41,000 pl/acre 45,000 pl/acre 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days after emergence observed Sinclair-Muchow Hybrid-Maize CERES-Maize Intercom Lincoln, NE, high-yield experiment, corn after soybean, intensive nutrient management, 2001.

Hybrid-Maize validation AG biomass (Mg ha -1 ) 30 Manchester observed 25 Manchester simulated Lincoln observed Lincoln simulated 20 15 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days after emergence Total aboveground crop biomass growing season. Manchester: Francis Childs farm, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, 34,000 plants/acre Lincoln: High-yield experiment, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, 38,000 plants/acre

Hybrid-Maize validation Crop model Grain Stover Total biomass --------------- Mg dry matter/ha --------------- Measured 13.2 13.2 26.4 0.50 Ceres-Maize 12.4 11.0 23.4 0.53 Muchow-Sinclair 11.4 11.4 22.8 0.50 Intercom 9.7 9.0 18.7 0.52 Hybrid-Maize 13.1 13.2 26.3 0.50 HI Lincoln, NE, high-yield experiment, corn after soybean, 37,000 plants/acre, intensive nutrient management, averages of 1999-2001.

Hybrid-Maize validation Location Manchester Lincoln Mead C. Center Plant density (plants/acre) 34,000 38,000 27,000 33,000 Simulated grain yield (bu/acre) 282 280 268 274 Measured grain yield (bu/acre) 248 242 247 266 Simulated total dry matter (lbs/acre) 24400 24700 23000 23600 Measured total dry matter (lbs/acre) 23000 24700 22100 23900 Manchester: Francis Childs farm, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, rainfed Lincoln: High-yield experiment, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, drip-irrigated Mead: NSFP trial, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, sprinkler-irrigated Clay Center: NSFP trial, 2002, Pioneer 33P67, furrow-irrigated

Potential applications Using historical, long-term climate data for a site: Assess long-term yield potential and its variation among years (irrigated and non-irrigated). Assess change in yield potential due to varying planting date, hybrid choice, or plant density. Post-harvest analysis: what happened? Management decisions: set adequate yield goals determine optimal planting date (window) identify most suitable varieties/hybrids determine optimal plant density evaluate economics and risks of various scenarios.

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 114 d hybrid, Planted April 25

Temperature ( o C) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Minimum (night) temperature during late grain filling PM 00 PM 01 10 20 30 10 20 30 August September PM 99 Lincoln, NE, based on long-term climate. At this site, high night temperatures during grain filling may cause early maturity of corn. Delaying planting or choosing a longer season hybrid could move grain filling into a period with lower night temperatures.

Can we exploit more yield potential at this site by shifting the grain filling to a cooler period? plant a full-season hybrid 2-3 weeks later than normal

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 119 d hybrid, Planted May 15

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 119 d hybrid, Planted May 15

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 119 d hybrid, Planted May 15

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 119 d hybrid, Planted May 15

Yield potential (bu/acre) 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 Simulated corn yield potential at Lincoln, NE 40,000 plants/acre, 1986-2002 Pioneer 31N28 119 CRM, 2860 GDU to maturity Pioneer 33P67 114 CRM, 2760 GDU to maturity 210 4/16 4/30 5/14 5/28 6/11 Sowing date

EI Lincoln, NE: 2003 Yields Predicted Actual Silking date 23-Jul 22-Jul Grain yield (bu/acre) 287.2 285.3 Lincoln, NE, 2003 Treatment: CS-P2-M2 Hybrid: 31N28 (119 d) Plant density: 35,000 plants/acre Planting: 13-May Emergence: 22-May Maturity: 25-Sep

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 2003, Pioneer 31N28, Planted May 13

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 2003, Pioneer 31N28, Planted May 13

Irrigated corn at Lincoln, 2003, Pioneer 31N28, Planted May 13

What determines spatial variation in corn yield potential in Nebraska? Mean Annual Growing Degree-Days (frost to frost) ¹ Mean Annual Precipitation (in) ¹ 0 50 100 Miles 1:10,000,000 0 50 100 Miles 1:10,000,000 Value 1757-2270 2270-2460 2460-2620 2620-2800 2800-2960 2960-3090 3090-3260 3260-3420 3420-3570 > 3570 Value 11.6-15.0 15.1-17.0 17.1-19.0 19.1-21.0 21.1-23.0 23.1-25.0 25.1-27.0 27.1-29.0 29.1-31.0 > 31.0

What determines spatial variation in corn yield potential in Nebraska? Maximum Irrigated Corn Yield (grain) (1997-2001) Maximum Rainfed Corn Yield (grain) (1997-2001) Yield 134-147 147-154 154-160 160-163 163-170 170-175 175-180 180-187 187-202 M. Milner (11-18-02) 30 0 30 60 Miles N Data is from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS). Yield 52-66 66-77 77-88 88-104 104-114 114-122 122-131 131-139 139-146 M. Milner (11-18-02) 30 0 30 60 Miles N Data is from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS).

Simulated attainable corn yields in different regions of Nebraska Irrigated corn (bu/acre) Dryland corn (bu/acre) @30,000 plants/acre @25,000 plants/acre Region Planting date GDD (F) Mean Common range Mean Common range Southeast-East 5-May 2650 245 230-270 195 155-215 Central 6-May 2600 250 235-270 170 135-215 South-Central 3-May 2650 255 240-275 190 145-215 Southwest 8-May 2550 235 220-260 115 80-155 Northeast 9-May 2550 240 220-260 170 135-200 North-Central 10-May 2400 220 200-245 120 90-140 Northwest 7-May 2250 205 195-225 85 65-105 Simulations based on weather data collected during the past 20 years at multiple locations in each district (High Plains Regional Climate Center online database). Assumes currently widespread cropping practices (planting date, hybrid maturity, plant density) as reported by NASS.

To achieve full climatic site yield potential, management requires: Identify optimal growing season duration: Hybrid-Maize model searches for optimal planting data and the date when grain filling stops. Select a corn hybrid that fully utilizes the optimal growing season duration (GDD). Use very high plant population (40,000 plants/acre). Grow under stress-free conditions.

296 Grain yield, Mg DM/ha 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Reported Simulated 259 222 185 148 111 74 37 Bu/acre @ 15.5% moisture SE EC NE SC C NC SW NW Reporting district Average irrigated corn yield in Nebraska by crop reporting district in the NASS database (1998-2002) and corresponding simulation of yield potential by the Hybrid-Maize model. Simulation is based on the current reported cropping practices (reported planting and maturity dates, 30,000 plants/acre).

Optimal management: gain in season length 11 19 d 20 29 d 30 38 d

18 Reported Potential 296 Grain yield, Mg DM/ha 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 296 259 222 185 148 111 74 37 Bu/acre @ 15.5% moisture 0 SE EC NE SC C NC SW NW Simulated full-season corn yield potential across Nebraska in comparison with actual average yields of irrigated corn (means of 1998-2002). Simulation assumes full utilization of the available growing season (optimal planting and choice of corn hybrid, 40,000 plants/acre).

22 Grain yield, Mg DM/ha 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 Contest winners Mean simulation Max simulation 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 370 296 333 296 259 222 Bu/acre @ 15.5% moisture Year Full season maize yield potential simulated by Hybrid-Maize compared to the yield of Nebraska yield contest winners (irrigated corn category).

Corn yield potential in 2003 Station Mead Beatrice Concord G. Island C. Center N. Platte Alliance Period 1982-2003 1990-2003 1982-2003 1995-2003 1982-2003 1982-2003 1988-2003 Planting date 4/25 4/25 5/1 4/25 4/25 5/5 5/5 Hybrid GDD(F) 2750 2750 2600 2750 2750 2650 2300 Simulated yield potential @ 32,000 plants/acre (bu/acre) Long-term maximum 323 321 309 312 327 331 276 Long-term median 263 256 265 270 271 265 233 Long-term minimum 225 240 151 231 197 166 162 2001 245 243 266 261 267 265 207 2002 250 240 254 268 246 251 237 2003 273 256 285 312 325 302 262

Potential applications Using real-time climate data for a growing season : Estimate actual yield potential and water-limited attainable yield based on daily records of solar radiation, temperature, rainfall, and irrigation. Management decisions: adjust yield goal during the season and make subsequent adjustments in fertilizer amounts (sidedress, fertigation) evaluate moisture status and make decisions on irrigation. evaluate actual plant growth and soil moisture dynamics in comparison with normal years/other years. make decisions for next year.

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

Irrigated corn, Pioneer 31N28, Lincoln 2003, actual weather until July 22

375 Planting Emergence Silking Maturity Forecasted corn yield (bu/acre) 350 325 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 Best possible 75% Most likely (Median) 25% Worst possible Measured yield Long-term median May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Date of yield forecast Real-time yield potential forecast at Lincoln, NE, 2003. Corn (Pioneer 31N28) was planted on May 13 @ 37,000 plants/acre. Beginning May 18, yield forecasts were made with Hybrid-Maize every 5 days. The red line shows the final yield measured (285 bu/acre). Irrigated corn, Lincoln 2003

Dryland corn, Pioneer 33B51, Mead 2003, actual weather until August 16

Dryland corn, Pioneer 33B51, Mead 2003, actual weather until August 16

Dryland corn, Pioneer 33B51, Mead 2003, actual weather until August 16

Dryland corn, Mead 2003, actual weather until August 16

Dryland corn, Mead 2003, actual weather until August 16

275 Planting Silking Maturity Forecasted corn yield (bu/acre) 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 Best possible 75% Most likely (Median) 25% Worst possible Long-term median Measured yield May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Date of yield forecast Real-time yield potential forecast at Mead, NE, 2003. Dryland corn (Pioneer 33B51) was planted on May 13 @ final stand of 24,000 plants/acre. Beginning May 18, yield forecasts were made with Hybrid-Maize every 5 days. The red line shows the final yield measured (127 bu/acre). Dryland corn, Mead 2003

Summary Models are not perfect representations of the real world. They represent the current scientific understanding in relatively simple mathematical terms. Hybrid-Maize is a robust model for estimating corn yield potential under non-limiting and water limiting conditions. Model estimates allow evaluating different options for crop management. Hybrid-Maize has promising potential for in-season management decisions.

Outlook Do more validation at other sites and for dryland corn. Write user s manual and release software in early 2004. More testing in real-time field management. Incorporate nitrogen management module.