An Overview of CO2 Capture Technologies What are the Challenges Ahead?

Similar documents

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

Oxyfuel Combustion R&D Activities

Advanced Coal Technology 101

Development in Oxyfuel Combustion Technologies for Coal Fired Power Plants with CCS (An Overview) Stanley Santos

Oxy-Coal for Electric Power Generation: Status and Prospects

Oxy-fuel combustion in GHG Context Status of Research, Technology and Assessment

(Part 2: Cement Industry Sector) Stanley Santos

Experiences from Commissioning and Test Operation of Vattenfall s Oxyfuel Pilot Plant

The Cost of CO 2 Capture and Storage

Challenges to Demonstration Review of Technology Development Beyond the Oxyfuel Combustion Boiler

The way forward for CCS in Poland

Reduction of Emissions from Combined Cycle Plants by CO 2 Capture and Storage

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

Overview of CO2 Capture Technologies, System Integration, and Costs

Outline of this presentation

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

The Zero Emission Power Plant Concept

Three years operational experiences with the Oxyfuel Pilot Plant of Vattenfall in Schwarze Pumpe

CANMET Energy Technology Centre R&D Oxy-Fuel Combustion for CO 2 Capture

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Breakthroughs in clean coal technologies

Cansolv Technologies Inc. Alberta NOx and SOx Control Technologies Symposium April 9, Rick Birnbaum

EOSLT Consortium Biomass Co-firing

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

Gasification: A Key Technology Platform for Western Canada s Coal and Oil Sands Industries

CCUS Moving Ahead: Recent Technical Advances

Feature: New Project Development Using Innovative Technology

Air Separation Unit for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems

Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems

J-POWER s CCT Activities

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

CCUS Status and New Developments.

Techno-Economic Assessment of Oxy-Combustion Turbine Power Plants with CO 2 Capture

The Global Context for Low Emission Coal Technologies

Fundamental oxy-fuel combustion research carried out within the ENCAP project

Purification of Oxyfuel- Derived CO 2

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

Consideration in the Engineering and. Technology for Power Plant Application

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

DEVELOPMENT OF HITACHI OXY-COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY WITH NEW TYPES OF BURNER AND FLUE GAS RE-CIRCULATION SYSTEM

Advanced Hydrogen and CO 2 Capture Technology for Sour Syngas

Oxy-fuel combustion integrated with a CO 2 processing unit

Sandhya Eswaran, Song Wu, Robert Nicolo Hitachi Power Systems America, Ltd. 645 Martinsville Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Development of Integrated Flexi-Burn Dual Oxidant CFB Power Plant

Panel II Jänschwalde Oxyfuel demonstartion plant.

Creating the Future of Coal-Fired Power Generation

Impact of Combustion Conditions on Emission Formation (SO 2, NO X ) and fly ash

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

Research Activities on Oxyfuel Combustion at IVD, Universität Stuttgart

Available online at Energy Procedia 100 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Demonstration of an oxyfuel combustion system

Young Dong Unit 1 Oxyfuel Feasibility Study and FEED

Carbon Capture and Storage - Technology, costs and way forward

Public Workshops on Carbon Capture and Sequestration

CO 2 Capture Utilization and Sequestration (CCUS)

USE AND ELIMINATION OF METHANE IN COALMINE VENTILATION AIR (Cummings,D,R) DUT Pty Ltd

IEA Clean Coal Centre.

ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY IN THE USE OF COAL

Advanced Coal Technologies for Power Generation

Reducing CO 2 Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Capture 3 Post-Combustion Capture

Tim Dixon. EEF - February 19 th

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

ADECOS II. Advanced Development of the Coal-Fired Oxyfuel Process with CO 2 Separation

Japanese Policy for Cleaner Coal - Towards Zero Emission

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

Hadong and Boryeong 10 MW Pilot Projects

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Post-Combustion Capture (PCC) R&D and Pilot Plant Operation in Australia. IEA GHG 11th Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Network Meeting

Post - Combustion Pathways: Presentation 2

Siemens Carbon Capture Technology

Mr. Daniel has authored a gasification patent and represents GE on the Gasification Technologies Council.

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Advanced Coal Technologies. Laufer Energy Symposium. Dianna Tickner Peabody Energy April 5, 2013

Efficiency Improvement and Biomass. Robin Irons

Korean Oxy Fuel Demonstration

Siemens Carbon Capture Technology

Technical Challenges and Cost Reduction Potential for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Gernot Schneider Dr. Rüdiger Schneider Sylvia Hohe

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Reforming Natural Gas for CO 2 pre-combustion capture in Combined Cycle power plant

General Manager IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

Long-Term Policy: Concepts, Methods, Industry Practice

Babcock Borsig Steinmüller GmbH. Bełchatów - Retrofitting the EU s Largest Power Plant Site

CO2 Capture in the Steel Industry Review of the Current State of Art

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Kiewit s Petra Nova CCS Project

IEA ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DAY Coal Fired Power and Efficiency

CO2 Capture with Foster Wheeler s Flexi-burn TM CFB Technology

CO 2 -plant Schwarze Pumpe. B. Holling, R. Ritter, (Linde-KCA-Dresden GmbH),

Available online at GHGT-9. Elsevier use only: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here

GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003

State-of-the-Art Technologies for Reliable/ Sustainable Coal Fired Power Plants

CCS and CCU. their Role in the Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy Intensive Industry

Heat Integration of an Oxy-Combustion Process for Coal- Fired Power Plants with CO 2 Capture by Pinch Analysis

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Circulating Fluidised Bed Technology for Indian and other coals Dr John Topper IEA Clean Coal Centre, London

Gasification Research in Australia: supporting deployment of low emissions power technologies. David Harris CSIRO Advanced Coal Technologies

Activities within the German Research project "Lime Stone based Absorption of CO2" (LISA)

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

Transcription:

An Overview of CO2 Capture Technologies What are the Challenges Ahead? by: Stanley Santos IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Presented at: Workshop on Capture and Sequestration of CO2 (CCS) 10th July 2008 Mexico City http://www.ieagreen.org.uk *Corresponding Author s Email: stanley.santos@ieaghg.org

Presentation Outline Presentation Outline IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Briefly summarise international policy developments and regulatory developments Overview of CO2 capture technologies for power generation o Post-Combustion Capture o Oxy-Combustion Capture o Pre-Combustion Capture What challenges, issues and future development in the three leading CO2 capture technologies. http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Brief Introduction to IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEAGHG) http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme A collaborative research programme founded in 1991 Aim is to: Provide members with definitive information on the role that technology can play in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Funding approximately 2.5 million $/year. Activities:- Studies (>100), international research networks, facilitating and focussing R&D and demonstration activities Producing information that is: o o o o Objective, trustworthy, independent Policy relevant but NOT policy prescriptive Reviewed by external Expert Reviewers Subject to review of policy implications by Members http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Our Relation to the International Energy Agency IEA GHG is one of 40 organisations having an implementing agreement with IEA http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Technology and Market Information Implementation Support Methodology for CCS projects under CDM Guidelines for CCS site characterisation CCS Project Financing Regional capacity for CO2 storage in India Regulatory Support Risk assessment and regulatory needs Environmental impact assessment for CCS Capture-ready power plant Monitoring Selection Tool Technical Assessments Improved solvent scrubbing processes for CO2 capture Capture of CO 2 from medium scale installations Improved Oxygen production processes Collection of CO 2 from distributed sources CO2 Capture in the cement industry Co-production of hydrogen and electricity Remediation of leakage from geological storage Fuel Cells for CHP CO2 Pipeline transmission costs http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Provide a forum for Governments and Industry to cooperate Collaborate with other international bodies o International Energy Agency & G8 o CSLF and APEC http://www.ieagreen.org.uk GHGT-9 16 th 19 th November 2008 Washington D.C. http://mit.edu/ghgt9

Development of CCS (Brief summary of International Policy Development) http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

International Policy Developments International acceptance of CCS was seen as a major barrier to CCS deployment 2/3 years ago o Situation has changed significantly in previous year o Main International Environmental Treaty is the Kyoto Protocol CCS accepted as a mitigation option in 2007 o Remaining Barrier: Acceptance of CCS to be included in CDM Awaiting decision under COP/MOP4 meeting in Poland (Dec. 2008) Key International Marine Treaties (i.e. London Convention / OSPAR) adopted amendments to allow CCS in sub sea geological structures o Established guidelines for risk assessment and management for CO2 storage in sub sea geological structures http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Role of CCS in climate change mitigation? IPCC Special Report (2005) CCS contributing 15-55% of CO2 mitigation to 2100 IEA Technology Perspectives (2006) CCS 20-28% of mitigation to 2050. Second only to energy efficiency. Stern Report (2006) CCS ~10% mitigation by 2025, ~20% by 2050. Marginal mitigation costs without CCS increase by ~60%. EC/Shell (2007) - 7 yrs delay CCS = 90GT CO2 to 2050 = 3 yrs global emissions = 10ppm World Energy Outlook 2007. CCS is one of the most promising routes for mitigating emissions in the longer term and could reconcile continued coal burning with the need to cut emissions in the longer term. http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Regulatory Developments Country/Region Europe USA Canada Australia Action EC Draft Directive on CCS developed focuses on regulatory development for storage component. Other areas (transport, capture) covered by existing regulations IOGCC drafted guidelines for CO2 storage in geological formations where states have primacy USEPA drafting overarching state guidance for CO2 storage CO2-EOR already covered by existing state and federal laws USDOT regulations cover transport of CO2 New GHG emissions legislation being drafted will include a CCS provision Provinces already regulate CO2 transport, CO2-EOR and acid gas disposal Federal Government to redraft oil and gas legislation to accommodate CCS State of Victoria has a consultation document for CCS http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

General Overview of CO2 Capture http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Current View on CCS and Efficiency Increase Carbon Reduction Key issue will be value of CO 2 Zero Emissions Trajectory Increased Efficiency Trajectory CCS will need the most efficient plant Near-term Mid-term Long-term Time http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 14

http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 15

Post-Combustion Capture http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Post-Combustion Capture Power generation Capture Air N 2, O 2, H 2 O to atmosphere Fuel Boiler or gas turbine (FGD/SCR) Solvent scrubbing Steam Steam turbine Power CO 2 compression CO 2 to storage http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Chemical Absorption Process http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 18

Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture (Typical Operating Parameters) For MEA (with 30% solution) operation: o Absorber: CO2 removal (40-60 o C) o Regenerator (Stripper): CO2 release & solvent regeneration (100-120 o C) o Efficiency: o CO2 product: Up to 95+% CO2 removal from flue gas 99+% CO2 (capability to achieve food grade CO2) o Energy requirements: Sourced from the steam from turbine http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 19

Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture 350 TPD Liquid CO2 Plant using Econamine FG SM* (proprietary MEA based solvent) CO2 is captured from the flue gas of a gas turbine (a cogen facility) having 4% O2 in the flue gas. Operated by the Suez Energy Generation (Bellingham, MA, USA) http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 20

CO2 Based Solvent Scrubbing Use of Amine scrubbing to capture CO2 is the most mature among the 3 mostly considered capture technology options for the power generation. Amine based solvent is currently the commonly used for CO2 capture o widely used in food processing (ie. carbonated drinks) and chemical industries (ie. Urea plant) o Many large scale storage demonstration (> 1 MT/yr of scale) mostly in oil and gas fields applications (For example in Sleipner, Salah and Snohvit) Current R&D Focus o Improvement to current solvent o Development on column design and packing o Development for scaling up (from < 1000 TPD to ~5000 TPD per unit) o Development of new type of solvents o Development is also on-going for application to coal fired power plant http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 21

Evolution Coal Fired Flue Gas Application 9 0 <Experience and R&D Facilities> MHI s Evolution Development of Flue Gas CO 2 Recovery Plant 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 1 Ton/Day Pilot Plant Long Term Demo. Plant 07 1 Ton/Day Pilot Test Completed Long Term Demo. Plant Test Starts 08 Large Scale Demonstration Plant Design Ready 09 Enlargement 3000 Tonnes /Day Design Completed 6000 Tonnes/Day Design Completes Start of Development Large Scale Test Plant Nanko Pilot Plant (2 Tonnes/day) FGD Experience 3000 Tonnes /Day Plant R&D for Process Improvement Commercial Plant Malaysia kedah Plant 330 Tonnes/day Plant Malaysia Kedah (200 Tonnes/day) Japan, Chemical Company (330 Tonnes/day) India, Fertilizer Company (450 Tonnes/day x 2) Abu Dhabi, Fertilizer Company (400 Tonnes/day) 22

Post-combustion capture: KEY ISSUES Solvent life Requires very low SOx (< 10 ppm) and NO2 (< 20 ppm) Solvent could be very expensive target: lower solvent losses Corrosion Stainless steel v carbon steel Inhibitors can contain V, Sn, Sb (antimony) Energy consumption Regeneration of solvent Environmental impacts Some degradation products known and regulated; others are not. http://www.ieagreen.org.u 23

Future Direction of Research Cost and Process Optimisation of the current MEA based Technologies Design of the Absorption column Reduction of Energy consumption of the regenerative column Improvement of Current solvents Improving kinetics Improving additives to reduce degradation Development of new solvents For Examples: Chilled Ammonia process, Cansolv solvent, KS2, etc... Environmental Impact Assessment Impact assessment due solvent degradation Fugitive emissions (especially NH3 as one of the by-product of degradation) http://www.ieagreen.org.u 24

R&D Effort in Europe Castor Post-Combustion Pilot Plant Project Installed at the Esbjerg Power Station Pilot Capacity: 1000 kg CO2 per hour (25 TPD) 5000 Nm 3 /h flue gas (coal combustion) Now in operation started in March 2006 CASTOR programme is now complete. Work will be continued in CEASAR Project http://www.ieagreen.org.u 25

Vattenfall s CCS demo project at Nordjyllandsværket Nordjyllandsværket Vedsted On-shore Structure Transport by pipeline On February 6, 2008 Vattenfall Nordic Thermal Power Generation announced the intention to develop a full-scale Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) demonstration project Vattenfall AB IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme 11th MEETING of the INTERNATIONAL POST-COMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE NETWORK 20th-21st May, 2008, Vienna, Austria

Development in new novel solvent o CANSOLV Process Other Developments o Alstom Chilled Ammonia Process o Powerspan ECO2 Ammonia process Other Large Scale Demonstration Project o UK BERR Competition (currently 4 consortium shortlisted) o Germany - Vattenfall s Janschwalde Project http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Oxy Fuel Combustion with CO2 Capture http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Oxy-Coal Combustion with CO2 Capture Air Air separation Oxygen Recycled flue gas Vent Fuel Boiler Cooling (+FGD) Purification/ compression CO 2 Steam Steam turbine Power http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Convective Section of the boiler heat transfer profile ash deposition and fouling issue HP HP HEATER ADVANCED SUPERCRITICAL BOILER MILL Burner design issue IgnitionCOAL flame stability devolatilisation & char burnout STACK (START UP) IP ID FAN LP CONDENSOR LP PUMP HP PUMP LP HEATER DEAERATOR Radiant Section of the Boiler heat transfer profile slagging issue fireside corrosion issue COLD FD FAN the plant in order to achieve ESP FGD Prior to any retrofit of carbon capture technology, it is essential to repower the highest possible AIR IN efficiency 30

COAL HP HP HEATER 3 4 ADVANCED SUPERCRITICAL BOILER MILL ASU NITROGEN AIR STACK (START UP) IP 2 ID FAN DEAERATOR OXYGEN LP HP PUMP SECONDARY RECYCLE PRIMARY RECYCLE Gas / GAS Gas Heater / ESP FD / RECYCLE FAN 4 CONDENSOR LP PUMP LP HEATER 1 2 3 4 1 - IP STEAM BLEED 2 - HEAT FROM ASU ADIABATIC MAC 3 - CO2 COMPRESSOR STAGE HEAT 4 FLUE GAS FEEDWATER HEATING 3 CO2 PURIFICATION INERTS GAS DRIER CO2 PRODUCT FOR COMPRESSION 3 GAS COLD PA FAN GAS COOLER & WATER REMOVAL AIR INTAKE START UP 4 31

Oxy-Combustion Technology Use of oxygen instead of air in a boiler Oxy- Combustion is the least mature among the 3 mostly considered capture technology options for the power generation. 3 key development issues Boiler and burner development Air Separation Unit Cost and capacity of oxygen production CO2 processing Removal of impurities http://www.ieagreen.org.u 32

ANL - EERC Study World s s 1 st Oxy-Coal Pilot Scale Study Tower Furnace (~ 3MWth th) http://www.ieagreen.org.u 33

Coal Flame Photos: Air Fired vs Oxy-Fired (Courtesy of IHI) http://www.ieagreen.org.u 34

O 2 -RFG flame with recycle ratio = 0.58 Recycle Ratio = 0.58 (~ 0.61 include the CO2 to transport coal) O 2 -RFG flame with recycle ratio = 0.76 Courtesy of IFRF Recycle Ratio = 0.76

1 st Large Scale Oxy-Coal Combustion Experience (International Combustion Ltd.) 35 MWth Low NOx burner Although it was not able to achieve the desirable CO2 composition the first combustion trial gained significant experience in burner start up http://www.ieagreen.org.u 36

Oxy-Combustion Technology What are the Enabling Studies in the near future that will provide a big step forward for Oxy-Coal Combustion http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Vattenfall Schwarze Pumpe Pilot Project Time Table for Implementation of Oxy-Fuel Project 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Pre- and Order planning Permission planning Execution planning Erection Commissioning Operation Courtesy of Vattenfall http://www.ieagreen.org.u 38

Schwarze Pumpe Oxy-Combustion Pilot Plant Courtesy of Vattenfall AB http://www.ieagreen.org.u 39

What it looks like today http://www.ieagreen.org.u 40

Callide A Project: Japanese-Australian Collaboration Nth Denison Trough Callide-A Power Station Capacity: 4 x 30 MW e Commissioned: 1965 1969 Refurbished: 1997/98 Steam Parameters: 4.1 MPa, 460 o C Steam Flowrate: 123 t/h steam Figure 2: Location of Callide-A Project. A Planned retrofit to a coal fired power plant with an oxy-combustion boiler http://www.ieagreen.org.u 41

Doosan Babcock Burner Test (2008/09) 40 MWth http://www.ieagreen.org.u 42

Air Ingress Oxy-Combustion: KEY ISSUES Estimated that every 1% of air ingress should be equivalent to about 4% reduction of the CO2 concentration in the flue gas. Several failures have been noted from previous experiences of not reaching the desired concentration of CO2 due to air ingress. This is a big challenge especially retrofitting a power plant. Boiler and Burner Development We need to build our confidence in running an oxy-fired burner/boiler especially at the same scale of our current PC boiler. Various technical issues elucidated - these include heat transfer aspect, ash and slagging, equipment scaling up, etc Largest burner test as of today operated with oxy-firing mode for coal was done by International Combustion during the 1990 s - what have we learned from this test? Cost and capacity of producing your oxygen CO2 purity will be a very sensitive issue to this technology - this would have significant impact to economics of the plant http://www.ieagreen.org.u 43

Oxy-Combustion: KEY ISSUES SO3 issue is a big missing link! ANL study (1985) have indicated that SO3 formation is 3 to 4 times greater as compared to conventional air firing mode We need to know more about this potential operational issue. http://www.ieagreen.org.u From Chemical Engineering Progress (Vol. 70) 44

Measured SO 3 concentrations for Lausitz coal at AIR and OXYFUEL combustion conditions Universität Stuttgart SO 3 measured, ppm 140 120 SO 2 measured SO 3 measured OXYFUEL 100 80 60 40 20 0 ppm ppm AIR 733 8 (6 11)* OXYFUEL 1758 85 (36 121)* AIR 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SO 2 at measurment position, ppm *... min. / max. value measured

Large Scale Pilot and Demo Projects PROJECT Location MWt Start up Boiler Type Main Fuel CO2 Train B & W USA 30 2007 Pilot PC Bit, Sub B., Lig. Jupiter USA 20 2007 Industr. No FGR NG, Coal Oxy-coal UK UK 40 2008 Pilot PC Vattenfall Germany 30 2008 Pilot PC Lignite (Bit.) With CCS Total, Lacq France 30 2009 Industrial Nat gas With CCS Pearl Plant USA 66 2009 22 MWe PC Bit Side stream Callide Australia 90 2010 30 MWe PC Bit. With CCS Ciuden - PC Spain 20 2010 Pilot PC Anthra.(Pet ck)? Ciuden - CFB Spain 30 2010 Pilot CFB Anthra.(Pet ck)? Jamestown USA 150 2013 50 MWe CFB Bit. With CCS Vattenfall Germany? ~1000 2015 ~250 MWe? Lignite (Bit.)? Youngdong Korea ~400 2016? ~100 MWe PC???

Oxy-Fuel Combustion Boiler Projects 1000.0 (Conversion @ 1 MWe = 3 MWt = 10 MMBtu/hr) Demo Projects Vattenfall MWe 100.0 10.0 Utility Boilers Industrial Furnaces International Comb 11.7 JSIM/NEDO(oil) 4.0 250.0 Youngdong 100.0 Jamestown Callide A 50.0 30.0 22.0 Pearl Plant Vattenfall 13.3 Oxy-coal UK B&W 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 CIUDEN 6.7 6.7 CIUDEN Jupiter TOTAL(NG) 1.0 0.1 ANL/EERC 1.0 ANL/BHP Test 0.2 Furnaces IFRF IHI 1.0 0.5 CANMET 0.1 B&W/AL 0.4 1.0 PowerGen 0.3 IVD-Stuttgart 0.2 0.2 RWE-NPOWER 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year ENEL

Pre-Combustion Capture (Considering only Coal Power Plant) http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Pre-Combustion Capture IGCC with CO 2 capture CO 2 compression CO 2 CO+H 2 O H 2 +CO 2 Coal Gasification Shift Acid gas conversion removal H 2 S Sulphur Sulphur recovery Oxygen Fuel gas (mainly H 2 ) Air Air separation Nitrogen Combined cycle Power Air Air http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 49

50

IGCC without Capture 5 coal-based IGCC demonstration plant in the USA, Europe and Japan IGCC is not at present the preferred technology for new coal-fired power plants Main commercial interest in IGCC is for use of petroleum residues Several plants built and planned at refineries IGCC has some intrinsic economic advantage over PC plant when CCS is added http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 51

IGCC Currently in Operation Nuon Buggenum 250 MWel

250MWe Air Blown IGCC (Fukushima, Japan) http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 53

CO2 Capture in IGCC Advantages of IGCC for CO2 capture o High CO2 concentration and high overall pressure Lower energy consumption for CO2 separation Compact equipment o Proven CO2 separation technology can be used o Possibility of co-production of hydrogen Disadvantages o IGCC is unfamiliar technology for power generators o Existing coal fired plants have low availability o IGCC without CO2 capture has generally higher costs than pulverised coal combustion http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 54

IGCC IGCC with pre-combustion capture has been the fundamental building blocks in various programme for co-generation of electricity and hydrogen Some examples o USA: o Europe: o Japan: o China: FutureGen (old) Programme HYPOGEN Programme EAGLE Project GreenGen Project http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 55

Pre-Combustion Capture: Key Barrier Will reliability hinders the deployment of IGCC? Record for IGCC s availability has been poor but improving. Complexity of the plant could be a turn off to prospective investors or power generation company Cost is another issue Source: EPRI http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 56

Pre-Combustion Capture: Key Development Area Development in Gasifier Technology Development in Shift Reactor Choice of Sour vs Sweet Shift Reaction Development in Separation of CO2 using Physical Absorption technology Development in the Gas Turbine technology Development of gas turbine firing H2 rich fuel using the current DLN technology http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 57

What are the current trend of development in IGCC Based Technology New fleet taking advantage of 10+ years of operation in the U.S. and Europe o Materials of construction o Spare equipment o Gasifier refractory / membrane wall o Burner design Range of suppliers to choose from, for a wide variety of coals and other feedstocks EPC alliances can provide important guarantees http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 58

GE Bechtel Reference Plant http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 59

Concluding Remarks http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

60 Power Generation Efficiency Efficiency, % LHV 50 40 30 20 10 0 Postcomb IGCC slurry Coal IGCC dry Oxyfuel Postcomb Oxyfuel Natural gas http://www.ieagreen.org.uk Without capture With capture Source: IEA GHG studies 61

US $/kw Capital Cost 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Post Fluor Post MHI IGCC slurry IGCC dry Oxyfuel Post Fluor Post MHI Oxyfuel Coal Natural gas Based on 1 US $/Euro Without capture With capture Source: IEA GHG studies http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 62

Cost of Capture and Storage Electricity cost, US c/kwh 10 8 6 4 2 PF-CCS IGCC-CCS NGCC-CCS PF IGCC NGCC 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fuel cost, $/GJ (LHV) Basis: 10% DCF, 25 year life, 85% load factor, $8/t CO 2 stored http://www.ieagreen.org.uk 63

http://www.ieagreen.org.uk Summary CCS is one of the important measures that will make a significant impact on reducing CO2 emissions CCS implementation is picking up pace internationally o Several activities have been initiated worldwide in the development of CO2 Capture for Power Generation industry. There are two set of horse race among the three leading CO2 capture options for newly build and retrofit power plant. o There is no clear winner at the moment! We need large scale demonstration of the carbon capture technology to build the confidence necessary for a rapid deployment. We also need to build our technical capacity base and encourage students to see CCS as their future career path

http://www.ieagreen.org.uk

Thank You Any Questions? General http://www.ieagreen.org.uk CCS http://www.co2captureandstorage.info GHGT-9 http://www.mit.edu/ghgt9 Email stanley.santos@ieaghg.org http://www.ieagreen.org.uk