In-situ Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Sediments Using Zero- Valent Iron

Similar documents
Optimization of ZVI Technology for In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Contaminants. Dr. John Freim OnMaterials, LLC Escondido, CA

Zero-valent iron s effectiveness at dehalogenating chlorobenzenes and its feasibility as a reactive cap

Field-proven remediation technologies for the most challenging sites.

CONTAINMENT FACILITIES TO PROMOTE CONTAMINANT SEPARATION AND DEGRA- DATION

Chlorinated Solvent Remediation Technologies

Bioremediation Using DARAMEND for Treatment of POPs in Soils and Sediments

Antimethanogenic EZVI

Remediation of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and vinyl chloride (VC) contaminated groundwater: lab and field pilot test.

RECENT USES OF IN SITU STABILIZATION, IN SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION, AND IN SITU CHEMICAL REDUCTION USING SOIL MIXING. RE3 Remediation, Renewal, Results

ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC FACTORS AFFECTING CONTAMINANT TRANSFORMATION AT IRON OXIDE SURFACES (Cosponsored with the Division of Geochemistry) Organized by

Subsurface Distribution of ZVI/EHC Slurry Validating Radius of Influence. Josephine Molin, PeroxyChem October

Environmental Solutions. Klozur CR. Combined Chemical and Bio-Remediation

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA GATHERED DURING ASHTABULA RIVER DREDGING, ASHTABULA RIVER, OHIO

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater using Carbon Amendments: Analytical Challenges and Solutions

May Solutions for Air, Water, Waste and Remediation. Oxidants & Reductants. Work Together

Field Evaluation of the Treatment of DNAPL Using Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI)

1-6 CORDOVA HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NO ) (CWIS NO ) (CWIS NO ) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2011

I-ROX. Chemical Reduction-Oxidation (REDOX) Technology

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

Manufactured Gas Plant Site Management - Program 50

THE USE OF VEGETABLE OIL SUBSTRATE S IN THE TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Field Evaluation of the Treatment of DNAPL

The Development of Innovative Technologies For the Remediation of Contaminated Sites

Impacts of a Zero Valent Iron PRB on Downgradient Biodegradation Processes. John E. Vidumsky DuPont Corporate Remediation Group

PILOT TEST OF ELECTROKINETIC-ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION OF PCE DNAPL

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Phytoremediation of Persistent Organic Pollutants. John H. Pardue Louisiana State University

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone using ZVI-Clay Treatment Technology

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Oil Diagnostics - Test Information

Managing a MGP Site Containing 121,000 Tons of Soils Containing Highly Impacted and Multiple Contaminates Of Concern (COC) Clinton, Iowa

2014 Western Dredging Association Environmental Excellence award Nomination Application

Bioremediation Product Series

Hudson River Cleanup and PCBs Community Advisory Group March 22, 2012

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

In Situ Remediation Conference 14

SECTION 2 WATER 2.1 ROUTINE WATER COLUMN MONITORING Collection Summary

WM 03 Conference, February 23-27, 2003, Tucson, AZ IN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IN THE PRESENCE OF RADIONUCLIDES

Bench Scale Trials of Promising Technologies for PFOS Remediation RPIC 2014

Contaminated Sediment Conceptual Site Models and Remediation

This report was prepared by Stanley Abraham, Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

1,2,3-TCP Remediation in Groundwater: Biological Reduction and Chemical Reduction using ZVZ

Nanotechnology for Site Remediation: Fate and Transport of Nanoparticles in Soil and Water Systems

Parcel F Carbon Amendment Placement Pilot Study, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, San Francisco, California

A Novel MicroElectroMechanical System (MEMS) Device for Passive Sampling of Hydrophobic Compounds

Appendix D LPRSA RM 10.9 Removal Action and Pilot Tests - Statement of Work Page 1 of 10 APPENDIX D LOWER PASSAIC RIVER STUDY AREA RM 10.

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Receive Site Fact Sheets by . See For More Information to Learn How.

Phytoremediation of Contaminated Groundwater

ATTACHMENT 12: CDISCO Description and Sensitivity to Input Parameters

Watch Water. ANSI/NSF 61 Certified From. February 2014

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune Restoration Advisory Board Meeting Minutes

UPDATE OF BALTIMORE REGION TOXICS WORKSHOP (Aug 3) AND REGIONAL CASE STUDIES OF NOVEL PCB REMEDIATION

SiREM-Major Services/Products

T&D Facilities & Equipment: Environmental Issues - Program 51

3SP_CO_1000 Package

A Method for Removing Brine Spills in Soil Using Electrokinetics

Biological Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Compounds. Barry Molnaa WSW Remediation Practice Manager ARCADIS

ETHICALCHEM BACKGROUND

ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT. Engr. Yvonne Ligaya F. Musico

TOP 6 REASONS IT S WORTH CONSIDERING AN IN SITU

Technical Assistance to Ohio Closure Sites

Implementation of Electrokinetic Based Soil Desalinization

23 Solid and Hazardous Waste

SEDIMENT CHOREOGRAPHY

Challenges in subsurface in situ remediation of chlorinated solvents

Visit our website:

Presentation Based on: Other References:

Appendix C. Chemical Extraction Bench-Scale Study Evaluation

Nanotechnology for Site Remediation: Dehalogenation of Organic Pollutants in Soils and Groundwater by Nanoscale Iron Particles

Klozur Persulfate Soil Mixing Recommendations and Application Guidelines

Fundamentals and Applications of Biofilms Bacterial Biofilm Applications

CARBON DIOXIDE POISONING ON PROTON-EXCHANGE-MEMBRANE FUEL CELL ANODES

Kentucky and Beyond BOS 200 Success Story. The RPI Group Approach to In-situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation

LEAF Method Testing of MGP-impacted Sediments in Gowanus Canal

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation DOUG HAMILTON, PRINCIPAL HYDROGEOLOGIST ACV ENVIRO

TEXTILE INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT. W.J.K.Dushyanthi Ranpatige Research Officer Industrial Technology Institute

Contamination of fjords by urban run-off

Comparison of EHC, EOS, and Solid Potassium Permanganate Pilot Studies for Reducing Residual TCE Contaminant Mass

TREATMENT OF PERCHLORATE AND 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN GROUNDWATER USING EDIBLE OIL SUBSTRATE (EOS )

Chloramine: An Effective Biocide for Produced Waters. Andrew K. Boal, Ph.D. and Charles Mowery

Overview of Permeable Reactive Barriers. Presented To: Dr. Norman Jones Civil Engineering Dept., BYU

Combining Low-Energy Electrical Resistance Heating with Biotic and Abiotic Reactions for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL Source Areas

Grand Calumet. River Revitalized

The emamoc (electrolytic methanogenicmethanotrophic FOR BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS

2013 IPEC Conference San Antonio

Overview of In-Situ Thermal Remediation Technologies. Douglas Larson, Ph.D., P.E. Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. June 13-14, 2012

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Expedited Remediation of Coal Tar Containing Sediments: Design-to-Build Approach with a Beneficial Reuse

The Next Step In The World Of Transformers

Optimizing In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethenes in British Columbia s Groundwater. SMART Remediation Vancouver, ON February 11, 2016

Reduction of TNT and RDX by Core Material from an Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier

Introduction to Sediment Remediation. Presented to: Lower Passaic River Community Advisory Group July 14, 2011

In situ Remediation of 1,4-Dioxane using Electrical Resistance Heating

Great Lakes Legacy Act. Marc Tuchman U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office

Nanotechnology for contaminated land Remediation

APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES

Transcription:

In-situ Dechlorination of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Sediments Using Zero- Valent Iron Kevin Gardner, Emese Hadnagy Deana Aulisio, Jean Spear Center for Contaminated Sediments Research University of New Hampshire

Overview In situ remediation or dredging / offsite treatment. Introduction of zero-valent iron (ZVI) various sizes and manufacturing techniques Dechlorination of PCBs in PCB- contaminated sediments Relatively fast reaction and an economically viable process

PCB Dechlorination Kinetics with ZVI in Housatonic River Sediment 90 80 70 Conc of PCBs, ppm 60 50 40 30 20 10 y = 23.535x -0.1088 R 2 = 0.8306 84.1% Removed 0 0.0 5000.0 10000.0 15000.0 20000.0 25000.0 Time (min)

New Bedford Harbor results 300 Conc of PCBs, ppm 250 200 150 y = 183.33x -0.0415 R 2 = 0.8221 100 56.4% Removed 0.0 5000.0 10000.0 15000.0 20000.0 25000.0 Time, min

Different Types of ZVI Evaluated UNH ZVI* RNIP RNIP/Pd Cerac Mallinkrodt Source lab Toda America Toda America Milwaukee, WI St. Louis, MO Cost $N/A $9/lb? $4.3/lb $2.39/lb Size 1-100 nm 30 nm 30nm 50 um 50 um Water Content 79.9% water 52.5% water 52.5% water 25.0% water 25.5% water Surface Area 33.5 m2/g 23.6 m2/g 23.6 m2/g N/A N/A Characteristic suspension suspension suspension dry powder dry powder * Wang and Zhang, 1996

50-um iron materials ground iron oxide powder reduced with hydrogen or carbon monoxide at very high temperatures precipitation of aqueous iron on the anode of an electrochemical cell

PCB dechlorination with different iron types 80 Percent Removal of Total PCBs (%) 60 40 20 Microscale irons Nanoscale irons 0 CERAC Mallinkrodt Toda Kogyo Method of Wang Toda Kogyo and Zhang (1996) Fe/Pd Iron Source

Why does degradation level off? Iron degradation faster than PCBs Passivation of iron surface Desorption of slow PCB fraction (unavailable PCBs)

ORP over time -100 Oxidation-Reduction Potential (mv) -200-300 -400-500 -600-700 Control CERAC Mallinkrodt Toda Kogyo -800 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (days)

PCB desorption and dechlorination kinetics - NBH sediments Percent Removal of Total PCBs (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 desorption with Tenax dechlorination with zero valent iron 0 2 4 6 8 Time (days)

What are the Breakdown Products?? 7 Day Breakdown of Congener 207 Internal Standard Congener 30 Internal Standard Congener 204 Congener 207 170+190 Noise 5+8 46 56+60 135+118

Ortho dechlorination 40 Concentration (mg/kg) 30 20 10 0 Ortho only congeners Non-ortho congeners 0.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Time (days)

Positional analysis Concentration (mg/kg) 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 Congeners with ortho chlorines Congeners with meta chlorines Congeners with para chlorines 80 60 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Time (days)

Homolog-specific dechlorination 120 Homolog Concentration (mg/kg) 100 80 60 40 20 initial 1 min 60 min 1 day 3 day 0 Homolog

Mass Balance 0.7 0.6 Concentration (mmole/kg) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 PCB Biphenyl 0.1 0

Reagent Delivery Seaway Environmental Technologies Deliver reagent(s) ) to contaminated subaqueous strata Provide adequate mixing of reagent in strata Maximize yield minimize reagent dispersion Minimize dispersion of contaminated sediment

Seaway Systems - Field Examples Contaminated Sediment Excavator Pressure-controlled housing provides a dry environment around the mechanical bucket or mixing in-situ treatment zone o Sediments are prevented from mixing with the water o Pressure-controlled subsurface technology permits mixing in dry environment for in-situ treatment Vision: barge-mounted, hollowstem auger encased in pressure-controlled housing

Seaway Systems - Field Examples Contaminated Sediment Remediation Vessel Water Treatment (Membrane Filtration) Excavator Vessel Contaminated Sediment Remediation Vessel (CSRV) CSRV establishes a containment area within the river o Prevents migration of contaminants o Operator can work quickly and efficiently o Progress can be easily monitored Low pressure within containment area prevents water from escaping CSRV applicable for in-situ treatment technology

Patent Drawing: In-Situ Treatment of Contaminated Sediments 191 102 101 151 194 193 A A 195 197 192 194 193 195 FIG. 18 192 103 197 151 196 Section A-A FIG. 20 145 191 FIG. 19

Deploying shrouds

Current initiatives Use of biodegradable, food-grade surfactants to increase availability of PCBs to iron Minimization, optimization of iron added Use of iron filings Influence of iron on microbial consortia Large-scale lab. experiments using prototype mixing/delivery device - summer Bioavailability/chronic toxicity of treated sediments - summer Fundamental investigation of catalysis / reduction mechanisms Reactivity of dioxins/furans/pcns (proposed)

Conclusions Cost? ~ $50/cubic yard in materials (for ~2-3% iron addition) 50 micrometer size iron works well and may be more cost-effective, easier and safer to handle Remediation endpoint high organic carbon results in slow desorption kinetics Implementation mixed into sediment or reactive cap Delivery/mixing a key issue for full scale deployment

End