PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS. No May 2014 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: WASTE ACT, 2008 (ACT NO. 59 OF 2008)

Waste Discharge Permit Application. for. Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Discharges

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES

Rhode Island Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater a Groundwater Objectives (GA and GB) b

Material Characterization Report

Discharge and Discovery Reporting Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Mobile Water Treatment Trailer

Midwest Analytical Services, Inc. "Where industry comes for answers." PRICE LIST 2009

Ordinance on the Remediation of Polluted Sites


Interpreting Analytical Results

Acceptance standards and charging rates for

GENERAL PERMIT WMGR098 BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE FOUNDRY SAND AND SAND SYSTEM DUSTS

Air & Stack Emissions AIR PT Workplace Air, Ambient Air and Stack Emissions PT Scheme Application Form

Part 1: Property Ownership, Property Information and Owner s Certifications

Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report 2016

Hazardous Waste Initial Training

Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives

NELAC PT for Accreditation Fields of Proficiency Testing with PTRLs Solid and Chemical Materials Effective January 3, 2012

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS

Environmental Forensics in Contaminated Site Management

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES

Waterfront Substation

STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

New Source MACT and Residual Risk at an Iron Foundry

ADDITIONAL SAMPLING REPORT WITH SITE CLOSURE REQUEST BUILDING 311 NCDENR Incident Number: Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

UNE STANDARD June 2010

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Continental Aluminum Exposure Investigation Executive Summary

Limited Remedial Action Reference Documentation For Site Professionals

GEMS: GIS and geo-statistics integrated in Brownfield remediation and redevelopment, applied in the Vilvoorde region

development impact assessment (DIA)

MEXICO S SEMARNAT ISSUES NEW SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND REMEDIATION STANDARD FOR HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOIL

Annex II. Declarations

LABORATORY ACTIONS, DECISIONS & SAFETY WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Colourants and pigments

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 3229 San Leandro Street Oakland, California

Waterfront Substation

75C Calcium Peroxide

Electronic Submittal June 11, 2013

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

Development of Potentially Contaminated Land Guidance Note for Developers, Agents and Consultants

Regulations to deal with the reuse of excvated (polluted) soil in Germany

Overview of the Railroad Commission of Texas Site Remediation Section

Lake Erie Works 2010 Annual Toxics Reduction Report (O. Reg. 455/09)

PHASE III ESA, HHERA AND RAP, NORTHWEST POINT, LABRADOR. Appendix 4a. Site Drawings. East Bulk Fuel Storage Site

Hazardous Materials December 9, Hazardous Materials Existing Conditions

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

Passive Gas Environmental Site Assessment and Monitoring

The Manitoba Contaminated/Impacted Sites Program

SECTION 7 SEPARATION OF WATER MAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS

November Nanticoke Refinery Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09)

November Nanticoke Refinery Reduction plan summary (OR 455/09)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 160-P HG-R

Application of Human-health Risk Assessment in Italy: Regulatory aspects and technical guidelines

your guide to completing an application for a new or replacement water connection from your property to an existing water main

Luas Broombridge. Annex J Surface Water Sampling Report. St. Stephen s Green to Broombridge (Line BXD) Broombridge. Cabra. Phibsborough.

WASTE CHARACTERIZATION: IN-SITU SOIL LOCATED AT ISRA OUTFALL 009 PLANNED EXCAVATION B1-1D

BASELINE MONITORING REPORT (BMR)

MANAGEMENT OF SONOMA COUNTY WILDFIRE DEBRIS

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol

PCK Schwedt refinery site Long term groundwater monitoring and natural attenuation

DROGHEDA LANDFILL SITE COLLON ROAD, MELL, DROGHEDA

April 8, 2015 Olympic Medical Center Rebecca Lawson, P.E. LHG. Connie Groven, P.E. Audrey Kuklok

The Environment Impact Factor (EIF) for produced water discharges a tool for reducing environmental impacts

SUPPLEMENTAL PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APPLEBY MALL 5111 NEW STREET AND 499 & 505 APPLEBY LINE BURLINGTON, ONTARIO

TABLE 1-1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING LEVELS AND CLEANUP/ACTION LEVELS FOR PETROLEUM CONSTITUENTS. Groundwater

33101 TAMPERE.

REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUITABILITY OF SCRAP TIRES

Railroad Commission of Texas

North Carolina Cleanup Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater

Risk Assessment of Hydrocarbon Releases by Pipelines

MONTEREY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH BUREAU DRINKING WATER PROTECTION SERVICES APPLICATION FOR A NEW OR AMENDED WATER SYSTEM PERMIT

Zotefoams plc. Technical Information Sheet TIS 20 (previously BTI5) Toxicity testing of Zotefoams materials INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

The New Jersey Private Well Testing Program: An Evaluation of Domestic Well Water Quality in New Jersey

Impacts of urban growth on surface water and groundwater quality in the City of Dessau, Germany

PST Rulemaking: Draft Rule Changes

This document has not been reviewed Department management, who may have additional comments at a later time.

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Local Government (Water Pollution) Acts, 1977 & 1990

Establishing Background Concentrations in Soil. Prepared pursuant to Section 64 of the Environmental Management Act. Version 9

Bioremediation Product Series

Assessing Drilling Waste Disposal Areas: Compliance Options for Reclamation Certification

Inventaire Report Information Report ID: Report Year: 2008 Programs Included:npri. Facility Information.

REVIEW OF RISK ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN THE UK AND ITS APPLICABILITY IN CHINA

Inorganic Chemicals (IOCs)

Project Tooheys Pty Ltd 31 July Nyrang Street RJL:jlb Lidcombe NSW 2141

Update - Vapor Intrusion and Mitigation in Florida

ESAA Regulatory Forum - Edmonton, AB - November 7, 2017

ETHICALCHEM BACKGROUND

Transcription:

Please return completed form to: Developer Services Dee Valley Waterplc Packsaddle Wrexham Road Rhostyllen LL14 4EH E-mail address: developer.services@deevalleygroup.com 1. Developer Details Name: Company (if applicable): Address: Tel No (including dialling code): Fax No (including dialling code): E-mail address: Post Code: 2. Site Location Details Development Details Address: Post Code: Residential Commercial Mixed 2.1 Is the new water supply required for a development on a brownfield siteyes No IfYes go to section 3.1If No, please provide details below of previous use of site and adjacent sites and then go to 2.2

2.2 Has the site or any adjacent sites or other land through which the pipeline is proposed to be laid potentially been affected by contamination? Yes No If Yes, go to 3.1. If No, go to 5.1 3. Site Assessment 3.1 Has the Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) determined the need for a site investigation? Yes No IfYes, go to 4.1. If No, go to 5.1 4. Site Investigation 4.1 The data from the site investigation should be used to populate the pipe selection risk assessment summary in Table 1 below. 4.2 Date when site investigation was carried out 4.3 How many metres below ground level was ground water encountered? 4.4 Ensure all intrusive site investigation details are attached to this assessment and then go to 5.1 5. Site Remediation 5.1 Has any site remediation (including changes in site levels) been undertaken? Yes No If Yes, go to 5.2. If No, go to 5.3 5.2 Has Table 1 and 2 been completed using data after remediation? Yes No IfYes, then provide details of remediation and go to 5.3. If No, then a new site investigation is required and table 1 and 2 should be repopulated. Then go to 5.3. 5.3 Is any site remediation planned for the site? Yes No If Yes, then provide details of further remediation and go to 6.1. If No, then go to 6.1. 6. Final Use of Site 6.1 Is there any storage of chemicals (including fuels) to be stored on the site that may affect the proposed pipe selection? Yes No IfYes, then provide details of chemicals and go to 6.2. If No, then go to 6.2

6.2 Are there any further contamination risks that may affect pipe selection? Yes No IfYes, then provide details of chemicals and go to 6.3. If No, then go to 6.3 6.3 What pipe materials are proposed by the developer?

Analysis only required where identified Analysis required where preliminary risk assessment has identified land potentially affected by contamination PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Test Total VOCs 0.5 Pass Total BTEX & MTBE 0.1 Pass Total SVOC (excluding PAHs and 2 Pass those substances marked with an * EC5-EC10 aliphatic and aromatic 2 Pass hydrocarbons EC10-EC16 aliphatic and aromatic 10 Pass hydrocarbons EC16-EC40 aliphatic and aromatic 500 Pass hydrocarbons Phenols* (from SVOC analysis) 2 Pass Cresols and chlorinated phenols* 2 Pass (from SVOC analysis) Ethers* 0.5 Pass Nitrobenzene* 0.5 Pass Ketones* 0.5 Pass Aldehydes* 0.5 Pass Amines Fail Pass Table 1 Pipe Selection Risk Assessment Summary All concentrations should be in mg/kg PE Threshold Metal pipes/barrier pipe Laboratory detection limit Testing UKAS accredited Y/N Maximum concentration at proposed pipeline depth (see Note [2]) Maximum site concentration (see Note [3]) Locations and depths where concentrations exceed proposed pipeline threshold Corrosive (conductivity, redox and ph) See Note [1] Pass See Note [1] Note [1] For wrapped steel, corrosive if ph <7 and conductivity >400µS/cm. For wrapped ductile iron, corrosive if ph <5, Eh not neutral and conductivity >400µS/cm. For copper, corrosive if ph <5 or >8 and Eh positive.note [2] Water pipes are normally laid at 0.75-1.35m below finished ground level. Note [3] Also state if liquid free product is present in soil or groundwater.

7. Health and Safety Assessment 7.1 The data from the site investigation should be used to populate table 2 below to assess the health and safety risks to Dee Valley Water staff. Table 2 CLEA Health and Safety Summary Contaminant Soil guideline value mg/kg Arsenic 32 Nickel 130 Mercury 170 Selenium 35 Cadmium 10 Benzene 0.33 Toluene 610 Ethylbenzene 350 Xylene 230 Phenol 420 Laboratory detection limit mg/kg Testing UKAS accredited Y/N Maximum site concentration mg/kg Locations and depths where concentrations exceed soil guideline value 7.2 Are there any other soil properties that could constitute a health and safety risk? 7.3 Do soil results meet the guideline values given in Table 2. Yes No IfYes, then go to 8.1. If No, then undertake remediation and go to 5.1 8. Any Other Information 8.1 Please provide any other information that you feel may assist Dee Valley Water in providing you with a quotation. 9. Applicant Checklist 9.1 Have all sections of the form been completed? Yes No 9.2 Has a site layout plan been enclosed? Yes No 9.3 Has all relevant information been provided? Yes No

10. Risk Assessor 10.1 Name and relevant qualifications of person directing the risk assessment for water pipes formand date risk assessment performed: 10.2 Name and address of risk assessor s company: 11. Declaration I confirm that I have completed this form and provided supporting information within the Site Assessment Report (SAR) in accordance with UKWIR Guidance for the Selection of Water Pipes to be used in Brownfield Sites and Dee Valley Water s Contaminated Land Policy and Guidance document. I also confirm that, if any further site investigation is needed and carried out, I will be required to submit an additional Pipeline Risk Assessment with the relevant supporting documentation. I understand that failure to supply any of the required information may result in a delay to my application being processed. Signature: Company Name: Print Name: Date: General Notes: Charges will apply for work undertaken and the information provided. These charges are detailed in the Dee Valley WaterCharges Scheme.

The information requested on this form is required for Dee Valley Water to provide you with an accurate quotation. Missing or misleading information could lead to additional costs and delays at a later date. Before completing the application form you should read the Conditions for New Water Connections