Standard Operating Procedure for Complying with CMP Requirements

Similar documents
INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

7.0 Stakeholder and Public Outreach

TTI s Capabilities in Connected Transportation

FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE/CRITICAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS. Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Summer Meeting

AASHTO WEBINAR Practitioner s Handbook 18: Air Quality Analyses in the NEPA Process for Highway Projects

18 June 2017 PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK AASHTO ADDRESSING AIR QUALITY ISSUES IN THE NEPA PROCESS FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Notice Cover photos:

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Guidelines for TxDOT Regional Toll Road Authority. Cooperation AND. Coordination

Congestion Management Process Update

2009 through Texas Department of Transportation

Prestressed Member Fabrication Plants (Multi-Project) Material Producer List Construction Division Materials & Pavements Section

OPEN DATA & PROJECT TRACKER. Michael Chamberlain TPP, Data Management

Version 1.30 May, Virginia Transportation Modeling (VTM) Policies and Procedures Manual

Understanding Congestion Context and a Tool to Help Choose the Right Mitigation Strategies Final Report PRC F

CHAPTER 2 PURPOSE AND NEED

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

Transportation Conformity 101. Session I: Course Overview

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

Houston Galveston Area Council Congestion Management Process

Caitlin Hughes Rayman Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 2013

I-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report

April Mike Taylor

Institute of Transportation Engineers Inc.

FHWA and FTA Funding Source Eligibility

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN UPDATE. Regional Freight Advisory Committee NCTCOG

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Regional Initiatives on Land Use and Transportation

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

KANSAS WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

The transportation needs described demonstrate that improvements are needed to meet the anticipated demands of travelers in the corridor and region.

Air Quality and Transportation Conformity

The Texas Economy: Economic Impact of a Floor Price for Crude Oil

Responding to Complex Integrated System Challenges: Energy, Water, Food Dale L. Keairns

Building Interstate 69 As A Series of Upgrade Projects

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Sanitation Services Bulk and Brush Program - Update. Quality of Life & Environment Committee November 14, 2016

Tri-Cities Transportation Study Area Congestion Management System Operations Plan

Improving Spatial Allocation of Construction Equipment Emissions

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

National Performance Research Data Set (NPMRDS): Travel Time Probe Data. Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission

I-35 Corridor Segment Committee Bagby Ave. Waco, Texas. March 9, :00 AM to Noon

DFW Conceptual Model Review

5.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Fresno COG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) / Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Member Agency Workshop

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank.

CRTPA Regional Mobility Plan Attachment 1 Agenda Item 4E Page 1 of 11

Fresno County. Congestion Management Process Update

For the first time, Texas businesses and organizations have a way to reach 95 percent of homes throughout the state.

Introduction. CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13

DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT

Texas Connected Freight Corridors

TRAFFIC FORECASTING REQUIREMENTS BY PROJECT TYPE. August Research Report

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. OU Meteorology Field Trip October 20, 2017

ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIR QUALITY

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Review of Ozone Emissions. Reductions Processes

Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update

Representative of the Texas General Land Office State Power Program. Duncanville ISD Electricity Overview 10 October 2017

Houston Ozone Past, Present, and Future?

Congestion Management Process Keeping the Region Moving Efficiently, Reliably, and Safely

Budget Request - Surplus Agricultural Product Grant. House Budget

ITEM 164 SEEDING FOR EROSION CONTROL

20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified

DRAFT Congestion Management Process Keeping the Region Moving Efficiently, Reliably, and Safely

PUBLICATIONS MAPS DATA

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS

FINAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION for the Cloverdale Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Resort Casino Project, Sonoma County, California.

I-35 Corridor Segment Committee NW Loop 410 San Antonio, Texas. March 11, :00 AM to Noon

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Texas Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY

Certification Review. Department of Transportation. United States. Final REPORT. Huntsville Metropolitan Area Planning Process.

APPENDIX A WILLIAMSON COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION ISSUES BRIEFING PAPER

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Technical Methods Part 2

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

Texas Senate Bill 5 - Reducing Pollution in Non-Attainment Areas: An Overview of the Legislation

Air Quality Technical Report PM2.5 Quantitative Hot spot Analysis. A. Introduction. B. Interagency Consultation

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35W FROM STATE HIGHWAY 114 TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 820

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-14/

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Certification Review. Planning Certification Review Acadiana MPO. July 2016 FINAL. Acadiana Metropolitan Planning Organization (AMPO)

summary report West Texas Rail Feasibility Study Texas Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HNTB August 2011

Washtenaw Area Transportation Study Request for Proposal for Model Update and Improvements

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request

Integrated Corridor Management --An Overview --

FFY Title VI/Nondiscrimination Annual Work Plan & Accomplishment Report

Transcription:

Standard Operating Procedure for Complying with CMP Requirements Approval Authority: Air Quality Branch Manager, Jackie Ploch Effective Date: 09/01/15 Review Authority: Air Specialist, Tim Wood Version: 1 Purpose of This SOP The purpose of this standard operating procedure (SOP) is to assist project sponsors in documenting compliance with Congestion Management Process (CMP) requirements at the project-level. Subject Overview In accordance with 23 CFR 450.320(d), federal funds may not be programmed for any project adding single occupancy vehicle (SOV) capacity in Transportation Management Areas (TMA) urbanized areas over 200,000 in population designated nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide (CO), unless the project is addressed through a congestion management process meeting the requirements of 23 CFR 450.320. In these areas, the CMP provides for the analysis of reasonable travel demand reduction and operational management strategies for the corridor in which a project adding SOV capacity is proposed. All identified reasonable travel demand reduction and operational management strategies shall be incorporated into the SOV project or committed to by the State and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Authorities There is no specific authority or requirement to use this SOP, but it designed to help project sponsors meet the CMP requirements of 23 CFR 450.320 in regards to transportation projects. Toolkit Use the SOP for Preparing Air Quality Statements in conjunction with this SOP. Personnel The audience for this SOP includes project sponsors, contractors, and consultants responsible for preparing valid documentation that a project complies with the Metropolitan Planning regulations. Procedure 1. Determine if the project is exempt from a project-level CMP analysis by completing Steps 1.1 through 1.4 as directed. 1.1. Determine if the project is located in a nonattainment area for CO or ozone. If so, continue to Step 1.2. If not, proceed to Step 3. 1.2. Determine if this project is adding SOV capacity 1. If so, continue to Step 1.3. If not, proceed to Step 3. 1 Added capacity projects typically include but are not limited to: new location roadways, adding main lanes, adding through lanes, adding auxiliary lanes > 1 mi, etc. Effective Date: September 2015 Page 1 of 5

1.3. Determine if this is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/Federal Transit Authority (FTA) project. If so, continue to Step 1.4. If not, proceed to Step 3. 1.4. Determine if this project is located within a TMA, as listed in Appendix B. If so, continue to Step 2. If not, proceed to Step 3. 2. Coordinate with the MPO regarding the CMP analysis by completing Steps 2.1 through 2.4 as directed. 2.1. Follow the established process of the local MPO or collaborate with the MPO in order to identify whether the project is included in their CMP. If so, proceed to Step 2.3. If not, continue to Step 2.2. 2.2. Request that the MPO determine whether the project should be incorporated into the CMP. If so, the MPO will add this project to their CMP; when completed, continue to Step 2.3. If not, request that the MPO provide a waiver for the project indicating why it is not appropriate for this project to be included in the CMP, and proceed to Step 3. 2.3. Follow the established process of the local MPO or collaborate with the MPO to identify other operational improvements, if any, within the project corridor. Continue to Step 2.4. 2.4. Follow the established process of the local MPO or collaborate with the MPO to identify any reasonable travel demand reduction and operational management strategies that should be committed to for this project. Continue to Step 3. 3. Refer to the SOP for Preparing Air Quality Statements for the applicable CMP disclosure language to include in the environmental review document, or in a separate technical report in the project file when an environmental review document is not required. The procedure is complete. Effective Date: September 2015 Page 2 of 5

Appendix A: Acronyms and Definitions Acronyms Acronym CFR CMP CO FHWA FTA MPO SOP SOV TMA Full Name Code of Federal Regulations Congestion Management Process Carbon Monoxide Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan Planning Organization Standard Operating Procedure Single Occupancy Vehicle Transportation Management Area Definitions Term FHWA/ FTA Project High-Occupancy Vehicles Single Occupancy Vehicle TMA Definition This type of project has FHWA/FTA funding, needs a FHWA/FTA decision, or has been delegated. These vehicles carry multiple passengers. An SOV is a privately operated vehicle whose only occupant is the driver. Urbanized area with a population greater than 200,000 as determined by the 2010 Census. Refer to Appendix B for a list of TMAs in Texas. Effective Date: September 2015 Page 3 of 5

Appendix B: Transportation Management Areas in Texas 1. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 2 2. Houston 3 3. San Antonio 4. Austin 5. El Paso 4 6. McAllen 7. Denton Lewisville 8. Corpus Christi 9. Conroe The Woodlands 10. Lubbock 11. Laredo 12. Killeen 13. Brownsville 14. Midland-Odessa 5 Source: 42358 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2012 / Notices 2 3 4 5 This is an ozone non-attainment TMA. This is an ozone non-attainment TMA. This is a PM10 non-attainment and CO maintenance TMA. The Midland and Odessa urbanized areas are each under 200,000 in population. However, the area requested and was granted designation as a TMA in July 2012. Effective Date: September 2015 Page 4 of 5

Appendix C: Revision History The following table shows the revision history for this document. Revision History Effective Date Month, Year September 2015 Reason for and Description of Change Version 1 was released. Effective Date: September 2015 Page 5 of 5