RESOLUTION NO. 14- The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows:

Similar documents
City of Los Alamitos

ADDENDUM TO THE NEWARK GENERAL PLAN TUNE UP PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH ) FOR THE NEWPARK PLACE SPECIFIC PLAN.

CHRONOLOGY: 'PUEBLO UNO

Appendix A. Kenwood Village Project. Scoping Document

RESOLUTION NO. 643 (09)

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the manufacture and distribution of single use carryout bags requires utilization of finite natural resources; and

Purpose of the EIR. Chapter 1 Introduction

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4162

CITY OF GOLETA NEW ZONING ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION NO.15- The Planning Commission of the City of La Habra does hereby resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, littering single-use bags can result in blocked storm drains, fouled waterways, and increased marine debris; and

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP TO ALLOW THE

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

... Noes: Supervisors:-N_o_n&...

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 2

Agenda Fremont Successor Agency Meeting May 14, :00 PM

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.3 STAFF REPORT February 18, 2014

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7817) City Council Staff Report

EXHIBIT A: Report from City Planning and the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (CPC)

Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director Pete Calarco, Assistant Director AGENDA REPORT

Appendix H Traffic Study

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, March 8, :00 a.m.

Commerce Park. Draft Environmental Impact Report. CITY OF FONTANA Citrus Commerce Park SCH SEPTEMBER 2014 VOLUME 1. Project Applicant:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

california REPORT TO THE: Housing Authority E Successor Agency ~ Oversight Board fl

UC Davis Medical Center Education Building Project Phase 2 Telemedicine Resource Center and Rural PRIME Facility January CEQA Findings

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA I NT REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL I AGENCY

MEMORANDUM DEBBIE MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN SUPERIOR COURT

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA For the Agenda of: May 28, 2014 Timed: 2:45 p.m.

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

CITY OF GLENDALE-CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL. Report on Proposed Improvements at Various Park Sites - Design-Build Project.

January 17, 2017 City Council Staff Report Green Building Ordinance

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO Section of the Santa Rosa City Code is amended to read in full as

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

An Overview of the California Environmental Quality Act

REGULAR MEETING BELVEDERE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 10, 6:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM I & COUNCIL CHAMBERS 450 SAN RAFAEL AVENUE, BELVEDERE, CA MINUTES

ORDINANCE NO. _5063. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz ordains as follows: SECTION I

MEMORANDUM. DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Informational Presentation; Approve Attached Resolution

Council Member Laliberte introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

R WHEREAS, the City of Elmhurst ("City") and the Elmhurst Park District ("Park District")

This page intentionally left blank.

Background: Recreational Facility, Outdoor- Rural is a land use category defined in the Routt County regulations as:

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. PL-3

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6096) City Council Staff Report

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, STATE

ORDINANCE NO. C.S. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING GROUNDWATER RESOURCES WITHIN THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

FROM: DATE: September 3, 2015


Municipality of Anchorage

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 7.C STAFF REPORT November 7, 2017 Staff Contact: Barton Brierley

Council Agenda Report

Staff Report to the Planning Commission Application Number:

City of Mission Regular Meeting Agenda Wednesday, February 15, :00 p.m. Mission City Hall

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, millions of plastic single use carryout bags are distributed by retailers in the City of Soledad each year; and

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance authorizing the execution of the development agreement by and between the City of Los Angeles

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No.

SANTA CRUZ LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SPHERES OF INFLUENCE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Addendum No.9 to the 2009 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report

HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW. Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Approval of the Long Range Campus Plan

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Environmental Information Form

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Exhibit C. Page 1 of 90. Prepared for: Prepared by: November 2011

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL. A Report on proposal received to restore and preserve City Hall's historical lobby tile.

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City Council Study Session Agenda * Wednesday, July 23, :05 p.m. Training Center, 2 nd Floor, City Hall

ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM

CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Report SCH#

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. 7.C STAFF REPORT March 15, 2016 LEISURE TOWN SELF-STORAGE & RV STORAGE

CITY OF MODESTO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MONDAY, DECEMBER 18, :00 PM BASEMENT CHAMBERS 1010 TENTH STREET MODESTO, CA

ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM BYLAW NO. 3876

CEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:

Resolution Resolution to Adopt Rates and Fees for Village of Paw Paw Wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) System Beginning January 1, 2014

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

2035 General Plan Update, Belmont Village Specific Plan, and Climate Action Plan

RFM Procedure 5: Program Administration: Annual Review, Document Control/ Management, and Program of Work Alaska Responsible Fisheries Management

HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY NELSON TERMINAL PROJECT USE PERMIT UP Butte County Board of Supervisors January 29, 2013

Ordinance No. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. (N.C.S.)

Attorneys for Petitioner, FRIENDS OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, HALL OF JUSTICE

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF BELLEVILLE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS Purpose and Authority

A Division of The Newhall Land and Farming Company Valencia Boulevard Valencia, CA 91355

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

Additional Planning Commission Recommended Findings

Piner High School Field Lighting Project

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLETA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GOLETA GENERAL PLAN CERTIFIED ON OCTOBER 2, 2006 (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2005031151) AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT. 1

RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLETA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GOLETA GENERAL PLAN CERTIFIED ON OCTOBER 2, 2006 (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2005031151) AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT. CASE NUMBER 10-043-GPA The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that: A. On March 23, 2010, CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC was the property owner of Lots 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Los Carneros Business Park LP was the property owner of Lots 1 and 3, legally described as Parcel One of Map 14,500 filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa Barbara in Book, 185, Page 64 through 70 of Maps, County Assessor Parcel Numbers 073-330-023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, and 030. B. On March 23, 2010, CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC and Los Carneros Business Park LP, filed an application requesting initiation of a General Plan Amendment to remove Lots 4, 6 and 7 of Map 14,500 from the list of Central Hollister Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites on Figure 10A-2 (Sites Suitable for Residential Development and Location of Housing Opportunity Sites) of the General Plan Housing Element and a General Plan Amendment to Housing Element Subpolicy 11.6 (Inclusionary Requirement for Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites) to remove a reference to enumerated sites 24, 25, and 26, which correspond to these lots. C. The application was subsequently amended to include a request for two General Plan Amendments. The first General Plan Amendment requests minor changes to the General Plan Land Use Element, Figure 2-1, Land Use Plan Map for Land Use Designation changes to portions of 4 parcels (APN 073-330-024, 026, 027 and 028) from residential use to business park use totaling 1.89 acres and Land Use Designation changes to portions of 2 parcels (APN 073-330-023 and 025) from business park use to residential use totaling 0.79 acres. The second additional General Plan Amendment request would reconcile the repeal of the Raytheon Specific Plan which requires minor revisions to the Land Use Element to eliminate reference to the Specific Plan in Subpolicy LU8.1 (Applicability) and Subpolicy LU 8.5 (Coordinated Development Plan and Quality Design). 2

D. On May 3, 2011, the City Council conducted a public hearing and initiated the Village at Los Carneros General Plan Amendments (the Project or GPA ). E. The City reviewed the Project s environmental impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code 21000, et seq.), the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations 15000, et seq.), and the City s Environmental Guidelines (collectively, CEQA ). F. On October 2, 2006, the Goleta City Council adopted findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and certified the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH #2005031151, pursuant to CEQA via Resolution No. 06-37 and adopted the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan ( GP/CLUP ) via Resolution No. 06-38. The GP/CLUP was subsequently amended by various City Council actions as reflected in the administrative record. G. A CEQA Addendum is appropriate pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15164 since minor changes and additions to the GP/CLUP FEIR are necessary to address the General Plan Amendments and no circumstances exist calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15162 and 15163. H. The CEQA Addendum for the Village at Los Carneros Project General Plan Amendments (Case No. 10-043-GPA) dated February 7, 2014 ( Addendum ) attached as Exhibit No. 1 and incorporated by reference, was prepared in full compliance with CEQA. I. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 23, 2014 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. J. After hearing public testimony the Planning Commission of the City of Goleta recommended adoption of the CEQA Addendum and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to the City Council. K. On July 15, 2014, the City Council of the City of Goleta held a duly noticed hearing at which time all persons wishing to offer testimony regarding the adequacy of the CEQA Addendum were heard. SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment. The City Council makes the following environmental findings: A. The GPA was analyzed for its environmental impacts and the Addendum was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15164. An addendum is appropriate only if these minor technical changes or additions do not result 3

in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts B. The Addendum need not be circulated for public review (CEQA Guidelines 15164(c)). However, an addendum must be considered by the decisionmaking body before making a decision on the project (CEQA Guidelines 15164(d)). C. There is substantial evidence in the record showing that the Addendum is appropriate for the GPA. SECTION 3: Action. The City Council of the City of Goleta, California does hereby resolve as follows: A. Adopt the Addendum and mitigation monitoring and reporting program ( MMRP ) attached as Exhibit No., which is incorporated by reference, required by CEQA 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines 15097. B. The policies and implementation actions set forth in the GP/CLUP EIR and the GP/CLUP and the approved project description and conditions of approval, with their corresponding permit monitoring requirements constitute the MMRP for the GPA. The MMRP is designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. C. Direct the Director of Planning and Environmental Review, or designee, to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of Santa Barbara within five (5) days of approving the Project, pursuant to CEQA 21152 and CEQA Guidelines 15075. SECTION 4: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 5: Limitations. The City Council s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework. 4

SECTION 6: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact SECTION 7: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent Resolution. SECTION 8: A copy of this Resolution must be mailed to CHA McKinley, Goleta LLC, Los Carneros Business Park LP and to any other person requesting a copy. The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based, are in the custody of the City Clerk, City of Goleta, 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B, Goleta, California, 93117. SECTION 9: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2014. MICHAEL BENNETT, MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEBORAH LOPEZ CITY CLERK TIM W. GILES CITY ATTORNEY 5

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) CITY OF GOLETA ) ss. I, DEBORAH LOPEZ, City Clerk of the City of Goleta, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 14- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Goleta at a regular meeting held on the 15 th day of July, 2014 by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: (SEAL) DEBORAH LOPEZ CITY CLERK 6

ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 1 FINAL ADDENDUM TO THE GP/CLUP FEIR February, 2014 Distributed Separately Available at: http://www.cityofgoleta.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=8619

ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE VILLAGE AT LOS CARNEROS PROJECT (CASE NO. 10-043-GPA)

Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program For The Village at Los Carneros Project (Case No. 10-043-GPA) Mitigation Measure Population and Housing Implemented By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting Action Mitigation Measure GPA 2-1: Any residential project that incorporates all or any portion thereof of Lots 4, 6 and 7 of Map 14,500, must provide a minimum of 69 (15 affordable units more than required by Subpolicy HE 11.5) affordable units to extremely low-, very low-, lowand moderate-income households. The affordable units may be for-sale units or rental units. An instrument, in a form approved by the City Attorney, must be executed and recorded against the property ensuring construction of the affordable housing and the maintenance of their affordability for a period of not less than 30 years. Permittee The Permittee must execute and record an instrument, in a form approved by the City Attorney, ensuring construction of the affordable housing and maintenance of their affordability for a period of not less than 30 years, before recordation of the final map. The Director of Planning and Environment al Review, or designee, must verify compliance with this requirement before final map recordation. 1